<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.eku.edu/items/browse?tags=flood+control&amp;sort_field=Dublin+Core%2CDate&amp;sort_dir=d&amp;output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-03-17T15:38:38+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>50</perPage>
      <totalResults>4</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="9218" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="73559">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.eku.edu/files/original/452d097f967b8be8fe3d665a47b6e1f9.jpg</src>
        <authentication>70ef670b9e45489aa556674e6082c524</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57644">
                  <text>Magic Lantern Slide Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57645">
                  <text>This collection was apparently purchased for classroom use by Eastern Kentucky State Normal School. The bulk of the collection is from the Keystone View Company and is global in scope. They show cultural, agricultural, and manufacturing activities related to countries around the world. There are also a number of slides from other smaller companies.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57646">
                  <text>ca.1900 to 1925</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57647">
                  <text>magic lantern slide</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57648">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57649">
                  <text>collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57650">
                  <text>2013a010</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="6">
      <name>Still Image</name>
      <description>A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="4">
          <name>Location</name>
          <description>Folder title or box and folder where image can be found.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="77604">
              <text>b.3</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="10">
          <name>Physical Dimensions</name>
          <description>The actual physical size of the original image</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="77608">
              <text>3.5x4</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77603">
                <text>Magic Lantern Slide Collection</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77605">
                <text>2013A010-K148</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77606">
                <text>Keystone View Company</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77607">
                <text>lantern slide</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77609">
                <text>image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77610">
                <text>Building Dikes to Protect the City from the Flood, East St. Louis, Ill., U.S.A.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="77611">
                <text>20118</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="635">
        <name>flood control</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13183" public="1" featured="1">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="31805">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.eku.edu/files/original/eefe6d76fc975f93a89b0a74e15c9499.jpg</src>
        <authentication>97e2b2c1143fc2761e9a49964f86294f</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="31806">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.eku.edu/files/original/f0a75e88d6639ee546342396d8120669.jpg</src>
        <authentication>f6f862d186525004e6887dde1094f2c3</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="58">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57609">
                  <text>Perkins, Carl D. Congressional Papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57610">
                  <text>Carl D. Perkins (1912-1984) served eastern Kentucky as a US Representative between 1948 and 1984. His papers contain legal documents and correspondence related to his activities in Congress and focus heavily on coal mining, flood control, education and labor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only a portion of this collection has been digitized. See the &lt;a href="http://ekufindingaids.libraryhost.com/index.php?p=collections/controlcard&amp;amp;id=188"&gt;Finding Aid&lt;/a&gt; for a description of the entire collection.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57611">
                  <text>Perkins, Carl D.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57612">
                  <text>1948-1984</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57613">
                  <text>text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57614">
                  <text>photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57615">
                  <text>reel to reel</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57616">
                  <text>film</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57617">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57618">
                  <text>collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57619">
                  <text>2005a002</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110690">
                <text>Letter from Joseph B. Murphy to Senator John Sherman Cooper</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110691">
                <text>Constituent correspondence regarding the Red River Dam. Murphy and Perkins are in favor of the dam. Murphy's letter was copied to Congressman John Watts and Congressman Carl Perkins. Also included Congressman Perkins' response to Murphy.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110692">
                <text>Carl D. Perkins Papers</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110693">
                <text>1968-07-22-24</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110694">
                <text>Contact &lt;a href="mailto:archives.library@eku.edu"&gt;Special Collections and Archives&lt;/a&gt;, Crabbe Library, Eastern Kentucky University for reproductions, rights and permission to publish.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110695">
                <text>correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110696">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110697">
                <text>text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="110698">
                <text>2005a002-bd058-f04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="3149">
        <name>2020KYSS</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3147">
        <name>AAD2020</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="635">
        <name>flood control</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="834">
        <name>politics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="835">
        <name>Red River Gorge</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="86391" public="1" featured="1">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="77772">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.eku.edu/files/original/e9987bdba6dfe3a2f0c51c37708ddeb6.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6f7a993d6ab111d65522ff179bc29a05</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="54">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="819446">
                    <text>�7 October 1968

Miss Mltriam Thornton
132 Woodland Avenue
Lexington, Kentucky
Dear Miss Thornton:
I certainly appreciate your taking the time t e
write to me your views on proposals t o build a reservoir
in the Red River Gorge in Powell County.

I very much hope, and have been assured, that
the this scenic beauty-spot of Kentucky will be preserved
to the fullest extent possible.
It has been the aim of our stream
programs over the years to preserve natural
to encourage conservation, and to stem what
to be a rush t o spoil the natural beauty of

development
resources,
seems to me
the land.

It was good of you t o write to me. I am always
glad to hear from my Kentucky friends and neighbors.
Always my best wishes.
Sincerely

Carl D. Perkins,
CDP:br

M.c.

�d!lli'l..iatn

(Jhowton

73 2 &lt;WoodLand d/-owu1:,
...l.exington, !J(wi:ucky 405 02

~

tWv.

/ 1

!f~o

U P~~~

7~

1- ' ~

:u.c _

/

q;;~1

-O?;z0/

7}f/Z/,,

f~

~

-

I

~~~­
~ Jtf-&lt;d;;?J~-

_j~~

w&gt;P-r~

~
~
' . I £ 4 4 ~I ~
I

~~~{/r~Y6--

~ f /1~~~
~ ,,J~r--/4,,,~~

,d ~~
\

~

I

~~

�~y~4~~
~ ,.__,( ~ /Z-(7 /L IL/"- ,

;J: ,{, , ,
~

J~

,t.._

~

_) ,,,.,_,.,

~

/ ~ ' d----?t'T ¢";

/~---.,(?~

~,,__&lt; 74-J~•Fdr~

~ I

L/--v~,

~ ~~

d~r ~ ·: dtVL(~

~ /(,,.,,.,,} fl-,-- t:Z,,._....:G J k j .;&amp;.;

.7":____=:;--

�d/!(i iiani 'Jho'l.nfon
73 2 &lt;vVoodl.and d!-venueLt:.xin9ton, 9(,ntucky 40502

- U - ~_-·

d¥tk,A?~-~

~~ ~~;i~ G£~¥/~~ ~~v ~

/,&lt;,,&lt;A/ ~

3

--✓/4.

-c~ ~ la-d-

I~

Co

'

~~-cJ:~

7 7:;/~

1' , _,~ L ~ ~ L/4 . J,,: =
~ --,~ ,o,,Zf ,z;;--1-~~:_1
.
,,,. .
- ~
~~ l.,.c-&lt;..L-.£a.-.:;{4'
h,-,,.,

'
.' L.,4~~,l

;_,_/~:.:c::; } t r

~ ~, ~ I ~ ~

~/ r
~

/L/

/l--;::7

a-

1, •.,,, /_,__,

~~~

~~ ~~

~~~~ ,
~

--;/ /_ //4
~ u...-" ~

~~~-

n-.z-c~~l,,7.7-~,v~ ~

�rt. 'A--~~

9'-

t4

~l_

7-

1~--1 ,-,,___cqr~ "o/j.4~
~ ,, ~~- ~ t ' ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~

fl
~ :;--- / Jl)~-/J✓~ ~

)}; , cf:

�o1 (i'l.iam 'Jho'l.n.ton.
73 2 &lt;'/ /1oodfan.d d /w.n.uE.
Lt:xin.9fon., !J&lt;.en.tuc/;y 405 02

p✓f. l

, l~P--~CJJt;/f:-tiz_ ~~ ~

rj ~;::;__ - ~~
'

-v()._

tA-4 ~ (

~ ~ ~~

1 ~/
~ &amp;

I!,...,,

cJµ~

/

~--

&amp;, -

~.J-tZ
I

~~/ ~J:-

~ ~~

4 : ~,

r---;;:,; ~ · ~ !

i ' ,-

----1

--r

-

J

I&gt;,- '

--

¢~~~~
~

~

, ~ ~ )- h - - H

;J,,,,./,:..,.; I ~ 7d(

~
,,,,,,,,.,,-----71

~tfl

d~

--

/h,v

,

.

fr;, I M-- ,e_,__.U
,:_

,,// / ~ -

~

~J--eR f ~/

�I

I

3 October 1968

Nr1!h

J ohn lt1cbard Hall

2610 Central Parkway
Aetlland, Kentucky
41101

~ t i • to let ,.

Dear Jt,e, ::~oc1ate your tak - - bave your thinking on the pro~ ~
·
Ve are in agree
as much ot the natural beau

project to be devel

with that pbilosophy.

Re■erYOS+.

tbe need to preaerve
grandeur ot Jrentucky a■

v

proceed 1n accordance

l SIJI
~
that tbte nev featm-e i n
our ge0graph1c
Di cape vtll enbance the scenic beaut y
of tbe entire
a a promote tbe conservation ot our
natural reeour
manner tbat will benet'1t not only
the reeidente ot
ell Count y, but tor allot our people.
1bank you tor sending me• copy ot tbe article
from tbe .Audubon magazine. J • • returning 1 t tor your
tiles.

I can

Always

be

flf',f

best wlabea.

at aenice at •1'1¥ tia.

Pleaee call upon •

81ncerely

Cerl D. Perkins, M.C.
CJIP:br

it

�~ 3 ' &lt;} ~~
mRS. JOt-lN RICHA.Rb tl..\.LL
2610 CeN TRA L PARKWA. Y, .'I.SH L A Nb, KeNTUCKY 4IIOI

~~-"U--____.._~~~~

J ~ ~~~

~ ~~

r/~

,,4

•

~

~~~~ ~
C?~

~

c;;r~~~

/

Jl~

~ ~

~ ~ ./40 ~

~ ~ ~
(!'__,a,~~~-&lt;L..,e·

~

~

-

~- ~

/kl

-12-?&lt;"~e.-.-Y/'""Z-e~~-&lt;:.,/4-L--v,..._-,
f ' t ,__ _ ,

~~--~~

7~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.

~

~

,.,,

~~a_~~

~~~~~ ~

~~_L ~~-/
/

�ffiRS. J O HN fl.lCHA.R\'.'&gt; H A.LL

z6ro C€NTRA.L

p.\.RKWA.Y, A.SH L A. N b, K € NTUCKY 4IIOI

~A~~~
~~~

.

-

a-~

~:

$:e~~~~~
~/~~~~~y~

cvl-

0--

~ deJ- ~ ~ -

.

.

�I

'

I

j

ffiRS. JOHN R I C H ARi:::, H ALL
z610 CeNTRAL PARKWAY, ASHLAN .:::,, KeNTU CKY 4lIOI

~ ~~~
~ ~

~~

?~~ ~

~~~
~

~

7- ~

~

~

~
~,

// ~~~~

/~~~

~ j ~ ~~
)

,.,

�ROUTE S

WINCHESTER, KY.

4-0391
PHONE: PILOT VIEW 842·5 023

BURLEY TOBACCO SEED

KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE

CLAIR TIMOTHY

ABERDEEN ANGUS CATTLE

September 11, 1968.

Mr. Carl Perkins
Washington, ~.c.
Dear Carl:

I want to thank you again for takin
duties to write me in regard to
ed Ri
your second lett er gave me some
ts that
in your first.

our other
feel t hat
understand

I feel so helpless in a project that is so important to the people
of Powell Cqunty and the Rest of those who live in the Kentucky River
Watershed. Those who draw their water from the r&amp;ver are so dependant
upon the water that flows down it bed, some of them say the don•t
want the rocks that have been cut away by the waters that flowed ages
ago covered up and destroy the seenic beauty. This beauty to me is a
large case of erosion t hat we as people have failed to do anything
about. Then when we get so wa:can some of these people do things to
delay a better way of life and to ward off future water fro the generation~
to come.
I did not mean to preach I just want to thank you for your interest.

Yours y ery truly,

J;i;,
R. Foster Adams.

�September 5, 1968

Mr. Foster Aaams
Winchester, Kentucky 40391
Dear Mr. Adams:

· In :reviewing l!'.CJ' recent correspondence with you this
mol'Ding, it occured to me ths.t I might
lef t an e~onec:&gt;ua
impression about the stat us of the Re ,.
Reservoir prpject .
· Whi le it is true that the Corps o,....,.,...""'ineers is , reviewing
11
~
orge to the maximum\
extent feas1bl.e," ther.e is no. .ng
t he compromise appropr1a.tion
~111 to prevent the Corps fro )roe
ng with work~ th~ pr~ject.
As a · ilia.tter- of act, the
BC e
port adopted by the O~ess
specifically directs the C
ot · · ers to proceed with, 1',nd
acquisition. : .
'
;.
t he Red River plan ao a.s to

l

(

I tho~t l sh

this point clear

•

\

,

in the e~e~ .\

I ta1~ed to'. do aoj t :
Aug\Wt 19 and August 28 letter,s . I -, \
cei-ta~ appr+ciat
continuing interest in this proJect.
'\\
I
'

I

•

I

/

Wit h

~

bes

ahes,

'

\

• · . :''
Sincerely•

1

\

'

\\

\
t

l

'

)

\_
r
{~

.r

' ·!
I
I

I

I
'

II
I_

I

�August 28, 1968

Mr. Foster Adams
Wh lchester
Kentucky 110391

_

~

Dear Mr . Adams:

I .t old you on Augwst 19~

Riwr

Dam

is waiting on a

l"e

t..o the Appropriations Commi t t

I enclose a lettea

tllla C.,..,_of ~

that action on the Red
Engineers are to nake

House and Senate.

lonel

Fel"d

E. .Anaraon, Jr . ,

. to11 Centn.l Di v1a1ona ot
.
-tb&amp;t t h e ~ and uie not yet able to aay when tbell'
t tbe two committees . You will note
·
• to ue:, • intonied.

Assistant Director of'

atudytng the que
repo:rt will be
Colonel An&lt;tera

~

.

1 W

~-

When I bear turtl'ler hoJD h1a, I will connunicate with you

CU'l D. Per'kina, M.c .
CDP:rg
lncloaUN

�23 August 1968

ENGCW-OC

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington,,, D. C. 20515

Dear Mr. Perkins:
This is in r-eply to your r .e cent letter concerning a report to the Appro•
priations Committees on possible Red River Reservoir, Kentucky alternate
plans for local flood protection and water supply.

The language of the conference report is currently being evaluated to
determine content and ex-t ent of coverage to be included in the rep&lt;,rt.
As soon as this evaluation is completed and the time required to pr-e pare
such a report has been determined, you will be informed.
Sincerely yours,

FERD E. ANDERSON, JR.

Colonel, Corps of Engineers
Assistant Director of Civil Works
for Central Divisions

�Aut,'&gt;'U.St 19, 1968

Mr . Foster Ac1a.."'.1s

Winchester
Kentucey 4o39l
Deal" Mi-. Adams:

-

Action on the Red River Dam

~

on a r eport which t he Army Eng.
Appro-pri o.tions Co1umittee of t ~ ,@l~

asked the Engineers to let me
be ready. As soon as I ~ ,q
wi ll pa.es i t on to you .

~
r 16 waiting
re t o rna.ke to ·the
and Senate. I have

when that report will
don that subject, I

work
u

You will remember t ·
House voted $776,000 for
construction
cut the appropriations to
$3301 000 and put 1 e. s pul.ation that the mo
. ney should be
spent only to fi
to be so controve

a s·

other than the one which be.d proved

·
ihe House-Senate conf'ereee struck out
tb&amp;t requirement, raised the money 'back to $776,ooo, and
virtually gave the Sngineers clearance to proceed with work at
the original site..

However, as a eanpromiae, the conferees told tbe Bngineers
to report again on the site situation. Until that report is
mde to the 'bwo earomittees, lbe IDgineer s cannot proceed with

construction.

With best wishes,

Sincere~,

Carl

ODP:rg

I&gt;.

Perkins, M.C.

�August 14, 1968

Lieutenant General William F. Cassidy
Chief of Engineers
Depe.rj;ment of the Array
Washington~ D.C.

~

Dear General Cassidy:

I am sure you are well aware that the
on fllbla].ic Works and Water Power£
&amp; !s app

m,

another ass ignment i n connection
Red River Dam and Reservoir in
On i-,ge 29 ot House
the conferees point out t
ofnlnterior and the Chief

propose.ls and have
~

Onder design is the
Conterees, h
so as to
Red R1ver Gorge. "
J:ng1neers to take
tor Clay City and
and the assurance
cities.

the

plan

e and Senate conferees
riations banded you
e proposal to build the

•

hicb is the conf'erence report ,
cretary of Agriculture, Secretary
En
rs have eval.uated alternative
ncluaion that tbe site presently
st for construction.
the

r ect the Chief of Engineers t o "review
e, to the ma.x:hnum. extent feasibly, the
The conferees alao call upon the Chief of
into consideration local flood control pa:,eatbt 1.Mliea
other communities to be protected by the reservoir
of adequate water supply for Lexington and other
pres

The conferees request the Chief of Engineers to report bis
findings "as soon as possible" to the Appropriations Committee of
House and Senate. Until those committees have concurred in the
t'indins you make, the $776., ooo approved for construction work on
Red R:lver during the present f'iacal year is to be restricted to land
acquisition and to such work aa would not be affected by 8.llY change
in the site of the reservoir.

I would appreciate it if you would let me know if the Engineers
have any idea how soon the requested report d l l reach the two eom,.
mittees .
With best wishes.1
Sincerely,

CDP:rg

Carl D. Perkins, M.C.

�CONFEREl~CE REPORT ON APPROPRIATIONS BILL FOR PUBLIC WORKS
AND WATER RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT- - HOUSE REPORT 1788
JULY 24

"In reference to the Red River Reservoir project , Kentucky, the
conferees note that an evaluation of a lternatives by the Chief of
Engineers , the Secretary of the Interior, and the Secretary of Agriculture was completed on March 15, 1968.

On the basis of that evalu-

ation, it was concluded that the site presently under design is the best
site for construction of the multipurpose project .

With respect to the

project storage requirements contemplated for this site, the conferees
direct the Chief of Engineers, to review the plan so as to preserve to
the maximum extent feasible, the Red River Gorge .

This review should

include consideration of local flood protection possibilities for Clay
City and other communities to be protected by the reservoir and the
assurance of adequate water supply for Lexington and other cities to
be provided from the reservoir, incl uding consideration of supplies
which might be available from existing and planned reservoirs, such
as , Buckhorn and Carr Fork.
"The conferees request the Chief of Engineers to report his findings to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees as soon as
possible.

Until he receives the concurrence of the Committees, the

Chief of Engineers should proceed with land acquisition.

Construction

shall be limited to such work as will not be affected by any changes
in the reservoir size .
purposes . "

The Committee has allowed $776 ,000 for such

���September 3, 1968

V..r . Woodrow Slone

920 !Jeventh Street
Ca.crollton, Kentucky 41oo8

_

~

~

Dear Mr. Sl one:
In view of y our let ter o
~
interested i n this 31:.1!'.lmlary o ·

River Dain.

26, ! t hought~~ ght be
atus of the proposed Red

f/4,,/

The House of Repre · nta es approved~expenditure ot
$776, 000 f or collStruct
at the site or i ginally chosen
by t he. li:ngineer s . The ~laJiie~a.mEmded the appr opriations bill
t o r educe the mo
·o $3 ,ooo wi th instr uctionstha.t i t be
spent oncy in s
ing nd select ing alternate sites . The
House ref'used t
that change .
As a compr omise , the tvo obambers agreed t o appropriate
$760, 000 for construction. Bllt the f inal bi ll forbade the
Engineers to spend any of the money until t hey have reviewed
their plan "so tllato preserve, to the maximum extent feasib1-,
the Ret River Gorge. "

When that review has been made, the Engi neers are to report;
t heir findings-to the appropriation committees of House and Senate.
Not until that report is made will the Engineers be at liberty
to spend aay money for construction.

The lngineers inform me thq are not yet able to predict when
they will complete their review and make their report to the two
Congressional committ ees .
'!'bank you

for letting me know of your i nterest in preserving

the gorge.
With best wishes ,

Si ncer ely,
Carl D. Perkins, M.C.

�(

�(

�September 5, 1968

Mrs . Joyce Rigsby

aoute 4, Box 66
Morehead, Kentucky

40531

Dear Mrs. Rigsby:
I have been t old by Congressr.
i..m • Carter's office
that y~u have been provided ~rlth the
orma. · n you s ought as
to the. r easons that the Conley Bo
Fis' · · Dock on Lake
Cumberl.¥d has not been opened. ~ tly the :fa.c:i.lity' did

not meet the St.ate st andards •

U

t opene d, and I certainly
vided an the earliest possible

by the fact that this dock
hope that t he facility wil
date . .

w

If" there i ~
tor you,· or 1:f' I can
to write me. 1 am a.l:
friends .

i tional information that I can obtain
helpful in ru\f ws;•J&gt; please don' t hesitate
· delighted to hear from my Rowan Count."'Y

With m:, best wishes ,
Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.

CDP:rr

I

I

�T I M L EG". CAR TER

MEMDER:

5 T H DISTRICT• KENTUCKY

COM M ITTEE ON INTERST ATE
AND FOREIGN COMMERCE

HOME ADDRESS;
T0MPKINSVl~J..E, KENTUCKY

~ongrtiiii of tbc Wniteb ~tateii

SECRE:TAR[E.S:

ROY C. WOOLUM
CORBIN. K£NTUCKY

OFflCE ADDRESS:

f 231

LONGWORTH OFFICE BUIL D ING

WASHINGTON, O.C.

~ouse of 31tpresentatibes
ma~bfngton, 19.~ . 20515

KATHLEEN GARNER

August 6, 1968

Hon.earl D. Perkins,
2252 Rayburn Office Bldg .
Washington, D. C.
Dear Carl:
Thank you for sending me the letter you received
recently from Mrs . Joyce Rigsby, of Route 4, Box 66, Morehead,
Kentucky, who is interested in having the camp ground opened
at Conley Bottom Fishing Dock, near Monticello.
I am this date writing the District Engineer at
Nashville and urging him to have this camp ground opened and
I trust that he will if this is under Corps jurisdicti on.

If

I run into a snag, I will let you know .
With kindest regards, I am,
Sincerely,

§~~~ ~Tim Lee Carter
cc: Mrs . Joyce Rigsby,
Route 4, Box 66
Morehead, Ky . 40531

�August 5, 1968

Honorable Ti m Lee Carter
House of Representat ives
Wa shington, D. C.
Dear Tim Lee :

I enc.lose a l ett er from Vire .
want s t o know i f the lngineers ·
Mont i cello at CUmberl and Lake.

at s

that although she lives in a di
r epr esented by you. I:f
it, I will be glad to co
•

Rig
from Morehead, who
rove a. ca.mp ground a.t

lai ni.ng to Mrs . Ri gsby
I represent , Mont icel l o i s
Qg you want me to do about

Wi th be&amp;t wis~

Sincerely,

Carl D. Perki ns, M. C.
CDP:r g
Enclo.sui-e

�Ausust 5, 1968

Mrs. Joyce Rigsby
Route 4, Box 66
Morehead, Kentucky 4o:531

~

Dear Mrs . Rigsby:

Because Monticello and Lake Cumber
re in the district
represe nted bsr Dr. Tim Lee Cart
~ r
ave
sed on to him your
let.tel· of Jw.y 31. I ha.ve ass
Carter I will be glad to
cooperate with him in any eff'o
. et the Engineers t o a pprove

0
(? ~

Sincerely ,

y

Cul D. Perkina, M. C.

the camp ground a t Conley &amp;&gt;tto

shir:,g Dook.

Wit h best wishes ,

CDP:rg

�)/~, ~-,, ti~ C0-,'j

f(:/lj~J

(!c,n_/ ~ c--._

£ ,{d'

7,(/ ~ ~\ 11:;:-"'---' I

!J~

~"&lt;l"''~-~ ().,. L

J--x_~ .~ JW\A/
- "7 -f,J t f~

~f At

&lt;-&lt;--v~

'r

~

L

' 0

,

i\""tL,
IS Jt__, 'I- :,LJ

.,JIJ

jO

""-,

ll_

·
'-&lt;..,,

C ..

w

-1-f1 ,

(,,/)'I,,,/ ,LJ(.,vr..7

""1' 1"'-'-'-~:/

d CJJ
D=!,__ ..) nI"-I~cc!. ,
i,~ . ~ Y,h, c~-1, "ffA~,; --½ tl
?l ,1 a,~ c~ 1 EV\~~ . j)~) ~- tt: ~1;
fJ~
JJ,&lt;_ ~J 1 ~; o/ ,.,,_,)
-cL 7/~ J~~ -t ~~ J~ ~M,'Y' t ;FJ.. ~
pP~ -~ Q,,_,,,, . . ~,~L "l r~~,_ ~ ~
L~

C'°"-

d--

cL,_ cffJj

1),,,, ~ ~

p /

-ti,_ Q°""f'

tVJ&lt;~

,~
-d ..,,J;J:

/&gt;'l.d- ((,,~.

;J,-L fl'--~~ 7/,_.;; "-"-'"'--- c0"j ~/ o4V&lt;,«..=·J,~ ~ " '
I ..J~tr / "-'-&lt;-- ,~JI J~ ·

;jj~£ ;~ '

J&lt;A~~4 '
t(},.,,
(!

~C..'-

i2 /4¾

&gt;rlj ~ .

�i TO SIN BY SILENCE WHEN THEY
SHOULD PROTEST MAKES
COWARDS OUT OF MEN.
-ABRAHAM LINCOLN

�CA RL D, PE RKIN S

COMMITTEE,

7TH DIST., K ENTUCKY

E OUCAT ION ANO L ABOR

etongrt~~ of tbe Wnittb ~tatt~
J',ouse of 1'.epresentatibts
lllasbfn11ton, :ll. &lt;t.
August 13, 1968

Mr . W. G. Duncan
519 Ridgewood Road
Louisville , Kentucky 40207
Dear Mr . Duncan :
Thank you for letting me know again your views on
the proposal to build a dam and reservoi r on the Red River.
Wi t h best wishes,
Sincerely,

~

~

CDP: rg

~

~\

~tuu-1;

~-I

()

'

..

•

I

�August 13, 1968

Mr .

w.

G. Duncan

519 Ridgewood Road

Louisville, Kentuck1 40207

~

Dear Mr. Duncan:

Than.~ you f or letting ~e ~
proposal to build a dar:: and res
With bes 'c wishes,

0
y

(0
CDP:rg

n you-views on the
on t he Red River .

Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins , M. C.

�SIERRA
KENTUCKY

CLUB
SECTION

GREAT LAKES CHAPTER

August 6, 1968

Lu '½' ,!)' KENTUCKY'S RED RIVER GORGE
In answer to the question "How do we stand on the Red River Gorge", I can
only reply that we are in a period of uncertainty during which we must await developments with eager optimism, as usual, confident that in the end the Gorge will be saved.
The most important and meaningful development possible would be for the Red
River Valley leaders to join us in the very fair. compromise proposal suggested by
Senator John Sherman Cooper whereby the objectives of the project, flood control, water
quality control, and water storage, would be met, and still save the vital parts of the
Gorge .

2cJJJl

~c Jj.f,;&amp;✓,,,;._

William R. Holstein, Chairman
3307 Pineneedle Lane
Louisville, Ky. 40222
!EDITOR'S NOTE:

I

KENTUCKY 'S RED RIVER GORGE
"A Signature of Time and Eternity"

Carl Sandburg has written, "The Indiana Dunes are to the Midwest what the
Grand Canyon is to Arizona and Yosemite to California . They constitute a signature
of time and eternity! Once they are lost the loss would IRREVOCABLE! "
Carl Sandburg is dead! His eloquent words are true today as they were 5 years
ago. All we have to do at this fateful moment is to include KENTUCKY'S WILD RED
RIVER GORGE along with the Indiana Dunes mentioned above.
W .G. DUNCAN
519 Ridgewood Road
Louisville, Kentucky 40207
August, 1968
" For Sierra Club Members"

�ID4nuillt ~boocatt,fflcstngtr
KENTUCKY ADVOCATE
DANVILLE. KENTUCKY. 40422

.July 23, 1968

Senator John Sherman Cooper
Senate Office Building

Washington, D. C. 20520
Dear Senator Cooper:
I think the action you initiated by the Senate
Appropriations Committee regarding the Red River
Reservoir, as described in the pri nted statement
you sent out, confirms your abilities as a wise
lawmaker and statesman.
The Red Hiver Gorge should be saved , and so should
the many other remaining areas of trees and wilderness areas we have left.
Expedience in emergenc ies is always a good excuse
for doing something, but not at the price of ruining our country (the land heritages).
We have, I believe, enough concrete and asphalt
in the country. We do need those trees, plants,
shrubs, and the other things of nature to sustain
the people with food, shelter, and clothing--and
also the oxygen produced by the trees to combat
polluted air and, possibly, to clear the thinking
of politicians who may not always include all of
the ingredients that make a country .
Yours very truly,

4
~-~w.

C. Alcock, Exec. Editor

Opponents to building a dam, which would transform Kentucky's Red River
Gorge into a series of mud flats, have been variously characterized as "misinformed
bird-wa!chers, nature fake rs, land grabbers, and militant adversaries of progress .•
and this lovely valley as being little more than a rattlesnake den."

�KEN1UCKY'S RED RIVER GORGE MUST BE SAVED!
-by Clara Napier Chenault

Mr. W. G. Duncan
519 Ridgewood Road
Louisville, Ky. 40207
Dear Mr. Duncan:
I would like to see somebody tell me one valid reason for building a DAM on
the NORTH FORK OF RED RIVER, in Powell County, Ke ntucky. I was born and raised
in the Red River Gorge, so no one need preach to me about floods. My seven children
grew up in the Red River Gorge and went to High School . They are now on their own
in life. We have often crossed the North Fork of Red River when we got in a boat, with
the old county road on one side, and we got out on the other hill. The bottoms were a
sea of muddy water and that meant a rich sediment over the land to insure us a bounti ful crop next spring. Without the floods Powell County would have been POOR RIVER
BOTTOMS in place of RICH RIVER BOTTOM FARMS .
How many people from Powell County have ever stood on top the knob across
the river from SPAUSE CREEK and viewed the fertile bottom lands on one side and
the lovely swamp, for scientific study, on the other. It stretches around the bottom
and the hill and back into the river. Very old graves are there, the final resting places
of my ancestors • There is nothing like it left any longer in Kentucky.
There is a mystery I would like to see solved. Somewhere on the Bernie Finch
Farm near the mouth of Swift's Creek, is an old cave. The older folk talk about the
renegades of the Civil War hanging out there. It is a big cave and never explored.
Daniel Boone was there, so they say. It would make a wonderful tourist attraction
today.
Now here's one for the book! During prohibition there was quite a bit of moonshining carried out in those rough and hard to get into hollows . In one of these hollows,
quite a distance by the river, to the mouth of the stream, someone set up a moonshine
still in a big sink hole. It was an ideal spot since a creek ran near by, so water was
handy, .and a small sink leading back into the hill to dump the slop in, s o no one could
catch them by the odor of the slop rwming down into the river. About a year after that
caper, across the mountain and about three or four streams up the river, from that
hollow, the slop ran out in a spring, which was a mystery until s ome of the boys told
what they had done.
These are some of the reasons I would like to see "The Whole North Fork of
Red River" set aside and preserved as it naturally is without manmade atrocities. You
can just very casually sit by and listen to the tourists rave about the unspoiled beauty
of North Fork and compare it with other highly advertised vacation spots that have
nothing to compare with what you can just drive along the r oad here and see. They bemoan their laxity in allowing the wonders of nature to be destroyed in the name of progress
in their states. According to the press and geography, Kentucky has the most rwming
streams of the original forty-eight states, and is only second to Alaska. Why can't
we have just one stream preserved in its natural state for future generations to observe?
August 3, 1968

(Mrs .) Clara Napier Chenault
Pine Ridge, Kentucky 41360

�W.G. DUNCAN
!519 RIDGEWOOD ROAD
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40207

This area in Mammoth Cave Park, originally quarried by the Park Service jor road-fill, was lat.er also q,wrried by the
Job Corps camp jor coastruction projects. The area, leveled and planted since the photo 1i·as rakcn, is directly over
part of th e Flint Ridge Cave System.

FEBRUARY 1967

KENTUCKY'S MAMMOTH CAVE NATI ONAL PARK

Population doubles every 35 years. Unless something is done about it soon,
there will be no Mammoth Cave in Kentucky, only wall-to-wall people . At last the
ants will complain about the number of people on the picnic . After the first quick
benefits for the few, there will be only a lasting loss for all of us . If there is any
doubt in your mind as to what is now taking place at Mammoth Cave, under the
present management, we suggest you drive down to this 50 year old National Park
and see for yourself.

NATIONAL PARKS MAGAZINE

�Word from within the National Park Service indicates that a new study for the
development of a master plan for Mammoth Cave National Park is in process . Two
years ago, studies of the Park management by the National Speleological Society and
the National Parks Association revealed some shocking conditions. The pollution of
water seeping into the great Flint Ridge Cave System as a result of placing a Job
Corp camp directly above it and the drawing of spring water vital to the caves are
but two specific illustrations.
The Sierra Club, the National Speleological Society, the National Parks Association and the Wilderness Society are all deeply concerned that this new master plan
safeguards this, the world's largest cave system, from further damage through
similar mistakes in management.
The National Parks Association has published recommendations that would
greatly relieve the present overcrowding of Park recreation areas by cooperation
with the excellent public and private recreation facilities outside the Park.
SIERRA CLUB
Kentucky Section
Great Lakes Chapter

·E X E C UT I V E
William R. Holstein
Corl A. Schneider
Michael 8. Flynn
Dr. Dudley C . Mortin
Carrol I B. Tichenor
James A. Kowalsky

Wil liom G. Duncan

C O MM I T T E E

Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Treasurer
Outings
Expansion
Publicity

3307 Pi neneed Ie Lane, Lou isv ii Ie 40222
1305 Oak Hill Road, Louisville 40213
218 Shady Lane, Lexington 40503
230 Tohomo Road, Lexington 40503
R.R. 1, Nlcholasvi I le 40356
Union College, Barbourville 40906
519 Ridgewood Rood, Louisvi I le 40207

Homi Iton W. Putnam, Membership
814 Iris Court, Jeffersonvi Ile, Indiana 47130

"Not blind opposition to progress But opposition to blind progress"

�August 22, 1968

Mr. Ollie Barker
Morehead

~tucey 40351
Dear Mr. Barker:

You asked about the proj
of Triplett Creek at Morelle
a letter f~am Colonel R. R.

.hrr&gt;rc~e tbe chanael
spol13e, I enclose

istrict Engineer

s that construction
necessary riallis- ofw

at I,ouiaville. Colonel
work waits on the aequi tion ,

r

Wt¥ bf the Morebead Ci

I hope this

. . ·

•

r,'illforaation you seek.

With beat ~
Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkina, M.C.
Cl&gt;P:rg
lnclosure

�19 August 1968

ORLE0-0

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. c. 20515

Dear Hr. Perkins:

In response to your Inquiry of 15 August 1968 about the channel Irr
provement of Triplett Creek, Morehead, Kentucky, Rowan County, the
following information Is supplied.
A Federal project under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood
Cont ro I Act, as amended, has been approved by the Ch i e f of Eng I nee rs
for widening, deepening and straightening about two miles of the
Tr Ip le tt Creek channel th rough the CI ty of Morehead. Th Is work Is
subject to the us~al requirements of local cooperation which Include
provision of necessary rights-of-way, ass~tlon of dam.ges, maintenance of the work after coq,letion and prevention of encroachment which
might Interfere with the proper functioning of the •~roved channel.
The City Council of the City of Morehead adopted assurances that they
would fulfill these requirements on 3 Karch 1967.
On 11 August 1967, detailed plans were suppl led to city officials
showing rlghts•of-way required for the channel l~rovement work. This
also Includes lengthening of one highway bridge. Recent discussions
with city officials Indicate that considerable progress has been made
on the acquisition of the neceasery rights-of-way. It Is not known
definitely when this activity by the city can be COl'l1)1eted. It must
be complete before the c;onstructlon of the channel l~rovemont can
be started. It I&amp; understood that the requirement to lengthen the
highway bridge across Triplett Creek channel will be assumed by the
Kentucky Department of Highways.
Upon ~letlon of rlghts-of..way acquisition by the City of Morehead,
tho channel l~rovement work wll I be progr.-..-d for construction.
Sincerely yours,

R.R. WESSELS
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer

�August 15, 1968

Col one l R. R. Wessels

Dist~ict l.i!!'lgineer
Col"ps of Enginee:rs
P.O. Box 59
Louisvi lle ) Kentucky 40201

Jv:my

Dear Colonel Wessels :
I have been asked wh
widen.ine; and deepening
Kentucky . l will appr e
t he stat us o~ cha~ ;roj +

s has been made towa~d
ek i n RO".-.ian County ,
if you. \Till let me mow

W
Hhbe•t Q

Carl D. Per kins , M.C.
CDP:rg

�August 15 :. 1968

'tr . Ollie Jarke r
110:ceheo.d

Kentucky 40351
Dear Mr. Barker:
, I ha ve asl~ed the A;rmy
Ao a :eesult of our conve
~
r
eport on the sta t us
Enc;.i.neers to let Pe have the
,
n
Trir•J.ett
Creel{ . As
of' t he proposal to wide(
" )
de
5
.neers,
I
will
consoon as I have I:'~ re1,ly
1
e

nu.nice.te vith you .
With best

'( j

Sincere}¥,

Carl D. Perki ns , M.C.
CDP:rg

�AUff'..lSt

16, 1968

1r. Leroy Tracy, Director
Kentucl.y Association, Soil and
Water Conservation Di striets
~~~eburg, Kentucky

~
~

42256

_

Dear Mr . Tracy:

I t was good to lea.rn, ff.~ ,; t

Kentucky Associat ion of Soil
Di stri cts, that conserv
g ti ·et
posed by the Arrey Engi

.. s

t

endors ement, of t he
a.t er Conservation
favor the site proRed Ri vei· D&amp;'l.

I never doubted t
t
was pienty of support
for t his project
o
he
. na.l site from thos e who
have a deep i nt st i preservi ng our natural resources
and scenery.
With bes t wishes ,
Si ncel"ely,

Carl D. Perkins , M.C.

CDP:rg

�/'--:~"DIS
'

'
f

8

' KENTUCKY ASSOCIATION, SOIL AND WATE

I

--1 ,

0

'
}
·1 is in~\\{

CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
SERI/ING

KENTUCKY S

z

01

121

SOIL

C O NSE R V ATION

DISTRICTS

F R A N K F O R T,

K E N T U C K Y

August 1 , 1968
D IRECTO R S

SAM M , MCE L R OY
PRES I OCN T

ROUTE 3
MOAG AN P'ltl.0, KY.

J E WELL GRAH AM
V I CE-PR ES I D ENT
L£W l SO U RC, KY,

Hon. Car l D. Perkins , Representati v e
United States Congress
House Off ic e Build in g
Washing ton , D. C .

LERO Y TR A C Y
S ECRETA~Y·TR£AS URER
RO\JTE I
L -'WRENcuuRo . Kv.

Dear Representative Perkins :

JOHN W. RAY
ROUTE ,

MAY P' lE L.D, KY.

H. A.JONES
ROUT£ 4
HENDERSON , KY.

ROM ER L IN DS EY

s Ao wNs v,LL &lt;. Kv .

CHAR L ES D. BEAN

Roua 2
cox •s C R £E: K.
N , RO

K Y.

ERT ELLIS

70Q, ,.L.OR£NCC. Pl~

9 URL1NGT0N . KY.

D. C

The Supervisors of th e 6th Area o f the Kentucky As sociati on
of Soil and Water Cons e rvation Dis tricts he l d their Summer
Are a Meeti n g on J ul y 2 6, a t F r a nkf ort, Kentucky .
One o f
t he items of business d isc uss e d by the Superv i sors was th e
Re d Rive r Dam Project in Powe ll County .
Th is g ro u p went
d
d
t
on re c or by a unanimous ecision s rongly en d orsin g t h e
con st r u ction o f Red River Dam on i ts or ig in a l sit e as
.
propose d b y t h e Corps o f E n g 1.neers
.

SH E RMA N

DOX 833

Some memb ers of the p ress ke ep referring that Conserva tionists
a re again st this p roject . We a re Conser vati onists, we a re
fo r t he project.
Pe r haps the g ro up aga inst t he project
would more prope rly be called preservationists .

$ 0MPtSE't • KY.

Very tru ly yours ,

H E IOBERT C , BRADFO RD
VANCEBURG, KY.

WILLIAM D , G ORM-'N

L~lt~r
D:~~
-!i:r

"" .A.ZARO , KY.

LT :bt
cc:

CONS ERVATI ON

Red River Impro vemen t Associa t ion
Lexin g ton He r a ld
Co u rie r Jo u rn a l

•

DEVELOPMENT

•

SELF-GOVERNMENT

�COlfF!RINCI RDOR'? Oil APPROP1UATI058 BIU, l'OR JIUBLtC VORIS
Mm WA'l'iR RESOOBJB DSVEU&gt;i?GT-•BOUSB REJIORT 1788
JUta 24

contenu note that an ....iuat1on ot Utematiwa by the Chief of
BnsiDNnt the

Secl'etary ot tba Interior, ar.t4 the Secntu7 of Aar1•

culture wu ccmpleted oa Mll.rch 15, }966.

on tm buia of that

ation, i t wu conclua.d tht.t tbe aite pNNntJ¥ UDder deatau
site for cODB&lt;a'uctioa of tbe lllllt1purpc&gt;N proJeot.

evalu-

1a t.be but

With rupect to tbe

project sOol'age requ1Nmnt8 coaterr,platecl tor th11 ,tie, the ~ • n u

41nct tbe Chief of
the nadmum

Eng1DeeP&amp;1

to ~ View the plan so. as to preserve to

extent teu1ble, tbe

Bed River

aoraa.

'l'h1a review aboul4

1ncluda caaslderatioa ot local flood ~ t t o o poaa1billtJ.e• tor Cl.air

City

and otbtr c0Clilmit1ea t.o be

protected b.Y the reaervo1r

u•uranc• ot a4aquate water aupply tOJ"

~ and

and tbe

otbe:- cit1e.a to

be prorided f'rcm tbe Naenoir, iDcludiQI eonaiderat:lon ot auppl1ff

which micbt bet available

fl-om

exlat1DS

1

&amp;D4

•'?ba &lt;:&lt;mfel'MS requut tbl Chief o~

1nga to the Houae
poaa1ble.
Cb1~

and

;larmed reaorvoira, auch

Ena'

.,..n to

Nport hia find-

Senate Appropr1at10l18 Committee• u aoon u

Until be receives tbe concur.NDCe

ot Ens1,DNl'a abould proceed v11'b

~

tbe CQiimitteea, tbe

land 41C&lt;luiaitioa.

Cooatr\1Qt1cn

sb&amp;ll be l1m1ted to aucb wOl"'.r. u Yill not be atteow bJ _,. change•
1n the NMrvo1r a1ze.

l'be COWdttee bu allCJRcl

$T16,000 tor auch

�JOHN SHERMAN COOPER
KENTUCKY

WASHINGTON, O.

c.

July 18, 1968

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. C.
Dear Carl :
Foll owing up my note to you on July 15 regarding
the Red River Res ervoir, I note that objections were made
by some citizens to my statement regarding water supply for
Lexington. While this was not an issue in the Senate Committee
on Appropriations, my statements were based on reports from
the Corps of Engineers and I wi l l send you the information
fromthe Corps of Engineers and the Hearings .
I certainly respect your position, but am doing
this so that we would not be at variance on this question .
With kindest regards , I am

JSC : sl
II

�COMMITTEE:

CARL O. P E RKINS

E ouCATION AND LABOR

7TH 131ST. , K ENT\ICKY

Mr. Henry J. Hughes, Jr .
2826 Adams Avenue
41101
Ashland, Kentucky
Dear Friend:
I have your communication concerning the proposed dam
on the Red River. I assume you have noted that the HouseSenate confer ees on the appropriations bill rejected the
Senate pr oposal to reduce the Red River appropriation from
$760,000 to $300,000 and to instruct the Army Engineers to
seek a site for the dam downstream.
That action means Congressional approval of the House
version of the bill which appropriates $76o,OOO for start of
construction at the original site selected by the Engineers .
With best wishes ,
Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.
CDP:cr

������������������Burler\e Smith
Letcher , Ky .

41832

Mrs. Maxine St ephens
R:mte 2
M-::,rehead ,
40351
Mr. Wa l t er H. Ihrig
102 Sunset Avenue
Hazar d ,
41701
Mr. Elw-::,-::,d C-::,rnett
Blackey,
40804
Mr. Henry J . Hughes , Jr.
2826 Adams Avenue
Ashla nd,
41101
Mr. Artie C-::,rnett
Bla ckey,
41804
Ka thleen C-::,rnett
Blackey ,
418o4
Mr. J-::,hn W. Irvine
3210 Ridgeway Drive
Ashland ,
41101
Mrs . Michael Ca they
R-::,ute 2
M-::,rehead ,
40351
Mr. a nd Mrs. T. M. At kins -::,n
1119 Riverview Drive
Pikev Llle,
41501
Mr. Lindsey Back
Jeremiah ,
41826
Mr. Bent-::,n Back
Jeremi a h,
41826
Mr. and Mrs. Grant Blair
R-::,ute l
Bla ckey,
41804
Mrs . Gwen Field s
R:mte 1
Bla ckey,
418o4
Mrs. J a c kie Gentry
R-::,ute l
Blackey,
41804

�!

JOHN SHERMAN copPER
KENTUCKY

WASHINGTON, 0 . C.

Ju ly 15, 1968

Honorab l e Carl D. Perkins
House of Represent atives
Washington, D. C.
Dear Carl :
Af'ter full consi deration of a ll the problems involved
in the Red Rive r Reservoir , I reached the conclusion which is
embodied in t he amendment I offered in the Senate Appropriations
Committee, which I have explained in the enclosed statement .
I know this is a knotty problem, and I have done my
best to resolve it , at least in the Senate, in a way which
would provide flood protection and water supply and at the
same time protect the major part of the Red River gorge .

With kinde st regards, I am
yours ,
Cooper
JSC : sl

�~

OF SENATOR JOHN SHERMAN COOPER ON RED RIVER RESERVOIR
July 15, 1968

The House bill H.R. 17~

t voi ~

ropriations tor fiacal. year

1969 which begins July l, 1968 and ends June 30, 1969, as passed by the House of
Representatives provided $76o,ooo for construction of the Red River dam and
reservoir.

$800,ooo

had been recoDDended by the Bureau of the Budget.

The total

estimated cost of the project is $11,700,000.
T~, in the Senate Committee on Appropriations, I offered an amendment to
reduce the $760.,000 to $300, 000 and to provide that the $300,000 would not be
used for construction during Fiscal Year 1969.

The $300,000 would be ased by the

Corps of Engineers to review 1'ul.ly the feasibility of the alternate site for the

dam, including core drilling for sub-surface investigation, which has been proposed
to be located approximately
approved.

5½ miles

below the upper river site which had been

In making its stl.l.Ct", the Corps will take into consideration the effect

of the two sites on the natural characteristics of the Red River gorge.
The survey would also require the Corps to review water requirements for
Lexington and other central Kentucky cities, and to determine to what extent the
Buckhorn Reservoir which has been completed., a.nd the Carr Fork Reservoir which is
under construction, will provide wat er supply downst ream a.nd to central Kentucky.
The survey would also review the feasibility of local flood control projects

tor Clay City. The Corps would make its report by~ l, 1969.
M;y-

motion was approved by the full Senate Committee on Appropriations, and

recommended to the Senate for Senate approval..
I think it clear that if my motion is adopted by the Senate and then by the
House of Representatives it would have the following results:
l)

It would prohibit the commencement of construction of any dam and

reservoir on Red River in Fiscal Year 1969. The Congress would determine in the
next session whether it would appropriate f'unds tor the lower site or upper site.

�Page 2 - Red River Reservoir -- July 15, 1968 -- statement of Senator Cooper
It would not be necess~
or lower sites would b~

~ ~ ~roject, and either the upper
gi' Mo~

strilJtion appropriations.

Thus, there

would be no required del~ beyond the one year.

2)

As

the Corps has reported that Lexington would not need the water

supply afforded by a reservoir on Red River until approximately the year
2000, the del~ in reviewing the project would have no adverse effect on

Lexington water requirements.

3) The estimated cost of the lower site is approximately $2 million
above the cost of the upper site, bu!the Corps of Engineers admits this is a
tentative figure.

It must also be noted that the present site will cost $1.2

million more if it is modified to provide water supply for Lexington and
other Conn0Pities.

The State of Kentucky would be required t o ~ this

additional cost and t he cost would be recove~ over a period of years up
yr&gt;rS,J_

to fifty/ from the municipalities supplied.

4) If the lower site should be found feasible and approved by the
Congress it would meet flood control and water requirements.
pool of the lower site at an elevation of

The seasonal

717 feet, compared to 757 feet at

the upper site, would place about 88o acres of water in the gorge above the
proposed upper dam site.

According to the Corps o:f' Engineers, it would

therefore reduce by 53~ -- more than half -- the amowit of water in the
gorge.

This would protect the greater part of the unique geologic charac-

teristics and flora and fauna of the upper Red River gorge.
I ottered

my

amendment? which was approved, to protect the unique Red

tiver gorge and at the same time provide adequate flood protection.

I hope

very much that it will be approved by the House of Representatives.
I am sending this statement to the hundreds of people who have written
me - - both those who have supported and those who have opposed the construction of the dam and reservoir at the proposed upper site.

�~

3 - Red River Reservoir - -

July 15,

1968 -- b'ut.tement of Senator Cooper

Ea1 l:.!.er this year I ~~ held by tbe Senat e SUb1

c omit tee on Approprietion~ ~ ~se ~ ho supported and those who

opposed the p)$ject .

As

a member of the Comoittee,1 I beard all the testimony,

and stated a.t the time I would make my decisi on upon the record which ,~as ma.de.
This I have done, a.s illustrated by my amendment which was approved t ~ by the
Senate Clmiuittee on Appropr iations.

�,17.'o . Paul R. Elb.ott
405 Sce~:sde.le .Road
YJ.id.cllcto-tm, Kentucky 4o243

Dear Mr s . El l i ot t:
When the E.nginee::.•a p i cked th
Rod River Dam, t1'1cy pronounced ·· ·
iuclin:ition ::.s to !'ely on thei ,:
matter.

I fee l sure the ere

chosen by t he Enginee:r-s
area ' s nat ui·al beaut w
Thank you f &lt;:r. your

e;inaJ. t e of the prop osed
e t he best choice. My
j ud@llent i n such a

at t h e site originally
~~=
in-..;llelv

ather t han damage t hat
I both want t o preserve .

tter of July 21 seeking

my

views .

Wit h best wis
Sincerely,

Ca rl D. Perki.ns , M. C.

I
\

\
\\

\

\

��Honoi•able Jo~eph B. ? - ~
:t.o.rsball, ?,tirphy &amp; ?toss
304 Security Tx~-t Buildin8
lcxington, ~tucq 40507

_ ~

~

Dea.r Mr . ?,llrplly;

It w:w good of you t o send
~
._,p y of the letter you
wrote t o Senato1 Coope:::-. As y
, I agree with your
view tbnt con.sti·uction should
d at once on the aite
chosen by the Engineci-s t~
e iver Dam.

With bc~t vish a ,

y

(0

Sincerely,

Carl D. Pcrkina, M. C.
CDP:rg

�LAW OFFICES

MARSHALL, MURPHY

&amp;

Moss

304 SECURITY TRUST B U I LOI NG

LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40507
JOSEPH B . MURPHY

E. DAVID MARSHALL
GORDON W. MOSS

AREA CODE

eoe

TELEPHONE 255- 3371

OF' COUNSEL

CHARt..ES G. W I LLIA MSON, JR.

July 22, 1968

Senator John Sherman Cooper
Senate Office Building
Washington. D. C . 20002

(0)

Dear Senator Cooper:
I wish to express my objection to your vote on the Red River Dam project. However. your vote on that project was in keeping with your record of favoring the minority groups and the socialists of this Country.
I think it is about time you begin to consider the demands of the people
you were elected to represent, and not the socialists like Justice
Douglas and the editorial \Vriters of THE COURIER- JOURNAL.
We taxpayers are entitled to some consideration, and since a great
portion of our money is wasted by the Federal Government. we would
appreeiate having some Qf it applied to worthwhile projects like the
Red River Dam, and we want it now, not later. Th.is project has had
enough study~d planning. The previous studies and plans need to be
put in operat; ..,n immedia~ely.

JBM:mb

cc: Congressman John Watts
Congressman Carl Perkins

�It~' . R. ~·l. P,)quctte
119 Drothe:r.:J C w:t
Ashland , Kr&gt;--lltuc1cy 41101

D;-,ar Mr . Poquett e:

_

'l'hank you :f'c..r fill ing out the

for t he prt&gt;posa:. t o lrwest igute
Dam,~ I t is goo'~ to liav1 your

~

:i.~

~

~

easing s upport

site f or tho Red River
t his subject .

With beat w::..ahc~,
Sincerel.y,

Ce.rl D. Perkins, M.C.

CDP:rg

�����M.1-:- . and Ml.--::. . John Reeves

Route 1,

box 305

~

Stanton, Kentw;tlcy' 40330
Dear Mr. fillld Mz·s • Reeves:

Thank you for l etting me kn
~

pi•oposal to i'inu a aeconu site

· t

your s

or t f or the

dam un tlle

a.ac..

River .

I ·would be the las'i; peraon '\ ~ would want to do anything
deaw.•oy tho sc~
au
of t:).e gorge .

t bat would

'With beot ,iis:tte1;1,

y

V
CDP:rg

Sincerely,

carl D. Parkin&amp;, .M. C.

�MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY
MOREHEAD, KENTUCKY 40351

IN9TRUCTIONA.L

July 22 , 1968

The Hon. Carl Perkins
House Office Building
Washington, D. c.
Dear Represent ative Perkins :

I am vitall y int erested in saving the Red River Gorge , and
reque st that you do ever ything possible t o support the Senate
provision for further inves tigation of the downstream dam s i t e .
Si nce rely,

a~~(~
✓,?UL~
Dr. C· ayton J
s on
Prof ssor of cience Education

CJ/er

MEDIA

��77~ If~ 7 •

covJ-

11&lt;JV~ _ °f}f"I,

1

~~Q_~',,.

r..tt

,,.,.,,A,-,,;J7. (;, 1 ,

r~,~--4-

J/ C

,

ll

5;:,. _s

~-;;r;;/;;v,~ t?:_,,, .~~ &lt;-,o)_

£2;.,t7-A-

.,J

Af~ -;i!b /4.;t,"-'.-£ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ U-&lt;.cf.P j'ffe'' -;k _ck ..
!J.,fo' c.~-fN'- .7,) ~~,,;!· -::V,., ,J;,-,.,oh tf/ew~"" ;;;-6,/
.,,,,.~,,,J;_ {)., \. ' ef ;;ti;,. d,, = , ~
,./4..,,,,_ ~ . c1,;-:t·
jl

ltl~~J

t~

;r;1,u.-e}1-

fii-&lt;L~ •

IJ'-.,,.7 (

Vr;;J &lt;f- fa~
y &amp;J.9 . p ,,.__p, c?

V~.Jf (f~,_;_j._,.--~,,;j,,._~ ·44

_fl,ft ~ -~"'

. iJ,.p

C4~)v. ;J:tJ./1

'

&lt;

"t

C&amp;-;~~

u

/j

C0c~

fa . ' ,ft-,_..,/_

��rtr· • Claud.a E. Wel l.man
2732 Greenway Dr:'..ve
Ashl and~ &amp;-ntucl;y 41101

Dear Mr, Well.m.M:
It -was gocd of y ou t o f i ll in t h

l etter s upporting

en Rod Ri ver .

0
y

Thimk you f ~:.· c~v:lng m1: yo
Wi t h best w::.shes !&gt;

(0
CDP:rg

· ows on t h:i..c subject .

Sincere ly,

Carl D. Perkins, M
.c.

��July 22,

Mr.

w.

1968

G. Duncan

519 Ridgewood Roe.cl
Louisvi l le, Kel}tu($¥ 40007

Dear Mr. Duncan:
It was t houghtful of you t o Bend me ·
reprint ot
lhe Courier-Journal 's editorial of th.._...~ -~
I
a,lso wat; glad to get a c.opy of the n·
Kentucky section of the Sierra 01' "'"'"__,

Johnson.
With best wishes,
Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins, M.C.
CDP:rg

�W G, OlTNCAN
s1g RIDGEWOOD no,
t.OUfSVll,LE, KENTIJCKY

, 0207.

MOLLY CLOWES, Editorial Page Editor
BARRY BINGHAM JR.
LISLE BAKER
BARRY BINGHAM
Executive Vice-President
Associate Publisher
EditM and Publisher
SATURDAY, MARCH 16, 1968, FOUNDED 1826,

JOHN ED PEARCE
WILLIAM PEEPLES
ADELE BRANDEIS
CHARLES WALDEN
HUGH HAYNIE, Cartoonist

EDITORIALS

A Red River Compromise
Everyone Should Welcome
THE ARMY CORPS of Engineers has decided, on the basis of a so-called "reconnaissance study," to go ahead with plans tlo build

the controversial upstreiam dam that will de•
11troy forever the scenic Red River gorge. The
!l'eport is dis~inting though not surprising.

The Engineers 'have seemed determ1ned from
t.be beginning to ignore the welfare of Kentuclcy es well ,a:s the pleas of conservationists
in tihe matter of the Red River Dam.
Nor can opponents of the dam apparently
lb.ope for much more help from Interior Secretary SteWlaTd Udall, oa:lthough Mr. Udall, in a
letter made pu·b lic Friday, indicates several
doubts and reservations about ·t he site choice.
Conservationists who met him here last month
21:a&lt;l hoped he would seek a restudy of the
project by the Water Resources Council. In•
stead, the Engineers merely shuffled some :o f
their old papeTs, called it a study and is.sued a
routine endorsement of their own destructive,
ill-conceived plans.
But if the Engineers have not changed,
neither have the· facts of the Red River dam.
There ls no earthly excuse for this dam. The
Engineers, from the depths of the pork barrel,
can only repeat ,t heir old wheezes to the effect
,t hat it will prevent floods downstream and
store water for •Central Kentucky. This is a
sham. It will neither store as much water or
offer as much flood protection as the downstream clam that has been urged by conservationists, and which would spare the gorge.

Could Have JI.let Two Need,
Whether or not Lexington ls going to
need more water in the future, it is clear that
its need is not pressing enough to justify a
water-storage dam that will destroy the scenic
Red River gorge. But with the exercise of a
little common sense we can have both the
water the state needs and the scenic region
it cannot afford to lose.

As Sierra Club officials have proved, an
effective dam on the Red River does not have
to be built where it will flOOd and ruin the
gorge. Placed six miles downstream it will
spare the gorge, impound more water for
Central Kentucky and provide more flood
protection for vialley towns. It will co.st more,
but .it will be worth more. And it offers a
compromise solution that no one interested
1n Kentucky's future can afford to ignore.
No one should be more eager to find a
compromise than the Engineers. Conservationists are beginning to organize, to find a
voice, to realize the political power of their
appeal, and their growing sense of outrage
could soon threaten even so powerful a lobby
as the Engineers. Throughout Kentucky re•
sistance to Corps projects is mounting, and
opposition is being heard not only to the Red
River dam but to dams on the Licking River,
at Kingdom Come in Letcher County, and at
Cumberland Falls. How much public hostility
can a political bureau afford1
It is also time for the Department of
Natural Resources to examine its plan to cooperate in the gorge dam in order to get more
stored water for downstream cities_ Its con•
cer,n for the water needs of Central Kentucky
is commendable. But department officials,
who have been so forward-looking in other
conservation matters, cannot take part in the
upstream dam project without abandoning
the sound conservation principles they have
championed in the past. For their own repu,
tations, as well as the future welfare of their
state, they should be glad tci endorse the
Sierra Cl ub proposal for a downstream damsite.
Kentucky's congressional delegation, too,
should welcome a solution that will satisfy
proponents of the dam without destroying a
scenic wonder and a great recreational attraction. Some naturalists, admittedly, will find
the compromise less than ideal; it will back
water into the gorge, will cover a few of the

In the Red R iver gorge
lower trails, and will probably mean the end
of the wild turkey population in the gorge.
But it will spare the existing roads and major
trails, all arches and caves, and most of the
white-water stretches of the river.
It is a sound and sensible middle way. It
will cost $2.5 million more than the ruinous
upstream site, but that is a small price to pay
for a priceless natural heritage.

�Dam Nonsense in Kentucky
The Army Corps of Engineers is about to commit
anothE'r offense against the nation's rapidly vanishing
wilderness and beauty. The corps proposes to begin
construction in March of a dam that would inundate
the gorge of the Red River in Kentucky.
The Red River, which runs through the Daniel Boone
National Forest, is rich in history, in fish and animals,
and in magnificent scenery. Its rapids and "white
water" make it one of the few remaining wild rivers
in the eastern United States. Its gorge isi lined with
massive, towering cliffs and spanned by more than
th_irty natural stone bridges.
The dam proposal, which has been floating un•
noticed in bureaucratic backwaters for thirteen years,
would mean at best a questionable intrusion. But as
so often happens with Army Engineer proposals, this
pla:i does not even make sense in its own terms. It
started out as a flood-control project. But the dam
would reduce the cresting of the Ohio River in a
major flood by only two-tenths of a foot.
Of late, the argument for a dam has shifted to the
need for impounding water for Lexington and other
cities downstream. But these cities can impound much
closer and less scenic streams. Moreover, the reservoir
would be adequate to meet thei; needs only for the
next thirty years. The dam itself would be useless
because of siltation in about a century. Geologists
point out that a man-made lake in the Red River
Valley is a harebrained idea. The whole region rests
on porous limestone.
As usual, the recreational advantages of the artifi•
cial lake are being stressed, but the lake will be an
eyesore-as are so many such lakes-in the summer
when it is drawn down and its shores are laid bare.
Recreationally speaking, the dam would merely substitute the pleasures of those who like motorboat
racing for the pleasures of those who like hiking,
fishing and canoeing in an unspoiled valley.
Senator. John Sherman Cooper, Kentucky Republican, says that once Congress has authorized a project,
" it has been the policy of the Congress to proceed
with the project." With a budget squeeze on, Senator
Cooper, as ranking minority member of the Senate
Public Works Committee and of the Appropriations
sub~ommittee on public -works, would have no diffl•
culty next session in persuading his colleagues to
repeal the authorization. It i~ time for Senator Cooper
to stop pussyfooting and get to work to save a beautiful river that belongs not only to his state but to all
the nation.

W. G. DUNCAN
!119 R ID G EWOOD ROAD
LOUISV ILLE , KENTUCKY -40207

�NIGHT

LETTER

July 4, 1968
The President
The White House
Washington, D. C.

On behalf of the Executive Committee of the Kentucky Section of the
Sierra Club, I appeal to you, since the Congress has passed to you the responsibility for implementing the six billion dollar cut, to withhold funds allocated
for the Red River Reservoir in Eastern Kentucky. This project will flood one
of the finest natural areas in the east using Federal funds to accomplish it,
and will stand out as an important exception to the positive conservation accomplishments of your administration.

Mr. Justice Douglas has been here and agrees with our position.
Secretary Udall believes that the Gorge should be saved. The leading scientists
and conservationists of Kentucky are working to save the a r ea . We invite you to
visit the Gorge and to see for yourself the fiasco that will occur unless your
good judgement prevails.
The decision to proceed with the destructive upstream site is the re sult of election year pressures. A handful of politically active constituents
of the sixth district have pressed the congr essman, who is up for reelection,
to build the dam at the approved site . He has accommodated them through the
Corps of Engineers.
We strongly urge that you withhold funds for this project pending full
evaluation of the downstream site.
W.R. Holstein, Chairman
Kentucky Section, Sierra Club
3307 Pineneedle Lane

�HERNDON J. EVANS
220

CLINTON

ROAD

LEX I NGTON . KENTUCKY 401502

July 4, 1968
Mr. W . G . Duncan
519 Ridgewood Road
Loui sville, Kentucky 40207
Dear Mr. Duncan:
I'm writing you in regard to the proposed dam at Devils Jumps in
Southern Kentuc ky. To prove that I'm really on the side of conservation I am opposing this darn because it will destroy much of the
beauty of the South Fork of the Cumberland River, an area with
which I feel sure you are familiar.
I am enclosing some material relative to the proposed Devils Jump
project. It's a s imple boon-doggle, which eventually will cost about
$200, 000, 000. It provides no flood control and the power produced
will c ost far more than it can be sold for. The TVA has said that it
is not interested in this power production because of its high cost; the
Corps of Engineers admits it has no appreciable flood control value.
Se nator John Sherman Cooper and Representative Tim L. Carter are
boosting this darn because it will call for the spending of this vast sum
in their area. Jobs produced will be something more than 100, I am
told, a lthough some advocates claim 200.
I have been working with Dr . William Russell, of Oak Ridge, Tenn.,
and his wife, to prevent construction of this dam, I attended a hearing
at Whitley City, Ky., on May 9, and stated my opposition. I also have
c irc ulated petitions opposing this dam.
I hope that you and I can be on the same side in this battle. The
Kentucky Sierra Club is opposing the darn and many Tennessee organizations are fighting it. So far Kentucky has not entered the battle as it
should . It is important that letters be sent to the Senators on the committees involved. Recently, Senator John Sherman Cooper got the Senate
Public Works Committee to appr ove $150,000,000 for the work. It's not
too late to get it killed in the House.

If you wish any further information, I '11 be glad to send it to you.
Sincerely,

/~~
J.
Herndon

Evans

EDITOR'$ COMME NT: Kentucky's distinguished Senator John Sherman Cooper has frequent Iy remarked:
"Give me testimony by people who hove the credentials. 11 Do Army Engineers have the credentials?
Do politicians? We would like to find out. Too many mistakes have been made already.

r· ted and dist i uted bv W .G. DUNC N. 519 Ri !2"e ood Road. l.ou.· sv ·lle.

v . 40207. for mem en;

�W.G. DUNCAN

Sports Illustrated

FOR

RELEASE

519 RID G EWOOD ROAD
LOUISVILLE , KY, 40207

NEW YORIK, N , Y. T0020

WErt-IESDAY, ~Q-:1 L 'Ith

SPORTS ILLUSTRATED ISSUE DATED APRIL 1, 1968 DECRIES BOONDOGGLE
WHICH WILL DESTROY KENTUCKY'S RED RIVER GORGE

NEW YORK, Mlrch 27---The dark clouds over Vietnam have at least one silver
lining, according to Sports Illustrated this week:

the war costs have delayed

building Kentud.y's Red River forge D3m for one year and there is a faint glimmer

of hope that the plans can be changed so as to lessen the needless destruction of
one of nature's W1ique pieces of wilderness.
The Sports Illustrated article agrees with the Louisville Courier-Journal's
position that the proposed darn is '" a boondoggle, pure and simple.'" And, says
SI, "most of the nation is not yet aware of what this boondoggle threatens."

It took the Red River 60 million years to carve out the gorge which includes
castle rock formations and natural rock arches that occur in only one other place
in the world, white water, abundant wildlife, and the finest botanical garden in
the Eastern United States.

''The vegetation is in such proliferation, 11 the article

reports, "that scientists wil 1 not have t iJre to finish an inventory of it if the

dam is built anywhere near on schedule."
All this will be destroyed to build a dam which has no good reason to be
built, and which will create a lake that few people want, says SI.

Sports Illustrated does not find the darn proponents' claims in the areas of
flood control and water supply justified.

In addition, says the article:

"The main justification for the darn is recreation and the possible

�2-2-2 (Red River Q)rge)
economic value of tourists flocking into the area to spend money at
motels, lodges and boat docks.
people of the area.

That is ho.v the dam was sold to the

Congressman John Watts supports the dam because

it is in his district and most of the people who are in favor of it are
his constituents.

Since Watts if for the dam, other politicians ob-

serve a gentleman's agreement which prevents them from meddling in his
political affairs.

This ancient convention has accornodated a nunber

of foul deeds in American life.

lhe Red River dam is one of them."

There will be hearings once more in Washington in early Ni.y and SI expresses
hope that the boondoggle might be stopped--or, at least, that the Sierra Club's
suggestion for an alternate site might be adopted.

This site, 5.8 miles d&lt;Mn-

stream, would save about 80% of the gorge and would create a larger reservoir
with better flood control.
#

#

&gt;

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION • TERRY RICE
PO

S

LL

RATED. ROCKEFELLER CENTER. NEW YORK. N .Y . 10020 • LL6-3973

�July 25 , l 9 68

Mr. Earl Kinner; Publisher
~he Courier Publiahing Company
West Liberty, Rentucky

~ ~

~

Dear Earl:

X apprecia.te your l ~
I can understand your vi .

r

ery much an.d
t.

I assure you th~
' n intent on my
part to destroy the
eni beauty. As yoi
knc,w, X took a pgait
· favor of the Red
River Reservoi
era years ago before any
question arose
ing the gorge . If l
made a contr
- T•-.•-..enttat thia time, I am
sure you realize
would be mi•understood.

Always rny best wi shes ,

Sincerely,

Carl p. Perkina, M.

c.

CDP .lb

\

\

�rlE L '

,) VAi.LEY COURI ER
l..l8ERTY, KY ,
,..EPHONE ? 4 3 -,55 1

r

·1

THE W OLFE COUNTY NEWS

THE ELLI OTT C OUNTY NEWS

CAMPTON, K Y ,

SAND Y HOOK, KY.

TELEPHONE 66S - ~S9 5

THE COURIER PUBLISHING

TEL E P HONE 736- 6005

Co.

E A R L W , K I NNER , PUBI..ISHE'R AND MAN AGER

WEST LIBERTY, KY .

July 22 , 1 968

TELEPH ONES:

74 3-35S1
743•396 1 (Nl&lt;;;HT)

Hon Carl D. Perkins
Bouse Office Bu i ldi n g
Was hing ton, D. C . 20525
Dear Cone ress man :
We strong l y favor Senator Cooper ' s move in the Sena t e t o compromi se t he Red River d am controv er sy .
Frankly , we have long f elt t hat a dam on the Red would be a
mista ke .

But ,Sen . Cooper ' s compromise s e ems to be the best and most

practica l solution possible since it will preser ve t he more scenic
wild areas of t he Red River Gorge and a t t he s a me ti me pl''ovide protection from floods to Stanton a nd Cl ay Cit y in Powell County a nd
prov ide a water supply for oities that may require it .
As publishers of tbree weekly news papeJ'S in the i mrnedia te area ,
we have talked wit h many pers ons --many in Wolfe County--and mos t
fe e l t hat the compromise i s t he mos t sens ible action t l1a t could be
taken .
Contrary to some reports , opp osition to the Red River dam j_ s not
confined to

II

a bunc h of outsiders ."

Many in this area are in sym-

pathy wit h the conserva tionists ' cau se .
We urge you t o s u ppor t the Senate - passed provis ion calling for a
restudy of t he al ternate dam site.

�~., 4.- 2
/-

/U~JJ~
,July 17 , 1968

iiono:rnble J c,b.n. S. Coope r

0ni t ed Stat ~s Senate
' 'as.-d.n&amp;t on &gt; D. C.

Dear John:
~ha:11&lt;. you f'o:.c g:i.ving me thP- detail s
got i nt (~- t he Senate Appropr i ati ons bi.
the /u-:my . As I understa11d it, your ar11e

the amendment you
.,i v.:i.l Function of
would cut t o

$300 t h ousand the $76o t.h ous6.nd V ··
r t h Red River Dam
by the House , It woul d f 03;~bid
c
t ruct ion ,,ork on the
R~d :Siver Dam dtcd ng the omT en: ·
al yeru:: ancl ~-1ould x-equire

the engineer s t o spend the $300
Nes:t yc!a.r ~

s :it e .

Cong1:esad s·i

money for the dam a:'&amp; t he
I aP})reci ~tce

With best

e,

asand searching f or a. new

de ~ e ~~hct her t o s.pp-ropriate

or t he new site .

i.c7g: · _

w
iay

this i nfo:rmation .

Sincerely,

Carl D. Perki ns, M.C.
CDP-:rg

��I
May

17 ' 1968

Mr . a.."ld Mr~ • Roscoe Meadows

Box 246
Clay City , Ker. tueky-

! twas thoughtful of :you t
~d me a copy of
t he l etter you w:-rote e.hout t he F.e _iv . Da.rr1.
Q

With my best

CDP:rr

r

&lt;tJ1
i-~

S1ne ere:ty,

Carl D, Perki~s , M, C,

i

i

I

I

I

,I

I

�I

Clay City, Kentucky
May 9, 1968
The Managing tditor
The Lexington Herald,
Lexington , Kentucky .
Dear Sir:
The Courie r Journal is giving the pr oponents of t he Red River Dam a rough time. It s eems t o me
some people are consideri ng themselves a conse r vat ionist ,
just beca use they have paid their dues a nd belong t o a socalled conserva tion club .
Now in our area, we do not have
a consetvation ciub, but we do have t r ained, qualified
personnel , with degrees in conservation.
The Soil Conservation Service;
The County Agricu ltural Agent; The
aind The U.S.
Agricultural Stabilization Conservation;
Forest Service.
These qualified people work together
for the purpose of conserving water, soil, agri cultural
land, timber land, ~ild-life, and combining them all,
they keep one purpose in mind, the greatest benefi t to the
most people.
The U. s. Army Corps of Engineers made
use of the competent knowledge of these conservation services.
They worked in conjunction with each other and each approved
of the others recommendations in planning the Red River Dam.
The Courier-Journal said pressure is
being used for the approval of the Red River Dam. The
Delegates who appeared in Washington before the Congressional and Senate Committees in favor of the Uam were
persons of Powell , Clark, Fayette, Wolfe, Menifee and
Montgomery Counties, and no one of this group owned any
land in the area of thi s proposed Lake .
We have one
purpose in mind, we approve of the survey of the Corps of
Engineers .
We feel tha t the 600 acres of farm land and
the other 20 families t hat the lower Dam-site would dislocate are more valuabl e to our C.o unty than the upper part
of Red River . We also feel that this Lake would only enhance the Gorge and not destroy or even mar it. We want
this Dam now. Thirteen years survey is long enough.
The people of central Kentucky are questioning, why the new found love of the Courier-Journal for
the Red hiver Gorge.
It was said at a public meeting in
Stanton, Kentucky that they don't want their competitive
Kentucky City of Lexington to be assured of adequate, high
quality water supply, any-way not now, just delay this
Dam and plan for another one some-day.

�We have already lost in two floods this
spring,
more wild-life in the 9000 acres of flooded
farm land in the lower Red River Valley than the Gorge
has contained in years.
Our look int o t he future has been brightened
by the prospects of flood control.
We feel its no tim•
to dally over a few wild flowers,
ferns,
vines,
salamanders ,
lizards etc.
We of this area have
much to lose by a de l ay -- The oppos ition are not
resid ents of our vall ey , there- for e t heir f eelings a r e
not i n sympat hy with us.
The Uaniel Soone National Forest and a ll of
Easter n Kentucky i s rich in natura l beauty a nd un explored
territ ory .
Re spe ct ful l y submitted by,
~

.C¥

~~~

Mr.

&amp;

Mrs . Roscoe

SuA~.

Meadows

Box 246
Clay Gity, Kentucky .
A copy of this letter has been sent to t he Courier -Jour nal,

Senator John Sherman Cooper,
Congressman J ohn Watt s ,
Congressman Carl Perkins,
Senator Thur st on B. Mor ton
and The U. S.,.Army Corps of ingineers .

�~~
tm)t

C6o-uritr-~ourttal &amp; TIMES
BARRY BlNGHAM SR.

BARRY BINGHAM J R.

Erl itor a1tcl Publi.&lt;hl'r

A.1sociatt Publisher

SU NDAY, MAY S . J968.

1''0L'NDF.D 1826.

EDJTORJALS

w~~\
- iJv~D
Watts Plan C:ould
.4. Unique River Gorr•
End the Dispute
On Red River
KENTUCKY CONGRESSMAN John Watts
has finally pointed a way out of the deadlocked argument over a proposed dam on the
Red River, Long an advocate of the dam,
Representative Watts has announced that he
will accept an alternate site urged by conservationist forces if it will provide the flood
protection and water supply needed by nearby residents. This sensible attitude points the
way to a compromise solution that should
please everyone concerned.
Opponents of the dam have tried for
months to make it clear that they do not oppose any and all dams on the Red River. Their
fire is directed-and with sound reasonagainst the damsite proposed by the Army
Corps of Engineers within the scenic and historic Red River Gorge. A dam at this location
would store considerable water for central
Kentucky towns and provide at least a measure of downstream flood protection. But it.
would do so at the price of irreparable and
eternal damage to a unique gorge that has
been called the Grand Canyon of the East.

Supporters of the dam have argued that
there are other valleys in Eastern Kentucky
"more unique" than the Red River Gorge, or
that contain as many types of plants and wildlife, It is true that Kentucky is blessed with
many littl_e -known areas of great natural beauty, including picturesque valleys and stands
of virgin timber. But the fact that ite are 10
blessed does not mean that we should squander our wealth by destroying a valley that
combines all of these attractions-a wild river,
natural arches, clllts and caves, scenic forests
and a living laboratory of flora and fauna.
.Fortunately, it is not necessary to destroy
or damage the Gorge in order to gain the
benefits of a dam. A downstream dam will impound a lake providing as much water storage and flood protection, and with more. recreational potential, without doing major damage to the Gorge. Everyone genuinely concerned with the long-range welfare of the
area should unite behind Congressman Watts'
wise proposal for a compromise. This should
include not only area residenta and embattled conservationists, but the Seventh District's Congressman Carl Perkins, whose district i.9 also concerned, and who has always
hitherto been a strong and trusted friend of
conservation forces.

PRINTED AND D1sTRIBUTEo BY -

W.G.DUNCAN
51 9 RIDGEWOOD ROAD
L ou1s v1LLE, KENTUCKY 40Z07
M AY ,

1966

, , FoR S1ERRA CLUB MEMBERS'•

�Utt (gouritr-~ourual &amp; TIMES
BARRY BINGHAM SR.
Edit.m· aud Publisher
SU!'&lt;DAY, MAY ;'i, 1968.

BARRY BINGHAM JR.

A.isociate Pub fo /ter
F"OL' NDF.D 1826.

E I) .I T () R I A L

Watts Plan C:ould
End the Dispute
On Red River
KENTUCKY CONGRESSMAN John Watts

has finally pointed a way out of the dead•
locked argument over a proposed dam on the
Red River. Long an advocate of the dam,
Representative Watts has announced that he
will accept an alternate site urged by conservationist forces if it will provide the flood
protection and water supply needed by nearby residents. This sensible attitude points the
way to a compromise solution that should
please everyone concerned.
Opponents of the dam have tried for
months to make it clear that they do not oppose any and all dams on the Red River. Their
fire is directed-and with sound reasonagainst the damsite proposed by the Army
Corps of Engineers within the scenic and historic Red River Gorge. A dam at this location
would store considerable water for central
Kentucky towns and provide at least a measure of downstream flood protection. But it
would do so at the price of irreparable and
eternal damage to a unique gorge that has
been called the Grand Canyon of the East.

~

.4. Unique River Gorge
Supporters of the darn have argued that
there are other valleys in Eastern Kentucky
"more unique" than the Red River Gorge, or
that contain as many types of plants and wildlife, It is true that Kentucky is blessed with
many litUe-known areas of great natural beauty, including picturesque valleys and stands
of virgin timber. But the fact that ~e are 10
blessed does not mean that we should squander our wealth by destroying a valley that
combines all of these attractions-a wild river,
natural arches. cliffs and caves, scenic forests
and a living laboratory of flora and fauna.
Fortunately, it is not necessary to destroy
or damage the Gorge in order to gain the
benefits of a dam. A downstream dam will impound a lake providing as much water storage and flood protection, and with more recreational potential, without doing major damage to the Gorge. Everyone genuinely concerned with the Jong-range welfare of the
area should unite behind Congressman Watts'
wise proposal for a compromise. This should
include not only area residenta and embattled conservationists, but the Seventh Dis•
trict's Congressman Carl Perkins, whose district is also concerned, and who has always
hitherto been a strong ano trusted friend of
conservation forces.

P R1 NTED AND

D1 STR I BU TED

BY -

W.G.DUNCAN
519 RIDGEWOOD ROAD
Lou1 s v, LLE, KENT UCKY •0201

MAY , 1968
• • F oR S 1ERRA

C LuB

MEMBER S••

�\

')

Utt &lt;S'o-uritr-~ourual G TIMES
BARRY BINGHAM SR.
Erii rn,· rwd Publisher
Su :'l:DA Y , MA\' :i. 1068.

BARRY BINGHAM .JR.
Associatt Ptibli .i h er
l''&lt;JL"ND F.D

1826.

EDJ T()HJ ALS

Watts Plan Could
End the Dispute
On Red River
KENTUCKY CONGRESSMAN John Watts
hu finally pointed a way out of the deadlocked argument over a proposed dam on the
Red River. Long an advocate of the dam,
Representative Watts has announced that he
will accept an alt!'rnate site urged by conservationist forces if It will provide the flood
protection and water supply needed by nearby residents. This sensible attitude points the
way to a compromise solution that should
please everyone concerned.
Opponents of the dam have tried for
months to make Jt clear that they do not oppose any and all dams on the Red River. Their
fire is directed- and with sound reasonagainst the damsite proposed by the Army
Corps of Engineers within the scenic and historic Red River Gorge. A dam at this location
would store considerable water for central
Kentucky towns and provide at least a measure of downstream flood protection. But It
would do so at the price of irreparable and
eternal damage to a unique gorge that has
been called the Grand Canyon of the East.

.4 Uuique River Gori•
Supporters of the dam have argued that
1here are other valleys in Eastern Kentucky
"more unique" than the Red River Gorge, or
that contain as many types of planu and wildliie, Jt is true that Kentucky is blessed with
many litUe-known areas of great natural beauty, including picturesque valleys and stands
of virgin timber. But the fact that ite are to
tilessed does not mean that we should ,quander our wealth by destroying a valley that
combines all of these attractions--a wild river,
natural arches, cliffs and caves, scenic forests
and a living laboratory of flor a and fauna.
Fortunately, it Is not necessary to destroy
or damage the Gorge in order to gain the
benefits of a dam. A downstream dam will impound a lake providing as much water storage and flood protection, and with more rec•
reational potential, without doing major damage to the Gorge. Everyone genuinely concerned with the long-range welfare of the
area should unite behind Congressman Watts'
wise proposal for a compromise. 'fhia should
include not only area residents and embattled conservationists, but the Seventh District's Congressman Carl Perkins, whose dis•
trict is also concerned, and who has always
hitherto been a strong and Lrusted friend of
conservation forces.

P RIN T EO AND DI S T R IB UTE D BY -

W. G.DUNCAN
5 19 R I OGE WOOD ROA D
L ou1sv 1LLE, K ENT UCKY 402.07

MAY, 1968
, , Fo R S1E RR A C L UB MEM B E RS '•

�~

10, 1968

w. Irvine
3210 Ridgeway Drive

Mrs. John

Ashland, Kentucky
Dear

Mr•. Irvine:

I am glad to have your le
interest in preservins the aeeni

u

. rting your
of the Red

River Gorge.
'l'bank

you for

1me

to write me about

this subject.
With 111¥ best w

CJl:rr

r

. ,

CJ

SincereJ.¥,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.

�32·10 !U.de;otray Pl":l VG
Ashl;~11d., Kentucky
l:1ay4, l 960
0

l cm s t :i.11 much i n te:i:•vs ted -cl.lot t ho n !.lt U1lal beauty o i' Red River .
G·org.e be pi,eoer ved. forever f'or our- ge1:1a1"•ntion and others to com.0.

l"eooe;nlz:tna the neod f or flood control ~o:i:• Clay City in Foue.ll co.,
WE:I

are h oping ·th is .con be ~1cco1upli.o hod t-rithout dost1•oying the ver,y

uniquo aco1:t0r-1 ol' t h o t}orge.

Hiltl p l ncp.s such as t h i s oi"a beccm-J.1.ng

.i ncroasingly- r o;roo as more .:ind moi"e of our bor·uti ful eoui1try i s
bm,iocl uncle1., conc rete.

If ke,pt c z i t i e ,

the Go1..ge w-:tll n ot be

jUot t1n o tlio1" fish ing and nio torbo::1t l ::1ke i n ou.t- s root ~rto te.,

but

a tr.e r,iendo'US s cenic Spot of gr,o ot 1~eor,ootional V3luo in tho true

mQanine; of the ,1oi,d0 recree tion tt uhioh is to 1-.e£11 osh and0 roc reote. H
Th ~"ll~ you f.'or your 1d..nd. reoon oidoration

Since:r&gt;o1y,

(P

~

Mr~

,J. Irvine

oz

t h is projoct,,

nnd llopin g

�April 24,

1968

Honorable John Sherman Cooper
United States Senate

Dear John:

ora•·

Thank you for the notice that Senator Ill.ender
will hear request• for funds f.
projects at 2:00 p .m.

Wednesday,

~

1st.

I plan to be there, as wel l

t the House hearing

I also note that · ne
o'f the Red River Reservoir
project will be
t
elide on May 7th.

heard.J ··

With

r
my

best·
91neere:cy,

Carl D. Perkins, M.
CDP:rr

c.

�JENNtr4GS RANOOLPJ-1, W. VA,, CHAIRMAN
STEPHEN M . YOUNG, OHIO
EOMUNC&gt; S, MUSKIE, MAINE
ERNEST GRUENING, ALASKA
B, £.VERETT JORDAN, N.C.
DANIEL K. lNOUYE, HAWAII
BIRCH BAYH, IND.
JOSEPH M, MONTOYA, N, MEX.
JOSEPH 0 . TYDINGS, MO.
WJL.LtAM B. SPONG, JR., VA.

JOHN SHERMAN COOPER, KY.
HIRAM L, FONG, H AWAII
J . CALES BOGGS, DEL.
GEORGE: MURPHY, CALIF.
LEN B. JORDAN, ID.AHO
HOWARD H , BA KER, JR., TENN,

COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS

R ICHARD B, ROYCE, CHIEF CLERK AND ST-'FF' OIRE'CTOR

WASH INGTON, D.C.

20510

Apr i 1 22, 1968

Honorable Carl D. Perki ns
House of Repr e sentatives
Washingt on, D. C.
Dear Carl :
Senator El lender ha s schedul ed testimony on a ll
Kentucky oi vi l works pro jects before the Senat e Public
Works Appr opriat ions Subcommi ttee at 2 p .m. on Wednes day,
May 1--and t ime for opponents t o the Red River Reservoir
has been sche duled the fo l lowi ng week, on May 8 . I
under stand that Congr e ssman Natcher bas arr anged for the
Hous e Committee on Appr opri at i ons to hear testimony on
Tuesday, April 30, and that opposi tion to the Red River
Reservoir wi ll be hear d on the House side on May 7.
I wi l l look fori...rard to seei ng you at t he hearings,
and I would a l so be glad to fi l e any statements you wish with
the Senat e Committee.

With kind r egards, I am

S;r_Y

your, ,

J ohn Sfierman Cooper
sl

t

�CDP: ra

�WINCHESTER, KY.

ROUTE 5

40391
PHONE: PILOT VIEW 842·5023

BURLEY TOBACCO SEED

KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE

CLAIR TIMOTHY

ABERDEEN ANGUS CATTLE

March 22 , 1968.

Congressman Carl D. Perkins
House of Re presentatives
Washington , D. c.

Dear Carl:
Since receiving your last letter I have wanted to write so many
time, but refrained because I knew you were so busiy that a leteer
from me would only put more on ~ou.
I am not having any fun in my retmrement and I feel that it is an
injustice to anyone to force retirement on them. One of the things
that is wrong is that we have more Wards of the State than we need.

My main reason for writing is the condition of the Red
project. I am deeply concerned and fear for the worst.
people will try to disturb a plan that will help those
reagon, I am unable to understand. Mr. Cooper seems to
out of both sides of his mouth.

River Dam
Just why
in the
be taking

It is true that the people in Powell will get the most out of the
building of this dam and I cannot see why consideration is given
to people who live so far away, some even from California. What can be
done?
Jack Matlack fo ld me that he intended to quit in about 45 days. This
is one job I have tried to get but I don't think I have a Chinamans
chance .
I hope that your victory will be the best you have ever had.
With be.s-t regards,

~

R. Foster Adams.

�Sincerely•

Carl D. Pe1•kina • M. C.

®P:rr

�Ma rch 16 , 196 8

Con g ressman Carl D. Perkins
House Office Bui l ding
Washington, O.C.
20000
Dear Con g ressman Perkin s :
On Thursday, March 14th, the city governmen t of Lexin g ton
ado pted a resolution ur g in g t he immediate construction of
the Red River Dam.
The resolution was passed by a vote
of 4 to 1.
'/

Since I cast the o nly d escendin g vote, I wanted to e nc lose
a copy of the statement which I made ex p laining how im p ortant
I feel it is to re-study the proposed site of t he Red River
Dam in the hop e that other alternatives may be found to insur e
protect io n from floods for those peo p le who l ive in the Red
River drainage bas in .
Despite the ac t ion tak en by the majority of the city go vernment
of Lexin g ton 1 wish you would g ive serious consideration to
s u pp ortin g a re-stu dy of this vital question .

:2

1

s~·
J~

r. e ly , ~_,,\

"- _) ~ ~e-V'

C. Graves, Jr.
City Commissioner

JCGjr :ms
enc 1 .

~J

~

�A Sr;,::•:z:,IEN"' s·:;?:?ORT: ~;G -='HE P?c:. •-:,:;,V ' ' I ON C.:7 THJ,; P,ED RIV ,\ ..J {CE
.'l.XlJ ENDOR~_ .TG •. 1~E- STtJ:,y O:? Ta·= ?f,v ~--'O:::i~D SIT3 :?OR rc., I ~ _:, 1 X .. VE":. DA.,: .

':'i1e eleci::ed o:fficia l.s of i:he

c:;_ ty of Lexin g tor:: •. a ve bee::.

as ke d by Congressman Joh~ Watts to endorse the p~o~pt ana imnediate

SL ) ) l y

fo r Lexington a nd the

wou ::.ct t2 abst:::·C:

\ .'h2 :1

:-nany

extremely

..,houghtful Lexin:sto;.: iar:.s, and other Ken v-1:::.._iar:s, a nd the

Sc .:::Ti::!tary of the : nter ior h ave 2.s ~:ed t he U. S . Cor ~) O S c _· .: :; ngineers
to re - stu-=.: y the

situatioil to aeter~ine if alternate~~~ less

des~Y:uctiv2 solutions can ~e deveio9cd.
·· earnestl y believe t~,a. t ·.::;:-. e ~ d:-:.:..n i s ·; :rat ion

,·101... ... -..

}ns t

se:tve its obligations to th2 c~ tiz-2~:s of Le~::.:::;;··.:on, ·.::he C0:n... .::.:1w0alth
of

Kentucky, ::::.nd the Nation- - 0y su;_:,::,o::·c:.n;,; ev:::.1:y reaso;,1ao l c ar.d

prac~ical e~!ort to preserve a ~as~erp~ece of nature- - t~e Red River

~here are t hree im;ortant ~easons for·suppor~~~~ a re - study
o~ t~e Red River Dam proposal .
1.

The c laim th at t he proposed darn in the North ~ork of

Rel ~iver ~s 3ecessary to insure adequate water for ~exington is,
in ~Y opi nion , aot true .

7he North Fork of t~e Red River is only one of several
~:~nches i n the Kentu c ky Rive r dra ~nage area w~ich is suitable
o~ water storage.

At lea st ~ive other branches &amp;re in various

~ .:ages of development for reseTvoir purposes:

B~ckhor~ Reservoir

�h~s ...:cen' co,,.) l eted; Carr Cree:i::

:~csc !"✓ .:,ir

is und er co1,stru c t ioY1;

be:c ~e other a a~s alo ng the Xentuc~y can bs crn..J lete~--a ~ l e~st

2.

~~ere is ser:.o~s ::aC

f~ood protec t ~0~ i~ ~he Red

~o~

the head of cacn of the
would , in~ ~: probability, prov!~e

~

~ore complete cont~o: o_

flco~ wate~s t~an the dam vhich is ?resently ?reposed.
S.

Americans are becorninG i~creasingly o~~~aged a~

~ ~e

wac~c~ and need less destruction of ~he few unspoile d ,,ilde~ness
::.:.~e::.s '.lh i~h rema i n in the Vni ted Str. tes .
~s fi:st sae~ 0y such courageous explorers as Daniel Boone and
~r. ~~c~as W~lker in the 17GO's is gone excep~ for a few ra~her
s~all areas- - and the Red River Gorge is one of these areas.
Kentucky is blessed to have six~een large ~akes --and
many more on the way - -to p:;_~ovide wa -cer re ere a tio::::i -- but Kentucky
and the Nat ion have pr ecious few 1.filder::i.ess areas l:..ke the Red

R::.. ver Gorge .
Geologists ~~rvel at the pal :=~je walls, the natural

o1 nature ' s finest bota~ica: g~~dcns.

:ts fine, clear water

streams co~tain musk!e, ~ock bass , aLd s~all and large ffiOuth

�-

3 -

....
,. .:.
..... ~-.....,

~iles --the ~ed Rive

Surely the c::..cy
govc~~~ent c~ ~axington can s~~;orw a proposal to re-cc=s::..der

w::.. lderness

aYer.. -- the Red -- ~ve--.c G·0:..·g.2.

Jose:J:1 C. Gra·,es, City Co::::aiss ::.oner
Lcx::..ngto~, Kentucky

:Cate~:

Much of the information contained i~ ~b~s s~ate~ent

"?.ec :-.iver Gorge" ,,hich appe:.:.--.cea in the ;,:agazine sectio~1 o~ the
Courier Journal on March 3, 1963 .

�DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS
TECHNICAL LIAISON OFFICE
Room 1031, Bldg. T-7, Gravelly Point, Washington, D. C. 20315
oxford 55493
FOR REL~AS~ 120'CLOCK, NOON, EST
Friday, 15 March 1968
DECISION TO PROCEED WITH
RED RIVER PROJECT(KY) ANNOUNCED

The Army Chief of Engineers today announced that the Red River
Dam and Reservoir project in eastern Kentucky will be built at the
location authorized by Congress.
Lieutenant General William F. Cassidy said his decision was made
following a restudy requested by the Secretary of the Interior, Stewart
Udall, to preserve the aesthetic and ecological features of the Red
River gorge. The restudy included reconsideration of the authorized
project and study of the desirability of relocating the project about
six miles down the river.
The Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, the Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration and the Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife
of the Department of the Interior and the U. S. Forest Service of the
Department of Agriculture cooperated with the Army Engine ers in the
restudy. General Cassidy said that his decision to proceed with. the
project as authorized by Congress was based on the following major
considerations:
1. The authorized ·project will provide the flood control,
water supp l y and water quality control storage needs at an estimated
cost of $3 million less than the lower site. ·

2. A project at the lower site would displace 20 more families
than one at the upper site. Also a dam at the lower site would f lood an
additional 600 acres of developable land and create sediment deposition
problems in the gorge.

3. There is a lack of substantial disparity between the effects
on the natural values of the area occasioned by projects at either site,
The adverse effect on the ecology by the authorized pr9ject is offset
by aesthetic, recreational and economic gains. The natural environment of the Red River gorge includes the effects of annual floods in the
gorge. General Cassidy pointed out that any adverse effect on the ecology

'MORE
,.,-

-

�will be minimized by operating the reservoir as a part of the
Kentucky River system to minimize the retention period of flood flows,
4. The seasonal pool of the authorized project is well below
the many major scenic landmarks of the Red River gorge. Of the twentythree natural arches in the region, only one will be affected at all,
and then only when the pool level is raised in operating the reservoir
to detain floods.
·
5. Officials of the State of Kentucky, the Kentucky legislature
and the Congressional delegation from Kentucky support the authorized
project.
####

2

�F oroory 2&amp;, 19~

Mr. Donala B. Shelton
1311 Locetown Road
Lexin3ton, l&lt;entucky
40508
Da.ar Ur. Shelton:
lt was good of you
we your arguments against conet:1:u.ction of • dam ln th "'-.ci,ie.d• of the Red Rivar near Stant on.

ith best w
Slncerely,

Carl D. ~rkine, M.
CDP:rl

c.

�::c&gt; &lt;&gt;:N"..A. LI&gt;

JB_ S

~ :EL

-:CW &lt;&gt;:al"

..A.::EC.C ~ I-X-::EC-X-

ARCHIT E

CT

•

ENG I N E E R

•

A

N

D

ASSOCIATES

DONALD
CARL

8.

N .

SHELTON

AIA

ELL I O TT

FEBRUARY
Fifteenth
1968
The Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Re:

The Proposed Red River Dam near Stanton, Kentucky

Dear Congressman Perkins:
THE PROPOSED RED RIVER DAM SHOULD NOT BE BUILT --- because --- Any proper flood control can be achieved much differently at less
cost •• • and certainly much less destructively.
- Proper water conservation can be achieved much better at different
locations •.. and much less destructively.
- In fact, there is not and will~ be a need for water storage on
the Red River within the lifetime of the proposed dam. This is
backed by engineering facts, charts, and figures.
- Extremely better recreation can be achieved by keeping the very
unique and unusual recreation area achieved - particularly at this
area - by the Red River through its millions of years of development and natural design.
This area of the river is the best area of the river and one of the
best in the state and nation for a perpetual he,ritage under a "wild
rivers" type of designation.
- The Red River Gorge is remote and yet is only an hour's time from
the great metropolitan Blue Grass area. It is very accessible to
most Kentuckians, neighboring states, and all visitors.
1 3 9 1

A R E A

L E E STOWN
CODE

606

R O A D

•

•

TELEPHO N E

LEXI N GTON.
254-348 1

KY .

AND

4 0 5 0 8

254-3482

�Continued
Page Two

- The Red River Gorge is a 'mecca' for scouts and for teaching all
people to realize and appreciate one of the aspects of our nation's
great heritages.
The Red River Gorge is a natural area washed out and evolved over
millions of years that is rich in the study of geology, animal and
plant life, and the history of mankind through the ages. It is
'scaled for human activity' and an ultimate environment' in 'recreating' persons that venture within its bounds,
- Improper zoning for the construction of dams and inundation of
river valleys should not be allowed to destroy our best recreation
and most beautiful areas,
- Each dam that is to be built should take into account the true,
natural, and geographic conditions of the entire area.
- The preservation of the Red River Gorge and Valley will be of greater
benefit to many~ people for all generations than a 'fluctuating
mud bank lake' type of environment.

Donald B, Shelton
Engineer, Architect, and
Environmental Designer
c:

To all Senators and Representatives
to the Congress of the United States

��rebrua')' 20, 1968

Lt Col Ferd E. Andereon, J r .
Aeeietant D1r8':tor of Divil Works
for Cent.Sal Diviaiona
~
Off1ce of the Chief of i ngineera
Departamat of the Army
~

Waeh:Lngton, D. C.

~

Dear Colonel Anderaon1

While I vae in Kentucky
wltb work with the
1 am

R1

indeey ·

telor,hone, bu

Alway• my

february 9, you called 1ll'J
~

-

b Rigas t o ld you t his on the

want to put i t in wri t ing for you.

wiehea,

Carl D. Perkine, M. C.
CDP:rl

�Fe brua ry 9 , 1968 :
Our f r i e nd Col one l F&lt;&gt; rd i'it1m1m.m An r' erson, a t the "S ng i ne ers ,
a sked me t o say if I f e lt y ou w0 r e jus t a s strong for th 0 Rod Rive r
Dam a s e ver or ha d you be come l e s s ent hus aastic .

I told him i t wa s my opinion tha t yo u were jus t a s s ~r on g
as e ve r fo r it , tha t you opposed a ny d ~ , t ha t you co~ld see no
point in any ne w st udi e s .

He ask ed if I could say how Jo hn Watts s t and s .

I told

him I would not underta ke t o s peak f or Wa tt s but that i t was my
o pinmon that Watt s f e l t jus t as he h8s f e lt be for e .
Bob

�Ml~. Ban-y Bi ngham; Sr.

Melcombe
Glenvtew, Kent uek,y
'

''

I

i.,

:, ' Fchrn."".J-'

).t '
1_
,·

i. '.J h&lt;.t.V0

~rou,:e sympatheti c

d understandtns answer

:r: 0 ,:1 not 'joini.n { t·n y cn..&gt;rrpn f.;~;n , -;ni tin
new ::::tuc'l~• o:::' t!:c
Rr?d Riv~ ::.- .l: ,il &gt;r '.Jno.m L
As Y'11l r.:~11
lon_; ~,n t!ie l-ll!i tc J{jllGC is
h:&gt;:.d iu·· J._; '.10 ::-k ::m 1.. 0 ·•r Jje~t , ,_
· ,1i- i ' C
1":' ::,,)jecti 1 11 t'.) 'L,Jc
·. -~· .,:,ri11~ ,&gt;. , 1 J., :tot; ~ i n~ ::-1..,. ,t _
, ::t t:, Int cri? r , J\_:ri c1 J.ture►

You 1.ent:".::m ,J:,:m

t}"~ '":n~t neer r;

t i'.:ln.

J ohn 1 ::: p,:,si t ion , c.s ".Jrencntcrl '. ;:&gt; --che Bu.c1 be t Lt,..:re{.v ·•ft t"1 • e o.11.n?:r u f.~w ,,ecke tt~), i:3
tdenti cnl uit!. ,•inc .
..._,__,,=r~a t 1v t tl 1E' --; •..,, • ne ._•ei;c•rvoi:r
woulr' i n no
&lt;U. r ·..c rug5ed be c1 ut.~• oi' the a r ea. I n J.so
::u.1.'

1''.J:.'

10:.' ( ·

_9c.,.'0!"1.

,,l'.

w::&gt;Ulc". be Gl.!.d t.~ ha!

e-.. i.nf o:r.'met:.::m. the n.:~encie s p r.:&gt;duce ,

:8'..it ·utrHe .I a1n t ·, 1:a.!tlng c.;. part i n r,~r f ic;ht a.ga.i n E;t a.
se~ond. look, neithei· -would I ,,ant to j~i n i n a request f or a new
s t udy which I feel would p roduce t he srune recor:imendat i ons. a s di d
t he f i l•s-i;. ~ e unl ess a.n ar b i t rary deci ::,i on wao imp::med. by- highe r~
auth◊dty .

Thank you a ae,111 f or y our i"ine l etter. I am ,;_l atl ~ur dta~~t~el'!ent on thi s subj e ct can be amicabl e . l do not find your
letter to be tn any sense "con~ t 1ous , " to uze your "1:)rd.

Al-ways

my

best Wishes.
Si,nc.e rely,

Carl D. Perkins, M.C.
CDPcr.f

�\
BARRY BINGHAM

Ba.RRY BINGHAM, JR.

EDITOR &amp; PUBLIS H ER

LISLE BAKER, J R.

ASST. TO THE PUB L ISKER

EX ECUT IVE VICE PRES I DEN T

Utbt arouritr~Jourttal
THE LOUISVILLE TD1ES
LOUISVILLE, KY. 40202

February 6, 1968
The Honorable Carl Perkins
House of Representatives
House Office Building
Washington, D. C.
Dear Carl:
You and I have been allies for far too long to allow any
publ ic issue to aff ect our friendly relationship . I don' t want to
appear that most obnoxious of all things , a cont entious woman, either.
Therefore, it is in a very mild and gent le spirit that I make the
following observations in response to your thoughtful and patient
letter of January 31st.
On the point that, although the project for the dam in the
gorge of the Red River has been a dozen years developing, not until
a year ago was there any objection rai sed, may I sugges t that it was
not until the mountain parkway was opened t hat the gorge became eas i ly
available to tourists, naturalists, etc . Very few people had had a
chance to see it and to under stand its peculiar value . I believe
that value arises largely f rom the fact that the gorge is a wilderness
area in which f ew ~ l e live . 'Ihat fact might account for the lack
of protest from within the area. But I believe there was a large
minority vote against the dam at the meeting of t he Natural Bridge
State Park Association in December - a meeting composed largel y of
people in the district . And I believe further dissent has been
expressed by the Licking Valley Courie~, the only paper, I think, in
the three- county ar ea.
Now that the gorge is easily available by way of Pine Knot
on the mountain parkway, or from Slade&gt; it provides an added attraction
for Natural Bridge State Park . Many of the hiking trails, which,
according to Bob Collins of the U.S . Forestry service, Chief Forester
of the Daniel Boone National Forest, were used last summer by many
thousands of people each month, will be flooded after the dam is
built. Because of the narrowness of the lake behind the dam, the
draw- down during per iods of water scarcity down river wi l l be very
severe - a drop of perhaps as much as forty feet, I believe, l eaving
unsigl1tly and unclimbable mud banks all around t he lake' s fringes .

�The Honorable Carl Perkins
February 6, 1968
Page Two

A dam downstream from the gorge would impound more water and create
a bigger, broader lake, more suitable for purposes of recreation .
I sympathize with your f eeling that the Sierra Club would
not be content with the findings of a disinterested body (should a
re- study of the project be made) unless those findings supported its
position. I know conservationists are sometimes unreasonable about
other factor s which have to be considered in questions of this sort .
However, as you probably saw in last Sunday's Courier, the Sierra
Club is asking for a feasibility s tudy of a dam several miles down
river . The Courier- Journal ' s positi on, as you know, i s that a dam
is necessary somewher e but we would like to see a s tudy made by the
Water Resources Council of the Interior Department of the site or
sites which have been suggested as al terna ti ves to the gorge site .
Since there is going to be a delay in the construction of
the dam anyhow, why not employ that time to have a study made of the
feasibility of the downstream s i te?
I believe John Cooper, who also has supported the dam in
the gorge for a good many years, is now asking InteriorJ Agriculture;
and the Engineers for additional information. I do not think , my
dear Carl, that consistency is always the greatest jewel - especially
in politics where flexibility and a willingness to listen and reexamine ar e so essential. These are qualities which have always
marked your own f air, impartial and judicious approach to public
questions . I am sure they still do ,
With warm regards ,
Sincer ely yours ,

�..

Mn. Barry Dlngl'&gt;am, Sr.
Mel.cz be

Glouvf.ew-, ICE&gt;.ntuaklf

r. ,,,. -- :::n1· ·iiat remo o-,r,u• t he
.....1: "t.n - .,... •

Jte

~

u.re of Secretar.,
need h1m in ·l t.

s d3i.n;; a splendi d J:&gt;b

'"~u ":I'\~ • ~.11-1 •tt:,st -~enen,is t l\·ln•'::3
"':HU' l~ttl!r :Jl" Jruiw.ry
26 a1&gt;~·:·· ,.,:' y,~.,···n1:t"tl'l ~r--: ''~} •"'IV'li.~ 1- • • 1".'.1,e H, l:''f&gt; ~ ,, rnt".;1'&lt;}- '.l'l FA\\e&amp;•
· t., i •n; T.rt1!'.'.:l··• .
of tos,ilte
0

·. d.1 i h.__.

/i

J , ,1nn

.

::, 11,) JSt '.~

, -•.

•· .. .. ~

..,1 1

:~t,',JS Y'.l i;,1C 0,UCr-lt 1.~

Ht v,irf

; . t0, l:)c1 1 tc.'!•' 1n PrmE!ll Ch,mt y, i s tn
'tts . l~ut tl1e ~:::ol"!.rn:t w ulo be tn
ner-.re1 b : r J·
the
W'J'\.f'e ,·mt ,
:it ef.?ect \.:.[JOU t he pe'J?le :lf. Ucmtfee
County. '.8~th 't!l~n ,::&gt;u.nt• cc n~ in t!le dt ,: t r.ll'.:t ! 1--e-p-reoent .
t•;:-i::,c,

t 1 t" i';

\:.,

c

mney
run:r..mt :t~r

G

~:)fflY inctrW?llfflt~ l i n :;ctt111g; C:o-r---t,"Tes• t:, ·vote
~ee-r1uc; e,n-d dee:i~ -:,f the dam end ~ mall
ota.tt ::m, ~nf;tl."Uit,tion. ~riniz; th(',i J-,r.en ~ " that t he

r&gt;~Ject was be-1.t~g de"JOl.oped, the1-:-e h.1. · 1 .r.. n~ "'b~ect to.n. rattled
a gainst t:t unti l :.ioout e. yea r ago. In ftict , th~rc iB 1 ev.ln n:,w, no
tfa.ra,

:&gt;bJ"!ct1on v1thtn the o.tteetet

e.ren.

1bat i s quite tn contmst t.~ t he Too.ctt!&gt;n ub1ch grieet.e m0,9t
r,r,poeal.8 t') build &amp;we. 1JfNl!lllY'~ there 1s vf.~~e apr,osttlen -t '.ra
thoee vrn,se hO!lltts, :f'at'mfl, butineeoee, ebtu-c.hos, Achool.• an&lt;l ~
rt.ea
13.re t, be CO"f8red. A ~ t e:xmx:,le t~ the , tto~c:1 i"f.ght
of:flciols and res1t1en\s of Ietcher C~nty- a:re mkinz t\E1J,1nst the pr:&gt;p,eel t , bUt1d a dam ~t 1ttn4dom cosm on the N~ P.u·k of the Kentucky
ffl.vor.
·

�I would n~t vant t ~ have a hand i n dea.-tr:&gt;yl ng or marring
any of the natural bea uty :&gt;f OW' m!&gt;untain sect i on. k t X believe
s tncerely tbat this proJ.)~"'""1 lrik,t\ w :,, (, enabl e l!Q,J'e ireoli)l e t !l see
and enjoy thts sceni c gru......u \4' ·l;il,l;l.l 4 ~~, d ~ so n:&gt;th The eete&gt;:•u ~f

t he reservob•1 flowing 'back into snaU er 50""!5e.s n~!i virtually unlro:nm
to tbe public, would ope,a, up new vtetae.

, , I ncidental ly,. yw m y be tr:1tei;est ed. t n the- ~rtgin ot the order
putting a teurporar:, t"reeze ·on the project e, t hat the englneen could
not begtn tQ spena. t he relattve4" 'amll sum ot $330,000 a\l&amp;J.labl e tor
""r-a· l"'\': ,L "'2 • l+. &lt;mrtna t he pseaent Piecal Year. The word te that
,, , l . :• , , . ·,·., ·r}u~ ,"t-~.u~et of Justice Douglas, ,as t he 1nsp1rat ton
, •l ' \."l t '1. 11es ~tng a .i:u,,,.1 etudy.
·1,_r 1·e ei.ih~ a'tY.&gt;ut a propooel tor a, nw st udy ii t hat ? spent
::.nns! de~ oJ e ;tM a.nd effort getting the· ini tial s-tudy made. I
ean,0·1, 1·e 1.'av: th:t~- a ae~~f! J.•) ok , r,,.ud cha n .:,e " 1.y ., ,. eta .. Nord:&gt; I
'belteve :i.t , rouln c :&gt;nv~rt ! nt ::, 1&gt;P'Y.)nents ar,y ~f th~se '\AY.) :fav~&gt;1~ t he
dm::. W•e :, 1:,1 -~ ,:.:t v\ •,as &lt;!U1 :,: ~et.•?ri i ':J :Ji , :L:::i:.- ~.
\.:!lui.J ~ l d
1-c c ~J.'l"Vi•1ce&lt;'1 \;hp ,c:,.;•~~ •v,:)iu , ho rla'•.tth, •
l t is trv.(~ 1

,, ·

;1=,u. e.,y-; too.t J~hn i-L.~t:e

~g -~ k!?y tun
ht~ iHtrlc~;. :Ont. I W is. deeply
~ho ur,6 1;.ooors '.:.h« -i; ·.,.,.ey g-.&gt; :t'!ll."\.~ 1"1 vlt b

u.ncl~r.w k1ug b~cc.um.c&gt; thr..: 01.1.n. , ~~.u•i te
t.'1v~l v-e~ u fo..!

1.iav-:~

ux~..:?--- u 1) ~11

it .

~!l

I Q::tY ~in t hat l ..::.m mua-u uni.v1.p1&gt;y t o ?L11.d. rufEe li' in tbs \umsual
!X)Sitf.on -::&gt;f o_ppo.s in~ pw..• -.r1t."WR ~n. a µtit&gt;l ic i 1;au.e . I do appntetet«
y~ur thoi.,.gb'tl\iln,esa i n vrt't!.ng· to

me.

Af.,,.._-ays m;.i, best tdshe&amp;.

Sincerely,

CDP: r f

�MOLLY CLOWES, Editorial Page Editor
.RY BINGHAM
· a!'(d Publisher

BARRY BINGHAM JR.
LISLE BAKER
Associate Publisher
Executive Vice-President
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1 6, 1968. ·FOUNDED 1826.

JOHN ED PEARCE
WILLIAM PEEPLES
ADELE_BRANDEIS
CHARLES WALDEN
HUGH HAYNIE, Cartoonist

Engineers

S~ould

Seel( a Restudy-

On Red River
THE SIERRA CLUBBERS must occasionally
get that lqnely feeling, but they have made
it clear tha,t they have not given up the fight
to block construction of a dam that would
flood the scenic Red Rlver gorge. And though
they may have powerful foes against them,
they have reason on their side.
Once more, in their weekend Lexington
meeting, they have made it plain that they
do not oppose dams anywhere on the Red
River. They are not opposed to flood control
for the valley l although how much flood protection the proposed dam will provide is
extremely questlonab)e), and they are fitmly
in favor of finding new water supplies for
towns in central Kentucky. The point is, as
they have once more pointed out, that all of
these things can be achieved without building a dam where th~ Army Engineers propose
to build it, and without destroying a unique
wilderness area of incalculable value.

A. Better Dam Downstream ?

What the Sierra Club wants, and wh,t
every Kentuckian should want, is a restudy
of the dam project to see if everyone concerned cannot be better served by a dam
farther downstream. It is generally assumed,
in the · absence of reliable data, that a downstream dam would cost morP., chiefly ·because
·:_the valleys below the gorge are wider and a
lake in the area would therefore cover more
ground. But the larger lake :would also provide more storage for water and more flood
protection for downstream farms and towns. •
And it would be of more (l'~reational talue.
A lak:e impounded by 'a dam in the gorge
will of necessity be narrow and deep, affording relatively little room for skiing and boating. If the water must be let out of the lake
to relieve central Kentucky droughts in late
summer months, ,steep, bare, muddy banks
w.i ll be exposed, making it difficult to reach
the trails, caves and arches that are the main
attraction to the valley. A lake downstream
would be a nice recreational addition to
neai;by Natural Bridge State Park, without
destroying a gorge which is becoming as gre.at
an attracti:on ,as NatuTal Bridge itself.
There is no reason in the world why a
restudy of this project should not be made.
A temporary cut-off in federal funds has
blocked a st.art on the dam for the next six
months, ample time for the federal government to send neutral fact.finders to Kentucky
to see whether we cannot have both the lake
and the gorge. For the sake of their own
future relations with the conservation-minded

�2 DIE, 6 HURT
IN CITY CRASH
Page B 10

SUNDAY, F EBRUAR

Sierra Club Seeks U.S. Study
For Alternate Red River Dam
By BEVERLY FORTUNE
Courler-Journ• I Staff Writer

\

-

LEXINGTON, Ky- The Kentucky sec·tion of the Sierra Club agreed yesterday
to request a feasibility study by the
Army Corps of Engineers of an alternate
dam site on the Red River, about seven
miles downstream from where the corps
now proposes to build the dam.
The 1·equest is in no way inte!l,d.ed_as
an endorsemenk of t~e a}tc1•tfate site, bul:
rath er as an expression of flexibility on
the part of the Sierra Club.
At a meeting yesterday here, the club
;igreed to notify by telegram Stewart
Udall, secretary ·of the Department of
the Interior, and Lt. Gen. W. F. Cas~idy,
chief of the Army Corps of Engineers,
of thei-r decision.
The decision to ask for a study of the
alternate site came aher · the administration's budget was released last week. It

includes an appropriation of $800,000 for control, better Tecreational faci lities (bethe controversial project.
cause the lake would be broader than
"The news from the White House was it would be upstream) and the same
the real shock. This is where we thought number of acre-feet of water storage as
we were going to get support," said a the original proposal.
member of the club's executive commitThe white water portion of the ri ver
tee.
would be preser vea, also. and the Moon. Tbe proposed $12 million dam got shiner's Arch woul~...damaged:- ht,
$330,000 in ap))'ropriations fr~m Cong.[!ls.s-add~ - - - - '
lag_,y ~o~ i.nit-ial-eoustrcrc 10n, though
Are Maintaining Option
work has not actually begun yet.
Knowledgeable sources in Washington
have indicated there is going to be a dam,
Those present yesterday debated at
said William length the wording of their telegram to
"and that's final,"
Schneider, Louisville, who has headed avoid giving the impression of endorsing
the Sierra Club's task force opposing the the project. They therefore are maintainproject. He added:
ing the option of opposing the alternative
"If this is true, the only other question site also after data is compiled.
"We're only asking for details on
then is whether the1·e is a chance of an
the downstream site," Schneider said.
alternate site."
Recognizing that the image of the SierAt the downstream location, Schneider
said, the dam would provide similar flood ra Club with the public is often one of
an unyielding, militant group, a club
member said, the executive committee
felt the club should demonstrate its willingness to consider new facts.
In case a dam is built?
"We'd be happiest with no dam but
happier with the alternate site," ' said
Carroll Tichenor, Nicholasville.
"Our congressional delegation feels it
h_as its dam," said Carl Holstein, Louisville, a member of the executive committee.
"Their feeling would probably be.
'Why bother to restudy the project if
we're going to catch heck from the conservationists anyway?' For this reason,
we felt something should be done."
The head of the Kentucky section
of. the Sierra Club, James Kowalsky,
pointed out that alternatives to asking
for the st_udy . would be "stepping up
our can1pa1gn m Rep. Watts' territory"
or employing a lawyer to determine
if the · case could be taken to court.

A

.More Hearings Ahead

Staff Photo bY James

ti. Keen

The House and Senate appropriations
committee must still hold hearings on
public-works projects and draft a bill
for funding them, which would give conservationists another chance, perhaps
their last, to voice objections.
Sch11eider said the Sierra Club would
request permission to testify before both
the House and Senate committees, which
are _ expected to hold hearings in the
sprmg.
The advantage no w enjoyed by Red
Ri ver opponents is that all new-project
funds are frozen , Tichenor said. The
freeze ls expected to last at least until
July, the end of this fiscal yeai·, and
perhaps longer, depending in large part
on Vietnam developments.
The telegram endorsed yesterday
states, in its entirety:
"The Kentucky section of the Sierra
Club met today, and agreed to request
a complete evaluation of the downstream
dam site on the Red River wbif.'11 -mav
.l1e a .satisfactory solution to all co1i'.cemed and might provide a wide range
- ' ~ecreational experiences for all
"'"' are requesting your help
'"int Interior Departments study of the ·new

an•
th
th
he
ni
of
m1

wt
th
ev
Na

a c
tio
I,

wh
Lel
the
hat

to
to L
T.
min,
mon,
and
Th
listen
hymr
pr aye
Thr
sileor

���J anuary 30, 1968

Mr~. Mary Fox Reutlinger
~ ' ,(' l

lvil~-·~l~L,'

::...:.:~: ...... .:.llc)

l

c...i.•._,,'fiY·

l~C!.tttcky

4o204

Carl D. Perkin~, M.
CDP: rf

c.

��Mr. J,•.ne:.• 11 . II u..'.i.
Preo.1. .:.e~t~

Powe11 c_~nt-.i K ~L'.i Burco.t-'.
sta.nt :m, Kc.ritu~ ty

'l1h~'Ulk y:,u. i'::&gt;r sendi ng
Heral u- ~ a.e r .t."eai;ure st-;,&gt;r/ ::&gt;r1
eonti. m..1.e uv ;:;upport of t he _.)lun

I om !.n acc:,i•d
Bure.au on thi o .;ubJcct .

,1

~
U

(~Jtho•.

lipp ing ~f t he Lcxint.,rton
• You my be sl.C'c I will
r u.(.!t a dm,1 o.u t h i o
·

d. your :.:&gt;all~,1 members ~:i· the la-l'm

A1,ro;ro m:,

CDP:rf'

stream.

Sincerely,

�Stanton , Kentucky
Janu ary It , l168

Carl D. Perki ns
United 3tates Representotive
House Office 0-uJlding
Washi ngton , D. C.
Honorable ,·,r . Perkins;
I am e'1closi'1g a ffews ar t i cle on the pr oposed Red River Uam Pro ject
which our resi rlent s of this a r r~a are an.'.ious lo h2ve con-=-tru cted at the
earliest possible rlatP .

Our Farm Bu reau Members and members of the Red Ri ver Valley Fl ood
Control Associ ation apor Pciate the time and ef fort that you have devoted
to this project. We k·-iow t hat you wi ll rPorese,.t ou r wi shes i n t hi s
matter if it co~es 11p -ror ?nothn· hea r ing in t.hP future .
You ~ay be assured that we arc ~oing to contjnue ou r efforts to see
t hi s or::,,12ct t o a completion . \l,'e t ru st that you a nr:l the other
memters of our Kentucky Congr essional group wi ll stand u o f or us as you
havP. in th.e past ,
Respectfully submi tted ,

tz/dc:·1(.I~ ((
,/ J~ames H. ha ll
? r esi de-it
P01,:e ll County Far m .t:lUrecu
J HH/ at

�~ ~/4,;/4~~. ;?u-•-~t~. .~ ~ ; /&lt;?~~_/~ I;/_~ ,
,,,L~--/4£e.. ~ /44 k~v_
/ ~ /~·~ul c:&amp;~ .,,-t4' /4/4 tZc,,~~2.c~~k

Red River Group
Unites To Fight
For Dam Project
By Ralph Wayne Derickson
The Red River in Powell County flows smoothly through
a well-populated iind agriculturally flourishing vaUey on the
fringes of Appalachia.
In some pools along the meandering stream, lt is difficult
to determine by casual glance in which direction it flows.
In other spots, the river shallows and ripples lazily over
lts shoals, providing good fish-gigging reserves.
But it is not always so placid.
About 65 times in the last 30 years, the Kentucky River
tributary has become an uncontrolled, raging monster known
as a flood.
. Its muddied, shimmering mass creeps from the high treelmed banks and then roars through the valley bottoms, leveling
crops and even livestock as it seeks space for its awesome
form.
Then it is considered wild.
If there is one thing proponents and opponents of a dam to
curb this flooding agree on, it is the fact that Red River
gets wild.
The opponents, specifically the Sierra Club, contend the
wildness of the river creates an unequaled beauty. In one of
its upper gorges, a rock-rimmed beauty around the river
exists that is considered "unique."
· But whether it IS unique-the only one-is considered debatable.
The Sierra Club, an organization which has been prominent
ln fights to preserve wilderness areas throughout the United
States, moved to stop the proposed dam in the Red River
Valley in the fall of 1967.
The club began publicizing ~ts arguments that the river
gorge contained wildlife, animals and plants, which should
be left untouched, and a scenic beauty which would be destroyed, or at least inundated.
Citizens in Powell, Wolle and Menifee counties, who had
been watching the progress of plans for the dam for about
13 years, were suddenly faced with something new-an active
opposition.

They knew why they wanted the dam, but were not sure
how to combat this well-organized opponent.

Protestors had been little problem in the mountains.
The Sierra Club capped off its publicity drive Nov. 18
With a hike up a section of the gorge which will be filled
with water backed up from the about 190 • feet dam.
Featured hiker on this trip was William 0. Douglas, an
associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Some professional journalists termed the trip a "pseudoevent." There was no news-worthy occunence, but by virtue of
the national figure involved, the event had to be "covered."
And it was.
ACCOMPANY JUSTICE, WIFE
Newspaper, radio and television newsmen from as far
away as New York-City and as near as Central Kentucky accompanied the justice and his petite young wife on the excursion.
It did what it was designed do, Ray Harm, naturalist and
painter, explained at a dinner meeting later. He thanked the
. residents of the area for being present at the march because
this made it a "controversial issue."
But even some persons associated with the opposition ad;nlt that a fight to stop the dam now may be too late.
Since 1953, when the dam was first discussed at a meeting
of the Red River Flood Control Association, there have been
MAN-MADE PENI.NSULAS - Road grades of the Mountain Parkway, Just west of Rosslyn, provided
four public hearings conducted by the Army Corps of En•
gineers (the latest in August 1967). More than $1 million was
these peninsulas when the Red River overflowed its banks in the winter of 1962. The flood waters c;rossed
allocated by Congress for the initial planning and construction.
the parkway into Clay City. This portion of the roac-J,is between Rosslyn and Stanton about 10 miles
The entire project will cost $$11.7 million.
downstream from the propost 1 Red River Reservoir Dam.
When completed, the reservoir area in the three counties
affectea will encompass about 3,140 acres at floodstage and will
collect drainage from an estimated 140,160 acres.
The dam will be built about 47 miles above where the
river empties into the Kentucky River, 12 miles northeast
Stanton, county seat of Powell.
The Corps of Engineers contends the dam on the north
fork of the- Red ·Rive-r- ,vould "drov the flood stage- around'
LJ
Clay City, which has been the hardest struck in the past, by
about six feet.
Six feet seems like a small amount, the engineers say,
but nearly all the damage during the worst flood-1962-could
have been prevented by such a dam .
In addition to the home and business damage,. between
11,300 and 9,500 acres of river bottom cropland are inundated
annually.
Section G
The Corps of Engineers estimates that flood control measures along the valley would provide about $446,000 benefits
Lexington, Ky., Sunday, Jan. 14, 1968
annually. Added to this, the engineers contend, are the benefits such as water supply, recreation and tourism attraction
which would amount to about $714,000 a year.
The Powell countians want this.
Another obvious factor is the promotion of the dam for the
They soon overcame their amazement at the opposition benefit of as many people as possible.
and organized a fact-reciting and promotional team. Probably
Due to state cooperation 1n the project, the dam will further
no other controversial issue in the county's history drew the serve
as a reserve of water for the Central Kentucky area.
residents into such close cooperation as did the attack on
Pendleton, a lawyer, compared recently the water usage
"our dam."
Then came the second blow-announced cutbacks in federal · figures provided by the Corps of Engineers for Lexington.
spending.
According to these tables, Lexington .now uses 28 million
Maj. Gen. F. J. Clarke, acting chief of the engineers, gallons of water a day and by the year 2,000, will take
summed the problems up in a letter in September, 1967, to nearly 140 million gallons of water a day .from the K'entu.r.ky
Dwight Pendleton, president of the local flood control as- River.
90ciation.
In 1930, Mr. Pendleton pointed out, only 9 million gallons
"We will construct the project as rapidly as practicable a day were available because of drought conditions.
_
consistent with good planning and construction practices and
The Kentucky River, during dry times, could be rAised
the availability of funds."
with the supply of water from the mountain reservoir through
The "availability o( funds," of course, necessitates Con- a flood gate ,;nd so,llwa
gressional cooperation.
There are two other forks of the Red River in Powell
Meanwhile. members of the Powell County Flood Control County. '.1he eng;,1eers dedded the North Fork would be the
.A~~ciation and members of the Sierra Club are sWl on the best possib!e-loca'. fon .f!)r the dam. .
rtfampaign tra[L
Included in the "bunch" of alternatives the Sierra Club
The pur pose of debating the reservoir points, Mr. Pendleton
.l!ays, is to "correct inaccuracies."
See RED RIVER, Page G·Z ff-Z -{: /

~unhay ]I.erttlh-lli'rah.er
,: a.._,~~J&gt;.'"~~EJU

I

�WATER IN CLAY Cl'fY-vVaters from the Red River in 1962 flooded Clay City. Before the flood reached
its crest the water stood about two to three feet deep in Smith's Grocery Store in the foreground. 'fhls
picture is shown looking east on Ky. 15 toward Stanton.

.

·'

�; ~~ ~ J":;h i~ C. R~il"1,.;t

_,O!i. tc-~::.t C:&gt;.i~t
.~. o. Box :!..56
',li.t. dl.C;; t-cr , JCcmtu::.ky

~

t hat ~ curry out 7 0111•
a dmonit i on 1xr1Je :ln ~':&gt;ur J.ot t -~
L-ecm.,.:;er 5 --::&gt; cou.uil d t he Red ru.·,"Or Dam.
t .l.nuc ey Ju.p;io::.¥i; ~r t he pJr..n

You r.ia.y be

a~

'lhull: YoU. :r.-::ri..

l"".)US

ey per.foi'nlft.nve of the
'l'i 3B

good of

/ OU

t

thiner,:

r

tutn lx,., vi

.a ,
Sincerely,

-CllP:rt

Y''.JU ~ i 1l {.",L"{)Ui~

:: u Uemb~1· of COltQ"e"°G .

It

�December 5, 1967

Congressman Carl D. Perkins
House Office Building
Washington, D. C. 20000
Dear Congressman Perkins:
I am writing on behalf of the Red River Dam Project. I know, by this
time, you have heard all the lengthy arguments for and against, and it
would be repetitious for me to go into that. I just wanted to urge you
to continue to support the .Da,m and the Corps of Engineers and that
the construction of the Red River IJa,m Project proceed as scheduled.
Thank you very much for a very fine job in the Congress in the past and
we pray God you will have many more fr:uUJul years there.
VeryJ.tt:ruly yours,
I

.

/

\r:,--:J.-h/c7kd_ ..1~ ~

,/

1

I

~~'--'e:.~7
·
.

John C. Bailey

I/

JCB:ps

/J ~
-"

._

'f )

' . /

'

.

,·'

'

f

: ..

I -~

, ·"'

--

�..,.
'•~10

,1,,,r-,r, Tl "

c-, 'krel..1

,T,,..,,...,E" H . t!'.)~krell C::&gt;mpany

• {; . J '.)Y, -211,
1·'incJ1ente;'.' ~ Ken t ucky

4o391

Dea r Mr. C::icl.;:re1_l :

Stncer0l y,

CR,rl D. Pe r k :l.n s, M. C.

CDP: rf

�PHONE 1606) 744·3558

December 1, 1967

Congressman Carl D. Perkins
House Office Building
Washington, D. C. 20002
Dear Congressman Perkins:
Although I am not one of your constituents I would like for you
to know my feelings concerning the Red River Dam Project.

I feel this is a worthy project and one that will benefit the
entire Kentucky River Basin which is so important to the Sixth
and Seventh Districts.
I ernestly solicit your support and would appreciate hearing from
you as to your position in this important matter.

The next time you are back in the Seventh District please give
my regards to my personal frient Billy Engle .

-----

---

Thanking you for your attention , I remain ,
Yours very trul

B. Cockrell
JBC:c

�Dt•. ?.tul. F. :t.ukhx) Pren i tlollt
.i.i.ddle Kcintuc!r;.y 3iver ·
l.o~ut
:'ao~•, .J~·::.'ice B:&gt;:: 12'(
Ctv.r,?t®., lC,.mtucl;,y

arltcle about you eud. yow"
· tna!JJ,Zt ne, vhtch you en•

~tlaute
el:&gt;aed..

With

s1ncere.1¥,
Car l D. Pel'kins, M. C.

�111/K

PA UL F. MA D D O X, M. D.
1

P.O . B O X ~

'&gt;7

C A MP TON. K E N T UCKY

Honorable ~Ii llia·'l Q. Dour;Zas
JusticP. u. c;. ,9.J,"re•ne Court
.9.1,prern.e Court Building
ivashinoton, D.c.
Honorable Douglas:
I appreciate your interest in ih Jtcd. 1r.ivr&gt;r Gorge (LT'"'! rind !/OU,r rAcr&gt;nt
visit to /y'olfe County. You MY not be alvlrP. of thri fact that onP--thirr'
of Wolfe Couty lies in the L"lniP. 1 Boone National Forest 1,1Mch includes
thr&gt; Red River Gorge and therr&gt; are pP.on7e in the other two-thirdn. Thr&gt;
people in the o thrir• t1,;o - thirds of Wolfe County ar(' lhr&gt; srcond porrs L in
the Unt ted States. Thr,.11 r.avq an aPeraae {)P.f' cani ta inco•'l.f" of ,i/;1.7.'J nP.r'
year. The bnauty of the ,ced itiver Gorge ha.'l done nothing to prnver l
this situation or to allPViate it. If you elininatr&gt; the r&gt;lP11cn r,_iJlion
dollar RBd fd.vP.r furn. you a 1 so eli"linate an eleven nillion dollrir industry
for t his area. If the dan does not ''1/tterializP, thP e."'Jrct 1,;ill /'" to
I erwe -ny people in the sa"1e no 1,,•Arty they hnve al uXZys /rno1,;n . I have
,wery reason to believe th.at the deuel o p·wn t of the dam. wil Z cause a
trenendous increase in the econonic recover .I,/ of tho area and it is a
little difficult for ·ne to see how the inpounaed lake would in any 1,;ise
dec r ease the type or nunber of wildlife in the Red raver Gorge .
0

If you arc succr&gt;ssful in nreventing the const ruction of this Red Niver W''l
I hope you will COIJP up &gt;uith an econo7l.ic substitute for the relief of
our poverty . The best I hnvt:i to offqr at this the is pi 7ls to 1Jrr&gt;ven-c
additional children fron being bo rn into our present rcononic nisrry .
I would appreciate riny constructive suggestion you ·,~ight have conCPrning
t h is matter .
Yours very sincerely,

,J

(

/ ... ~c.'- .

,I,,_.

I

J

IL-,-•

.,,t,./n.__,,

)A, /)

Paul F. Maddox, M. D., President
Middle Kentuck.l/ lavnr Developient .1ssociation

PPM: pam

I.

�-

�KENTUCKY DOCTOR

AGAINST
SOUTHERN POVERTY
Wolfe County, poorest
in the Sou th,
produces only one crop
in abundance: babies
t\ " , 01n1AL.. W EEl&lt; I. Y ca:;eload f u r Dr. l'a ul M addox
n 111;s lo 85·] patients- plus 15 babies de!i1·erecl. He if
the only dodo r in \1/olfe Count) . Kentuckv. and ha;s
been since he began practieinµ: 1:-$ :'ears ago. Wolfe has
the loll'est per-capita income in the South. according
1(1 tlJP la;;t ,·ensus. Tlte d&lt;wto r. 1d 1ll·~ ;:-i1 e11 a lul o f
thought to duo nic poverty. points nut that most of
his patients. 1d10 a re hill folk like hims('IL are white.
i\ nglo-S/lxon. Prolcsl.ant. a nd have heen chronically
poor for µ:e11eratio11~. Their ~hacks h,He lung lwcn
more a real part of the Southern 11·a) of life than the
white-pilla red mansions of legend. T he fact$ prove
it's " ma larkey ." he saYs, that the per111ane11L poor of
t\ merica are Neg-roes. or im111igrn11ts. or live 011I } in
bi/! city slums. T he re's sim pl) 110 11ca) to make a
livin/! here. T he r:nst Kentul'ky scenery is lovelv- bu t
!here';; 110 railroad, no industn . 110 &lt;"oal t" s peak of. A
briner sn atches out a li ving p.-rowin/l a little tobncco.
and maybe planting cucumbers for the new pickle fac l my. But the hill folk do produce offspring. Families
of ei?--I-11 nnd ten are ave rnge. 16 lo 19 nn raritv. Birth
&lt;·011Lrol a lone, sa)s D r. :Vlacldo.,. c;ould n·t ,;olvc the
prob lems of 1\iolfe Count y, l)lJL he adds. if ·'families
had four child ren instead of eight. we'd . in effect,
d&lt;Ju hle the per-capita income 11 iLhout raisi ng one
"i ngle additio11al stalk uf Luba(·&lt;"o ur i11creMing the
avai lable j ohs. Besides. I'd get 111o rP sleep .' ' Jll
Jan uary, 1962, Dr. .Vladdox be~a11 LPlling the rnolhe rs
11"110 come l.o his clinic abou t the new bi rlh-con trol
pill. Resul t : fn three yea rs. 1he birth ra te hns d ropp('d
by 50 percent. \v' hat's more, 1110LIH1rs nn the pill. he
fi nds. :,spruce up ,111d starl ln Lake belter r-a re of thcrnoelve:; and their Jnn1 ilics. \'i'o lfe C ,u11I) is cha ngi11g.

II ill _folk lik(· Ora I left I and Mar!faret ( r ight ) Spark.1
and th eir chi/d,-,•n. Dt. l'anf Maddox ( Jar [ ,,Jr } says, live
1cith some of the si111plicit_y of th.Pir r11u;estors. lch o _iirsl
l rekk,•d inlo this hill country 011 I he h r,,•ls oj Ua nie/ 800111· .
P ROIJCCED BY LA L"RA IH, RCO l . JST
P I-IOTOGRAPHEO B \

]UH :-S \'i-\ CI-I O'.'s

contiuued
100~ ii ' 6- 6~

77

�KF&gt;/TL 'CkY DOCTOR

/11 1/i,,

n·111r11,,

hill,.

1/,,. II/ail i.~ slil/ rl,·/i1•cred

bF

n1tt!v. To r russ u ri1•1•r.

Or. ,l/11dd11.r wu/1.-s II s1n1_1"i11g.
v/cJ.j".shi1111,·d Sll'ingin{!. bridp,,~.

"Some folks never knevv there ,vas a
vvay to stop having kids vvholesale."

Mrs. Uel{lhiu 'lulso11 . .3:!. 1dwsc lrn,ba11d t{oes marginal jarming, had 11i11,, d1ililn·11.
&lt;111// hus n ul b,·en pr,·gnant sine,-.

.'i/11· Ui'g1111 taking th" pill in Jr111.11ary. /',ih2.

Y111111.,: 1·011ples like Darrr!l and Ri1u Hals,,y had 111J ,111alms about 1tc1·,,pting 1/i,,
11ill. suys 11/addox . 7ko J"l'ftrs married , thl'y hare onr&gt; child.

'" l"111 a hillbilh my~elf. .. ~ays Dr. }laddux. who came fru111 ncarhy Ellio tt Co unt) . '· [ belo n1" bere... He speaks the la11gua;?;e ,if his
patients . people like Margar et Sparks. 1,hose rou ngest. fo-abv is
four rnun ths old. S lw was o ne nf thf' prel:liest. smartest girls i11 lier
;.;c1e11tli-;,:rade ,-la ss when shr· quit ~d1uol, at 12. lo rna rr). TIH-'11
slw had Pigh t ba)Jies in a row. Mrs. Spar ks is s till a pret t1 1,unrn11

�:1/ar;uu ,·t 1111d Orn S1111rl:s.
U"itl, S&lt;'I ,.,, 11j 1/wi, ,·i;tl//

11111 ii ., he !'mile.;: Slw ha,- lu,-1 mu~t of her tee lh fro Ill ,·hildhcarin;.:.
Hn husba11d Ora. :17. i« 1111,re Pnterpri·• i11µ- tlrnn rna11 ~ of the 111&lt;·11
in \\"lfe Cou 11l _1 . 1d1n :,,i111pl_1 µ- i,·p up c1 11d live u11 1d1ate \ er 111'!fan• 111Ter,-. I le l'Ut, a little liml,er. and he far111::- ::-11me l1Jha,·&lt;·o.
\11\, hi,- 1,ife. ;.:ratefulh. i~ taki11;c the pill. Oldt&gt;r. 11111rr eomplir•,lfc•d kind~ of 1,irth-eontrul 111l'lliud" ju~l did nol 1,11rk. the dod,,r

f,,mul. in an an-a\\ here onh t,•11 pt·rcc11l of the home·~ h,I\ e i11door
plu111'ii11;! . .:ind eii.d11 h11111m1 l1t·i 11;,!S 111.11 lil't' .-r, ,11clPil i11 lt&gt; a l110r&lt;11l111 lwu-c. "i\ 1.,1 11[ prople 1u11u11d li Pn' arc fatali~tif'_-- Dr.
\ladd o'\ '-'1\:-. "Tlw~ fil!-ure a lot l)r I.id~ \Ill:- jusl tlir 11a~ it \\a~
me,111I lo hr. \nd hc·lir,·e it or not. ma11 _\ "f them ne1t·r hrard
l\('f111,· tha t tlinl' '""' an\' 11u_1 ln sl1Jp ha1 in/.! kid, 11hule~nle ...

,.f,i/d,-,•11.

11

ho rut1f:!.&lt;' jrom

Jm11-ll1t111/lt -11/d fl,,11111·
111 A111h,•1i11,·. 1:; I ri,,.!tt J.

1,.b

79

�KENTUCKY DOCTOR

co:--11.xlrrn

"In cities, medicine is a competitive
business. Here, I'm really needed.''

Dr. Maddox e.xaminrs 81-y mr-old ./,•sse Dunn . who come in complaining
he 1ws "smulherir,g." Diagnosis: shortn ess of breath.

lie delivers r111uth1·r bab_y in the " bruodPr'' - t'.g .. l/la/('/'/lity ruo,11 . Fell'
mothers com.e fur ore1wtal cart' , si.mplv shou.· up tn {(iue bidh .

Dr. Maddox li vt'.:- r ig ht above l1is clinic. with his wife and four sons. and
if he gels five hours sleep a night he's grateful. Three buzzes from a nurseassista111 is tfw signal that a lady int.he "brooder" room- ma ternity wardis ready lo g ive birth. J1Ios1 cxpt:dant mo thers never come down from the
ftills fo r prenatal care, but show up when the y're ready to deliver.
I " They' re prct ly smart about "hen they're due," sa ys the doctor.) Oflicially, his office hours stretch from 8 a.m. Lo 9 p.m., but he's on call 24hours a day. ~even davs a week. AL dawn, Lhe jalopies start chugging up
the drivewa)·- and by 9 :30 a.m. on an a verage day, he may have seen 14
patients . He &lt;'ha rr\·es S2 to .$ 3 fo r a visit, $60 for a delivery, including
a11esthesin. circumc ision of the male baby a nd an eight-hour stay in the
·' brooder" morn. He also figures he delive rs 400 babies a year free. Even
al tl1ese low. lo w prices, since Jul). 1953, the unpnid hills have lotaled
s1,1.1.noo_ whic h he reckons he'll collect ill "hcavc11."
" '\'i/ a y-aL look who's here to see us." he g reets each new patient,
11Jovi11g s low and easv. never ruliled. He saves time by seldom sitting
clown. and talking his medical records into a dictaphone. To fetch thee:,;tre me ly ill lo the c·li11 ie. he's arranged with the loeal funeral director to
bring !hem in the hearse - at a charge o-f $].
''/olfe Cou111 y. he savs. is just as ''unde rdevel()ped" us nn y poor Latin An:ie1·ican nalio11. State and welfare fond s. which ha ve poured i11 he re hy
!he mill io ns . nre o nl y a stopg ap- and he thinks ac tuall y hurl. " An y time the
Government pays a farmer for doing nothing, like not planting tobacco,
ir's d o ing 1,im an in j ustice. A man of 1-0. sa~·- in good health, loa b fo r three
or four years. gains weight 011 starc hy welfare food. prelly soo11 his joinls
stiffen 11p with a rthritis, and he can't work and he's lost LIH~ha h it. A 1ro1nnn
11 hose hus band 'deserts' her often collccls rnore welfa re moner thn11 the
fami lv 1\ ou lcl if he worked. So he goes o ff to li ve in a c-abin ove r the hill
a11d s1waks back. uccasiona lh·. to produce more babies." The salvation
for \\'o lfe Cou1111. which has 11ever kn01r11 anylh ing hut depression: small

80

I OOK ll-• 6-65

industr) and rea l j obs. Wh r 1101, Dr. iWaddox &gt;&lt;uggesls. allracl 11ew business with Lc11-year ta x exemp tions. as did Puerlo Hico whe n it launched
its enormously successfu l "Operation Bootstrap" ?
Ever y thing co11t.ributes to the poverty cycle. The b right ·-young ' uns '·
leave. a "brain drain" he compa res to Cuha 's o r Eastern German y's. Even
now, there aren ' I "25 people in the whole county. with some 6.500 inhabitants, who care about its problems or can do somethin g about them." And
so. in addition lo doclor i11gsome 30.000 patients drawn from three counties.
D r . Maddox is a o ne-man uplift program. His $ 360-a-year fee for al.tending sch ool-board meetings goes as a prize to the county's best teache r,
for "espr it d e &lt;'o r ps is important, a feeling o f pride. tl-ial you're produc ing." Why did he settle here? " These hillbillies lrns l me because l 'm o ne
of them. I could ne, er havP been a doclor if it hadn't been for the Gl bill
o f rights. In the big cities. med icine is n competitive bus iness. Here. l ' m
renllv needed, I'm performing man y services. I can cure 12 s ick people
in my clinic- while some surgeon is taking out a /!all bladder inn J.exington
hospital." 1-fe·s offe red vo un g doctors, fresh out of medical schooL a $l00a -month s ubs iclv just to sel up praclice in ~ .To!-fe Counl ) . ·' You ca11 go fi shing a l ot of the time." is his sah.:s Lalk. "J u:;l take some of the patients . a
little o f the load." Thus far, no take rs .
'Tm not s ure an r thing m ud , can lie dorw f,11 the olde r peo ple, exc;epl keep them a li n : and try to make Life a little_ bette r for them whi le
t:lwv·re he re. The hope is for the yo ung ones. the nc:-.. t gm1eration. 1f 11t·
can break the povert y c·." ·lc. help the m fro m hn1·ing· too rnCTrn mouths to
feed, there's a chance L!ieir kids can get some sehoolin;,; and b reak out. Because sure a s s hooting. if \I t:' clon'L. !he kids 1, ill go 011 1,elfare a11d live
the s nme life as their parents ." This said, he ducks inlo a con~ulli11g roo111
lo ta lk with a lad y who has j ust had he r seventh child , and whose hus band
is paralyzed and on relief. " Now, ) ou need a nother bah)_-· Dr. ;viaclclu:-;
te lls he r.. ·' Jike a hole in the head. Let me te ll } o u about these pills ... _..

�Hr.. . ·:,1.'l,: i , .{:ii.e:...,~130 {~ , President
'l:hc L-.::~·•.:...,v : 1 1.:2 Ht..dub::m Socie t y

Loui £villc , Keut i.:.cky
Dear Merle :
Louisv ille 1,u u.u.b:;:1. $:)c i,,::~y O'- ;"- · ..; ·~iJ.0 c onuc..i.--uc:·d :.m o f
&lt;1..:.i... ::m tll( :1e ...· n i ·ru: . :£ '· .•l c. t ~,U J ..h!i ~L~r 1 s l'.:.:;::&gt;l utio•• ;;iet :i:'0 .1.....~L 1:i::1.2·~ :ia&gt;0i·J i..u1..:i: ,~, t ,.c ~J:&lt;3m:1.c~rcs u;:;o..:.n.s t
\:he l:...U~.

n

t,•,

TlJllJ'..k ~ou 10,·~
Wlt h b~

V

rae thin doc ument.

i ~ e s,

Sincerely ,

Ca rl D. Perki ns , M, C.

CDP: rf'

�894 STARKS B UI L DING

455 SOUTH F OURTH STf-lEET

LOUISV I LLE, KENTUCKY 4 0202

November JO , 1967

Mr . Carl D. Perkins
2252 Rayburn Building
Washington, D. c. 20515
Dea.r Carl:

I was requested by the Louisville Audubon
Soci ety to forward the enclosed Resolution
to you for such consideration as you can
g ive to it .
Kindest regards .
Cordiall y yours ,
~

-1 ,,,
71/€-~-

Me rle E. Robertson
MER/dla
Encl.

�At a special called meeting of the Board of Directors of the newly formed
Louisville Audubon Society (membership in excess of 1,600), the following
Resolution was unanimously adopted,
WHEREAS , the U. S. Corps of Engineers h as begun acquisition · of land to erect
a dam on the Red River above Nada, Kentucky , which action has b een authorized by
Congress under the 1962 Flood Control Act after public hearings had been held in
the area around 1954 and in 1963, and
WHEREAS, these hearings were local in nature and held at a time when this
location was merely a name on the map, and
WHEREAS, the majority of our citizens were unaware of the spectacular scenic
features of this Red River Gorge which would be· crestroyed by the impoundment and/
or rendered inaccessible through inundation of Ky, Road 77 which parallels the
Red River Valley floor, and
WHEREAS, two arguments fo·r this dam (namely, 1, A water supply source for
Lexington and other communities, and 2. Flood protection for Clay City) have been
advanced,
THEREFORE, be i t resolved that we respectfully ·petition- our· seven Kentucky
representatives in Congress, our two Senators , our ·Governor and the Chief of the
U.S. Corps of Engineers to· delay further action until up-to-date studies · can be
made of alternate sites and plans, which will accomplish -the •·two objectives
mentioned above without destroying the unique flora, fauna and geologic features
of this region,
We do this not in a desire to hold up any progress, · but· in- order to present
up- to-date studies at public hearings , since many cit iz-ens have an awareness of
and interest in the s i tuation which did not exist previuusly.
We do this in conformance with the objectives of the· National Audubon S-ociety,
to preserve for posterity ·those esthetic and irreplaceable values which cannot be
measured in dollars , and with ful l confidence that the U. S . Corps of Engineers
can accomplish these goals by suitable structures· e·lsewhere,

-The ·Louisville Audubon Society

November 1 / 1967

77l~£.9~
Merle E . Robertson , President

Herbert Van Arsdale, II, Acting Secretary

~ J. ~ ~ -

Carl T. Fischer, Jr., Vice President

�M::· ~ Villiam C. Johnstone
192') Lowell Avenue
LO'liSvi l l e' Kr-!nt ucky
Dear Mr. Johnst:xi.e :

I gr eatly apprect a.t e your
setting f'orth your rcuaona f
the R8' River nim.

r
Vt'mlber 22
rttnz const r uction of

! n3ree wit h evel'"''
of
e ~ ints you made . I also
conti nue t ,:, suP.Ir-)rt t . dam
Y® r o.r gume.n ts ehoul.d be a ll
t he more convi nci ng b ause f yo ur e=c:perience i n c~nserva.tion ,ror'!t a.TJ.d you o1H
proci atton and. enj oyment of t he
sceni c beaut y
a in a rea .

Wit h beet

Sincerely,

Oarl D. Perki ns , M. C.
ODP:rf

�November 22, 1967

l:bnorable Carl Perkins
House Office Building
Washington , D. C.
Dear Congressman:

In re :

Red River Dam

Background and Interest
I write as one with a long interest in the conservation and wise use
of our natural resources . My interest dates back into the 20's and 30 1 s when
I saw and experienced the ravages of uncontrolled water, which began in the
watersheds of our small streams and rivers.
I am familiar with the Red River area. As an Agronanist at the University
of Kentucky (1937-1952), I vK&gt;rl&lt;:ed with the farmers in the lowlands below the
gorge. I saw their crops wiped out too often by untimely floods and helped
them divert _part of their plowland from corn to improved pastures by introducing Ky. 31 Fescue (discovered in adjoining Menifee County) . I roamed the
hills of the Red River gorge 25 years ago and saw in it a beauty spot for
nature lovers. I consider myself a true conservationist -- one who believes
in making the fullest, widest and wisest use of our national assets, not
one who merely wants to keep the status quo of nature.
'!'re Red River Dam - I approve.

I am in favor of t he Red River dam and reservoir because:
1. It is an important part of a long range plan to control and utilize
the water resources of our country. With our growing :p:,pulation, water management is the JTOSt im:p:,rtant factor in the orderly development of our natural
resources .

2. It will accelerate the proper use and development of a large area
of level land below the dam. Because of the hazards of over-flow, this area
has not been properly and fully utilized. Kentucky, with its shortage of level
land, needs this type of agricultural developnent .
3. It will protect the town of Clay City and encourage the industrial
development of the area.

�Page 2

November 22, 1967

4. It will add stability to the water supply of cities and corrmunities
along and near the Kentucky River from the junction of the Red River to its
confluence with the Ohio. In periods of drought the Kentucky now becorres little
m:,re than a stagnant cesspool. The Red River reservoir, together with others,
as tributaries of the Kentucky, will make possible the full development of the
Kentucky River which with its palisades, is one of the m:ist beautiful in
lmlerica.
5 • Too lake formed by the darn will enhance, not mar, the beauty of the
hills St.lrI'Qunding it • None of our present lakes could compare with the beauty
of it.

6. It will not upset the balance of nature. On the other hand, by providing a constant supply of water, it will overcome the shortage of water in the
extended periods of drought -- such as occurred in 1930. Wildlife, will still
have hills, streams, and forests, plus the lake, to inhabit.

7. It will provide the greatest good to the greatest number, which is,
denocracy in action.
8. For hikers, bird watchers, and other nature lovers, there are :rrany
alternatives. The Breaks of the Rockcastle, the Falls of Bad Branch, and headwaters of the Little Sandy and others have beauty, ruggedness, and wildlife
equal to or exceeding that of the Red River. They are ~rthy of enthusiastic
exploration.

I urge you to do all in your power to accelerate the construction of the
Red River darn -- not to delay it. It is needed as an integral part of our
progress.

�!-tr . C. A. C:&gt;lc:.. r.

Pr ocidcut
Kentucr..y River Devel opioont Association
I£axi11t,t:;)n ,

en'1.1uc y

Dea l:' Fr::.encl:

Like ) ou, I have heard n v 1ru...i'.Jli!,/ that "l,rould p ersuade
~ vi ew t
t t
·ver rem shoald be

rue t o C.iJi:lll&amp;0

c:m:.t ..·uct eJ.. I c::itiree tJ..ldt tllo
serv:Jlr i s ne~...ted i'Q•r i 'J.OOd
cont rol and ,1c:1t e r SU.l,).I,) ,
·rd. uivia.euu., it vould
u.t t ract t ouriot s wh:;) w
of cre::a.t ec~n :&gt;rui c help t ~ the
people of t hat a rea .

W1th bes t o
S-lncerely,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.
CDP: ri'

�KENTUCKY RIVER DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

PRESIDENT

November 21, 1967

CARUTHERS A, COLEMAN, SR.
L£XINGT0N

VICE·PRESIOENTB

E, E. FREEMAN
WINCHEBT.£R

JUDGE IRVINE TURNER
JACKSON

H. K. ROGERS
F°AANKFORT

WILLIAM B. STURGILL
HAZARD

SECRETARY
VAN H. RENEAU
BEATTYVILLE

TREASURER
R. W. SMITH
IRVINI:

DIRECTOR OF ENGINEER.INCl

H. A. SPALDING
HAZARD

DIRECTORS Cf' PUBLIC!TY

M. H, HOLLIDAY, JR,
.JACKS □ N

FRED BULLARO
HAZARD

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
House Office Building
Washington, D. C. 20002
Dear Carl:
I am surprised to see all of this adverse publicity about
the Red River Dam. As you know, this dam is one of the
many up river dams that our - association has proposed and
supported for the last ten or twelve years. Our position
is still unchanged. We think the local people in the
valleys of these respective rivers and creeks should be
protected first from destructive floods.
It is our
position that if this is done, floods on the Kentucky
River will cease, and the cities in the Kentucky River
Valley, who depend on it for water, would be amply protected.

DIRECTORS

A. R, BARBER
HAZARD

JAMES HALL
STANTON

CLYDE CORNELIUS
81!!:'ATTYVI LL!:

ARCH MAINOUS

All of this outside influence and protest fails to give
any consideration to the people most vitally affected;
namely, the farmers of the Red River Valley and the
residents of Clay City.

LE:XINGTCN

JOE MORGAN
BO □ NEVILL.E

ROLAND PRICE
WHITE■ BURll

GARNIS SACH
JACKSON

CLAY BISHOP

E~gineers have already made their study, and we support
their conclusions. The Association will appreciate your
efforts to offset this outside interference in an already
approved program.

MANCHEST~R

Cordially,

REX FARMER
HYDEN

OR. W. C, CLOYD

KENTUCKY RIVER DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

RICHMOND

BEN CORNELIUS
IRVINE:

C. A. Coleman
President
pgg

�ALTERNATE FLOOD CONTROL

...

PLAN

KENTUCKY RIVER VALLEY
OY"

KfNTUCKY RIVER DEVfLOPMfNT As,oCIATION

"•""'-e

•,I .,._,.,.••,,. J,,...,.~,,,.,,,:. ~.e~,11,c

,~,,&amp;&gt; ~...

N ..~ -

~A;,f ......
- ~..

&amp;Ht..R.
HAZA••, IC'TJrrn'UCkl
J0•2A•l.9#1

�\

November 20, 191&gt;7

MH. Walt.er Chenault

Pine Ridp., Kentucq 4JJ60

Deu Mrs. Chen&amp;ult:
I •lladtoba'ftfO\ll'lat.

GPN••lnl 1111 oppoattion
club

w

the proposal t o bui ,

YVll&amp;...a

thoe t

~rl3th

the
rs ot you
on the Red River.

Yov, Yleva OD tbi• c:·t)ir:a\ edft:n1&amp;111•• will be
bal phl. W me when
s to t he House Ploor

for a v.ote.

y

With best wie

Carl D. Perkin.a,, M•. C.
CDP:'ff

����V

NOWl'nber 20,

1957

Mr. Hopi' l4. BUboul', Chat.ran

Kentucey Cb&amp;pter
The Nature con.servancy

Bex 5005
Uniw·n lty station

Lexington, Kent ucky 4e5o6

'l'hank you

~ 07!

st?nd.1 ~
he rte sol ution a dopted
ot The .·. tu.re Cons~:e-va.ncy at 1ts

by the Kantuoky C'h a-pter

e.ess1on October 13

a.uKQ
l .

in mi nd ~tc ,o ppol;)itio:1 your
oposal t o 'bu i l d a dam on t he
rtiat t e-r eorr:es bef ore t he Hou~e -f'or e. vote .

I 1-r-1 11 be g l-•

8J'OU.P hi.a expre$ .
He.d Ri ver when

to

o

·

_

Si.n&lt;lere ly ,.

CVl D. Per kins, M. C.
CDP:rr
\

\

'

\
I
I

J
I

\

�KENTUCKY CHAPTER
Box 5005
Uni versi ty Station
Lexington, Ky . 4 0506

November 17, 19 67

Rep . Carl Perkins
House of Representatives
House Office Building
Washington, D. C.
Dear Rep. Perkm s:
I am enclosing a copy of a resolution passed unarnbmously
by the members of the Kentucky Chapter of The Nature Conservancy in
attendance at the annual meeting at Rough River State Park, Kentucky,
on October 13-14, 1967.

Roger W. Barbour
Chairman
RWB;erp

�The Kentucky Chapter of The Nature Conservancy at its annual
fall meeting at Rough River State Park on October 14, 19 67, adopted
the following resolution:
Whereas the United States Army Corps of Engineers has been
empowered to construct a multipurpose dam which will flood the gorge of
Red River in parts of Powell and Menifee counties, Kentucky, and
Whereas the impoundment would destroy one of the truly wild
rivers left in the eastern United States, seriously damage or destroy the
attendant flora and fauna, and irreparably impair the scenic grandeuF of
the area, and
Whereas the gorge, statements to the public by otherwise
responsible people to the contrary notwithstanding, is unique, and
equivalent areas are not to be found, and
Whereas the impoundment will flood the scenic road used by
thousands of visitors annually, and the topography is such as to render
an alternate seenic route not feasible, and
Whereas there are alternative methods of flood control in the
lower reaches of Red River and alternative sources of water supply for
downriver cities and towns,
Therefore, be it resolved that the chapter recommends that
construction of said dam be held in abeyance pending a fair and impartial
survey of the values and alternatives involved, and
Further be it resolved that a copy of this resolution be spread
upon the minutes of the Chapter, and copies of the resolution be sent to
the Kentucky Members of the United States Senate and House, the
Secretary of the Interior of the United States, the Commanding Officer
of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and the Governor of
Kentucky.

�Mr. J Obn Eliu

;ol.6 conatance Drive

Valley
Deal'

station, K ~ 40?72

John:

years .

It was good t o bear ...,_.r.v-,,- .
r t i tte.n
Yes , 1 had a. most p
. ....., ..u-t with your

I ho vi

father at !fa.rdburly.

am

gl.a.d

yo

in opposition

to the propoled dam on ha Re Rivu•. I will keep
yov.r apposition in mi ni
1e time comes to caH
a vote on t hie
lon.

Since r¢ly,

Cari D. Perki ns, X. C.
CDP:ff

�•

I

November 16, 1967
Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington 25 , D. C.
Dear Carl :
I realize that it has been at l east fifteen
years since I ' ve seen you , there fore , I ' m sure that this
will come as ~ui te a surprise hearing from me.
Had a good talk with Dad about seeing you ,
and t he get- together at Hardburly. Wish I could have been
there.
The mai n reason I ' m wri ting is about the
Red River Proj ect. I feel that a great injustice is being
done to the people of Kentucky , if this project be allowed
to continue. So I am urging you to do all within your
power to prevent this project ' s completion .
Dad and all

my

family sends their regards.
Sincerely ,

~- 4 ~

John Elias
5016 Const ance Dr i ve
Valley Stati on , Kentucky

40272

�~iovember 21, 1967

Mr. Roacoe C. 'DaYU

Davis B!'os. Ke•zyon !\uto St ore
157 !ain Street
!'. O.

,OX

~

8)2

Ra:&gt;:ard, Kentucky

Dear Roscoe:
I an se'ld_ng, under ~
the book "Outcloora USA" rent

•

~

e cowr a copy of
in your letter of

1;ovember 15th.

twas interest
in ur discussi on of the
merits of the proposed .. d
er ~ contrasted with
the benefits th
uld
f'rom one on the Uortb Fork
of tbe Kentuc
ver ! wu al.80 i nterested in your tour
thro\lgll t he go
.-ec :tly with the dele~tion ot the
league of Kent,.,vt11~~trirtsmen and the ~ecut:tve Director
of the National Wildlife Federation.
With ey best w1shes,
Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins , M.
CDP:rr

c.

�DAVIS BROS. KENYON AUTO STORE
HOME OWNED BY ROSCOE AND BILL DAVIS

HARDW ARE

*

ELECTRICA L &amp; PLUMBING
SUPPLIES *
SPORTING GOODS * FARM IMPLEMENTS

AUTO PA RTS &amp; ACCESSORI ES

* HOME APPLIANCES

Pho ne 436-2811

Mail Code NO. 41701

157 MAIN STREET - P. 0 . BOX 812

HAZARD, KENTUCKY

11/15/67
Hon Carl D.Perkins
Washing ton,D.c.
Dear Carl:
Glad to hea r from you,also ~lad that you rece i ved a letter
f rom ColWessels.Also g lad to know that he gave you some enlightment
in regard to what I knew had been stated, 1 only hope that it .will be
something to get us started on flood control here in this valley.
This past week end I went along with many otheres from various
parts of the state to tour the Red River project that is gaining a lot
of publicity.Thomas Kimball, Executive Director Of The Nati onal mildlife Federe.tion from Washing ton was down. I made t h is tour i nstead of
the one coming up this week wi th Chi elf Justice Douglas.
The League Of Ky Sportsmen ha d a dele@:ation to ~o along w5th
Mr Kimball last week,we heard many stories of the flooding of Red Biver
from the Assocications Atty ~r Dwight Pendleton from that area. None i n
our party offered any thinv. at that time against the proposed p roject.
But many like my self was wondering how i t came to the front so_fast.
As it was stated that they had been t i nkering about flood control s i nce 1952. 0f course we here have been doing it since 1927. Tn the Lexi ngton
Herald of this date some several articles were wri tten in regard to t h e
benefits that would be dervi ved from thi s constructton of the Red Ri ver
Dam. Sunday I heard such remarks,Lexi ng ton is boostin~ this project,also
bi g business is behind it ,others stated that if Lexin~ton wa s going to
face a water crisis in the near future they felt that other sources for wae
ter would be avaliable,such as the North Fork Of The Ky Rlver ,yet off er
more to more people than Red River Dam coul d offer. Also hea rd t h e cost
of this would be very small,others stated sure it would becaus e the ~ov
owned most of all the land as it was in the boundaries of t h e Daniel
Boone National Forest . Many was in doubts about the cost plus benefits
as the Corps of Engi neers has always stated. I didnt find out from any one
if the valuation of the land had been determined to the acreage that
this dam would take i n,that was in the over a ll cost of around eleven
mi llion dollars. Did hear that it would be one of the cheapest of all
the Corps undertakings.Also i nto days paper i t stated t hat 1300 people
i n Clay City was wonderi n g what was ~oing to happen to them. if' this
project fa i led. Of course you know that we have more people living on
t he outskirts of Hazard such as Lothair , Walkertown,and many o the rs
tha t live in the rural a reas that surround us.
Others stated that it was a Pork Barr el dea l t hat prompoted
this project over so many others,this I have no way o~ knowi ng . N9i ther
care. Did overhea r that several Mfgs were pl anni n g on moving into that
T HE STORE WITH FRIENOLY AND COURTEOUS SERVICE

�DAVIS BROS. KENYON AUTO STORE
HOME OWNED BY ROSCOE AND BILL DAVIS

HARDWARE

*

ELECTRICA L &amp; PLUMBING
SUPPLIES * AUTO PA RTS &amp; ACC ESSORIES
SPORTING GOODS * FARM IMPLEMENTS * HOME APPLIANCES

P hone 436-2811

Mail Code NO. 417Ul

157 M A IN STREET - P. 0 . BOX 812 -

#

HAZARD,KENTUCKY

2

area,beleive their Atty told Mr Kimball that at least there was i n
consideration about thirteen. One is already operating. 1~1hi ch was the
Lycoming Corp.Think they are shoe M~gs.
I would have really like d to have gone along with Chief Justice
Douglas this week,but I have a deer hunt ing tr ip planned,hRve al ready postponed it too long from the stand poi nt of weather. ~o J
will let them and others take this tour,they are g oin~ to meet a
lot of opposition of them being there,whi ch we didnt have last
week,we had fine cooperation . I think I can see some what throu~h
it all,why there i s no opposition in regard to thi s project,Carl i t doesnt
take away any thing from the i r people.It is qui te different from what
you ran into wi th Carrs Fork Reservior.Since the Gov owns all the
property,naturally you cant expect any opposition to such a project.
I do hate to see such Natural Resources destroyed,when the same thin~
could be acheived here on our stream. Or any where else,if this was the
last resort i t would be different.
Sorry to take up so much of your t ime,but feel thi s is a v ital i ssue
that I feel some things you should know about in your own area . I am
enclosing a Notati on from the National Wildlife Resources in re gard
to a book tha t is soon to come out.

Sincerely.

~~ .

Roscoe c/navis.

THE STORE WITH FRIENDLY AND COURTEOUS SERVICE

�"OUTDOORS USA" -- THE 1967 USDA YEARBOOK
More than 200 guests , representing the Congress, private con servation organizations, government agencies, and the press,
joined Secretary of Agriculture Orville L. Freeman on October 26
for an official pre view of the 1967 USDA Yearbook -- "Outdoors
USA." Held at the headquarters of the National Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C., the reception was sponsored by the
Natural Resources Council of America.
Continuing a tradition started in 1849, the new Yearbook contains a wealth of information, beautifully illustrated , of
interest to not only farmers but all persons interested in conservation and the outdoors.
"I know you will like this book,"
said Secretary Freeman in presenting the first copies to those
attending the preview ceremonies, "because it deals with
adventure, beauty, and people .
This is as it should be. We
seek to conserve and improve Outdoors America -- and to enhance
our citizens' appreciation of it -- not for the sake of land
and water -- or wildlife, g ame, cattle and sheep -- but for the
people's sake .
Conservation is for people. People are the
beginning and the end of it. Man is the conserver and unless
his efforts make him happier, more secure , healthier in body
and spirit, it is all so much wasted effort . This is a book
for all Americans -- for citizens concerned about conservation
of our natural resources, for hunters and fishermen, for family
campers, for all who are concerned with the quality of the
total environment, for children eager to learn about the outdoors, for farmers interested in profit - making recreation
enterprises."
"Outdoors USA" contains 408 pages of text, illustrated with
over 220 black and white photographs, plus a section with 43
color photographs. There are 109 chapters under four headings:
The Big Woods, Water, Beautification, and The Countryside .
Most of the authors are Department of Agriculture specialists,
but there are also chapters by university faculty members, outdoor writers, and officials of other governme nt agencies. For
the first time in Yearbook history, one of the authors is a
youngster -- 12 year old John Sbarbara III, of Radnor, Pa. When
he was 10, he and his family enjoyed their first farm vacation
in southwe stern Oklahoma. John kept a diary during the vacation and, at the suggestion of his mate rnal grandfather, Lloyd
E . Partain , of the Soil Conservation Service, he wrote a piece
and submitted it to Jack Hayes , Editor of the Yearbook .
It
was accepte d and, along with Mrs. E.D. Pearce, President of the
General Federation of Women' s Clubs, author Johnny Sbarbara
attended the preview and personally received one of the first
public . copie_.§, px_esent@..d by. ~~cr,.etary; Fy e ~ ma;1: .
Senators and Congressmen hav e limited numbers of Yearbooks
for free distribution to constituents. Additional copies may
also be obtained for $2 . 75 each from the Superintendent of
Documents, Government Pr'inting Office, Washington, D.C. 20402~
I\.-~

·~.

...

~J

�* ** * * ** * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * ** ** ** *

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

*
*

*
*

*

*
*

*
*
*

*

*

*
*

*
*

*

*
*
*
*

* * *

PENFOLD ELECTED CHAIRMAN OF NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL

*

*
*
*
**

Joseph W. Penfold, Conservation Director of the Izaak
Walton League of Americ a, was elected Chairman of the Natural *
Resources Council of America during the group's annual meeting*
at Milford , Pa. in early Octobe r . Penfold succeeds Fred E.
*
Hornaday, consultant to the American Forestry Association .
*
NRC is an association of major national and regional conser*
vation organizations, ranging from the American Alpine Club
*
to the World Wildlife Fund.
*

*

Other officers named to lead the Council during the coming *
year were : Richard H. Stroud, Executive Vice-President of the*
Sport Fishing Institute, elected to the office of Vice-Chair- *
man ; Daniel A. Poole, Secretary of the Wildlife Management
*
Institute, re-elected NRC Secretary; and Dr. Robert F . Hutton,*
Executive Secretary of the American Fisheries Society, re*
elected NRC Treasurer. Named to serve on the Executive Com*
mittee, in addition to the officers, were: Past Chairman
*
Hornaday; Gordon K. Zimmerman, National Association of Soil
*
and Water Conservation Districts; and Stewart M. Brandborg,
*
The Wilderness Society.
*

*

*

Using the theme, nNRc in the Third Decade," representatives*
of Council member organizations discussed a number of conser- *
vation issues and problems during their annual meeting.
*
Topics included the work of the Public Land Law Review Com*
mission, mining law problems, Land and Water Conservation
*
Fund inadequacies, estuarine policy and water quality, the
*
Federal Water Pollution Control Program , the Classification
*
and Multiple Use Act for public lands, and state standards
*
for water quality . Actions taken by the group included agree-*
ment to sponsorship of a reception in honor of the U.S.
*
Department of Agriculture's 1967 "Yearbook" to be published
*
October 26, and an expression to the Congress~ in suppo~t of
*
extending the work of the Public Land Law Review Commission,
*
providing a similar extension is given the Classification and *
Multiple Use Act of 1964.
*

*

*

*
*

*
*

*

*
*
*
*
*

*

*•

(

*

*

*

*

* *

*

*

**

*

** **** ***

*

*****

* * * *

**

WILDLIFE REFUGE RE-NAMED TO HONOR DING DARLING
The Sanibel National Wildlife Refuge, established December~ 1945
in Lee County, Fla. , has been renamed the J. N. "Ding" Dar ling Nationa 1
Wildlife Refuge , in honor of the former chief of the Bureau of Biological Surve y and first president of the National Wildlife Federation.
Darling was largely responsible for initiating the National Wildlife
Refuge System which now numbers more than 300 units and includes more 1
than 28 million acres . The System is administered b y the Bureau of
'
Sport Fisheries and Wildlife.
Page

14

�Mr . J ames G. Taul bee, President

Wol fe C:&gt;unty Kiwanis Club
Campt on, Kentucky
~ r Mr. Taulbee:

plete agreement about
shGuld be b utl. , P

Wtth

bestY

R1ver

nam.

I believe i t

11

Sincerel y ,

Carl D. Perkins , M.
CDP:r f

c.

�1==::~========-----campton, Kentucky
November 13, 1967
Hon. tyndon B• Johnson
?.resident or united states
Washington, D•C•
Mr. President:
I have been authorized by the v;olfe county Kiv,anis club to write
you a letter concerning the construction of a dam for water reservoir
in the Red River gorge. our club voted to support you and others in
this construction and we believe that when comploted this dam will be
a great aesthetic and economic asset to \7olfe , powell and Menifee
counties .
we believe that the beauty of this gorge will bo enhanced by the
waters from this reservoir and that by way of boats and trails, remote
scenic points can easily be seen.
FUrther, we are of the opinion that when this project ls comploted
that the unique scenic views together with the sports and recreation
which water affords, will attract thousands of tourists to this gorge .
we hope that you will see that money is appropriated for this project
and that i t is completed at the earliest pos s ible date.
sincerely yours ,

copies to :
stewart Udall, secretary of rnterior
John Sherman cooper, u.s. senator
earl D• ".Perkins, Representative
John watts, Representative

J

�N::&gt;v-e mber 24, 1967

Mr . Lon B. R~gers

P . o. Box 181
Pi keville , Kent ucky 41501
Dear llG;

You know wha t a hi gh opin
have
your j ud(3Illent.
Hence, t a:m impressed by ;rou r. / W'l,~ 1'1"t'. t hat :,our t rip through
tha Red atver Gor ge convinc
a dam should not be placed
t here . I t is, aa y~u soy, a
dly beaut1i'ul. aree..
Thank you f'or

,f

sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins, M.

CDP: rf

a.

�LON

B. ROGERS
P.

o. aox

101

PIKEVILLE. KY.

41501

OFFICE 437-6479

November 20, 1967

RESIDENCE 437- 4628

Honorable Carl D. Perkins, M.
House Office Bldg.
Washington, D. c.

c.

Dear Carl:
After a trip through the Hed River Gorge on Saturday
afternoon by car, Mrs . Rogers and I have decided that the
g orge ought to pe preserved, and that alternate sites should
be considered for the dam or dams. This is one of the prettiest
short drives in the country.
No, we did not join Justice Douglas and his pretty
ffii.fe on the Hike, nor did we see them, but we drove from
Slade interchange, via Nada, and the tunnel up the gorge and
out at Sky Bridge to Mt. Parkway near the Dessie Scott Home.
It is truly a wildly bea:u tiful area and should be
preserved. I hope it is not too late. If the Army Engineers
can des1troy the Red River Gorge, they can destroy Cumberland
Falls, and even our Beloved Breaks of
I hope you will use your influ
River Gorge .
Best wishes always,

Lon B. Rogers.

save the Red

�:

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1967

C

49

•

Conservationists Rallying Against a Dam i-n
By BEN A. FRANKLIN
Special to The New York Times

PINE RIDGE, Ky., Nov. 19
-An aroused species of urban animal - the weekend
wood,sman and his wifeinvaded · the wilderness forest of Daniel Boone here this
weekend to demonstrate for
the preservation of solitude.
The protest by organized
conservationists stirred an
angry counterdemonstration
in the deep woods by local
people in this rustic region
between the Appalachian
Mountains and Kentucky's
bluegrass country. Forest
Service officials said it was
fortunate that no one had
been shot.
The issue that brought
William 0. Douglas, !Associate
Justice of the United States
Supreme Court, his wife
Cathy and about 400 other
nature lovers-most of them
from cities-on the protest
hike into the Daniel Boone
National Forest is a bitterly
contested flood control dam
planned by We Army Corps
of Engineers in the wild Red
River gorge.
Two Factions Mingled

The conservationists were
opposed by local people from
Powell, Wolfe and Menifee
Counties who support the
dam. Both factions mingled
in a traffic jam of, on the
one hand, sports cars and
family sedans bearing outdoors club emblems and, on
the other, dusty pickup trucks
narrow Forest Service
on
access road.
One Forest Service official
said many of the nearby resi•
dents were armed. The only
incident, a barrage of firecrackers, made the hikers
flinch.
The anticonservationist, prodam forces carried placards
that said "DAM the Gorge."
They freely .damned Justice
Douglas and "the · bird and
bee nuts" for what they consider is meddling after 13
years of patient workin~ and
waiting by local comm1tte~s
to obtain flood relief that 1s
now almost a reality. The
Red River dam is scheduled
for construction starting in
March.

a

The New York Times (by Georoe Tam&lt;!s)

Supreme Court Justice William 0. Douglas in Red River
Gorge. He backed Sierra Club's opposition to dam project.

Hunters Invade Catskills

See Issue of Survival

The issue, according to the
program forces, is their survival- "scenery or people".
The alternatives, they say,
are a 16-mile-long reservoir
that would reduce downstream flooding and enhance
the area with a heavily used
~

-----

-

.

spots in the country which
we must do all wee can to
save."
The dispute has perplexed
informed Federal officials in
the
Washington
because
timing
of
the protest,
launched only a few months
ago by the Kentucky chapter
of the Sierra Club, has raised
questions about the adequacy
of the prolonged hearing and
authorization process, which
began in 1954. Until last
August, no objection to the
dam had been raised in
countless preparatory proceedings.
Timing Questioned

"What is genuinely disturbing," one Washington official
said, "is that if only onetenth of what the Sierra Club
says about the damage to
Red River gorge is true, why
was this not raised along the
line since 1954? Is this true of
all Corps of Engineers projects, or many of them? Why
didn't the Forest Service
speak up for preservation?
We don't know."
Officials of Kentucky's
newly organized Sierra Club,
headed by James Kowalsky
of Union College, in Barbour•
ville, say they were not
aware of the dam proposal
because it had received little
publicity. Recently the plans
were changed__...to add a $3-

The New York Times

Nov.20.1967

Dam would be built at cross
million, 8-foot elevation to
the dam to hold back millions of gallons of water for
Lexington, Frankfort and a
-UMOP S&lt;lf.l!O J,HflO uazop
stream.
Even this arrangement, negotiated with the Corps of
Engineers by the Kentucky
Water Resources Authority,
received little or no publicity

until the contract was
signed. The authority is not
required to hold and did not
hold public hearings. Col.
James A. Thetford, who
heads the authority, is a retired officer of the Corps of
Engineers.
'Entirely Neutral'
At the corps's district office in Louisville a spokesman defended the agency's
role in the dispute as "entirely neutral."
'"If Congress says build a
dam, we are going .to build
it," the official said .. "We are
never for a project or against
it except on a factual basis
- whether the cost of the
dam will be returned in benefits from reduced flood damage, better water quality and
recreational use."
It was this attitude of the
corps and the cost-benefit
formulas enacted by Congress
under which it must operate
-formulas that exclude any
consideration of esthetic or
wilderness - preservation values-that drew the wrath of
the demonstrators here.
The Sierra Club contends
that the Red River is a primeval stream, tranquil for
most of the year as it flows
between vertical sandstone
bluffs 500 feet high and
along musty, narrow bottomland.

Some local residents denounced the conservation group

�• ~ a o-'lJJ. L

U

J!'C l l~ 1

By DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Special to The New York Times

I

ouay

Tvc1 ~uonar-ic;O\."C', v, cc rv-~t..

that would attract many people anyhow-because of the
publicity generated by the
antidam group-and a continuation of annual floods
that have resulted in millions
of dollars of damage.
At the maximum water
level the reservoir would
inundate most of the primitive gorge and its tributaries.
Kentucky conservationists
call it "the Grand Canyon of
the East." Justice Douglas
during yesterday's protest
hike proclaimed it "cne of
the great untamed beaut.Y.

MARGARETVILLE, N. Y~ whole valley will sound like
Nov. 19-"Many of the hunters Vietnam," says Max Kass,
come up here with a $5 bill owner of a sprawling motel
and a set of underwear and complex on Route 30 a few
they don't change either one miles out of Margaretville. Mr.
till they get back to the city,"JKass expects a bonanza in the
a grizzled mountaineer com- next few days, since he can put
plained today.
up 230 hunters.
.
Most hunters, however, arHe was t~lkmg ab?ut the rive well supplied and manyl
army of red-Jacketed city men j
_ _
Mrs. Douglas, left, accompanied her husband on the tour. Plans to dam the Red River, which would flood scenic gorge, have been in works since 1954,
who will temporarily abandon Continued on Page 95, Column 3
their wives and steam-heated
apartments tomorrow for a trek
into
Catskills
where deer,
they
will the
shoot
white-tailed
black bear, wild turkeys, a few
Quotation of th e Day
The Other News
cows and, occasionally, each
other, on opening day of the
"We must take with both hands the opportunity
International
hunting season.
now presented to us."-Prime Minister Wilson. [1:6-7.]
Commanders weigh motive of
Once they get here, they will
enemy's big drive. Page 3
find mountain towns and vilMember of Yemeni Republican
Kennedy assails U.S. health- Japanese licensed to make
lages all but deserted. In the
Council resigns.
Page 6
care programs.
Page 22
H.I.S. men's wear. Page 72
snow-robed catskills, almost!
The police used a helicopter
Pressure builds in Karamanlis
A reading problem is hard to Industry forms council to
everyone goes hunting in the
yesterday to beat down tall
to
return
to
Greece.
Page
11
detect.
Page
42
help farmers.
Page 72 grass and flush two teen-agers
first few days of the season.
Pope Paul made his first public appearance Grivas leaves Cyprus for
The only residents who don't International
Small Business: Running a who authorities said had gone
Religion
talks
in
Athens.
Page
13
since
his
operation
Nov.
4,
speaking
to
a
are those who cater to hunters'
ballet school.
Page 72 into hiding after leaping from
In a move designed to protect the dollar in
Negro priest celebrates the
needs or who are afraid of the wake of Britain's devaluation of the crowd, of 25,000 in St. Peter's Square from British devaluation step ends
a stolen car in the Broad ChanPersonal
Fjnance:
Expenses
orthodox
liturgy.
Page
33
a 3-year effort.
Page 74
the window of his study. [1:5.]
armed city slickers.
pound, the Federal Reserve System yesterday
of the retired.
Page 72 nel section of Queens.
France's late support irri tates
A musements and t he A rts More liberalized world trade
'Like the Ser;es'
The boys surrendered when
announced the increase in the discount rate N ational
Britain.
Page 75
"Report From lron MounPage 72 the wind from helicopter's
is urged.
"It's like the first day of lhe to 4½ per cent from 4 per cent. The disTentative settlement of the two-month Market to pursue talks on
tain" is reviewed. Page 45 Dutch investors are upset by rotor blades flattened the 10World Series," says Albert count rate, which is the amount commercial technicians strike against the American
Britain's bid.
Page 75
Bosley Crowther is named
frauds.
Page 72 foot-tall grass and reeds on
Weiss, editor of The Catskill banks pay to borrow money from the Fed- Broadcasting Company was announced in Devaluation to help Americritic
emeritus.
Page
58
Mountain News. "During the eral Reserve System, is one of the basic Washington by the Federal Mediation and
Survey
finds
closer
watch
of Jamaica Bay's marshy shorecan tourists.
Page 75
and stripped away their
Patchen play staged by
daytime, just about everybody interest rates in the economy, and its in- Conciliation Service. The terms of the agreedirectorships.
Page 72 land
Threshold, lnc.
Page 59 October's gain in personal hiding plce.
disappears.''
crease is expected to raise the cost of money ment to end the walkout by 1,500 urfion Government and Politics
Three other teen-age boy,s
Throughout a five - county for borrowers throughout the country. Ca- members were withheld. After a vote by the Pentagon grounded 600 F-105
Negro troupe announces fourincome lags.
Page 72
mountain region, barbershops nadian bank officials announced a similar union members early this week, a return to
play season.
Page 59 Greece makes bid for foreign had been captured a few minbombers
in
1964.
Page
5
utes earlier by policemen who
will be closed, garages will increase. [Page 1, Column 6-8.)
Harkness Ballet closes its
investors.
Page 72 chased the stolen car and its
work is expected by next weekend. [1:1.)
Romney says President erred
be shuttered, production will
season.
Page
61
Bond
interest
rates
seem
sure
A
compromise
Senate
bill
that
would
on Vietnam.
Page 28
On the Continent, the Finance Ministers of
five occupants about two mile,s
plummet at saw mills and furCesare Siepi sings at Hunter
to rise.
Page 72 through Howard Beach and
niture factories, and milk will the six Common Market countries, including greatly extend Federal jurisdiction over the General
College.
Page
61
·
Pa~
Pa'!' Broad Channel.
sour on the dairy farms and France, agreed to contribute to the Sl.4-bil- country's meat supply and that goes well
Charles Lloyo Quartet plays Ad•. News. .....
77 Over the Counter 71
lion Joan that Britain wants from the Inter- beyond a House-passed bill emerged today. Navy is key force in San
According to the police, Pain the processing plants.
Dl•idends
...
...
.
71
Personal
Finance
72
in the Village.
Page 61
Diego enocy.
Page 2
trolmen Jack Winograd and
Most mountain high schools national Monetary Fund. Michel Debri~. the Administration officials hailed the stronger
S ports
John Speller were cruising
will be empty of 16- and 17- French Minister of Economy and Finance, measure, which now goes to the Senate Antimissile base sites to be
Society
discussed.
Page 15
along Cross Bay Boulevard
year-old boys, many of whom was the chairman of the unusual night meet- Agriculture Committee. [23:1-2.)
Susan P. Kennedy married to Giants beat Steelers, 28-20, when they saw five boys in a
Peace Corps to appeal draftwill receive academic permis- ing in Paris. [l :6-8.)
lose Frederickson. Page 62
Metropolitan
Lanie!
G.
Ibarra.
Page
54
ing of volunteers. Page 16
car that had been reported'
sion to go hunting the first
Speaking on television from 10 Downing
Ruth Lande is wed to Stanley Minniear, a substitute back, stolen two days earlier from
The New York State Board of Regents
few days of this week.
steal Giant show. Page 62
Street, Prime Minister Harold Wilson asked issued a blueprint to reorganize and reform Carbon monoxide fumes kill
Page
54
Shuman.
the Fresh Meadows section of
three in motel.
Page 18
Industries as far away as
British people last night to respond to the state's urban schools. The board asked
Barbara Tabak and Robert Undefeated Colts turn back Queens.
Binghamton to the west and the
A malaise is found to stalk
Lions
by
41-7.
Page
62
the
devaluation
by
working
harder
and
less
Berger are wed.
Page 54
policemen pursued the
Kingston on the east-those
the Legislature for $11-million for the reform
Northeast.
Page 27
Packer defense stops. 49ers, carThe
southward to First Road
that have not adjusted their selfishly, for their country's good. "This is a proposals, but warned that this would only Philadelphia N.A.A.C.P. asks
Fashi
o11s
and
Home
13-0;
Starr hurt. Page 62 and Cross Bay Boulevard, where
vacation schedules to the sea- proud nation," he said. "We're on our own make a small dent in the problem. The
Rizzo's ouster.
Page 34
Humor, insight mark encyclo- 93-yard pass play marks 30-3 they forced it to a halt. The
son-may find that a sucden now. It means putting Britain first." Mean- changes would drastically affect public edu- City antipoverty official asvictory by Bears. Page 62 five boys in the car jumped
pedia on wines.
Page 56
plague has reduced their healthy wh;1e, the first signs of a political storm cation at all levels, and include the establishsails Johnson.
Page 37
Box carries room full of infla- Jets defeat Patriots, 29-24; out and scattered, but one 14over the decision were appearing, with de- ment of an urban teacher corps. [l:l.)
work force to a trickle.
Copter's air blast helps police
Snell is injured. Page 63 year-old boy was caught
Page 56
table furniture.
mands for Mr. Wilson's resignation. [1:6-7.J
125,000 Are Expected
Mayor Lindsay intervened personally in
capture pair.
Page 49
Doll makers are set for the Raiders conquer Dolphins on quickly.
Spain
devalued
its
currency
by
16.6
per
the stalemated taxi contract dispute, calling Hunting season starts today
John J. Whalen, regional
Coast, 31 to 17.
Page63
Patrolman Winograd chased
holidays.
Page 56
in the Catskills.
Page 49
game manager for the Stat_e cent, in another repercussion of the British representatives of the Taxi Drivers Union
Eagles rout Saints, 48-21, as two other boys and caught them
devaluation.
The
move
puts
the
Spanish
Obi
t
uaries
and
of
75
fleet
owner
groups
to
a
night
Kibitzing reigns at youngsters'
Conservation Department, estiSnead excels.
Page 64 near a cluster of summer cotGeorge Hoefer, jazz writer Rangers face North Stars in tages where he found them
mates that about 125,000 hunt- peseta at the value of 70 to the dollar, com- session at City Hall. Unionized cab drivers
chess tourney.
Page 52
pared
with
60
previously
[1:7.]
in the city have threatened to strike tomor- Progress described in oral hisand disk collector. Page 47
ers will clutter the mountains
game at Garden. Page 66 knee-deep in icy water. The
ln Washington, General William C. West- row night if there is no agreement on a new
Dr. Edward Flemming, obste- Greek-Americans hold Czechs police said one boy was 16 and
during the two-week season. Of
tory project.
Page 57
trician, gynecologist.Page 47
these, 90,000 will come from moreland said that United States and South contract by then. [l :2-3.)
'
to 0-0 soccer tie. Page 67 the other 15 years old.
the outside. The rest will be Vietnamese forces were now "winning a war
A drug insurance plan that would cover Industry and Labor
Meanwhile, the helicopter,
Filipino
driver
killed
in
race
Financial and B usiness
mountain people.
by Ralph Manee, had
of attrition." The American military com- the cost of prescriptions for members was Soviet completes test of 60at Macao.
Page 68 piloted
m.p.h. hydrofoil. Page 93
Steel mills report big auto
"Only one in IO hunters will mander in Vietnam predicted that the U.S. announced by the Associated Hospital Servbeen
summoned
to help find the
actually bag a deer," Mr. mi_ght be able to begin withdrawing troops ice of New York (Blue Cross). A Blue Cross E ducation and W elfare
orders.
Page 72 English springer spaniel wins remaining two boys. Two
open
field
trial.
Page
69
Whalen says. "We figure that from South Vietnam in two years or less if •vice president estimated that initially 300,youths were spotted on the
Tennessee, U.S.C. top rivals west side of Cross Bay Boulethis make each deer worth t'1c bombing of North Vietnam continues, and 000 persons would be enrolled in the plan, Nation's college campuses
for
football
crown.
Page
70
have
a
new
mood.
Page
1
about $100, based on the pro- if the South Vietnamese Army is strength- if it is approved by the state, and if enough
vard hiding in the tall grass and
Universities asked for publicreeds.
rated cost of the hunter's equip- en'?d. [1:5.]
drugstores agree to participate. [1:2.]
Man
in
the
N
ews
service philosophy. Page 53
When the hovering helicopter
ment over several years and i
"Foreign Affairs" - C. L.
Speaking
in
the
Bronx,
Senator
Robert
F.
l
n
Vietnam
itsetf,
in
the
17th
day
of
fightGeorge
Wilchen
Romney,
enighad flattened the grass and exthe amount of money he spends
Sulzberger reviews trends
Health and Science
ing
in
the
Central
Highlands,
South
VietnaKennedy
called
America's
health
care
promatic candidate. Page 29 posed the boys to view, the coup here."
in the news abroad every
Archeological finds delay
pilot, Robert Clendenning, orAbout 75 per cent of the mese paratroopers drove a North Vietnamese grams a "national failure." (22:4-5.)
Analysis
and Comment
Monday,
Wednesday
and
Portions of eight of 38 previously secret
highway in Israel. Page 9
dered the boys through a bull
12,000 deer expected to fall force from a hill overlooking Dakto. South
Editorials and Letters to the horn to move to higher ground.
Saturday in The New York
this season will be killed the Vietnamese paratroopers and infantry had letters from the martyred German theologian Soviet flight around the
Editor.
Page 46. The boys followed the helicopmoon is expected. Page 14
T imes.
first day. Most of them will go struggled for four days to take the hill. Dietrich Bonhoeffer to his fianc~e will be
Fred Hechinger en school de- ter to a knoll and were a~
American troops engaged the enemy in sev- published here today by the Union Theolog- United Fund reports progress
to local people.
centralizatioa plan. Page 46 rested there.
in city hospitals. Page 21
ical Seminary. [l:6-8.)
"For the next few days, this eral areas of the Highlands. [1:4.)

I

I
==-=======::::;::===========================================================================
Copter's Air Blast
Flushes Out 2 Boys
I
Sought in Car Theft

I

!

I °l

�•.,.. :'"'"'-l~· K. T.l" 'i.nc
~·~,.o R ·.r1 ,:-, , : • Ur:!.,.e
Ar,hlanc1, Kentucky

~~t

You ,rcll
'
on cJ.l !&gt;Ublic
queot.:. ~nr-. Hence: I ii':- .1)1.c .r ,~
hc·.-c ~--;y_:r vlc1rs in
:np:,"'.ti~n to c•o:1r-t::ix•tion
, r-11 on ·;;he Red Rl vcr .
We d :a, ns ;:rou
I h

-on w.v

to "Cccpt~

Wit h hest~

h:1rd. tine l3st wee!;:.

ur invttatt:&gt;n to &lt;&gt;.all ~m you.

e~

'Y

Sincerely,

Carl D. Perki ns, M. C.
CDP:rf

�dhfJand, !J(£tduaky

//-/1-G?

�Ll&lt;! Fred I:. 1'iJ.©:1zzi
t. :,~·, &lt;.:tty of Im::tngtou

H?!1:)I•

C?rn?:t001:c,1lth ;Jf K~n~ ticlcy
1£::iug'..:'.)n, Kcrrturky

~

f'.m on rec-:&gt;i"cl m'.,j~ ~ s u~:t..; J..u fo.V;)r
r ."am. I ru,1 pJ_,~atl
t'r 14 dtocussin,.; the
bcne!'icicl e:!'i"cctr.
:.-o., ~" · ·-w~ultl !11.lve ~n
L~::-d.n,;t~n , :; ,,a'v0.c . l c1;''!,)l.,·.

r

::&gt;:f c~n::;ru~tioa o:f the .2"' ·~
t~ r,a"."'! yom· lcttc..· :., , M·:r · ••

Sln--crcly,

Cnrl D. Pcrkinc,
CIP:rf

?,:. c.

�F" R E D E . F" UGA ZZ I
MAYOR

November 14, 1967

The Honorable Carl D. Perkins
The House of Representatives
House Office Building
Washington, D. C.
Dear Mr. Perkins:
While there are many reasons, insofar as the City of Lexington
is concerned why we would like to see the Red River Dam built as
speedily as possible, I want to discuss with you the one that we
consider the most important--our city's future water supply. We
believe, too, that we are expressing the wishes of all downriver
cities which must depend upon t he Kentucky River for their water.
In 1930, when Lexington was perhaps one-third its present
size, industrially and from a population viewpoint, a serious drought
occurred. We are advised by the Corps of Engineers that the Red
River Dam is just one of a series of impoundments in Eas t ern Kentucky
that will take care of al l the needs of the Kentucky River watershed
when built . The first dam to be built in this chain is the Red River,
and engineers guarantee that this will take care of all our city's
needs until the year 2000. Some of those opposin g the impoundment
say that this term of years is "inconsequential", but we cannot agree
with this statement . Should a drought of the proportions of that of
1930 occur before the dam is bui l t, our city and the cities below us
on the Kentucky would encounter a most serious water shortage. Within my life time , I hope, we shal l see Lexington a city of 300,000
population , with proportionate growths recorded by our downriver
neighbors.
Further, in view of Lexington's fast growing population,
it should a l so be taken into consideration that a lake of this size
would provide enough constant flow of water to take care of the
effluent from our disposal water . Frankly, Lexington and the dozen
or more other cities and towns downriver cannot face the possibilit y
of being without an adequate water supply and the proper means for
disposal of our waste water.
The Red River Dam should be built with all speed. Opponen t s of
the project say that other methods can be followed to get water;
that other dams can be built. But they are not realis t ic in any
degree. They know, but have not spoken out on the subject, that it
took 13 years to get the Red River Dam to its present stage of development and that o u r cities, grow i ng rapidly each year, cannot wait
a n other such period, or any period, while new plans are discussed.
Besides, the Red River Dam is just one of a series that will take
care of the water needs of all our people at some future date when
a severe drought strikes our land.

�The Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
- 2 -

November 14, 1967

Lexington and other downriver cities must depend entirely on
the Kentucky River for its future drinking water and water for
industry.
I believe in conservation, but think that conservation
of water for future needs is paramount to any other consideration,
particularly when unnecessary delay could bring a water famine to
our area. Any decision on this matter must consider what will
accomplish the most good for the greatest number of our citizens.
While the Red River is a beautiful scenic area, it must be kept in
mind that the river can become an ugly, destructive, uncontrollable
river in time of flood.
Please use your best efforts to get this
project under way at the earliest possibly moment.
Even that may
be too late.
Sincerely yours,

JJ?~~

Fred E. Fugazzi, Mayor
FEF:es

�1,ovci;;her

7, 19 7

M.c • E. E. 13,.ica

Presiuent , Wolfe Cotmty
~

Imp1•o ve.im. Ass::&gt;cl ation
Cao.pt on , Kent ucky
Dear Mr. Bach:

Tl'1ank :fOt. f o r 1ncludin~·
vere sent copies o:t yo..n· le

you knov , I

Asso
o n'

gree co.::iJ;&gt;letely

Co unty l :.~ro...-et:1e11t

Bed River G;)r~e.

i

u

ill.! list of th:&gt;se ,,ho
President J :&gt;nnson. As

the vieus of the Wol f e
t b uilding a dam in the

With l:c:,t wi ohes ,

Sinccrefy,

Cdr l D. Perki ns, M. C.
CDP: rf

�oampton, Kentucky
November .3, 1967
Hon. UY'lldon B• Johnson
President of trnitod states
washington, D• C
near )?resident:

I have been authorized by the Wolfe oounty Improvement Association

to write you a letter concerning the construction of a dam in the
Red River oorge.

our Association voted unanimously to support your action in this
construction and we believe that vrhen completed, this dam ,vill be
a great asset to Wolfe, Powell and Menifee counties.
we are of the opinion that the waters of this project will create
far more scenic places than it will destroy. In fact, the water
will provide roadways whereby boats will have access to parts of
the · gorge which now, by reason of ruggedness, moat people do not
seo.
we are making every effort to promote and increase tourism in this
section. Also we have hopes of getting a small factory in this
section. That is, in our county seat. Federal a.id fo~ farmers,
for schools and for road construction, has increased greatly the
production potential in this county.
The completion of a Red River nam will greatly improve and
strengthen our economy. At such time Tourism will be increased
one-hundred-fold•
It appears that most of the objections to the buildi ng of this
dam are coming from outside. complaints from people who are not
fully aware of the facts and from groups of people who may have
ulterior motives.
e trust that you will see to it that money for this work is
made available and that construction is continued until completed.
sJ.nce~ely , yo"2;? ~
Frliaa~ w~
unty
Improvement Association

copies to:
sec. Stewar t Udall
sen. John Sherman cooper
Representative, oarl ]Perkins
R9presentative, John O• watts

'

�November 7, 1967

Mr. D:ma l d B. S'hel t on , Architect

1391 Lee st j wtl Road
Lexi ngt on , Kentucky 40508
~

r Mr . Shelt::&gt;n :

I t was good of you t o s

e yo

2 advocating r eductions i n feel
d r:,ppi ng o f the p r::&gt;p~se d Re

o"
8~

Thank ~ u

~~r~

With best

w -1-

y

t li

letter of November

xpcnditures i n gene ral and
in p.lr t i cuJ.ar .

il.!le a nd trouble to vrite me.

~

S1ncerely,

Carl D. Perltins , M. C.

CDP: rf

�ARCHITECT

•

ENGINEER

•

A N D

ASSOCIATES

DONALD
CARL

N.

B .

SHELTON

AIA

ELLIOTT

N O V E MB E R
Second
1967
The Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House Office Building
Washington, D.C.
Dear Congressman Perkins:
It appears that it is of vital consequence to our nation that our energies
and monies are wisely spent.
I greatly urge you to insist on major spending cuts at this time in our
history. I feel this move is of particular concern at this time .
I believe that figures show the average wage-earner is working from January
through the best part of May to pay the taxes taken by our governments before
he reaches a point where he can spend or save for himself (considering a full
year). Just a short three or four years ago, when I began watching this
calendarization of the total taxes taken from us, the governments' portion
only went through a part of April. This appears to be both a great and an unhealthy increase.
There are some very fine people in government jobs, but I believe it is readily
apparent by the very nature of 'no profit or loss motive', that it is impossible
to get anywhere near the value for services or work accomplished from government expenditures as you get from well-run private enterprise. This is, of
course, speaking of the general picture.
By the very nature of the non- existant limits to the governments' spending,
except the collective vote of Congress under all of the pressures to spend so
much money for so many good things, it appears that we will have to some day
soon put a percentage limitation of the nation ' s gross on the total the
governments can spend, and then a percentage on the total percentage of the
gross national product that the governments can tax.

1 3 9 1

A R E A

LEESTOWN
CODE

606

R O A D

•

•

TELEPHONE

LEXINGTON.
254-3481

Ky .

AND

4 0 5 0 8

254 - 3 4 82

�Continued
Page Two
The governments would then be faced with a budget in which it would be a
matter of whether to spend here or there, rather than one in which it is
just a question of whether to spend or not to spend .
We are already past the desirable percentage. The percent of a man's
salary or wages taken is a form of control of this part of each working
individual's life, and his time invested.
One area that could bear the closest scrutiny and supervision, is the cocalled 'pork-barrel' spending. This too often not only wastes money, but
is to my mind, destructive, rather than creative, in a heart-rending way . I
can say without hesitation that the Red River Dam should not be built as now
planned and located. It would be a great waste of our state's best natural
resources for generations - and a most unnecessary one! Please halt the
Red River Dam as now planned so a better and true determination can be achieved.
I hope that we citizens soon can have something to look forward to, and each
year getting healthier and better instead of the tax and spend situation
getting progressively worse.
Very sincerely,

Donald B. Shelton, Architect
DBS : ewl

�J

.ilr. P....&gt;gei• W. fu.rb:nir
Aocor.t..tc P...•:&gt;{'ca;~~
u~1i•ro1•3ity- of K&lt;:.lt.l!.:,\}"

Le.x'"ln,,?t,on, ltetltucl;, 1~0506

I aA°lclrc and. 1-ocpcct J'.
c:.nt...ou t~ t lla ,n.ld
ru.•.n.~. Co:r ·.
ap_&gt;1·e~lu.t1.. ;rou:,." n.:vion
• 11 tal-.ini ..~he time t:ll
, :&gt;v.hL ·.;.l tl."y t::&gt; couvi 4ee me I
o}, u.lu c},.,n,:;.- i:r..:,· 12inJ ~ ·ho • p:locd dwn. You ore,

beauty ~1. tl1c: ~1

!nd~ed, most x,e1"'.,ue.st • D I genuinol,y bolieve t he
bcnef.i.t3 tl'ut thiJ .:o:;;, :&gt;11". ould b r ;,ng tc; t hat aroa of
Easte1.111 Kcntu.c
i t h·
li"i;e i-ating i •tJ n.e.tc.ra.l 'lx4.u.t.f,
:r~'lr exceed. o.ey " .-•a toot oir;ht be done.

tWLceroly,

Carl D. Per,.tno , U. C•

CDP: rf

�UNIVERSITY OF KEN T UCK Y
LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40506

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
D EPARTMEN T O F ZOOLOGY

October 27, 1967

Representative Carl Perki ns
U. S . House Office Building
Washington, D . C.
Dear Rep. Perkins:
It seems that you favor the construction of a multipurpose dam
in the lower reaches of Re d River Gorge in eastern Kentucky. As a private
citizen, I should like to prevail upon you to change your mind, and to do
all in your power to prevent the construction of the dam . It will be too late
only when the impounded water has destroyed the flora, the fauna, and the
scenic beauty of the gorge .
There h ave been many statements in the press, both pro and con
about the proposed dam, and many ai each side have been considerably
exaggerated. Two that I have heard many times are particularly absurd :
1) There are many other areas in eastern Kentucky that are

comparable to Red River Gorge . I was born and grew up
in eastern Kentucky, and have spent nearly my entire
professional life in the general area . The south fork of
'.the Cumberland River above Devil's Jump comes nearest
being comparable, but is considerably different, in flora,
in fauna, and in overall appearance . The gorge of Laurel
Creek in Elliot County is a miniature of Red River . Rockcastle River in places exhibits similarities to the Red,
but these areas are much less extensive, and lack the
scenic beauty of the Red River Gorge. The Red River
Gorge has no peers.
2) The Red River Gorge is little used, with only about 5 00
visitors per year. I cannot remember my introduction to
the Gorge, but I do know that it has been over 30 years
since I first entered the region with a college class . I
was a student at the time, but led my own college class
first into the gorge in 19 39. Since joining the staff of
the Universi ty of Kentucky in 1950, I alone have been
responsible for more than 500 visitors a year to Red River
Gorge.

�October 27, 1967
2

I live in Lexington: I own property here: I 've lived here for
17 years, a nd expect to retire and die here. I have as great an interes t
in an adequate water supply for Lexing ton as anyone. I will not presume
to tell the engineers where to build their dams for water supply, but there
must s urely be feasible s ites other than in Red River Gorge .
I cannot speak with conviction on flood control , for I have no
first-hand exp erience . I h a ve always chosen to live and bring up my
children above the high-water mark.
As a privat e c i tizen, with a love for and a not inconsiderable
knowledge of Red River Gorge and its attendant flora. and fauna, I request
t hat you do all in your power to preserve this magnificent gorge for
posterity.
Sincerely,

t;cui!~~
Roger W . Barbour, Ph . D .
Associate Professor
RWB:erp

�Red Ri ver Darn
Clon~l FPrd AndP r son callP.d 0cbobPr 27 to sav ho ha 3
noticed nowsoaoer st JriPS about opposition to dam , i ncluding
march by Justic9 Dou~las so~ for Novembor .
Anderson says En~inoPrs arP en~agod in acouiring land .
The have spent $680,000 in advancP-d engineering and m.mrb
design .

fne re is ,.,pJJ0 , 000 in 1968 budg t , most of which

will go for land acouisition.

0

rhat mak s about 1 million
0

out of the tota l cost of $11 , 100 , 000.
No construction constra cts hav9 b~ n l~t .
0

RLR

�Oct~ber 16, 1967

M~. C~nley Sorrell

Canpton, Kentucky 41301
Dear .Mr. Sorr el l :

f

~

It ·was t houghtful of you to
the S,Jllda.y Hem l d•Leader.

October 11 wich ae&lt;nmpe.nt

the ediwrlal
ct.ate

e lipping.

ur note of

Wi th bes t 1-l is hes,

y
ODPs jf

o

stnoerel)',
Carl D, Perkins, M, 0 ,

~

��,I

..:·-=-:.:.:.·.:..·-=
- ..:·....:.:·-.:..··:..:·-:_,:_:-:.:-::-:::-:::~_ __ _ _ _~ ·face ~ great industrial and tourist boom because of · the building of the Red River Reservoi r. Some day the stale will
build a slate park on this impoundmcnt and we predict that
it will have the tourist drawing
By HERNDON J. EVANS
tural state. But only a Iew of about niue miles. upstream cover tJ1e hillsides.
river certainly will not be des- power of any existing _state park.
Herald Editor
them ever _have seen th_e gorge. above the da_m site, is like auy All Otis beauty will be pre- troyed. The huge boulders that The lake will be bigger than
r have just revisited the Red AI~er ~ trip thro1;1gb tins gorge, other small river or l a rge creek. served and made available lo in centuries past have rolled _Dewey and Buckhorn poured
River Valley center of a con- I J OJD with the U111led States De- I can take . you to 50 such thousands of persons each week down to the water's ed"'e still rnto one and the scenery will
troversy inv~lving conservation partment of the . Interior's Bur- streams in Eas~er!l Kentuc½y ~vho will visit the area. Noth- will be there as they "aiways surpass that of Lake Cumber- ·
minded members of the wide- cau of Recreation, the Corps and to many similar ones 1b mg of beauty is Jost in i mpound- have been.
land.
spread Sierra Clubs of Amer- of Engineers and with others hilly areas of other parts .of our ing the stream. As of now, the We have the engineers' word lf yot~ should wish lo sec th is
ica and slate and federal offi- who a~tually_ have seen the state. You see _the same scenery heavy growth of t rees, vines and for tJ1is because !he lake will area this would be a wondet:flll
cials who want to impound the yalley, rn saymg tl!at the build- and the trce-lrncd shore lh~t weeds almost blots out the river not extend Car enough upstreain time of the year to g?· Drive
waters of this beautiful stream mg of a 172-foot high dam mil you see along Elkhor1_1 Creek m ,1s it winds its way towa rd the to destroy the scenic beauty of to Slade on the Mountam Parkas another reservoir to guaran- enhance rather than hurt . the the Blue Grass section, part1- shoals, or "white water" u p- this gorge. Some parts may be way and take Sta!C 15 to Nada
tee our future water supply.
scenic beauty of the Red Rwer cularly around Fra~kfort. To stream. Herc again misinforma- inundated a few feet, to be sure where you tur~ right and take
I have visited various parts Valley. The starthng beauty of ?ay that the Red Rive~ gorge lion has spurred Siena clubbcrs but the engineers estimate that State 77, passing through the
of this valley in the past but the area to be cover~d to form is t!1e .only s~1ch ar~a 1n Ken- and otl1ers bent on "saving" the at least 11 miles of rough wat- long highway tunnel. You !hen
this time I started at the site of the 2,200-acre Jake will be seen tucky is a gross 1msstatemeot Red River to carry on the fiaht ers above the Jake will take can take State 715 lo Sky Bndge
the proposed dam and traveled by milli?ns of visitors to the of fact.
even after federal officials h;ve care of all the hardy souls who and the!1ce to Pinc Ridge wh~re
upstream to the upper reaches area durmg the years after the Woodlands enhance the beau- said that the dam· will be. built want to hike or carry canoes be- you slnkc the Parkway agam.
of the river.
dam is completed, instead of by ty. of Reel River along tl~is nine- to prevent floods, to provide tween the pools of water that
At the intersection of ?7 an?
There is no question of the a . few hundred . ~::?rsons who mile stretch but there 1s noth- drinking water and industrial will be found there. The gorge 715 y~u ca n follow the r iver_ if
beauty of this region. Fall col- might w1s.h to v1s1t the gorge 111g here that can not be sc~n use water for Lexington and will not be destroyed. The miles you wish. Along the roads wh!ch
ors were in full sway in many on foot or Ill a canoe.
111 hundreds of . other places rn other downstream cities. and to of river below the dam still will follow the nver you c11n find
places and the ri,·er, while at
Seven From The Dam
our sta~c. The_ real beauty_ o( tie in with a chain of l akes that be the same as they are today. places to park and wa)k down
lo\v c?b _because of a lack of In the fir~t place, ti.le propos- the :eg10'.1 1s !n _the t_o~vermg, will guarantee fres h waler from As Edmund Burgher, retired to the_strc~m. For the fll~st sevraillfa ,1, 1s one that has great ed lake will be about seven mult1colo1ed ch£fs, particularly Kentucky's mountains at least weekly newspaper editor of the en miles 1t may be like any
app_cal lo nature lovers. Sic~ra mil~s long from lhe dam, local- in the late aftern~ons w,h~n the until the year 2000. The): say, Clay City Times declared along other stream. bt!t ~~.r the ar~;
1Cluo members, armed withed m Powell County about 1.5 sun bathes the cl!ffs, J),ihsadcs too, that no scenery Will be the journey " now we can have a)J?VC the lake _it 1,11! be mao·
more misinformation tha n miles downstream from the Red and rock format!ons Jn_ golds "destroyed," and everyone who our cake a~d cat it too." Also n1(1cent And, if you can hold
facts, seek to preserve this riv- River's junction with Indian and purples and intens1f1cs the visits the region will be forced accompauyill" me ,{,ere Geor"c Ot!t until 1972 you can make the ,
er, ils huge houlders, its high Creek to the "while waters." beauty of the colorful gums, su- to agree.
!3illill''s Jict;11c1 corresponde~tt tnp by b?at
1011 (romththe,, darn1 lo
cliffs and palisades in thcit· na- The river in th is area, and for macs, _dogwoods and oaks lhat The "white waler" part of the and ;o~tmaster of Stanton, an~l • ~;;ite~-se,f
of
e wh t e
Green Abner, star route mail
But keep this in mind : The
earner ~nd groc?r. :\II know building of the Red -River Dam
the area mvolvcd 111 tl11s proJcct will not impai1· the scenic beauty
and a!l look forward to the ~ay of the Red River Gor ge 110 matwhen Powell County, l\lemiee tcr what the uninformed may
County and Wolfe, County will say.

- - - -- - - - - -- - -- ---'---=-- ------·-......c:-c..·_-_. :·........._........:c.,_:__ _ _.:..__ _ _ _ _ __

l

�October 12, 1967

Mr. ltxlney 'f11 Olar!~, Superintendent
Powel l (hun.t y Schoo.ls

~

Stanton, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Clark:

I am 1n e:ffl!)lete a.greeme
~

~am of FA.ucat1on

on t he Re

your l etter of October 9.

O
y

h the
Vi

wll Count y
D!url, as ~"Pressed tn

wark on this proj ect

will go foNl.l\\ steadil y .

'111th best "1sbe•

' V s1noere1¥,
Car l I&gt;. Perkins, M. C.

CDP: rf

�POWELL COUNTY SCHOOLS
RODNEY

T.

CLARK, SUPERINTENDENT

BOX 5

STANTON, KY .

October 9, 1967

Honorable Carl D. Perk in~
Member of Congress
Was hington , D. c.

Dear
The Powell County Boartl of Education of Stanton, Kentucky,
has gone on recor d favoring the construc tion of the 1-led
aiver Dam in Powe ll Couhty, Kentucky.

Not only does the ded diver, during flooding stages,
cover the bottom lands and destroy crops b u t also covers
many of the roads of the county which force the closing
of schools due to inability to operate transportation
vehicles.
We feel tha t the construction of the dam will be a great
boom to the economy of the county, creote a wonderful
r ecr eat ion area, construct a storage bas in for an adequate water supply to a number of cities in this area,
and make it possible for schools to operate without
interruptions froru •flood conditions in t he ded River
Valley .
Your help in this Project will be greatly apprecia ted.
BOA.RD OF EDUC11.TION

, 7:'erlf.~e~
RTC/ms

�Oct~ er 12, 1967

t. R:&gt;$e &gt; Pl--os1dent
Sb:tn m.st?t~ FeeemM.on
Lea.1\te o&lt;P Kentuc~t·~ SpOrtsmen
P~ O. Box 127
Clay Cit y, Kentucky 41312

•1r. F:&gt;rest

:a·.

I rnn lnn t o htlve a l e ;~
'E· t es, $P/':1"'ta.l...""'T":"Carrurer o "'
that t he Lesgu.e h.s n
l
Bed· Rtvcr n,,n.

r or33n1z3ti~n., reporti ng
l"t f or the prc;posed

Gbead:our v!etc:m!}!:5 ~

I :f:'eel sure work will move

a.

y~u ana Mr.

D1.1~~1v1

Wi th best ~

Sincere.ly ,

Carl. D. Pe:rkins., M.

CUP:rt

c.

�Fish In Every Stream
A Sportsman In Every Home

October 7 , 1967
Carl D. P erkins
Representat iv e
Se venth District
House Office , Building
Washington, D.C.
Mr. Pe rkins:
The S ixth Bistrict Federation of the League of Ken t ucky Sportsmen
voted, a t its Octobe r meeting, to gi ve full support to t he proposed
Red River Dam and Reservoir Pro ject.
The Sixth District i s composed of nineteen counti e s in Central
and Eastern Kentucky.
The Le ague would appre ciat e any help you
might g ive to this project.
Sincerely ,

~~.er~

Sixth Di strict Federat ion
League Of Ky Sportsmen

res.
t Federat
Leag ue Of Ky Sportsmen
1."R/ jbr

�October 10, 1967

Mr. H. t. S~u~lock, General Manager
East I&lt;.:entucky Rural Elcctrtc Cooperative Corp.
P.

o.

B~x

707

Winchester, Kentucky 40391

a.ar

~

Mr. S,purlock:

I ru:i glad to have the Ll....
reeordtng your organizatt:&gt;n I o Board of D5.rect~r' e 1n "':2s.:wJz- of' the Re&lt;.. River Ihm. I
a.sree 1r.i. th you o.h:lt the dam sho
be built and I feel eure
·work ,~ill nove a.head.

y

With be::t 1:iahcs I

0
y

Sincerely,

Carl D. PerkUB, M. C.
CDP: r!

�EAST KENTUCKY

RURAL ELE CTRI C COOP ERAT IVE CORPORATI ON
P. 0. Box 707 • Lexington Road

• Winchester, Kentucky 40391
Area Code 606 Tel. 744-4812

Octobers, 1967

MEMO TO :

All Persons Interested in Eastern Kentucky Development

FROM:

H. L. Spurl ock, General Manager
East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative

SUBJECT :

Red River Dam

The Red River Dam has become a point of interest and controversy i n some
areas and in recognition of this, the East Kentucky RECC Board of Director s
adopted this resolution at its meeting October 4, 1967 ;
"Noting that the proposed construction of the Red Ri ver
Dam has become a matter of great controversy in the press
and among conservation groups, the latter with whom we
usually agree, we the Board of Di r ectors of East Kentucky
Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation in meeting assembl ed
at Winchester, Kentucky, on October 4 , 1967, do h ereby
resolve to express our views to our representat i ves in
Congress and to the public generally through the press
and other public media .
Our concern is always for the conservation and enhancement
of physical, social and aesthetic values in the rural areas
of Kentucky, We feel the construction of the Red River Dam
will r esult in a substantial strengthening of these values
and that the area affected by the constructi?n of the . Red
River Dam will be improved particularly with regard to
beautification, r ecreation and flood control , There being
no issue of hydro-electric power here i nvolved, our position
therefore is taken purely in rel~tion to our vi ew of the
effect of the dam and the l ake on the public interest, otherwise than from any consideration of our continuing . ~esire
for low-cost power in rural areas of Kentucky. We are trying
to look at this as residents of t he area whose lives are most
directly affected.
We commend to our f riends in Congress and the publ ic generally
a positive approach, in regard to the construction of the Red
River Dam and believe such an approach warrants moving ahead
with the project as rapidly as reasonably possible ."
HLS : lb
Alex 8. Veech, President
Albert Dicken , Vice President
James S. Patterson. Secretary-Treasurer
H. L. Spurlock, General Manager

An Adequate Supply of Dependable, Low Cost Electri c Power for Al l of Rural Kentucky Through Cooperative Effort

�Oct::i er

J, 1967

Ur. Clr:u-ence
..
S . Miller, Cho.irman
11..r. Seltlon Shol~t , Secreta:tc-y
Region Ten Tow.•ism ~ t t e e

612
Jackson~ K.Emtuck;y 41339
l)ear Mends:
Box

k on. the Red River 1ml.
I

am

in c~lete ag~t.mel}f;) with those views.

no dou'b~

~

.s teadily and~

mi.D4, that

There is

the proj ec-~ will move forward

.

W1tb best wishes,
Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins, M.

c.

�Septombar 21,

1967

Resolution Pe.seed by Regi.on Ten Tour1sr,i Comr.tittee
in bohnlf' or Red R.i.wr ~ 1n Kentucky
~Rl--':.AS, tho Beg.\en Ten Tourism Committee, oompcsed
of nine counties ~1,-: Breathitt, Wolfe, Ousley, Estill,
lee, Poi.i8ll, Morgan, ~ifee and Magoffin.
W11EREAS,

Beeton Ten

has a coocem

tor

tourism growth

through wider ueo ot water recreation and the trequont flooding
conditions pJ'S1ent this as wall as ~sing thousands ot dollars
dmitago to cl"Ops and property.

Wl~F.EAS, the ~ River Dam proposal has t ho highest

teasibillty ratio ot

any

Corps ot Ensineer project.

\-JHE?.r:AS, indistnalists have indicated a desiro to e:xpadl
1n this area, it tho threat ot floods vatrf\ removed and more
recreational .t"t.1c1llt18s were available such as a tr.an-made dam.

Wl:IEREAS. tbsre j.s almcst total support in favor of

construction or the &amp;d Ri.ver and rooogniz1ng the need of
water for cities doWnstream. Obsrorving, there is slight
uninformed, outsi de objection to the Red River Dam.
RE:SOl.VED, that the Region Ten Tour1sm Canmittee recoomend.
to all concemed tbat, progress en the tied River Dmn bo accelerated
and not ~.red in ~y way.

�I'

October 6, 1967

Mr. Jack St.®e, Preeldent
Wlncbeste:r-Clal"k County

Chamber of Cormerce
Winchester, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Stone:

I agree vtth y ~ o•raaqti:4"ti1L'PD that the led Rivel'
tam should be buUt.

wl.'k vlll go forward

I

eteadU~ on tb1s pl'O

y

wtth best vie........'-

~

Slncerely,

Carl D. Perktu, M. C.

CDP:rf

�~eptember 26, 1967
1dnchester, Km:tu.c ky
A hbJ·.,...,UTIO!~ ENDORS I NG THF~ ~D .dIVER H£SERV'vl R
l?RvJ ,t;C1', J-OWELL COUNTY , KF... TUCKY

\1HERE'AS, the U. S .. Cor pe of Engineers has made extensive
studies on the feaaibili ty and ·che necessity for a flood control
dam on the Red ltiver in row ell County, l&lt;.:en tuclcy , w.nich, if

con~tructed, would be of incalculable value to not only the area
of l)owell County but to adjacent counties and in fact to the

Co1UULonwet.J.th of Kentuclcy as a whole in that it would,
1.

£revent the terrible and cootly flood damage which
baa occurred too often in t his area and,

2.

Provide a lake of great scenic value which widoubtedly
would promote tourism i n this section of .6a~t Kent ucky
and,

;.

Undoubtedly would be in t he l 0ng run of' great economic

value both as a tourist site and from the standpoint
of relieving financial burdens on property owners,
l ocal, · State and Federal governments in repairing the
damages occasioned i n t he past by flood ing,
NOW BE IT THE.REFORE RESOLVED, that the ,ti1,c.J.eater-Clark

County Chamber of Commer ce endor~e unanimously the proposed
f l ood Cvntrol dum on the tled Hi ver i n Powell County, !(en tucky
and u.r(se the iied Idver valley .F'lood Control Aobociation to do

______ ,,, ~vei~yti.1ing

possible to secure t h is dam and,

J:3.r.. lT f'URTflliR tU;;;vLV.iill , t hat we urge rnembera of t he United

- l -

\

�~tutes Senate representing Kentucky and C0ngressmen from
Kentucky to support and encourage u. ~. Army Corpo of Engineers
and any other interested personnel to continue this pro ject to
its £inal conclusion.
Unanimously adopted by the Ninchester-Clark County Chamber
of Co -i!lerce at a regular eeusion held Septernber 26, 1967 .

· ,1

'a.ck -&gt;tone, l:'.t·esident
inehester-Clark Cuurity

Ch&amp;.aber of Co•:.:merce

l certify that the foregoing i,l copy of .desolution passed at

regular meoting of the Winchester-Cla..tk Cuunty Chumber of Co 1ue1-·cc
Board of Directoro held September 26, 1967, at ito office in
Winchester, Kem:ucky.

-~

&lt;U-L-7:

s ./s4-tfhr.:

·· cretary

- 2 -

�Oct~'ber 6, 1967

Dr. E. E. curry, Pi-esident
Clark Rum l Elect ric Cooperative Corpomtton
P.O. Dox 748
.
Winchester, Kentucky 40391.

~

Dear Dr. Curryi

l agree With your o
Dam should be bttlt.

_ ~

I fi

on that the Red River
work will gO f o rwrd

steadily on this p

y

lfith best wt she

Sincerely,

ear l D. Perkins, M.

CDP:rt

c.

�S. M. MALONEY

DR. E.E.CURRY

SECRETARY - TREAS .

PRESlOENT

ELMER D. JOHNSON

JOHN P. GREENWADE, JR.

MAN A GER

VICE PRESIDENT

P. O. BOX 748

@ooperalive @orporalion

Winchester, Kentucky 40391

October 3, 1967

The Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Represent:atives
Washington, D. C. 20510
Sir:
We are enclosing a Resolution affirming our support for the proposed
Red River Da,m in Powell County, Ken-tucliy. The Resolution passed
by unanimous vote of the Board of Direcf;ors regular monthly board
meeting held September 26, 1967.
Sincerely yours,

EEC:ps
Enclosure

Owned By Those
We Serve

A LOCAL LY OWNED

,

L OCALLY O PERATED

•

TAX PAYING

•

BUSIN E ISS MANAGED ORGANIZATIO N

�"

WHEREAS, the Clark Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation
serves ten (10) counties in Eastern and Central Kent,ucky but a
preponderance of its membership is located in Powell County, Kenrucky
and,
WHEREAS, this Board has been advised by three of its Directorate
from Powell County - Mr. Edmon Burgher, Mrs. Vandetta Derickson
and Mr. S. M. Maloney, that certain foreign interests have apparently
attempted to disrupt plans already set in motion by the United States
Corps of Engineers for the construction of a flood control dam on the
Red River in Powell County, Kent,ucky and,
WHEREAS, this Board representing over 8,000 members has
come to the conclusion that it is most important to the economic welfare
of Eastern Kenrucky and Central Kent,ucky that this dam be build not only
for its value as a flood control dam which would alleviate severe economic
loss occasioned to Powell County residents in times past but would act
as a new site of potential tourist attraction which is most important to
this area of Kenrucky,
NOW, THEREFOR E, BE IT RESOL VED, that this Board by unanimous vote urge the United States Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of
the Budget of the United States to forward this construction at the earliest
possible time,
BE I T FINALLY RESOL VED, that a copy of this Resolution be sent
to Hon. John Sherman Cooper and Hon. Thurst:on B. Morton, U. S.
Senat:ors from Kent:ucky ,· Hon . John C. Watts; Hon. Carl D. Perkins and

-1-

�Hon. Dr. Tim Lee Carter, Representatives from Kentz.tcky; U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers and all appropriate newspapers and radio $tations.

.. Curry - President
irk Rural Electric
Cooperative Corporation

I certify that the foregoing is an exact copy of a Resolution passed
by unanimous vote of the Board of Di,rectors of the Clark Rural Electric
Cooperative Corporation at its regular monthl,y Board meeting held in
Cooperative Headquarters, near Winchester, Kent:ucky, on Tuesda,y,
September 26, 1967.

.., ,6-f'v\_~

Secretary \

-2-

�Geptember 28., 1967

Mr. Fa'rl

w.

Kinner

Publisher and f4anager
1'be Courter Publiah1ns CQlllPElDY

West L-tberty, Kentucky

J)ee.r J!Brl:

ter ot sept.ember

I ws glad to

" ;n..........,61t1~n to the

25th enclosing elipp

Ued atver

nw.

As you say
get t ogether for

tine i t we could

ta •

Wit~ ~ ·

y

,

Sincerely,

Carl

CllP: rt

l).

Perkins., M. C.

�THE LICKING VALLEY COURIER
WEST LIBERTY, KV.

THE WOLFE COUNTY NEWS
CAMPTON, KY.

THE ELLIOTT COUNTY NEWS
SANDY HOOK, KY.

TELEPHONE: 668-3595

TELEPHONE 738-8005

1 TEl.EPHONE 743- 3551

THE COURIER PUBLISHING Co.
EARL W, KINNER, PUBLISHER ANO MANAGER

WEST LIBERTY, KY.

TELEPHONES:

743-3551
743-3961 (NIGHT)

Sept. 25, 1967
Hon Carl D. Pe rkins
House Office Building
Washington, D. c.
Dear Carl:
Thank you for your recent letter stating your
position on the Red River Reservoir project.
We have obtained the help of others in Washington
to deveiop facts and advise of t he Corps of Bngineers
plans and their goint planning with the Kentucky Water
Resource Authority, to increase the height of the
conseEvation pool stage above what was explained
to the public, and sell the water to the City of
exington.
Agencies which carry oat public policy different
from what they explain to the public are the ones which
make our citizenry lose faith in demacratic processeso
We think all this needs to be explained fully
to the public.
Maybe we can get together and talk things over
some time. It might be mutually helpfulo

BARLW • KINNER:lw

�September

Mr. !arl

14, 1967

w. &amp;inner

Publtsber and Manager
'l'he Courter Pllbltahtng Compsny
West Liberty, l(entucky

_

~

Dear J!arl:

It w.a t ~ t f u l of :vou to ee~
Fl!&gt;yd ~ t y !t'lmes. I found it =a

o
V

edtt::&gt;rlal 1'rom lbl'IIBD AU.en• s
l appreciate your note

ttng.
PPUlS•

~f September 11th whtch aecompmied

With beat VS.shes,

V
CDP:r:f

~

Sf.Ueerely,

Carl

». - .

M.

c.

�'

THE LICKING VALLEY COURIER
,
WEST L IBERTY. K Y .

THE WOLFE COUNTY NEWS
CAMPTON, KY.

THE E LLI OTT COUNTY NEWS
SANDY HOOK, KY.

TELEPHONE SH 3 - 3845

TELEPHONE NO 9 . 3595

TELEPHONE RE 8 -6656

THE COURIER PUBLISHING Co.
EARL W. KINNER. PUBLISHER AND MANAGER

WEST LIBERTY, KY.

TELEPHONES,
SHERWOOD 3·3845

SHERWOOO 3•3841

Sept. 11, 1967
Hon Carl D. Perkins
House Of fice Building
Washington, D. c.
Dear Carl:
Here's an eaitorial from Norman Allen's
Floyd County Times--against the dam and reservoir
ol'l Red River.
And there will be otherso It's a travesty to
dam up such a beautiful strep. Soon there will be
several reservoirs and lakes, each competing for
tourists. But there is only ont' Red River with its
unspoiled natural beauty--and it wont have to
compete for tourists.
If there's a bare chance to stop it, wont
you whisper in our ear?
Sincere ly,
EARL

w.

KINNER:Ww

�r

Floyd County Time51 Sept. 7, 1967 -

Sec. l, Page 3

THE FLOYD COUNTY TIMES
Published Evecy Thursday by

Prestonsburg Publishing Company

------- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - NORMAN ALLEN

Editor

Subscription Rates Per Year:
In Floyd County, $3.50 • Elsewhere in Kentucky, $4.00
Outside Kentucky, $5.00

red as second class matter June 18, 1927, at the postoffice al
Prestonsburg, Kentucky, under the act of March 3, 1879.

LET RED RIVER BE ITS
NATURAL. WONDERFUL SELF!
:t-[eithm· flood contro-1 n or elect ric power are included in the functions of the proposed Red River
dam which will inundate miles of Kentucky's most
J)icturesque scenery and remove from the view of
man wha.t b perhaps the wildest stretch of "white
-.,v,ater" in the state. For Red River has never presented any flood problems for downstream communities, .:nc the dam is not even remotely considered as a source of electric power.
And that, we contend, removes t he last valid
l'eason fol' damming t his st1·eam whic'h flows
tilroug,h a veritable canyon and surroundings of
pristine beauty that are perhaps unmatched in the
eastern half of the United States.
The U. S. Corps of Engineers appa1·en:tly justifies the cost of the impoundment on the expect.1/tion of co11 vetting the area into a major tourist
attraction. A few thousands of dollars-not the
several millions the dam will cost--s,pent in publicizing the Red Rive1· gorge, its tower,ing escarpments, the beauty of the stream itself and the rom ance of the area which lies in its watershed
would, in foe years ahead, make this flow1ing river
more of a mecca for tourists than any smaU lake
suoh as the dam will create could ever be. The
t ime is not too far distant when a free-flowing
river, especially one which rises in and runs
through an area unspoiled by man, w ill be a· rarity.
Red River deser ves a chraTI'ce to remain such a
place. T he people of Kentucky can fight for it to
h ave that chance without fearing that their opposition to its impoundment will imp·ede progress of
nny kind-industrial, social or sp1ritual.
Some'body has as ked, " Should we a'lso- flood the
Sistine Chapel so that tourists can get nearer the
ceiling?" The fascinating distances of the Red
River gorg~ should not be converted to the depths
0£ impouu:lcd waters for the enjo,y ment of t hrillseekers who need to get back to nature insltead of
nearer the tops of towering cliffs in boats.

1

�Seytt-mber 22, 1967

Mr .. end Mrs. Chester. Martin

Stanton, Kentucky 1'0380

Dear friends :
·- -~
I am 1n complete agreeme ·
view about t he dest rabUtty of
'.Red Rf.vc1•

D!"t.T!l.

~

! be.ve every eon
-w'tll move ahead on ached

h ~
u _ ! ng the

. t hat thi s proJect

•

Sincerely,

Carl J&gt;. Pel"k1ns, M. C.

CDP: rt

�..

Stanton, Ky. 40380
September 15, 1967

Honorable Carl Perkins
United States Congressman
House of Represent atives
Washington, n.c. 20515
Dear Congressman Perkins:
We're writing you in support of the proposed Red
River Dam in Powell County.
Our situation is typical of many landowners i n
Powell County. We own a river bottom farm and
have stood helplessly by on ~umerous occasions
and watched our crops washed away by floodwaters
from the red river . Many times we have gone out
in the middle of the night and rescued cattle
marooned by the floodwaters.

A recent statement in the Courier Journal, to the
effect that bottomland is helped more than hurt
by floodwaters just simply isn't true. This may
have been the case years ago before conservation
programs placed our hillsides#, in grass and timbero
farms , like ours, would be suitable for industrial
and residenti al development, once the dam, is built and
flooding stopped.

Many

We respectfully urge you to use your influence to see
that t l1e dam project continues on schedule . We join
hundreds of others in Powell County in thanking you for your
support of the project thus far.
Very truly yours,

Ylh .Y rJt,iJ.Cl~ )1/a,L
Mr. and Mrs . Chester Martin

�Septcm1:,er 26, 1967

Mr.. and Mrs . Buel Roge r s
Clay Ci•~y1 Kentucky 40312
Dear Mr. and Mn . lbgers:

earl. D. Perkins, M.

c.

�•

�I

-

~~

~

41

;/; ~., ~~ .~~

knMr(,~

~

~

J

c4:;;rr

�Septer.il:er 25, 1967

Mr. ruid Mrs. Hru.~la?.l R. Brow
2516 neww.n Street
AsbJaryd~

Keutueky

Dear F'dend.a:
Thank :&gt;i-OU f:,1• your let
setting :::'o rth your views in .,,...,,,.......~
Rivet' Datt.

ItlaG&amp;oodoof

opix&gt;s1.ng the pmjec"'·

y

to

W1th beat ,d..s

Sincerely,

Carl D. Per..tina, M. C.
CDP: rf

�.

,

.,,

HARLAN R. BROWN
2516 NEWMAN STREET

ASHLAND, KENTUCKY

September 18, 1967
Dear Congressman Perkins:
I t is possible that the enclosed editorials
have been mailed to you fro~ many in y::iur district in
opposition to the proposed Red River Dam in Kentuc ky.
Recently our family held a reunion at Natural
Bridge State Park and agamn we visited the Gorge in Red
River. As natives of Morgan Count7 we had seen this area
many times. We oppo 8e the Dam a s;men tioned and we ur g e
y ou to o_p1p 8 e it also.
Arguments are offere::l. on b oth p::iints of view
of course, however, this is nature in it ~ or ignal type
and sho'J Ul. be preservea. ;/e bel ~e
you will want to give
serious consider~ion to th e Dam 1 s possible destruction,
even t hough very little of it is to be in your di ~trict .

Sincerely,

1k_
✓ ?. /J~~
Mrs Harl an R . Bro·m

°)'}) &gt; ~
Mr &amp;

�...

--m4r ltrkiug

·-- •

'1

]lnllt!J &lt;t!nuritr

Successor t.o ''The Llcldng Valley Scorch er," Established 1882, West Llberty, Ky,
EARL W. K INN E R,
E ditor and Publisher

H E L E N P . S TAOY

Associat.e E ditor

Trade a Scenic Masterpiece

For Mud Flats, Bare Banks?
Beau ty in the Red River gorge
(Edit.orial in The Courier-Journal)
,Le~te1,s have been sent to Governor IDd·

wa:rtl B11eathi,tt a,nd Presidrent Lyndon J ohnson
pr(:jtesting plans of tlhe A1,my IDng}neers ,, o
flood the sceni'c Red Riweu: Gorg.e wit'h fl.
flood-cointrol .da:m. The protesters n1ay not
giet fa:r; Cong1-.iss hats a-h'eady a,pproved the
dann, aind Ute Engiineeu:.s aire not earsily sha,ke.'l
loose f.i-om an aippropri:aition. Bu,t the pr.oites-t
ma:y un~over ,tJhe reasoniang, i:f any, behind
tlhils pec.ul1ia,r u~derta,king.
Thiere is &lt;no good .nea:son for a d-am on the
Ried iRliMer. Foo: yea'l'S itlhe Enginlelers ag1,eed,
and why they der:ided, overnight and with
Uttle wau·n,iJng, that ,iJt had su:dd'enly become
a good i&lt;llea, ha·s n~er 'been e"plained. It
shoubd lb:e lb:e001Use the datm is goi-ng to do a
rot of d&lt;amaige.
tS ome people i,n 1:he a.rea have been gulled
into suppw1ting ~he diam in tJhe ,beJ,ie&lt;f they
will g,e1t a •s cenic lake tJha,t ~vm .spur a big
tourist t:11:'&lt;llf.f,ic_ But tlhe reservoir wrn be
Sbl1ictly foo- waiter stora!!Je iam:d fiood con1trol,
,a,nd clru.11ilng 1!hie summer months will be piairtly
0ll_llp'bl'ed oo mak!e way :tor fatll and ,w mtex
tl'a!ins, ~~ alI1 Llgly ·expam,se of bat·e 1brun,ks
a;nd mud fia,ts. To cr0'alte 1Jhiis pant-time eyesone ltlp:e Elngineers, wil&gt;l sacrlfi~e: one of the
mo:st 'pidtJuITTesque go,rges nri E&gt;aLStem America,
aind ~ntuclcy's tlinest rema&gt;iin!itng wild ,rhner.
Negliglible F loo1l Curb
A:s, a 4:locld cont:ro1 measu're, the dam will
be a faroe. 'Dhe~ i,s 1Il.O indu.stry in t!he gorge
to prot®t itlrom floodlS, 't he v.alle!Y [la.nus are
heLpe'd 18JS oiffte!ll ·a\S hiurt by !fue .small flood,l ng
tihiat 0001.n'S, and th.e effect on dow.nistream
tlloods · on ,tJhle Ohio woutd be .imi.gnifi:cia.rit;
evien fille Enginetems a/d!mit tlh'&lt;lit llhe dam would
lmo:dk 111:0 mo11e thain two,t,enths of a foot lflrom
a maljor Ohio Ri'Ver flood.
· Natturaliists and g®logusfts, inc1udling some
ttltom ,the Upi&lt;vei&lt;Slity: of Kentucky, m1Ve aTgued
f.or y,ears ,t:hatt a balke m the Red River Valley
wais :not only a lbad ,i'dea but an tm1prrax-,,tiical
on:e. Thety poim out tJh·a t porou;s ~tone
underlies IUte whole Teglion, as evi'dencetl. by
the awmeirou,s caV'es am:d 'bridgre&lt;s, iamd 1:ihaJf it
,WIOuld cost untdYd amounts Ito ,tatrop the M'iater
:flrom seeipin1g out hlu::o:ugh •tm.ese natwral es•
cape 'V'ail:ves.
Foul11tlh.iermor.e, •t.he:re is every reason ltO 1.&gt;eMev-e 1/h:wt the dam wou.Jld: destroy more irecrea,biona:l v,a,lue thlan ,a ,la,kie would creaJte; tlhe~-e,
are dozens , of •bigger ia;nd m01·e acaesslj.fble
!a:J~es in .th-e state, buit ~rea.s of di'fil\s and
oa,v,es a.n:d free, rushing ,walt!efr a11,e ge,t;ting
l~ard Ito f\ion~. And w!hile d'Ow.rvstream cities
sudh as Lex'.ington and FlranJ&lt;lf'Q0.1t could undoubtedly use tile water •b.aokied .up by 1!11.e
dam, birglg,eir waller supplies could' be oveaJted
by dams on neairby sbreams thaJt would not
destroy the na;tuval •be1a1uty •th1·e!!Jbened by t:his

onr..
~ ,-

--

~

'111:lle 1food !RiV1e1· gorge, muoh of it in tihe
Damiel Boone Naitio.n:al ~ou·est, its 1ii.c'h nolt only

O HAR L ES A . GOBL E

Production Supt.

in, soen:ery; its Strea:ms ·w e ,promisilng b1ieeding :g1roun:ds for ,t rout and walleye and bea,ver.
The tlhiciketls 1ailong the remote •reaches olf the
go~g;e -stil~ boast grou.s-e, dee1·, l!!IQ,tti:l'rel amd
wild tuir,k re y. '11he 11'i.Viel1· iA:s·elif lhais receWed
naitional notiice for ills rapids and oa.ma:&gt;ing
si&lt;bes. Bult d.f the dam is built, .a,1,1 of lthis natUll'al 'b:earulty wm be .scraped ba,1~, bu11llfozed
and drowned.
Wilth the ldevellopment of our hligihway sys•
bem a,nd the g,rowth of '1lh'e :re.c reation indus•
bry, ltlhis ireg:ioo hlolds guie'alt promi'Se :for 1\utm·e
ge111era1lions seekltng o:ellief d',r om crowded ciW
living. To saic1u'fice thlls i11,rep:la:ca1b'l'e he1r~to::uge
'of fo;unilng niver, soar&lt;im.g clilf'fs and a-odk tow,el's, &lt;lleep gorges a nd graceful natural ia1,c;h.es
fot• ,run unneed'e'd and prooobly ug1Jly ,pud'd le of
wiatJer woull!d be worse than a dla!rce; ilt would
be a ti,a,g·edy.

Let Red River Be Its Natural,
Wonderful Self!
(F loyd County Times)

.,~

N eith:er flood control nor electric power '
are dncluded in tlhe fun'Otions of the proposed ~.
Red River dam which wi11 inun~e miles of .r
Kentu.c~y•s most pi.cture$que scenery am.d I'emove firQm..the vJLie.w ot.Jnan w,1re,t da perlh.aps_z,
1:Jhe wtlde1,t stretch of "whli,te water'' ill1 the 1
stalte. For Red Riveir Qi.a:s neviea- preselllted
serio~s d'lloow ·pi,oblel;11S ifor dow,nstrerurn com·
rrum~ties, atnd ~he qam Js not even remotely
consirdered 18/S a source Olf ele·c1tmic l)!Ower.
And rtftl!alt, we ccmitend, removes tlhe last
vallid reason for dairnimirig tJrus sbream whioh.
flows t h1·oug,h a ,veritable c~yon Wld. surrou,ncliing,s of [Pi·Jstlitne •b eauty tlhat are peI'haps
u,llll'l1laltch:e'd .in ith.e eastern half of tlhe Umted
States.
The U. s. Co1'i&gt;s of Engine:e rs aippaTently
just,ilflites bh:e cost of t ne impoundment on Vhe
exipectation of conv,e'libing the ,area · mto a
majOlr tourist a,tJtlvaction. A few thousantd dol-·
la,rs-not tlh:e seve1,a,l mli11ions the dam will
cost-spent in publiciZing 'tllre Red R\iiver
igonge, alts ,towiering .esoo1'Pments, the beauty
of 1the 'Shooam 'i,tse1f and it:he romam:ce of the
area -w.hi:dh liies &lt;irl its watrshed would, in Nie
yeiair.s ·a.head, mruk:e t his flo,wm:g 11.i'veir more
of a mecca .for tour,i sts than ,any small ~ake
sudh as :the diam wiH create could ever be.
The time diS -no): too far •distant when a fre.e:fl9Wling 1riv:er, oopeciallly one whi'&lt;&gt;h 11i\se.s in
a.ttd runs -iliirough ,a n .airea unspoiled by man,
wm lb:e a •r.aa'ihtY. .
Ried Riv.er q:esel'Ves a cha,nce oo ,r emain
such a place. The ,peopil:e of Kentucky can
11ig1h.t for ilt to have that clhance ,withoUlt lfearing •!h&lt;ait rtlheir opposibi.on ito the iD1[p'oun-dment
wi.11 impede 'Progtuess of all¥ kriatd-indus.bria,l,
socti,all or sp11~tual.
!Som1ebody hais ia;sked, "S'hould we also
filood the Sistine Ohaip~ oo tJhiait towrtists can
get nearer 1the ceiling?" The foocitnating d,isillances of ,tlhe iRed Ritver gorge should not be
oon&lt;velited ;to ,t he ·depths of impound'e:d waiters
1'or the enooyment of t'hrill,i-see.ke.rs who need
to get baclt ito .nature instead of nearer the
,t ops of Jtowering cliffs in boalts.

i

I
i

�I

September 13, 1967

Mr. Herndon J. Evans , Editor
The Ii!xington Herald
~xington, Kentucky
J&gt;ear Hern.don:

I agree completely with

he Red

River

Dam should be constructed.

As you sey, it wi
needs of Lexingtort and o

'D5lur-ca:re--er the future water

s down stream on the

Kentucky River.

It will be a t
thousands of visitors ·

It would provide a. s
tlOOd p:rotee

a

. tton that will bring
stcJ.te and to tbat area.

udustrial development and

Thank yo ~ zvvour letter asking rey, help in assuring
constructi on of
s dam. I feel sure work on the proj ect

will go forward s scheduled.

Sincerely,

Ca.rl. D. Perkins , M. C.

CDP:rr

�THE LEXINGTON HERALD
He:RNOON

J. EVANS

LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY

£01TOR

September 8, 19 6 7

Rep. Carl Perkins
Rayborn Office Building
Washington, D. C.
Dear Carl:
I am taking the liberty of enclosing an editorial from
The Lexington Herald of September 7, regarding efforts of the
Sierra Clubs of America to block construction of the Red River
Dam in Eastern Kentucky. Many of those who are protesting
never have seen this area and are in no way familiar with the
facts.
The people of the area to be affected are 99 per cent
in favor of this dam, which will bring them flood control, industrial potential and will take but a minimum acreage of the
hundreds of thousands of acres of similar beauty in this part
of the state. While "white water" from a canoe may be enjoyable to a limited few, a big lake can be used by hundreds of
thousands of tourists through the years. I have seen the 11white
water" change to yellow, muddy water and flood hundreds of
homes in Clay City, Waltersville and other parts of the Red
R iver Gorge. Lexington's future water supply is tied in with
this dam, already approved by the Corps of Engineers . The
same applies to other downriver cities.
I earnestly solicit your help in carrying out this project,
without delay or interference from those who do not have the
facts.

�~-IE
a Ji

C"7 ..--..

r.,...NJ"'"'qTA .,., .,_ .,...-;-\~

.LJ~L~.-

\..T ,,., v

.A,.

A ...... ~.

r ...~-~.c1.u.....J

Publlshe&lt;I Monday Tllru Friday Morning ExclU&lt;llng Holldoyo.
LEXINGTON HERALO•LEADt:R CC.
L:xlngton, Ky. :t.9•139 Wos'. Short Strool
NEV/ YORK, 24S Pork Avanuo
HcRNDON J . EVANS, Editor
FRElD 0 . \'/~CHS, Gantra! Manager
Second-class postage paid &amp;t Lexington Ky
The Associated Press Is exclusively entitled to tho use (or 'republl"'tlon of all news dlspokho::
credited to l!, or not otherwise credited to thl: p~per 6nd also the local news published herein.
•

Thursday, September 7, 1967

~

Anyone who has seen the muddy flood
scenic wonders and palisades much more
easily.
.
,yaters of the Red River in the homes and
has advocated every
The
Herald
long
~usiness houses of Clay City is not likely
conservation measure and has been on the
to become emotionally upset over the pos•
side of those supporting the preservation
sible elimination of a few camping sites
of scenic wonders. But in the case of the
f?r members of the Sierra Clubs of AmerRe~ River gorge it believes that those opposing the dam are completely in error on
ic;a. Yet some members of that organizaseveral counts. In the first place, if this'
tion would like to see the Red River Dam
were the only scenic area in that part of
dropped because a few of the hundreds of
the state there might be some reason to
gorges in Daniel Boone Natural Forest
question the dam-provided of course, that
might not be available for campouts if the
Central Kentucky's water supply was not
dam should be built.
in the picture. But Daniel Boone National
Forest is made up of hundreds of thou: Hearing has been set for tonight
sands
of acres of land equal in scenic
at Stanton and the Sierra Club representabeauty to the gorge; in many ways some
tives, are expected to be out in force to
of the area is superior in scenic beauty to
protest the building of this dam that will
that found in the Red River Valley.
end the flooding of towns along its course
We do not believe that too many of tbe
and guarantee Lexington, Frankfort a n d
persons advocating the elimination of this
other cities along the Kentucky River an
project actually have seen the area in
inexhaustible water supply.. Perhaps you question. The dam would impound a lake
may have forgotten it, but the Red River
some seven miles in length. It would proDam is the facility that will provide these
vide
flood control for many homes in Powcities and others downriver with a water
and
Menifee Counties. It would provide
ell
supply adequate to take care of expansion,
sites
for
industrial development around
industrial development and recreation r~and
Clay City, and goodness
Stanton
gardless of the future demands in these
knows
that
is
about the most pressing
categories.
need at this time. One can safely say that
The Commonwealth of Kentucky, r~c- . the future of this area hinges on the deognizing the importance of having an invelopment of this impoundment. Its recreational value can be measured in its
exhaustible water supply, has taken steps
comparison with Buckhorn Lake and Deto see that the Red River Dam to be built
wey Lake in other parts of Eastern Kenby the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is
tucky.
raised to a sufficient height to provi~e for
These counties, situated in what has
all future water needs of Lexington and
been called the depressed areas of our
downriver cities. Lexingtonians look upon
state, desperately need help and this help ;
this facility as the finest thing possible as
can come quickly and positively through
it answers all questions about the adthe building of the Red River Dam. It
equacy of the future water needs of the
should be built even if it deprives a few
area.
members
of the Sierra Clubs of America
At a recent hearing where Army
an
opportunity
to spend the night under
engineers were to give information on the
the stars. When the needs of a few hunland buying process, members of the
dred persons are pitted against the needs
Sierra Club and a few disgruntled 1 a n d
and
the very future of countless thousands
owners voiced opposition to the developwe
are
on the side of the masses who will
ment. They contended that if the R e d
:lock to that area in an endless procesRiver gorge were permitted to continue in
sion once the recreational and industr:"':
its natural state that several hundred
potentials are made available.
campers every year could enjoy i~s beauyVhy not write to your congressmen toty! They failed to state that if the dam
day and let them know how you feel about
were built that several thousand visitors
this project?
could enjoy the lake, s~e the mountains,
-

-

·

,

g

-

..

�7
September 18,

1967

Mr. Bernd.on J. Evans
&amp;U.tor

the 1,exington Heiw.d
229-239 Vest Short street
Lexington, lentucky

~

Dear lrerndO.UI

'l'bal1k you tor sending
in 'Wh1ch you take tssue vt.ttt

QppQsing construction

tt -.a

th

rint of your edltorle.l

Oourier-lQUl"Dal's stand
Biver lbm.
to remer.nber me.

Always my

Stncerel.y,

Carl D. Perkl11$, M. C.
CDP:rf

�'J

The Courier-Journal, with one possib!e
exception, always has supported Kentucky impoundments which generate public power. It now is lending its support,
editorially and newswise, to a movement
it hopes will block the building of the Red
River Dam, a nonproducer of power, in
Powell County.
Sometimes newspapers in their zeal to
support a project overstate their case.
This the Courier-Journal is doing in its
effort to kill the Red River project. But,
we ask, is it necessary to distort the facts,
to make statements that are not true, in
order to accomplish this end?
"As a flood control measure the dam
will be a farce," the Louisville newspaper
said editorially Sunday. Here the newspaper pits its "engineering skill" against
the more qualified engineers of the U .S.
Army Corps of Engineers who have made
exhaustive studies of the area for many
years. The paper supports its own ' ·engineering" by quoting two University of
Kentucky scientists who claim the dam
won't hold wat,er. Did these professors
reach their conclusion by core drilling?
The Army engineers -used this method to
decide that the dam would bold water.
In 1962 the waters of the Red River
· flooded Clay City and inundated thousands
qf acres in the area. Water stood several
feet deep in homes and business houses
of Clay City. Army engineers estimated
the loss in excess of $235,000. Floods come
often to the Red River valley, a fact that
· the Courier-Journal lmows auite well
Then, why did it say that the dam wili
have no flood control value when enaf..
neers say it will save Clay City from flood
losses? Many farmers at a meeting Thursday night in Stanton attested to the destructive·forces of floods and told of heavy
crop losses year after year. Yet the
Courier-Journal said " the valley fanns
are :,elped as often as hurt by the small
flooding that occurs "
~he Army Corps of Engineers is skilled 1:1 measures to prevent floods. First
studies of the Red River project beaan
~ome 13 years ago. Contrary to the ccfur1er-J ournal's statement, the· enair.eers
h~ld a public hearing in 1963 at"' which
plans for flood control were discussed.
The r~creation potential of the d;;,::,""... also
was discussed at the ti..'ne. Later Gvv . Edward Breathit~ and others asked t:-,~ ..::;ineers to redesign the dam so that i:s 2.cded height would guarantee a pe::c ..:~al
water _si1pp~r, for Lexil~gton, Frai1..~ort
~nd o~!:~r C..Lres on the Kentucky River,
mto_w~~ch the Red River empties. T:'!e
LoUisvu.e newspapers freque::tly :n a d
cal!ed attention to Lexington's "ii:adequate water supplv." particularly at

fones when :...exi.,gtoi1' and·:.ouisville·werc
seeking tile same industrial projects. But
-:.::is p2·obably was a coincidence. Would
they nov, deny this water need? ,
The Louisville newspaper's statement
that the reservoir "during the summer
months will be partly emptied to make
way for fall and winter rains, leaving an
ugly expanse of bare banks and mud
flats" is just another example of truth
distortion and misrepresentation to gain
a noint. The Courier-Journal knows full
well that flood control impoundments are
not drawn down in summer, but i.'1 the
winter and ~arly spring. Lakes draw few
tourists during these cold months.
We have no quarrel with the Sierra
Clubs of America who are asking that
the dam be blocked. California residents
and clubs elsewhere know little about the
Red River gorge and they must rely upon
we have cited to
!°:1sr,epresentations
fv~Vide grounds for such club opposition.
a~ree, that the Red River gorge is
b~aut}Jul, out we also state that the scenic
~--auties
dam-blockers cry about will
des~roy~d by the impoundment
e a \e will snnply make these scenic
~,·orders available to thousands of persons
ead of to ~ few hundred who mi ht
fn:nt t!) c~mp m the valley instead o/on
• v.,_ up1an ~- There are many areas with1~ ;.he ;onfmes .of the hundreds of thous;•1ds Oi acres m Daniel Boone N~tion~1
"' orest thlat are just as beautiful ;; the
c.creage ocated in the gorae
· Couner.
J It. will be recall
. e d th-t"'
a. the
bo~r~al gave editorial sunport to the
Dmlq:n~of the proposed power-generatin.-;the11cs ~p dam in ~outhern Kentucky .
a ongress turned aown . Th
1:er knows. too, that the scen:/e;;g.,a.tnat stretch of the Cumberland liver'
Rqual t? or ~1ay surpass that of the R;d
_.ver gorge. Furthermore did the Louisraise its Zroice when the
~~!e
~ l u gorge below Cumberland Falls
regte_dly one of the nation's outstanding
w bwalter areas, was inundated b'y La1-e
Cum er and?
. ., ,
The Red River area ne d
.
fiood_ control, f01\;d~~~~~;~~1
e.-l ' t~~ odunsm. T~ese are v:tally need,. ;11 n1~ epressect area ~. .:i:.:::.Suc.:1 an impoundment b"s
state.
teeLncr
Lexmg
-; ton and all
· . "' ···-- guaran·o
ctov·:niver c;f
~ perpetual water supply ·co· Id ' ies
t -·,. . e i'1id ustna
· 1
,
...
mean
·. : f th·u
c~untry y t ·h salvation 01.J! .·-~::.
oo 1
i-~a th . e t e Courier-Journz.1 describsh'ou1/ g~rb·ge say\_that its scenic beauty
d
no. e sacridced '·for an unneeded
Cpro~,ablyJ ugly puddle of water." Only
·
om 1 er- ournal can ,,
long lake of ~,? ?OO
a seven-mile
acres ass--e
a "m
dd
d
dl~ of water" when it wants tou c y pu ·
point!
arry a

as

i'f/ ~\

lli:

m,:

,f

tr:rspaper

~:~iI

f.~~'

ttf~

..

�■

Mr. \; • D. SpD.ulain3
Clay ,:: · ·':,y, Kentucky'

I b[~ve n~ d.oui)t t:hat the
wtll te C' rr'..e 1 -:: ::&gt; c::&gt;mplet ion .
close to ~1100,000 .00 ~or conct-,,- _......, ,.,.
Year.
Thank ~r~u fol" you1·
Witl 1 l.,e~t

CDP:rf

t1

•

r.-oir project
,:-e1--e ziven
the Fisc3l

��I
•

I

Sept en'be:.' 21; 1967

Ur.. i!lliion

nurcham

Cl.a:' City , Kentucky

~

:Dear !-!l". Bur~ Jn:

Tha..'lk you f~r sending me t
e.dopted. by tee Clay Cit;y" Li ons
continued progres s on the ~

rbant unde~

y

W1t ll best id s

l ution
ns f or

v r Dam.

~

l am sure there ttill
t hi s ~

ub ~a

i nterruption. -to

.

•

Sincere~,
Carl D. Perkins, M.

a.

��En5ineers has made extensive studies on
cessity for

the feasibility :md ne-

e. ::loo'"' control d ~;-)_ on the Red ?..ivcr i:'1 Io ell County ,

and it has been determined to be o•r p:i.ramou..."1t irnpoYtancc to Clay
City , 1 o··.-ell County an~l. 8entra:: :. entt..ck;y , a:1d
WHJ.j_{&amp;S, the cost-00·'1.efi t :-::::-atio determined from t~ese s--cudies

and not ruestioned by a.~y sources, and

s~vere inconveniences and substanti3l losses throuGh inu."1dation of
a rr:ajor part

o::

°'c!1e city, as ~:ell ..,s ar: unfc&gt;.voraole outlook for

acC'uisi tion of ne·.·.1 busi:1esses, civic and other desirable ex_:-,ansion ,
now therefore ,

BE IT R3SCLV.;,!J.;, by the Clay City Lions Club that it resents
t!~e intrusion at ti:.is 13.te

~te : by r::incr _"'0::-eic:;•1 interests, bol-

stered by publicity fron oth8r sources, 2.lso for-;:i.cn , in an e:L:ort
-'.:;o co::--..fuse and d:'...sr.1 t -ie.ns alrec:1.-· L1 i::otion for acco:-::plisL·nent

The Clay City Lions Club c~lls on all proper a~thorities ~oY
continued 1.:minte:c::c.i tcd pro ;:.~e;ss in co·1st:cuction of the dc:.m v!ith
all reaconaale s eG

Red P.iveY Dam an--1 Reservoir

"'.;o r.i~e

~

re.lit;• .

B.8 IP R.sSOLVED that a copy o:: tnis resolution be sent to Fons .
Joh.,,"1. S . 0ooper and. :::hYiJ.s~o:::.
Pons. John C. W2tts,

c

0

?

-:orton,

u. S.

Senators fro,.... re~tucky;

_1 Pet':ins and Ti~ Lee C rter , R~p=esenta -

tives fron Kentucky; the r.rrr-y Co~s

o::

Znci~eers, ~nd ~npropriate

ne\ivs .r.1edi3. .

/

J

J

��HAZARD, KY.

WASHINCTON. D . C .

BAKER BLDG.
TEL.436-2151

1028 CONN. AVE.
TEL. 223·4566

H. A . SPALDING
ENGINEER
MEM.A.J. M.8 M.E • K.S. P. E: A.S.C. E.

HAZARD, K EN T UCKY 41701

September 12, 1967

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Carl:
The people at Stanton and Clay City, in fact, in Red River Vall ey
general ly, are very much up in arms about the efforts of the so
cal led "Sierra Club " and naturally, the Courier- Journa l , to block
construction of the Red River Flood Control Reservoir . Of course
they offer al I the old arguments about destruction of scenery, the
beauty of the unspoiled wilderness and so on .
In my judgement the construction of this reservoir, which as you,
of course, know, is probably one of the most needed projects of
this character in Kentucky, would enhance, by adding a beautiful
lake, rather than detract, from t he beauty of the Red River a rea.
The lake would occupy only a smal I area of the lower part of the
gorge; the remainder will not be affected except possibly to make
it more accessible .
Presumably the activities of this opposition group will have no
significant effect but it seems well to let you know of the local
concern . From a not extended contact with such undertakings,
this one, in my experience, is unique - there is, li tterally, no
Iocal opposition but unbounded enthusiasm for it.
Thank you for past favors. With warmest regards, I am,
Very sincere ly,

HAS:bj

�I

i

September 12, 1967

Mr. H. D. Fit,:,p a.trick t Jr.

Vice Preiidefit
The Bank JQSti)lune
Pre.stoMwrg, Kentucky

Dear H. D. :

I appreciate yOltt letter
support of the Sierra Club ' s etto
struction of the Red River

I am always glad to

ess

your

to

k con-

views on all

issue.a.
With 'best wish
Sincerely ;

CDP:rr

\F

Carl D. Pe rkins , M. C.

�September

8, 1967

Congressman Carl D. Perkins
House Office Building
Washington , D. C.
·
Dear Carl :
I think that you should support the
Sierra Club in their efforts to stop the
construction of a dam on Red River .
Best

wishe~;f youjsi
H~ D.--:;;Fi ~
ick , J .,
V~ P r e s id en t

HDFJR : p

j

�September l2, 1967

Mr. Donald S. Hem'7

Work Unit Conservationist
Soil Conservation Service
P . O. Sox 25
stanton, Kentucky 40380
Dear Mr. Henry:

You and I are in accord 1
on the Red
River Reservoir. I believe it w jJ be
great boon
to that part of our stat """-----~l. 1
conservation
proj ect, it will attra.c
u.nd industry, and
it will provide a splen

With best wishe

Sincere:cy-,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.
CDP:rr

�? • C . """10::;:: ,.,,..,

Starto·..,. ;:ent11.c··t7 l.·0:?-0
Serytembe~ 6, 19€7

Honorable Ca:"2- Pe·..1 -irs
U~iter St~t s Corgre~s
f:01·src o:'."' 3ep:""'se.rta"·ives
· :a.,.·-,-=,,,-::tor, D. C.
0

Dea!' i ·:::- . Per::ins :

I t is · 7i t· i ntere~t co.ncer1:i:1g thG Red Ri veT. Rescrvo5 r
in Po-;,;el:'.., ·:ol·"e ['_nc ;•,..,·-i.::\"'c Count:.cc::: tl1at I ··rite this letter .
As . 1or1,. rni ·1• C01"$(:'Y&gt;i.-P tir.ris~, Soil Conserv-ati on, I :1::::.\·e
~:o::.·~-('r~ "it::-. the f,..rr-iers '"'..'1d lando·n1e:"s ir Po·.•e2. 1. and ··lol~?; Con nti1::s
for t1,e last 1·'?2:&gt; e::o e i ght ffir"lPths . I ::a•·c :1cl-ne-4 rilar an~ a·--·-ly
Irc.nv b"dl•· 11eN1 er· CO""'!"'e·"v2t 1 o.r u:ract2.ces i·" t}'.-e ,s co· ,..,tic,.. , bot!1
abC'V"' a11· bclo·.-- ~ :1(-&gt; .,..,J'.'0-,0&lt;"!'-&gt;' :J_p( Riv·er Da- s:t':" .
'l:'he ":-:"me:..·s a.i.1r' l::''_(·o-·nr-:"? i!"' tl•i~ """°,'.:'.. h:.\r'"' l'.)c·:ed foroa•, Uh"":" t'·is da - •:i~: be i.n ·,lac&lt;? . ' lit': -'..::1,:? helu of

·-•a:rc'l to th-

t!1e d ..... -- ::::ary o:-'1cr C0•.,se:"vat; 01'1

~e~manent

c,_r?

□easv.:""e~

cc1.:"

"Je

irsta::.J.c' for .'J.O!'e

lasti~~ a~~~ct .

Sirce 19rf I :-:.ave b::e·-,

&amp;~

er·nloyeA

--:-i ➔·'-

thP So:1.:. C'"'rser-

va-i::.on 3e.,..,.rice .
I, ,,.. as intere~ted as a.n,vone ~ra coc"se:r·:a.tj_"'.i" o: a:..2
0 101'.' .iw.t-..--~-&lt;- reC'o,.rc0s, i.ricludj_np- -::-rildl:..fe ,,.., - r:1.t1· r['_l ½e-:-·,tr .
It

is r1•1 l~or:':.'s+ ou~.:-:."''.., t:..,,.,,. t:1c da¥0 no,-1 uronos.,,- o-- ~ec:1 ~iv~r ·-::_ 7 1
maJ:e t··e a:-ea !:'ore co-cl' '3-"- to ~--11:lj-... -, ·1ot to '"entio· Fl/"'0c CC'"'trol. a-d r c_..,ep+:,_,...r .
0

Y.0 ·r su·~.,...or·i· t::- se" t&gt;.::-,~ t:1j_s pro:Gct is c?............ -i.e- o'-t on
sc!1ed'1.le -,i 71 !Je rre"'tl·• a.D""'rec5.c'-cd b 11 th 0 over ••'1el '1in 7 r.1ajori y
o::' -:· e la1-.do·rne:~s t', ,..,t I r,~ ist .
1

J/;u~J?:!7

Donald S . ~!enry
10·,·: rn5_t Co',se-~vat~. is':
Soil C"'P"ervatio.ri '3er~r5.c8

�September 12t 1967

Mr. Dwight Pendleton
Attorney at Law
Stanton, Kentuck;,1
Dear Mr. Pe..ll.dl.eton:

I understand I am indebted to you £or a eopy of'
the Clay City Timts, which carrie~
the efforts o:f the Sierra Club to
the Ried Rh·er Da.m.
I b&amp;ve long ~up:por~
I belie'.ve the r eservoir w·
to the area , both from th
tourist business and
en

o.

iele opposi ng
onstru.ction or

bui!_ :,,g of t his dam.
great economic benefit
int t view of attracting
industrial. develop,,,

be

ment.
With best wis

Sincerely,

Carl D. Perkins , 'M . C.
CDP:n

��AN .AR..EA t4EWSPAPER (7 COUNTll:S): POWELL, CLARK, WOLFE, LEE, MENIFEE, ESTILL, AND MONTGOMERY

ESTABLISHED 1896

THE CLAY CITY TIMES
.,,,.
OLAY CITY. KY. 40312
I NCORPOIIIATED

f'll8Ll8HED THURSDAYS
POWELL COUNTY'S

STANTON

CAMPTON

OFFICIAL PAPER

TO

BUREAU OFFICES:

WINCHESTER

Rep. Carl Perkins

FROM ....M
....r.....,s__,..B...a.,.sMl!9_ _ _ _ _ __ 1 I Ji

DATE Sept.

I,

, Business Office

7,1967
The enclosed copy of The Clay City Times is compliments

of Dwight Pendleton, Attorney , Stanton, Kentucky.

�Legal Pa per

CL AY CI T Y TIME$

STANTON
Powell County

Mountain
PARKWAY'S
_Leading Paper

Read Weekly By 20.000 Persons. Currently Rated In The News And Adv ertising Media As One 0£ The N ation's Outstanding Small-Community Area Newspapers. Paid Readership In 38 Slates And Overseas.

VOL. 72

Never Less Than 16 Pages, 2 Sections

THE CLAY CITY TIMES, CLAY CITY, KY.• THURSDAY, SEPT. 7. 1967 Published Thursdays

10 Cents A Copy

No. 36

Red River Opposition Appears
(Times Analysis )
The storm clouds of opposition
to the Red River Reservoir are
.gathering.
The Louisville Courier-Journal
is once again playing the "white
knight" in shining armor rem.iniscent of television commercials. This time the "cause" is
preservation of natural beauty
- the }3.ed River gorge.
In a front page story in the
Sept. 2 four-star edition of' the
Courier-Journal, the newspaper
devoted the same amount of
column inches to the Red River
Reservoir as it did to the Vlet11am election.
The front page story detailed
"•a nationwide prot~st by conservationists against construe-

tion of the Red River dam in nal, letters to Kentucky SenEast-ern Kentucky. "
ators Thruston B. MoTton and
MEETING SET
John Sherman Cooper have
A meeting will be held at 7:30 asked that funds be held up
tonight (Thut&lt;5day) at the Pow- until ".an impartial study of the
ell County High School for all area can be made."
persons inter ested in backing. Many Powell Countians have
the Red River Reservoir proj- been puzzled by the implic-ation
ect.
~at no impartial study has
Scheduled to be discussed at been made, inasmuch as the
the meeting is the possibility of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
reactivating the Red River De- (Louisville District) have alvelopment Association.
ready reached the stage of land
Anyone interested in r,eeing acquisition for the reservoir.
the Red River Reservoir be- It is noteworthy that the Courcome a 1·eality is invited to at- ier-Journal is not known for
v,oicing opposition to flood contend tonight's meeting.
The protest was organized by trol in Jefferson County. Are
'.he Kentucky chapter of the the citizens of Louisville more
Sierra Club.
important than the citiZ:ens of
According to the Courier-Jour- Powell County?

J.t is also noteworthy that a I We're talking about the conphotographer serv-ationists with the Soil ConCourier-Journal
took pictures of flood waters in servation Service (SCS) of the
Clay City in the spring of 1963 United Sta tes D.epartment of
and ~hat about two out of five Agriculture. T-he Powell office
farm crops in Powell County of the SCS has full-time personhave been destroyed by flood nel concerned solely with conwaters at one time or another. servation in the county.
It is furl!her noteworthy that .In lebters to Washington ofif "conserv-ationists" in ,t he ficials, the Courier-J o u r n a l
Sierra Club (no information was quotes the letters as saying in
given in the CourJer-Journal part that:
a bout the club or who its mem- -The Red River gorge scenic
bers are or where it gets its area is "the most beautiful in
money) are concerned about t-he state."
conservation in Powell County, -The gorge is "threatened
the conservationists in Powell with de£truc.tion by the relentCounty wh~ would know more less Army Corps of Engineers,
than anyone else about the who now plan to build another
problem haven't voiced opposi- unnecessary dam."
tion.
_«,p1-.~ 1 ~•0 ~t. hearings on this

fateful project were held 13
years ago."
Further down in the story,
the newspaper quotes the Sierr a
Club as saying the Red River
gorge is " the most unique and
beautiful ar ea of its kind in the
eastern United States."
Apparently the gorge, first describ,ed as the most beautiful in
Kentucky, became lovelier and
lovelier wi~h each passing par,agraph.
The Sierra Club, according to
the Louisville newspaper, s-aid
the "destructive impact" of the
reservoir would include loss of
trout fishing, beaver, wild turkeys, deer and gmuse, squirrel
and scenic beauty.
In the past, the newspaper

has voiced opposition to the
Red River Reservoir project .,.....
a $12 million project slated for
c-0mpletion by 197,2, and involv.
ing land jn P.owell, Menifee and
Wolfe Counties.
Whether or not Courier-Journal publisher Barry Bingham1s
empire c-0uld pressure the dam
project into being shelved is
debatable, but many observers
feel that the Courier-Journal's
tacit endorsement of opposition
to the dam could hold up funds,
thereby holding up construction.
·Why is opposition to the project coming from Louisville 120 miles away - when there
is little, if any, opposition from
the people of the counties aff.ected by the reservoir?

Some Powell Countians have
told The Times that they find
it touching that Louisville which has spawned such noteworthy projects as Cassius
"Muhammed Ali" Clay, open
housing and ,the threatened
destruction of ,the Kentucky
Derby - is concemed with preserving the beauty of the Red
River gorge.
Others have merely s·aid it
·stinks.
Readers oi The Times in fay.
or of che $12 million flood control project have the rig.ht to
write -their representatives in
Congress to urge that the projec.t be continued on schedule.
The editorial page names the
Congressional representatives.

�- ~---------~------------,~
i

Legal Paper

CL AY CI T Y TIMES

STANTON
Powell County

Mountain
PARKWAY'S
.Leading Paper

Read Weekly By 20,000 Persons. Currently Rated In The News And Advertising Media As One Of T he Nation's Outstanding Small-Community Area Newspaper s. Paid Readersh ip In 38 States And Overseas.

VOL. 72

Never Less Than 16 Pages, 2 Sections

THE CLAY CITY TIMES, CLAY CITY, KY., THURSDAY, SEPT. 7, 1967 Published Thursdays

10 Cents A Copy

No. 36

Red River Opposition Appears
(Times Analysis)
The storm clouds of opposition
to the Red River Reservoir are
gathering.
The Louisville Courier-Journal
is once again playing the "white
knight" in shining armor reminiscent of television commercials. This time the "cause" is
preservation of natural beauty
- the Red River gorge.
In a front page story in the
Sept. 2 four-star edition of the
Courier-Journal, the newspaper
devoted the same amount of
column inches to the Red River
Reservoir as it did to the Vietnam election.
The front page story detailed
"a nationwide protest by conservationists against construe-

tion of the Red River dam in nal, letters to Kentucky SenEas,tern Kentucky."
ators Thruston B. Morton and
MEETING SET
John Sherman Cooper h a v e
A meeting will be held at 7:30 asked that funds be held up
tonight (Thursday) at the Pow- until "an impartial study of the
ell County High School for aJI area can be made."
persons interested in backing
Many Powell Countians have
the Red River Reservoir proj- · been puzzled by the implic,afion
ect.
that no impartial study has
Scheduled to be discussed at been made, inasmuch as the
the meeting is the poss ibility of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
reactivating the Red River De- (Louisville District) have alvelopment Association.
ready reached the stage of land
Anyone interested in Geeing acquisition for the reservoir.
the Red River Reservoir be- It is noteworthy that the Courcome a reality is invited to at- ier.Journal is not known for
tend tonight's meeting.
voicing opposition to flood conThe protest was organized by trol in Jefferson County. Are
'.he Kentucky chapter of the the citizens of Louisville more
Sierra Club.
important than the citizens of
According to the Courier-Jour- Pcwell County?

It is also noteworthy that a I We're talking about the conCourier-J ournal
photographer servationists with the Soil Contook pictures of flood waters in servation Service (SCS) of the
Clay City in the spring of 1963 United States Department of
and ~hat about two out of five Agricuture. The Powell office
farm crops in Powell County of the SCS has full-time person.
have been destroyed by flood nel concerned solely with conwaters at one time or another. servation in the county.
It is further noteworthy that In letters to Washington ofif "conservationists" in :the ficiaJs, the Courier-J o u r n a 1
Sierra Club (no information was quotes the letters as saying in
given in the Courier-Journal part that:
about the club or who its mem- -The Red River gorge scenic
bers are or where it gets its area is "the most beautiful in
money) are concerned about the state."
conservation in Powell County, -The gorge is "threatened
the conservationists in Powell with d~truction by the relentCounty who would know more le~s Army Corps of Engineers,
than anyone else about the who now plan to build another
problem haven't voiced opposi- unnecessary dam."
ti-0n.
- ••-ri..~ 1&lt;&gt;t0 ~t hearings on this

fateful project were held 13
years ago."
Further down in the story,
the newspaper quotes the Sierra
Club as saying the Red River
gorge is "the most unique and
beautiful area of its kind in the
eastern United States."
Apparently the gorge, first described as the most beautiful in
Kentucky, became lovelier and
lovelier with each passing par.agraph.
The Sierra Club, according to
the Louisville newspaper, said
the "destructive impact" of the
reservoir would include Joss of
:.rout fishing, beaver, wild turkeys, deer and grouse, squirrel
and scenic beauty.
In the pa&amp;t, the newspaper

has voiced opposition to the
Red River Reservoir project a $12 million project slated for
completion by 197•2, and involving land in Powell, Menifee and
Wolfe Counties.
Whether or not Courier-Journal publisher Barry Bingham's
empire could pressure the dam
project into being shelved iis
debatable, but many observers
feel that the Courier-Journal's
tacit endorsement of opposition
to the dam could hold up funds,
thereby holding up construction.
Why is opposition to the proj~t coming from Louisville 120 miles away - when there
is little, if any, opposition from
the people of the counties affected by the reservoir?

Some Powell Countians have
told The Times that they find
it touching that Louisville which has spawned such noteworthy projects as Cassius
"Muhammed Ali" Clay, open
housing and the threatened
destruction of the Kentucky
Derby - is concerned with preserving the beauty of the Red
River gorge.
Others have merely said it
stinks.
Readers of The Times in favor of the $12 million flood control project have the right to
write their representatives in
Congress to urge that the project be continued on schedule.
The editorial page names the
Congressional representatives.

�•

September 7, 1967

Mr. FArl

w.

Kinner

Courier Publishing Com:pan_v
West Liberty, Kentuclcy

_

n

~

Dear Ear l:

Thank you f or sendin~
issue of t he Wolf'e
County Hews which contains
·
one netfS story- about
oppositton to the Red River . ervoir, as welJ_ as your

article on page 5.

~

Alw&amp;:ys my b es ~

y

Sincerely-,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.

CDP:rr

\

\

\

\

\
r,

�August 21, 1967

w. Kinner
Courier Publishing Company
West Liberty, Kentucky

Mr. Earl

Dear Barl:

There is a difference in the status of t he two proposals
for dams •- Red liver and Falmouth. ~
N
ey has ever been ap•
propriated for Falmout h so nothing has
en done toward
building it.

gag ng

By contrast, Congress
for planning work on Red River
for construction. The Army en
of acquiring land for the~
So, you see, it woul

o
eer

rs close to $100,000
has approved some $360,000
re in the preliminary stages
•

thing of a feat to stop it

now.

wishes,

Carl D. Perkins, M. C.

CDP:a

�■

1

°fHE ·

'

\

THE WOLF E COUNTY N EWS
CAMPTON, KY.
TELEPHONE NO 8 -3595

ICKI N G VALLEY COURIER
WEST LIBERTY, KY.
TELEPHONE S H 3-3845

THE COURIER PUBLISHING

T HE E LLIOTT C OUNT Y N EWS
SANDY HOOK, KY.
T ELEPHONE R E 8 •6656

Co.

EARL W . K INNER. PUBLIS HER AND MANAGER

WEST LIBERTY, KY.

TELEPHONES :
SHERWOOD 3-3845
SHERWOOD 3 -3841

Aug. 18, 1967
Hon. Carl D. Perkins
Rep. 7th Kyo Dist.
House Office Building
Washington, D. c.
Dear Carl:
John Watts stopped the Falmouth Dam
appDopriation. Hope you can do something to
stop the Red River damo
Attached are opinions from our three
papers about Red River and Paint and Blaine
Creek projects.
We think most people are now feeling
about the same way as regards reservoirs 0
Hope you will take staps to stay these
projects.
Sincerely,

BARL W. KINNER

�OBSERVATIONS
•

AND

prove we ha:ve just as good
craftsmen in the h'.ills as anywhere.

•

IKE APPROVES BOMBING
-When· the armed forces announced this week American ,
planes had bombed a railNO SIDEWALKS _ CITY road bridge in North VietLIABLE FOR DAMAGES _ nam just 10 miles from China
West Liberty is the biggest on the main railroad bringand best tov.rn we know of ing military supplies from
tbat does not have sidewalks. China to the Viet Cong, fonnAnd thousands of man-hours er President Eisenhower said,
of labor under the Work Ex- ''I do not believe the bombperience and Trnining Pro- ings constitute a risk of
gr'am are available to build bringing Red China info the
sidewalks at no cost to the war." Eisenhower said he apcity. A foreman for a big con- proved the new attacks bestruct~on firm was heard to cause military targets are
remark recently that he could involved ~d said raids close
ta'ke 12 to 16 "happy pappies" to the &lt;;hmese border should
~nd build sidewalks all over ~ ctmtmued.
West Liberty in four or fiv~ ·
- -- months. But no effort has SPOILING RIDR RIVER--Tlie.
been made to get a project appropriations sub-committee
~tarted-not even a permit to in the House has approved
J:)Uild sidewalks. Prestons- $330,000 to start construction
bur.g Street is the town's sec- on Red River Dam in Powell
ond most traveled street. It County, but the House has
is on Prestonsburg Street not yet voted the money. Red
where the high school is lo- Riiver is the last unspoiled
cated. Hundreds of children wild river in the eastern part
have to walk out in the street of the nation, too beautiful
11a get to school-there being to be covered by a reservoir.
111owhere else to walk. The P1,otests should be made to
b ig increase in fa-affic on President Johnson an·d GovUS-460 (which traverses Pres- ernor Breathitt direct to foretonsburg street past the high stall any project that would
school) makes the danger 'spoil this unspoiled river of
critical. City officials may Daniel Boone National F ornot act until a 'YOUth is hit ~st. Too much beautiful counand killed. Then the c1ty may tryside is being covered by
he liable for damages.
'reservoirs in this Appalachian region. Only enough dams
HURJRAH FOR THE HILLS to protect against floods are
,-The quarterly newsletter- justified. Dams and raeser. magazine of Alice Lloyd Col- voirs built. primarily to suplege back in the hills of •ply water to downri,ver cities
~ nott County, won second hurt people in our region, and
place award in the Graphic we should fight such projects
Arts Aw a rd Competition before they get started.
~ponsorred by the Printing Inb
o.ustry of the Carolinas, Inc. $5 :M[LLION ·F OR RECREAThe Ali.ee Lloyd publication 'I\ION-The U . S. Corps- of En- [' ,
iwas judged :llor excellence in gineers pla,ns about $5 million t
concept, design, and crafts- worth of recreationaJl devrelopananshirp. Editor is Robert ment along Cave Run iRies.e1·~ ee Hoskins. Which goes to voiir. Planned are -550 picnic ,

PREDICTIONS

PA.GE FOUR

West Liberty, Ky., August 17, ).96'7

It

�'

'

·-- ~

OBSEtYA~IONS

~D
PREDICTIONS

DREDGING ST-REAM BED--

C-Ongtressman

Perkins

W'hile

home for the July 4th l'ecess

of Congress, announced fillat
$65,000 would be in the 1967-

68 federal P ublic Works bud•
get to dredge the channel of

Beaver Creek from Martin to

lts confluence v;&gt;ith Big San- ~dy River to prevent floqding

of· Martin. This

is the Kind o'f

public works projects need- .., ·
ed- in the mountain.,.-&lt;ll'eoging_:
ancl wid1;cnlng channels of ·neiaar- ·

--------

clogged strea:ms. But Congress:

man Perkins saiid allso the bud{&lt;et would contain $200,000 foi .
the Paintsville Reservoir o'n

Paint Creek in Johnson and" '
Morgan and for tlie Yatesville· ·
Dam on Blaine Creek near Lou-·
1sa. These are the kind of i)ublic works projects not needed

in the mount.a.ins. Dredge rand
widen ohannels of our clogged

mountain streams and build only enough ·dams to protect
towns from floods. Bla.i·n e Creek'
never flooded any town. lt is -the·
least neede'd of any d'am· we
have ever heara proposed. Covering valuaible iand 1&gt;ca.rce, bot~
&gt;tom land With big reservoirs ,
brings no profit to an ave-a in
our hill count-i:y• .

•I • .,

ONE MILLION JOBS-Tobacco :l
is Kentucky's biggest cash crop
and brings in more than 300

million dollars annually to farmers, and the tobacco indu$.t,.,
provides . emipl.nvmen+

'

..

�September 7, 1967

~

Mr. W. R. Holstein

3307 Pi.neneedle Lane
Louisville, Kent ucky 40222

:Dear Mr. Holstein:

~or sen"l
send me a copy of the
to President Johnson.

It was t houghtful o
letter you and Mr. C. B. Tic

I note your r ~
$330, 000 f or :prelimi

st
c

1/ith U •·

at the appropriation of
truction on the Red River Dam.

be held up.

Sincerely,

C.a.r.l D. Perkins• M. C.

CDP:rr

�Lou;sville, K~~~ucky
Sapterabw- f, .1:961

The Pres i dent
The White House
Washington 25. D.C.
Dear Mr. President:
We regret that the House Appropriations Conmittee has recently approved
the expenditure of $330,000 for construction of the Red River Reservoir. The
Red is Kentucky's finest wild river and one of the state's most valuable scenic
and recreational regions. We believe that the Red River Gorge, in its present
wild state# is more valuable to the people of Kentucky and 5urrounding states,
than it will be as a drowned valley behind a dam.
Hearings on this project were held thirteen years ago, during a period
when we were not as alert as we are today to the threat of vanishing wilderness
and to the population explosion. At that time, the Corps of Engineers justified
the cost of the dam on the basis of recreational and flood control benefits. we
find reason to question their calculation of recreational benefits amounting to
$70,000 annually, after reading a letter written by Hr. Frank J. Welch, Assistant
Secretary of Agriculture, to the Secretary of the Army, dated July 26, 1961. Mr.
Welch stated: 110ur estimate of recreatfona1 use by 1970, in this portion of the
Red River Valley, without the reservoir, exceeds the Corps of Engineers estimates
of recreational use with the reservoir constructed".
The flood control benefits as reported in House Document No. 423, show
$1S0,000 for Kentucky River tributaries, $148 7 000 for Kentucky River Main Stem,
and $142,000 for Ohio River for a total of $440,000. This must be on an annual
bas;s. We quest;on the validity of these calculations after reading another
section of Hr. Vetch's letter which statess
''The report estimates that the Eagle Creek and Red River Reservoirs
would have reduced the crest of the January 1937 flood, the maximum flood of
record in the Ohio River Basin, at Louisville, Kentucky by 0.2 foot and 0.1
foot respectively. The report also estimates that the Red River Reservoir would
have reduced the stage of the 1937 flood in the lower damange reach of the Ohio
River by 0.025 foot. It would appear that their estimates, which indicate minute
reductions in flood crests along the Ohio River flood plain, are we11 within the
limits of error of both the data and the procedures used for these determinations
and are therefore, of questionable value in assessing benefits". We are dubious
that this dam can be economically or morally justified as a flood control project.
The Red River flows through a canyon of great scenic beauty, unique
in this area, with high values for recreation, fishing and hunting. Many of
these values will be lost if the dam materializes. rhe attached schedule lists
some of the destructive effects of the reservoir. Have we any right to destroy
the wild, scenic nature of this area unless we are to gain something more valu•
able in return?

�Page • 2

We ask that the appr opriation of funds for this project be delayed
until an impartial study can be made of the area and its best. long-range
use. We believe that Kentucky cannot afford to lose this great scenic wilderness recreation area. Secretary Udall stated the ease very we11 when he said:
"If• in our haste to 'progress'• the economics of ecology are disregarded by
citizens and policymakers alike. the result will be an ugly America. We
cannot afford an America where expedience tramples upon esthetics and development decisions are made with an eye only on the present".

Most respectfully yours,

UJ/2-N~
w. R. Ho1stei n
3307 Pineneed1e Lane
Louisville. Kentucky 40222

c.

B. Tichenor
Cave Spring Farm. Route 1
Nicholasville, Kentucky 403S6

attch.

�•

DESTRUCTIVE IMPACT OF THE RED RIVER RESERVOIR

t. The elimination of the land route along and through the scenic
Red River Gorge. This is the most unique and beautiful area of
its kind in the eastern United States.
It.

The elimination of most of the white water which is now being
used by Kentuckians and those from adjoining states for canoe
travel. This is the best of the few white water steams in
Kentucky.

III. The elimination of the beaver population. This is one of the
few areas in Kentucky where a high beaver population exists
without conflict with farming and access road flooding.
IV.

v.

Elimination of trout fishing in Swift Camp Creek and the Red
River above the bridge.
The elimination of a key wildlife habitat component in the form
of cleared bottom land soils. This component can't be replaced
anywhere in the area.

VI.

The drastic reduction or elimination of the wild turkey population
in the area. This is one of the best in Kentucky.

VII.

The drastic reduction of squirrel, deer and g~ouse which now habitat the area. The grouse and squirrel hunting in the area is very
good.

VIII.

The elimination of what is potentially one of Kentucky 1 s best
fishing streams for walleye and muskie, with controlled sflto,toa.
measures enforced.

IX. The elimination of one of the finest stretches of wild river left
in Kentucky, and a future tourist attraction of far greater potential than any lake that could be built.
X.

The elimination of parts of the most scenic of the hiking trails
and the land route to view the scenic Sky Bridge.

�We have been authorized to use the folto.l ng names as ando-rserJ of this letters
Mr. &amp; Hrs. Jaaes £. Kowalsky

Or. g. Mrs-. Thomas E. Co1 ley

Unf on College. lo.x fe41
Barbowvl l le• Kye C.0,06

1917 C1areMOOe. Orfw
texfngton• . ~Y•

lt28

Mr• Ri·charcf 1-.., 9ecoff
Sox US
Bal'bour¥f 11 e • Ky•

Mias ~ McOowelt

6th Street
Lexington, Ky. le0$08

Col. Lawis H. Morrison
Rt. 2• lox 41)-A
Crestwood• Ky. ,.OOtlt

Mr• Olar1e s H. Gatz

"'• Frank J.Berens

""• Gear~ A .. ttudeman

870 larkspur AWftUe

Kfu Susan w. Gelet"
)&amp;tOO Custer Street

Mt ss Marj ort e O• P1amp

Louhvf 11e• Ky. 1t02·1 3

Cincinnati• Ohio ltS208

Louf svf 11e, K'f• lt020S

428

)839 OOl'rllOnd load

2S33

fureen Drfw
Loufsvf11e, Ky. lt02-18

Loufsvflte. Ky.
1W • Eugene

"'"•· "• Ae
,.
o. lox

w.

c. Anderson

NI"•

llal.f'

18S
Corbin• Ky• ft070l

w.

Mr. Wflliaa H. Garnar

w.

ar.sby

Loutsvf lie, Ky.

930! Beulah toad
Ferri Creek• Ky. At0291
2S~ Tennyson Avenue

G. Duncan

""• &amp; Mra. Davtcf Hu,.el

S19 Rfdgewoocl Drtve

3226 Herbert Avenue

l.ovfsvt 1 le• Ky. lt0202

Ctndnnati• Ohio 4S21t

$heraan
Cl nc:i nnat i , Oht o

""• Jerry Oaks
6$66 Shetwn
Cincinnati• Ohfo

"'"• frank Caftbs
2790 Hewton Roact

Miss Stella Wahler

ffr. Oavfd 1. Shirley

Hf ss Bertha F• Long

Mr$. J. Oaka

6566

2790 Watler

Cincinnati, Ohfo ~S244
2827 SJevf n StreeJ

8ox 10102, AFOG

Ctncfnnatl • Ohio ltS2'+1f

WPAFB, Ohfo ftS,.JJ

Lout svf11e• Ky. 40212

Hr. Hat-ry "• Caudfl 1
Whitesburg. Ky.

Mr• Janes R• Caucff 11
Whf tesburg• Ky•

Whftesburg. Ky•

Mr. Stewart Rowe

Mtsa Sandra "• McNeft I

w. Ge Wt gl __,,-th•
'• o. &amp;ox 27J

IV•

Jr•

Cynthiana• Ky. ,.10'1-

Mr. Earl w. K1Mer
c/o liektng Valley Cowter
&amp; The Wolfe County Newe
\!fest Liberty. Kye lttlt72

1It&amp; Congress Run Rd.

Ctncfni,ati•

Ohfo

4S21S

""• Hywell J,.. Jones
420S 81 ack thort1e Ave.

Long Beach. Calfforttla
(for111erfy of Harlan County)

s. 8rf 2enclfne
ltU Oakview Drhe
Greenvi 11e, Ky. 423l+J

Mr. Atex "acHtllan• Jr.
18 Earnsclfff Ct.
,ort Thanas. Ky. l+t07S

"'"• Johath. . V,. Nof'Rtan, Ut

Mr, &amp; Mrs. Jame.

Mr. 'Thomas

w.

Martin

ttrs. Anne

r:.

CQucff 11

)816 £fmwood AwnUQ

lout-vii le• Ky. lt0207
Mr" Howard E • Marsh

4208 (lufgley Avenue
Lakewood• Ca1ffornta
(formerly of Loutsvf11e)
Hr• John R• hwnport

6 Rto Vfsta Road
louisvU te• Ky.
Mr. Joe

s,una

)i.0t Clewland lllvf.
Lout svf lie, 1ty.

282' Blue Roek Id•

810 McCut11,1111

Cf ncf Mati • Ohfo ltS23'

(lfzabethtown, Ky.

fir• .Nnae·S R• Hfc:ka

Mr. Arthur

s. Rf cketts
7302 Wolf flen 8ranch Rd.

Mr. &amp;- Mrs. Hugh Reynolds

Prospect• Ky. ltOOS.,

CarroHton, Ky.

2301 Chrencf~ Ave.
l.ouisvi tle, Ky._ lt020S

General 8ut1er State Pk.

�Page • 2
Mr. James M. Hurrell
150 Bellaire
Louisville, Ky. 40206

Hr• Edward J • Schwenda u

Mr. John

c. Holt
2407 Ashwood Or•
Louisville, Ky. 40205

Hr. Richard c. Behymer
42S6 Brenan Avenue
Oayton, Ohio 45429

Hr. Cyrus MacKfnnon

Mr. Charles Rogers
P. o. Box 2212
Lyndon, Ky. 40222

525

w.

Broadway

Louisville, Ky. 40202

3808 ~eenwich Rd.
Louisville, Ky.

1833 K1erner Lane
New Albany, Indiana

Hr. &amp; Hrs. Car1 A. Schneider
l)IS Oak Hilt Rd.
Louisville, Ky. 40213

Mr. &amp; Mrs. Richard Kahlstrom
5458 Newfield
Cincinnati, Ohio 45237

Mr. &amp; Mrs. Ben T. Cooper
2200 Cross Hi 11 Rd,.
Louisville, Ky. 402o6

Mr. &amp; Hrs. Whayne H. Haffler
430 N. Broadway

Mr. Sherwood Williams
201 St. James Drive

Mr. H. Scott Pickens

Lexington., Ky.

Lexington, Ky.

Hr. H. T. Shaffer
371 Garden Rd.

Mr. w. T. Hc0ouga11
1852 Russel 1 Cave Road
Lexington, Ky.

Lexington, Ky.

Mr. Michael B. Flynn
218 Shady lane
Lexington, Ky. 40503
Mr. Dudley

c.

Ma~tin

230 Tahoma Rd.

Mr. Robert G. Mascharka

7308 Boxwood Rd.
toufsvilte, Ky. 40~22
Nr. John E. Pearce
The Courier-Journa1

Lexington, Ky. 40S03

Louisville, Ky.

Miss Frances E. Bosley
509 Forum Avenue
Louisville, Ky.

Mr. Edwin

Miss Johanna Henn
Lotts Creek CQflmunity School
Rt. 2, Box 26S
Hazard, Ky. 41701

Hiss Dorothy L. Everson

c. Brooks
7423 Montganery
Cincinnati, Ohfo
4001 Lomond or.
• 16
Louhvil le, Ky . 402

�DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOUISVILLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P. 0. BOX 59. 830 WEST BROADWAY
LOUI SVILLE. KENTUCKY 40201

1N REPLY REFER To ,

ORLRE (Red River Reservoir)

2 August 1967

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington , D. C. 20515
Dear Mr. Perkins :
Further reference is made to the public hearing
which is scheduled to be held on the Red River Reservoir
Project at 7:30 P .M. EST on Wednesday, 16 August 1967,
in the High School Gymnasium at Stanton, Kentucky .
Inclosed for your information and use is a supply
of 11Land Acquisition Procedure" pamphlets. Additional
copies may be furnished on request .
Sincerely yours ,

~ :J \~~
1 Incl
Pamph let (quint)

\_,-/ R. R. WESSELS

Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer

�DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOUISVILLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P . 0. BOX 59. 830 WEST BROADWAY
LOUISVILLE. KENTUCKY 40201

1N REPLY REFER

To,ORLRE- A (Red River Reservoir)

12 July 1967

Honorable Carl D. Per kins
Hous e of Representatives

Washington, D.

c.

20515

Dear Mr . Per kins:
A public hear i ng will be held on the Red River Reservoir
Project at 7:30 P .M. EST on Wednesday, 16 August 1967 , in t he
High School Gymnasium at Stanton, Kentucky.
The purpose of the hearing is to inform landowners and other
interested parties of the general location and extent of lands required for the project and t he basic policies and procedures involved in land acquisition and to answer questions that affected
landowners or others may have concerning the project.
Sincerely yours ,

~~

R • R • WESSELS

Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer

�-

lu·s . :~tJ1a Dc..lton
Stanton, ~cr.:tucky
Dear Hrs . DUl,t;on:

'Hith rc:fer~nce
cc.rn::.n.e th, constructi::&gt;n of t'
clos::.ng a sclf-cxpla11atu1·y le. ·
o~ th~ l.r-..:,s Coi-ps of ~necrs.
:it uas a ple~
for you and yom· husbar~
P.l1.1cys

ffi1,,:)~

Y

CDP:r e
enc.lOS tl.!'e

~

"·:e o lctte1·s convcr Dum, I am en-

Depar tment
obtoin thi• inf01,na.tion

•.1 i~:1.., s ,

Since...•ely,,

Carl D. Perld.n$" M. C.

�-

April 14., 1967

CoJ.oneJ. R.

n. Wessels

District Ens1,neer

u. s.

~

Corps of Engineers

Louisville, ltentuc.liy

Dev Colonel Wesst.As:
Can y-ou tell oe how ao
is expected to begin on the
Councy? ity understanding is
to start this work and ~ ~
pl.ans are.

tl.~tion work
:Ver Dam in Powetl
is
l'XJS~

JN:&gt;'!ll!:Y availabl.e
to hnow what your

S.u~ ~Y :,ow.·s,

CJ&gt;P:rs

Ca.rl D. Perkins, M. C.

�•= = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - ~ - - ~ - ~ t, i.OUiSVILLE

U.S. AR ..

lOUISVILLt, KENTUCKY

40201

26 April 1967

ORLED-P

Honorable Oarl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. C.

20515

Dear Mr. Perkins:

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of 14 April 1967
concerniilg starting construction of the Red River, Kentucky Dam.
Construction is presently .scheduled to begin in the Spring of
1968. This scheduled initiation of construction is predicated on
the time required to complete necessary preconstruction planning
and to acquire the land necessary for construction activities. The
first construction item scheduled is the outlet works.
Subsequent construction will be contingent upon continued
appropriations by Congress. If adequate funds are available it is
estimated that construction will require about four years.
I trust this inf'ormation is sufficient for your present
needs.
Sincerely yours,

R. R. WESSELS

Colonel, Corps or Engineers
District Engineer

�April 14, 1~7

Ure. Martha Dalt~n
Stanton., Kentuclcy
Dea.?" Mrs. Dalton_:

There is, in the budget
1
;330 .,000 for consr..~ ~:;;:
~:
Dam. I would e.ssu::::e the
veey soon. lICMrVer, I ~-::
st LouisVille to tell
w
the sum o~

begin this eonst1-ucti

pass the

\rol"d

• l

he

next fiscal year,

n of the Red River
trcdc on 1 t m.ll begin
e District E:1£1.neer
tc pl.ens they have to
I hear from him, l will

alona ·

With bes{;i;heji\ aJ.~~,

Y

Sinaerel.y,

Karl D. Perkins, U. C.

P. S.-

I keep rememberi.r-3 wbat e. fioo meal I had with you.

�.

•

l

,,

Dalton'c1- RMotwont
Stanton, ~ 40380

April 11, 1967

Hon. Carl Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. c.
Dear Mr. Perkins:
As you know, my husband and I are engaged in
the restaurant business in Stanton , Kentucky. Therefore,
the Dam to be constructed across Red River is of extreme
importance to our business.
We appreciate all you have done for us in aiding
the building of this Dam. However, we would like to ask
an additional favor from you. We want to kmw when, in
your opinion, the contract for the construction of the Dam
will be let and how soon we can expect to see construction
started.
Thanking you in advance, I am,

Very truly yours,

u

Mrs. Martha Dalton
Stanton, Kentucky

�7
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
O FFICE OF THE CHIE F O F E N GINEERS
W ASH ING TON , D.C. 203 1S

IN R EPLY REFER TO

ENGCW-OC

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Mr . Perkins:
Transmitted herewith for your information and further use is a copy of
the Reconnaissance Study of a possible alternate to development of the
authorized Red River Reservoir project in Kentucky .
The Chief of Engineers, after careful evaluation of all factors involved,
has concluded that the multiple purpose projec t at the authorized site
should be construc ted .
Sincerely yours ,

1 Incl
as

~4d
£ ' Cd~cw-(/~~~FERD
D
E. ANDERSON

JR .

C

Lt Colonel, Corps of Engineers
Assistant Director of Civil Works
for Central Divisions

�9 April 1968

ENGCW- OC

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Mr. Perkins:
Transmitted herewith for your information and further use is a copy of
the Reconnaissance Study of a possible alternate to development of the
authorized Red River Reservoir project in Kentucky.
The Chief of Engineers, after careful evaluation of all factors involved,
has concluded that the multiple purpose project at the authorized site
should be constructed.
Sincerely yours ,

'
1 Incl

FERD E. ANDERSON . JR.

as

Lt Colonel, Corps of Engineers
Assistant Director of Civil Works
for Central Divisions

�•

RED RIVER RESERVOIR

!:illJ1.Q

-=:::::

-.:::::::::

FLOOD CONTROL POOL ELEVATION 807
SEASONAL POOL

ELEVATION 767

ROAD TO BE RELOCATED

-v-

0 CO,\TRC.. P001..

~

E(.EV 101

US. HIGHWAY

STAT£ HIGHWAY
COUNTY ROAD

-';

NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY

_,, , ---

APPROX/MAT£ LIMITS OF ACQUISITION

1
!\E

s

I

T

w

..
0
'? -----c

YICJN/TY

IIAP

LAND ACQUISITION PROCEDURE

Cou nl y

I

RED RIVER RESERVOIR
Kenlucky River B asi,,
U .S. hRMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
LOUISVILLE
CORPS
JOLY

1967

CF ENGILV!EERS

LOUISVILLE,

KENTVCKY

�RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KENTUCKY
LAND ACQUISITION PROCEDURE
16 AUGUST 1967
PURPOSE OF PAMPHLET

The purpose of this pamphlet is to provid~ g~neral
information to property owners and other parties interested in the policies and procedures of the Government
concerning the acquisition of real estate interests for the
Red River Reservoir Project, Kentucky.
AUTHORIZATION

The Red River Reservoir is a unit in the general
comprehensive flood control plan for the Kentucky River
and the Ohio River Basin, adopted by the Flood Control
Act approved 23 October 1962 (Public Law 87-874,
87th Congress, HR 13273, 77 Stat. 1173), Section 203
(pertaining to Ken tucky River) and Federal W~ter
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1961. Prosecution
of the project is under the jurisdiction of the District
Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer District, 830 West
Broadway, P. 0. Box 59, Louisville, Kentucky, 40201.
DESCRIPTION

The Red River Dam Site is located on the Red River,
tributary of Kentucky River in East Central Kentucky.
The construction site is approximately 47 miles above
the mouth of the river, about 12 miles northeast of
Stanton, Kentucky and about 115 air miles east-southeast
of Louisville, Kentucky. At spillway crest the elevation
will be 807 feet m.s.l., and the reservoir area will affect
lands in Powell, Menifee and Wolfe Counties. Large
areas in Daniel Boone National Forest will be involved.
INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED

The Government will acquire fee title to such lands as
may be necessary to accomplish the authorized purposes
of the project as follows :
(1) Construction areas for the dam and permanent
structures.
(2) The reservoir area up to elevation 812 feet m.s.l.,
which provides a freeboard of 5 feet above the spillway
crest, to protect against adverse effects of saturation,
wave action and bank erosion.
( 3) Lands required for shoreline control with a
minimum of 300 feet horizontally from the spillway
crest elevation of 807 m.s.l., where freeboard does not
provide such area.
( 4) Selected sites along the shoreline to meet present
and future public requirements for outdoor recreation.
Flowage easements may be acquired in lien of fee title
in remote areas of the resen-oir.

Oil, gas and mineral rights will be acquired in fee or
subordinated to the Government's right to regulate
development in a manner that will not interfere _with the
primary purposes of the project, including public access.

owner will be afforded a reasonable time to negotiate
for settlement. When an agreement is reached, payment
and closing of the transaction is generally completed
within 60 days if the owner's title is free of complications.

CEMETERY RELOCATION

A cemetery, which is located on the construction site,
may have to be moved, depending upon final plans for
dam and appurtenant structures. If it is determined that
relocation of the cemetery is necessary, interested parties
will be contacted. In those cases where cemeteries will
be inundated, or where access will be lost because of the
reservoir, relocation will be at Government expense. A
reinterment site will be selected in the same vicinity, if
possible. Every reasonable effort will be made to procure
a site which meets with the approval of the Cemetery
Association and next of kin. After the site is agreed
upon, a Plan of Relocation will be prepared and an
action will be filed in the U . S. District Court to secure
approval of the Plan of Relocation. Upon approval of
the plan, a contract will be awarded for the disinterment
and reinterment of the remains and relocation of
monuments. The relocation work will be performed as
soon as possible consistent with construction schedules
and availability of funds.

DETERMINATION OF VALUE

ACQUISITION BY CONDEMNATION

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States prO\·ides that just compensation will ~e
paid for the acquisition of private property for public
use. Just compensation is recogni_zed by th~ Courts to be
the fair value of the property nghts acqwred as determined between a willing buyer and a willing seller. The
Courts have held consistently that amounts claimed for
such items as Joss of good will, business potential, and
sentimental attachment cannot be included in payment.
Estimates of the fair value of interests to be acquired
from each individual property will be made by compete?t
professional appraisers familiar with property values m
the vicinity. These appraisers are selected by the Government on the basis of their qualifications as to experience,
integ rity, and demonstrated good judgment in evaluating
the fair market value of real estate. Property owners, or
their representatives, are contacted . by the_se. apprai_sers
and invited to accompany them during their inspections
in order that all factors bearing upon fair values within
the scope of the law may be given full consideration in
preparation of appraisal estimates. Ea0 appraisal ~stimate is given a careful review by a rev1ewmg aprra1ser
to insure accuracy and fairness. Then a representative of
the GO\-ernment will make an appointment with the
landowner to discuss settlement.

It is the policy of the Government to purchase ritshts
in project lands by voluntary sale wh~ever poss1b_le.
There are no high-pressure methods used m dealing with
the owner. Under no circnmstances is the owner compelled to sign a purchase contract. He has the undeniable
right to refuse the offers made by the Government and
demand that his compensation be determined by Court
proceedings. If a satisfactory agreement cannot be
reached within a reasonable time, the Government must
acquire the necessary property rights throug~ the United
States District Court in order that the proiect may be
completed on schedule. At the time the Court action is
filed, the amount of the Government's appraisal is
deposited with the court and title to the required property
rights passes to the Government. Generally, the conrt
will permit the owner to withdraw a substantial amount
of the funds on deposit before the case is tried. Court
action is considered fair to both the Government and the
landowner as each will have a full opportunity to present
evidence of value. Any offers or counteroffers made by
the Government or the landowner during negotiations
for settlement will not be binding in the event of condemnation, unless accepted by both parties.

ACQUISITION BY PURCHASE

Property owners may retain title. to buildings i? t~e
project area, if desired, at the appraised salvage pnce m
both direct purchase and condemnation cases. The appraised salvage price will be deducted from the Government's payment for lands acquired. Buildings retained
by the owner must be removed from the project area in
accordance with dates established by the Government at
the time of acquisition. All buildings not resen-ed by the
owner will be ad,·ertised by the Government and sold to
the highest bidder. Owners will be encouraged to reserve
growing crops except in rare cases where there 1s a
probability that possession of the land will be required
prior to the han·est season.

Land acquisition will commence at the dam site in the
swnmer of 1967 and generally will proceed upstream
therefrom. Present schedules contemplate completion of
acquisition in 1969.

POSSESSION OF LANDS

PROJECT OFFICE

As a general rule, after title has been acquired by the
Government, owners and tenants will be permitted to
retain possession of the premise~ until ~~ey are n 7eded
for project purposes. Under certam cond1t1ons, cont1_nued
occupancy will require lease arrangements, which will be
governed by prevailing rental rates in the vicinity. ~Jnder
no circumstances will the Government take possession of
the owner's property until proper arrangements are made
for payment.

Acquisition of the land for the Red River Reservoir
is nnder the direction of the Morehead Real Estate
Project Office, located at 110 Bishop Avenue, Post
Office Box A, Morehead, Kentucky. Personnel of the
Project Office will render assistance to property owners
in matters pertaining to the real estate program. Property
owners are invited to consult with personnel of the
Project Office at any time.

Section 301, Title III, Public Law 86-645, approved
14 July 1960, provides that:
" It is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress
that owners and tenants whose property is acquired ~or
public works projects of the United States of Amenca
shall be paid a just and reasonable consideration t_herefor.
In order to facilitate the acquisition of land and mteres_ts
therein by negotiation with property owners, to avoid
litigation and to relieve congestion in the courts, the
Secretary of the Army ( or such other officers of the
Department of the Army as he may designate) is authorized in any negotiation for the purchase of such
property to pay a purchase price which will take into
consideration the policy set forth in this section."
In accordance with the intent of the law, actual,
practical, and realistic negotiations will be condu~ted
with each landowner to the same extent practiced
normally between willing buyers and willing sellers in an
effort to arrive at a satisfactory settlement. During the
initial contact for settlement, the landowner will be
advised fully as to the location and amount of land
required for project purposes, the interest to be acquired
and the procedures for purchase and payment. The land-

RESERVATION OF BUILDINGS

MOVING COSTS

Under some conditions property owners and tenants
are paid for certain expenses, losses and damages involved in moving to another site as a result of the
Government haYing acquired their lands. The owners,
or tenants, must make application for snch payments
within one year from the date the Government acquires
title to their land, or from the date they vacate the
premises, whichever is later. These payments are in
addition to payments made to owners for the acquisition
of lands. The Government"s representative wilJ explain
the details of payment for moving costs at the time
property owners are contacted for purchase of lands.
SCHEDULE FOR LAND ACQUISITION

�8

1,1

: I
I

RED RIVER RESERVOIR

~

i

KENTUCKY

MARCH 1968

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS
WASHINGTON, D.C.

�RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KENTUCKY
RECONNAISSANCE STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
2.
3.

r'

Paragra.2..h

Report of Chief of Engineers
Comments of the Dept. of the Interior
Comments of the Dept . of Agriculture
Title
SECTION I - INTRODUCTION

a.

b.
c.
d.

e.

Purpose of Report
Description of Authorized Project
Current Status of Planning and Funding
History of Public Contacts and
Coordination
Nature and Extent of Opposition to
the Project

1
1
2
3

5

SECTION II - SITES AND SCOPES OF DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERED AND
FUNCTIONS OF CONSIDERED SCOPES OF DEVELOPMENT
a.

b.
c.

General Background
Function Summary
Relation of Considered Scopes of Red River
Development to Kentucky River Basin
Development

5
7

8

SECTION III - ECONOMICS OF THE CONSIDERED SCOPES
OF DEVELOPMENT
a.
b,

c.

Basis of Average Annual Benefits
Basis for First Costs and Annual Charges
Relationship of Annual Benefits and
Annual Economic Charges for Each
Considered Scope of Development

8
9

12

SECTION IV - PHYSICAL AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF THE
CONSIDERED SCOPES OF DEVELOPMENT
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.

g.

General
Natural Arches and Other Geologic Features
Fish and Wildlife
White Water
Educational Value
Wilderness Setting
Other Aesthetic Considerations

a

12
13
14
14
15
15
·16

f}
·¥

�TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
Title

SECTION V - SOCIAL EFFECTS

16

SECTION VI - SUMMARY DISCUSSION

17

SECTION VII - CONCLUSION

19

LIST OF TABLES
Title
1

2

3

4

Pag~

Agencies with which Red River Reservoir
Project has been coordinated

4

Physical characteristics for various scopes
of development, Red Riv~r Reservoir,
Kentuckr

6

Relative functions of each considered
scope of development, Red River
Reservoir, Kentucky

7

Annual tangible economic benefits to each
considered scope of development, Red
River Reservoir, Kentucky

9

5

Summary of first costs for each considered
scope of development, Red River Reservoir,
Kentucky
10

6

uerivatiQn and summary of annual economic
charges for each considered scope of
development, Red River Reservoir,
Kentucky

11

7

Comparison of annual benefits and annual
economic charges for each considered
scope of development, Red River Reservoir,
Kentucky
12

8

Extent that each considered scope of
development affects the gorge area and
tributaries, Red River Reservoir,
Kentucky

b

13

�TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
LIST OF PLATES
Plate No •
•

Title

1

General Map

2

Consider ed Dam Sites

3

Relative Pool Levels for Considered Dam Sites

4

Stre~m Profiles &amp; Pool Levels Considered
(2 sheets)
LIST OF APPENDICES

No.

Title

A

Evaluatio,, of Re creation and Na~ural Values

B

Sierra Club Analysis of 6 March 1968

C

�DEPARTMENT OF T HE ARMY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS
WASHINGTON, O.C. 20315

IN REPLY REFER TO

15 March 1968

HEPOHT OF 'lliE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS
ON RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KEN'IU::KY

This is 11\Y report on the r ecent reconnaissance study of possible
alternates to development of the authorized Red River Reservoir projec t.
The study was conducted with the cooperation of the Departments of
Interior and AG;riculture.

Copies of the comments on the report from

Secretary of Interior St ewart L. Udall and Assistant Secretary of
Asri cult ur e J-ohn A. Baker are incorporated in this report .
As can b e seen from Section VII of the report, I have concluded that
the site presently under design is the best site for construction of the
contemplated multipurpose project.

WILLI.AM F. CASSIDY

Lieutenant General, USA
Chief of Engineers

�UNITED STATES
D~PARTMENT OF THE INTER IOR
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
WASHINGTON, D.C .

20240

March 14, 1968
Dear General Cassidy:
Your letter of March 12, 1968, requests our comments on
your reconnaissance study report, Red River Reservoir,
Kentucky.
In accordance with the agreement reached with Secretary
Resor, representatives of this Department cooperated with
members of your staff in making the reconaissance study.
Two damsites and two levels of development at each site
were considered. Information was obtained on the capability
of each alternate development to provide for flood control,
water supply, water quality control, and outdoor recreation
and fish and wildlife conservation purposes . Consideration
also was given to the impact that each proposed development
would have on the people residing in the affected area and on
the ecological and esthetic aspects of the Red River Gorge.
As you know, Kenneth Holum, Assistant Secretary of the
Interior, and Edward C. Crafts, Director of the Bureau of
Outdoor Recreation, made a complete on .. the .. ground
inspection of the project area in company with you, Phillip S.
Hughes, Deputy Director of the Bureau of the Budget, and
Edward P. Cliff, Chief of the Forest Service, on March 9.
This visit to the area was most helpful to us in making judg ..
ments on the data developed by the reconnaissanc::e study.

,.

The Red River Reservoir Project was authorized for
construction by the Congress in 1962; authorized project
purposes were flood control and recreation. During pre ...
construction planning for the project, the project plan was
modified to include storage to meet industrial and municipal
water supply needs at Lexington and other Kentucky towns
and to improve the quality of water in the Kentucky river.
Our comments focus on a comparison of the potential
developments at the upper and the lower sites which would
satisfy to the same degree the functional objectives of flood
control, water supply, water quality control and recreation.
They are based on the data and analyses provided in your
report.

�Estima ted annual benefits are comparable: $1, 371,000 at
the upper site compared with $1, 364, 000 at the lower site.
Water supply and water quality control benefit s are identical
at the two sites. Flood control benefits are somewhat less
and general and fish and wildlife recreati on benefits are
somewhat higher at the downstream site.
Total estimated first costs for a development at the lower
site exceed those at the upstream site by $2, 720,000 , which
reflects additional costs of the dam and appurtenances and in
lands and damages. Total estimated annual economic charges
for a development at the downstream site are $103,000 greater
than at the upstream site.
The benefit-to-cost ratio for t h e development at t he upstream
site is 2. 25; at the downstream site it is 1. 92. The difference
in excess of estimated annual benefits over annual economic
charges between the two sites is $110,000.
We note, however, that the project at the downstream site would
reduce permanent flooding of the Red River Gorge by about two
miles and would reduce by one-half {six miles) the inundation of
tributary valleys. These values which would be saved if the
downstream site were selected are not, of course, reflected in
the benefit--cost ratio.
As pointed out in your report, while the estimates of first costs
for the project at the upper site are based on good data and
detailed engineering studies, the estimates of costs at the
lower site are, understandably, based on less precise data and
limited engineering s tudies. Obviously, a more accurate
comparison of benefits and costs could be made if the data on
the lower site were more refined. It is recognized that the
foundation conditions at the lower damsit e have not been explored.
Your report notes the tangible advantages accruing to the upper
site and concludes that a dam at that site could be completed
one year earlier than at the lower site. We agree with the conclusion that benefits from development at the upper site could
be realized s ooner than those from the lower. However, since
certain costs also would be incurred s ooner for the upper site,
the actual net benefit foregone woul d be reduced substantially.

2

�It is our understanding that. with a development a t the lower
damsite, the upstream end of the conservation pool {e l evati on
717} would tail out about . 5 miles above the mouth of Swift
Camp Creek; i.e., upstream from the Route 715 crossing.
This appears to meet the concern about sediment build-up
at the point where visitors would have their first opportunity
to view the river and roughs. Obviously, minor modifications
in the project plan might be necessary to select the optimum
elevation for the seasonal pool. This seems possible.
As noted in the report, a project at the downstream site would
permit maintaining a portion of State Highway 715 to provide
road access to the upper gorge when the project is not operating
for flood control. The development at the upper damsite would
flood out the present road on the north side of the river and
future access to this part of the gorge would be from the south
side of the river only. It is our judgment that providing some
road access to this highly scenic area is essential. Providing
this access would reduce the cost advantage for the upper site.
As I am sure you are aware, in recent years the public generally
has become increasingly aware of and concerned with maintaining
the natural and ecological values such as those this stream valley
and its surrounding environment display in high degree. This
change in attitude has led us to assign more significance to the
intangibl e values in our consideration of conflicts between
pressures for development and pressures for preserving some
stream valleys in their natural state.

In retrospect, if we were starting with a clean slate in our
consideration of the Red River under today's criteria which
give heavier emphasis to protection of natural values than was
true a d ecade ago, we might well decide: (1) that no dam should
be built on this riv er and attempt to meet the needs in some
other fashion; or (2) propose a dam at the lower site.

In conclusion, therefore, while we prefer either no dam or the
lower site, we realize that, in view of the cost differential,
including the rebuilding of roads and provisions of necessary
access sites, time delay, and lack of substantial disparity
between effects on the natural values of the area, the

3

�Administration and the Congress may wish to procee d with
the authorized project as recommended by the Corps of
Engineerso
We appreciate the opportunity to participate in the
reconnaissance restudy and the opportunity to review your
proposed report.

tJ8&amp;U

erior

Lt. Gen. William F. Cassidy
Chief of Engineers
Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army
Washington, D. Co 20315

�. 1

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS
WASH I NGTON, O.C. 20315

IN R EP LY REFER TO

ENGCW- OC

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
House of Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Mr. Perkins :
Inclosed is Plate 5 showing the relative elevations of some principal
geologic formations and pool levels of Red River Reservoir project in
Kentucky .
The plate should be inserted in the copy of the reconnaissance study
report by the Chief of Engineers previously furnished you .
Sincerely yours,

1 Incl
as

$d_~-~ ? r FERD E• .ANDERSON, JR,

Lt Colonel, Corps of Engineers
Assistant Director of Civil Works
for Central Divisions

�18 April 1968

ENGCW-OC

Honorable Carl D. Perkins
Rouse of Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Mr. Perkins:

tncl.osed is Pl.ate 5 shoving the relative elevations of' some principal
geologic formations and pool levels of Red River Reservoir project in
Kentucky.

'lhe plate should be inserted in the copy of the reconnaissance st\ldy
report by the Chief of Engineers previously furnished you.
Sincerely yours,

1 Incl
as

FERD E. ANDERSON, JR.
Lt Col.onel, Corps of El:lgineers
Assistant Director of Civil Works
for Central Divisiona

�7

. 1230

/

/

I

1170

/

/

/
/

-- 1050
.

Nada Tunnel

en

.

E
Q)

&gt;

NOTE: For d escription of geological
features see Section IV,
Paragraph b of text.

990

0

..a
0

+-

Q)

-

930
Red Byrd Arch

Q)

r.f•

~

C

~o

8 70

&lt;;
/

+-

0

&gt;
Q)

Moonshiner Arch
(Hunter's)

UPPER DAMSITE

________ ~~ ::ntr:I~~~~_~I~~BO~]________ ______ _

810

w

WUff

Seasonal Pool - Elev. 757

750

RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KENTUCKY
DAM LOCATION
AND
POOL LEVELS STUDY

690

UPPER DAMSITE
RELATION OF GEOLOGICAL
FEATURES TO RESERVOIR

630'--J-_.&amp;-______________________________________._____
/

42

44

46

48

50

52

54

56

Miles Above Mouth of Red River

58

60

,2

I

64

66
PLATE 5

�DEPARTMENT OF AGR ICULTURE
W ASHINGTON. D.C. 20250

Lieutenant General William F . Cassidy
Department of the Army
Ch ief of Engineers
Dear General Cassidy:
Reference is made to your letter of March 12, 1968, and the blue penciled
draft report of the Red River Reservoir ·reconnaissance study which accomp~nieu that letter .
Th e Red River Reservoir would l ie wholly or substantially within the
Daniel Boone National Forest- - depending on which damsit e is selected.
I n any case, it is contemplated that the Forest Service would develop
and administer reservoi r recr eation and related l and management i n har mony with existing Nati onal Forest programs .
I n a recent re- eval uat i on of t he four reservoir alternatives, with part icula~ emphasis on the scenic, geologic, f i sh and wildlife, and recreation valu es of the area, the multi ple purpose project at t he authorized
s ite and the flood -~ontro.l only project at the downstrea..-n site far
outranked other alternatives as being most acc eptable .
Th e choice "between those two acc eptable alternati ves was not an easy
one. The multiple purpose p~oject at the authorized site would create
a splendid opportunity for a rather unusual boating, hi ki ng, and
viewi ng e:iq)erience while the downstream flood contr ol only project would
mi nimize inu~dation of a f ine stream bottom emrironm.ent. The remaining
t wo alternatives are undesirable i n that they would present either
bothersome sedimentation patterns or reduced recreati on opportunity
while inundating substantially the same mileage of stream in the Gor ge
as would the multiple purpose project at the authorized s ite .
Our analysi s has failed t o i dentify sufficient reason to support the
flood control only project at the downstream s i te. Although we recogni 7,e the superb qualities of the Gorge as a whole, we know that it is
not a natural or primitive or wilderness area. I t has been logged.
It has r oads in it . Several structures exi st there. We also know
that m~st of the scenic and geologic features of the Gorge will remai n
wi th the multipl e purpose project at the authorized site.

�2.
We support the multiple purpose project at the authorized site and judge
it to have the potenti al for recapturing some of the back country feeling
that has already been lost in the Gorge. At the same time , it would have
characteri stics which would make possible an unusually high quality and
very usable water based recreat i on envi ronmen~. We would capitalize on
these characteri stic s through a dispersed type of recreational development
program in the upper Red River arm of the reservo.ir- -a pr-ogram which would
complement the more conventi onal type of reservoir recreation p.l anned ::~or
the balance of the impo'..Uldment . We look forward to working with the
Corps of Engi neer s i n the development of a master plan f or the reservoir
which recognizes t hese objectives .

Sincerely yours,

t¥

·'= •· __

~~sistant Searetarf

(

qfi~

�SECTION I - INTRODUCTION
a . Purpose_2..!._ report. The purpose of this report is to provide information on two considered damsites for Red River R~servoir
with two levels of development at each site in order to evalua t e the
economic, physical and social effects of each level of deve 101-mc n t
at each site. Development levels have been carefully selected to
provide infprmation on a wide range of performance as related to the:
(1) beneficial effects for flood control, water supply and water quality
improvement at downstream points; (2) recreational opportunities that
would be obtained by virtue of each level of development ; (3) i:;ocial
aspects to the extent that the levels of development would affect
families and real estate; and (4) the physical effects of each considered
level of development on the ecology, aesthetics and biota of the gorge.
It is well established that the level of development which would provide
the greatest measurable economic benefits would have large physical impacts upon the gorge. Conversely, it is equal ly well established that
the level of deyelopment which would minimize th~ impact on the gorge
would result in substantially reduced downstre.am benefits . Thns,
the objective of this study is to €Xpl ore the interrelation of the
economic, social, and ecological impac ts of several levels of development
so that information is available for decision making. Economic costs
and benefits will be presented for each level of development and social
effects will be discussed to the extent that the plans directly affect
land and families . The extent of inundation of the gorge will be
depicted for each of the considered levels of development.
b. Description of authorized project. The Red River Reservoir
project was authorized for construction by the Congress in 1962. The
authorization provided for a dam on t he North Fork of the Red River
approximately 47.5 miles upstream from the mouth of the Red River
with the damsite about 7 miles upstream from the mouth of North Fork
of the Red River. The authorized project purposes were flood control
and recreation (including fish and wildlife recreation). The. project
lies entirely within the proclamation boundary of the Dan iel Boone
National Forest. The da11IBite is located in Powell County, Ken tucky
with the reservo i r e).tending into Menifee and Wolfe counties. The
authorization contemplated:
(1)

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

an earthen dam having a height of approxit1at€ly
175 feet .
a saddle spillway .
a conventional dry-tower outlet works.
project lands necessary to develop and support all
project purposes .
relocation of highways and other utilities, as necessary,
to sustain existing transportation patterns and utility services that will still be needed after the
project is completed.

�(6)

facilities and access roads necessary to develop
the recreation opportunities created and to
support the public needs.

The authorized Red River Reservoir project has been closely integrated into an overall development plan for the water resources
of the Kentucky River basin. In addition to Red River Reservoir,
the present basin plan consists of the following projects:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

Buckhorn Reservoir - completed
Carr Fork Reservoir - under construction
Booneville Reservoir - authorized, in preconstruction
planning
Eagle Creek Reservoir - authorized, in preconstruction
planning

In addition to the above listed authorized projects, a potential
reservoir on the North Fork of the Kentucky River, the Kingdom Come
Reservoir, is in the latter stage of study and consideration. The
locational relation of the Red River Reservoir to the above reservoirs
as well as to t he several major local protection projects in the Kentucky
River basin is shown on plate 1.
c. Current status of planning and funding. Funds for preconstruction planning of the Project were first appropriated in Fiscal
Year 1964 and continued in Fiscal Years 1965 and 1966 . Funds for
initiation of construction were appropriated in Fiscal Years 1967
and 1968. The President's budget for Fiscal Year 1969 includ es an
amount of $800,000 for continuation of construction. Acq u isition
of project lands at the upper damsite has begun but actual pl~sical
construction has been delayed due to budgetary restrictions on expenditure of appropriated funds and due to lack of completion of planning
necessary to initiate const ruction.
During the preconstruction planning for Red River Reservoir,
it was necessary to review the scope and features of the authorized
project to determine if the project properly reflected the total wat er
resource needs t hat might be served and to give consideration to current
legislation and to the requirements of Senate Document 97, which have
been adopted since project authorization. As a result of this review,
consideration was given to modifying the authorized project to include
storage in the reservoir to meet a municipal and industrail water
supply need at Lexington and other Kentucky Bluegrass areas a nd for
improving the quality of water in the Kentucky River by augmenting
low flows.

2

�The requirements for stotage for water quality control were determined
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration in accordance
with the Water Pollution Control Act of 1961, as amended (Public La.w
87-88). 1he r equirements fo ~ storage for municipal and industrial
water supply were determined in response to a request of the Kentucky
Water Resources Authority, the responsible agency for the State of
Kentucky, and have been closely coordinated with that agency. Inclusion
of storage for water supply into the project was investigated in
accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended (Title Ill
of Public Law 85-500). This act requires that non-Federal interests
must be r esponsib le for the ~osts of storage provided in Federally
constructed re&amp;ervoirs for water supply.
In view of the indicated
requirements for both water quality control and water supply storage
in the Kentucky River and wj_th the legislative authority to modify
the project to include these functions, storage for water quality
control and water supply are being considered as project purposes.
Red River Reservoir, because of site limitations, is incapable
of meeting the total water quality control and water supply storage
requirements in addition to t·h~ flood control storage requirement.
Consequently, Red River Reservoir has been integrated into a system
with Booneville Reservoir, which has the best physical and locational
capability of meeting part of the water quality and/or water supply
needs of the lower Red RivPr and Kentucky River basins.
In accord with the Men,orandum of Agreement between the Secretaries
of Army and A~riculture, it is contemplated that the project's recreational
opportunities nnd land management would be developed and administered
by the Forest Service in harmony with existing programs and development
within t he Daniel Boone National Forest. Thus, the Red River Reservoir
project is being integrated into a comprehensive recreational and
public use plan for thE Daniel Boone National Forest in recognition
of many facets, includi.1g the Cave Run Reservoir (now under construction
in the Lickitg River basin) and the authorized Booneville Reservoir.
d. History of_.£.'-!.!?}ic contact_s and coordination. In the early
stages of the study, wh i c h resulted in t he authorization of the Red
River Reservoir, publjc b~arings were held in Hazard and Frankfort,
Kentucky on 22 Hay 19.:,4 c:.n&lt; 2 June 1954, respectively. The purpose
of these early hearings wa; to solicit the views of the local citizens
as to the water resource needs in the Kentucky River basin. At that
time a specific request ti; construct a dam on the Red River in the
interest of flood control was presented by local interests. Throughout
the s tudy, close coor.J1.nation was maintained with interested local,
State and Federal Agencies. After the Ohio River Division Enginee r
had reviewed the r eport of the Louisville District Engineer, a pub l ic
notice was issued outlini1,g the features of the projects being considered
and presenting the rccorr,mendations of the reporting officers thereon.
The notice further im, i cec; comments to be furnished the Board of Engineers
for Rive rs and Harbor s . Response to this notice was favorable to
construction of the Red River project.

3

�r,..

Prior to authorization, the Public Works Committees of the United
States Senate and House of Representatives held hearings on the Kentucky
River report, in which the Red River Reservoir Project was included . In
these hearings there was no opposition recorded. Subsequent to authorization, the District Engineer, Louisville, held a public hearing at
Stanton, Kentucky in March 1963. The purpose of the hearing was to in;Q!1D_~ll interests of the extent and nature of the project authori~ed by
the Congress. The hearing at Stanton in March 1963 was attended by
approximately 200 people, of whom 75 signed attendance cards. Of
those expressing their views, none opposed the Red River Project.
In August 1967, a public meeting was held in Stanton, Kentucky
primarily for the purpose of informiug the land owners, who would
be affected by the project, of the real estate acquisition procedures
and tentative schedules for acquisition. At this meeting, the first
formal opposition to the project was expressed by representatives
of the Kentucky Section of the Great Lakes Chapter of the Sierra Club .
The Kentucky Section was formed in February 1967.
Prior to and subsequent to authorization, and as appropriate
to the scope and nature of the progressive phases of planning, close
coordination has been maintained with the known Federal, State and
local agencies having significant interest in the project. A summary
of those agencies with which the project has been coordinated is presented
in Table 1.
Table 1 .

Agencies with which Red River Reservoir
Project has been coordinated

---------------·- -- ------------ -----Agency
Federal Agencies
National Park Service
Fish and Wildlife Service
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Soil Conservation Service
Forest Service
Bureau of Public Roads
Bureau of Mines
Commonwealth
Department
Department
Department
Department

of
of
of
of
of

Kentucky Agencies
Highways
Fish and Wildlife Resources
Parks
Natural Resources

Local Agencies
Powell County
Menifee County
Wolfe County

4

�e . Nature and e xtent of opposition to the project . Opposition
to the Red River Proj ,~ct has developed in the last several months,
particula rly since abnut Jul y 1967. The opposition has been composed
primarily of conservation groups led by the Kentucky Section of the
Great Lakes Chapt e r of the Sierra Club and supported by several ocher
groups, viz; the Nature Conservancy, the Audubon Society, and the
Kentucky Academy of Science. In addition to these formal organizations,
some memht:r s u i t he a c ademic community, primarily those involved
in biological sciences, are opposed to the project on the basis tha t
the project area is presently being utilized as a natural classroom
anJ t hat area' s educational value would be lessened if the project
we r e conslr uctcd. Oppos ition to the project has also taken the form
of letter writing to various public officials in the United States
Con gr ess, t he ;:xe cutive Branch of the Federal Government, and the
St a t e Gove rnment of Ke ntucky. Also public speeches have been made
by r e prcs ~ntative s of t he opposition and newspaper articles have appeared
in two major newspapers in Kentucky and in national publications in
opposition to t he Project.
Maj or support fo1 the project has been maintained by people in
the Red River Valley who are interested in an improved degree of flood
protection. Additional support for the project has been maintained by
interests whose present and/or future ph ysical and economic welfare is
dependent to a large extent on having an adequate quality and quantity
of flows in the Kentucky River. The expressed views of the Executive
Branch of the Commonwealth of Kentucky are in support of the Project.
The House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Kentucky recently
passed a Resolution in support of the project by a vote of 61 to 11.
The Board of Directors of the League of Kentucky Sportsmen (an affiliate
of the National Wildlife Federation) also went on record in support of
the project. Additional support comes from downstream interests requiring adequate quality and quantity of water in the Kentucky River.
SECTIOtl II - SITES AND SCOPES OF DEVELOPHENT CONSIDERED AND
FUNCTlONS OF CONSIDERED SCOPES OF DEVELOPMENT
a. Gener~.!_!)5:.ckground. For this study there are two damsites
being conside red . These sites are depicted on plate 2. One of these
sites, referred to as the upper site, is the site which has been authorized
by t he Congress and is the site on which detailed planning to date
has been ba~ed. The other site is about 5.3 miles downstream from
the upper site and is referred to as the lower site. These two sites
were selected for study since no other sites were found which could
satisfy the flood control objectives as authorized by the Congress.
In order to provide a wide range of pool levels for consideration of the
effects on the ecology and aesthetics of the area, two pool levels
were selected for each site. One of these pool levels is referred
5

�to as of Mult i ple-Purpose scope. This multiple-purpose pool level
would satisfy the functional objectives for flood control, water quality
control, water supply, and r e creation in accord with presently available
information and in accord with project formulation requirements as
described in Senate Document No . 97 . In order that consideration
might be accorded to lesser scopes of development, particularly with
respect to effects on the gorge, a scope of development to minimize the
effect on the ecology was selected for study at each of the two sites.
Each lesser scope is studied as a point of reference only and is refe rred
to as the Flood Control scope since the storage provided is that storage
which is required to retain the authorized flood control function
of the multiple-purpose scopes. It is emphasized that these lesser
scopes are, in fact, points of reference rather than realistic alterat ives.
Thus , t here are four scopes of development selected for study
which are referred to hereinafter as :
UMP - Upper site - multiple-purpose scope
UFC - Upper site - flood control scope
LMP - Lower site - multiple-purpose scope
LFC - Lower site - flood control scope
The physical c haracteristics of the considered scopes of development are summarized in table 2 and shown graphically on plate 3.
The scopes of development selected for study were agreed on by
representatives of the Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and Army
on 21 February 1968. Input for the study has been provided by each
of these Departments.
Table 2.
Site and
Level of
Development
UMP

"
11

II

UFC

"
LMP
II
II
II

LFC
II

Physical characteristics for various scopes
of development, Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

- •-·- -·- - -- - - -Elevation
(rns l)

Area
(acre~_)_

Volume
(acre-feet)

Mi nimum
w.s. - W.Q.C .
Seasonal
Flood Control

725
751
757
801

1 , 080
1,720
1,870
3,180

24 , 000
60,500
71, 300
179,400

Minimum
Flood Control

712
785

740
2,590

12,100
133,400

Minimum
w.s. - W.Q.C.
Seasonal
Flood Control

688
712
717
755

1,180
1,950
2,120
3,450

25,800
62,500
72,800
180,600

Minimum
flQQd ~ontrol

685
744

1,080
3,060

22,700
l{t.'.2, 00Q

Pool

6

�b. Function Suim,ary. A summary o f the functions &amp; capabilities
of the considered scopes of development is presented in Table 3.
Table 3.

Relative functions of each considered scope of
development, Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

- -- - -- --- ---- - ---------·---------·

UFC
LMP
LFC
-----------

UMP

FLOOD
CONTROL
---- ·-Stage reductions

(in feet)
At Clay City (on Red River)
1 year flood
3. 8
10 year flood
6.0
50 year flood
6.0
At Frankfort (on Kentucky River)
l.U
1 year flood
1.0
10 year flood
50 year flood
0.6

WATER SUPPLY
Estimated dependable yield
(M . G. D. )
Diversion out of basin 2,./
At Lexington Intake

10
65

WATER QYf\.LITl CONTROL
Objective flows below
Lexington (c.f.s.)
GENERAL AND FISH AND WILDLIFE
RJ::CREATlON
------Visitor days per year
Initial use
Ul timate use

477

'!!./

220,000
600,000

3.8
6.0
6.0

4.0

4.0

6. 2
6 .2

6.2
6.2

1.0
1.0
0.6

1.0
1.0
0. 6

1.0
1.0
0.6

None
None

10
65

None

477

80 ,000
200,000

None
None

p_/

240,000
600,000

None

110,000
250,000

IrWACT OF EACH CONSIDERED SCOPt
-OF_!)EVELOPt-lliNT
---- - - --OH E_COLOGY, BIOTA
AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF
THE GORGE c/

2

4

3

1

2,./

To Mt. Sterling.

'E.._/

Maximum objective 9 out of 10 years during months of June, July,
August and September. Other monthly objectives are January, February
and December - 140 c.f . s.; March and Novembe r - 164 c.f.s . ; and
Apri l, May and October - 312 c . f . s.

£1

Impact increases as numbers increase.

7

�c. Relation of considered scopes of Red River development to
Kentucky River basin development. The planning to date on tf1e Red
River Reservoir has been developed in coordination with that for other
projects within the Kentucky River basin so as to provide optimum
development in meeting the water resources needs of the basin. Thus,
the UMP scope of development, which is the r esult of planning to date,
reflects the appropriate flood control benefits for the Kentucky River
basin after benefits have been computed for the Buckhorn and Carr
Fork Reservoirs. Likewise, the flood control benefits along the Ohio
River are computed subordinate to the effects of reservoirs in the
Ohio River basin which are completed or under construction. The water
quality control storage has been developed in a system with the Booneville
Reservoir.
SECTION III - ECONOMICS OF THE CONSIDERED
SCOPES OF DEVELOPMENT
a. Basis of ?Verage annual benefits. The benefits attributable
to each scope of development are computed by established methods .
All benefits are based on a project life of 100 years and an applicable interest rate of 3-1/8 percent.

(1) Flood control - Derived from damage-frequency relationship with the damages being computed after the effects of all
local protection works and other upstream reservoirs in a more advanced
stage of development had been subtracted. These benefits have been
determined by the Corps of Engineers.
(2) Water supply and water quality control. Benefits a re
computed as the least expensive alternative means of meeting the determined
flow requirements or quality of flows which are likely to be developed
in the absence of the multiple-purpose scope of development. These
benefits have been determined by the Corps of Engineers based on a
recently revised water quality flow need furnished by the Federal
Water Pollution Control Administration and on the water supply storap,e
required to meet the water supply flow objective establishec. by the
Kentucky Water Resources Authority.
(3) Recreation. The recreation benefits have been determined in accord with the guidelines provided by Supplement :fo . 1 to
Senate Document No. 97. These benefits represent the consensus of
the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S . Bureau of Outdoor Recreation and
the U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service. The recreation benefits represent
that visitation which would be attracted to the area by th"' reservoir
development, which would not be occasioned without the project.

8

�The benefits a r e based on an initial visitation which is estimated
to~obtain illllllediately upon completion of the project with the ultimate
visitation expected to obtain in about thirty years after project
completion and continue at that level throughout the project life.
(4) Ecological features. The effects of each of the developments on the ecological features of the area are to modify their
environment and not create or destroy them . No tangible monetary
values have been assigned to such modifications. Accordingly, no
change in net benefits is attributed to ecological values. Likewise
intangible aes t hetic values are not reflected in the tabulation of
net benefits.
A summary of the average annual tangible economic benefits
table to each scope of development is presented in table 4.
Table 4.

Annual tangible economic benefits to each considered
scope of development, Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

Purpose

UMP

Benefits ($12000) 1/
LMP
UFC

Flood Control

446

Water Supply

131

131

Water Quality Control

88

88

General and Fish and
Wildlife Recreation

706

165

1,371

611

Totals
1/

attribu-

446

437

708
--·1,364

LFC
437

-206643

1966 Values - 3-1/8 percent interest rate.

b. Basis of first costs and annual charges. First costs for
the two considered scopes of development at the upper site (UMP and
UFC) a re based on construction cost estimates which reflect information
obtained from detailed sub-surface investigations, topographic mapping
of the project area at large scale and detailed engineering studies
employed in the advance engineering and design phase for development
of firm plans for actual construction. On the other hand, the estimates for the two scopes of development at the lower site are based
on considerabl y less precise data, particularly as concerns the
assumed nature of the unexplored foundation conditions at the damsite,
use of topography from the small scale U.S.G.S. Quadrangle maps of
the area, the limited nature of engineering studies available at
this time for the lower site development planning, and the approximation necessitated at this time in appraisal of real estate values

9

�in the area between the upper site and lower site. For the purposes
of the cost estimates herein the foundation and real estate conditions
are considered as favorable as at the upstream site. It is estimated
that the completion of construction of a multiple-purpose scope project
at the lower site would be one year later than the l.JMP.
Highway 715 is considered for retention as a scenic drive, subject
to periodic flooding in a l l of the considered scopes of development
except for the UMP. However, the improvement or abandonment of this
road has not been approved by the Kentucky Highway Department and
its relocation elsewhere may have to be consider ed . It does not
appear feasible nor desirable to relocate the highway above the flood
control pool within the gorge.
Es timated first costs of the projects for each of the considered
scopes of development are presented in table 5.
Table 5.

Summary of first costs for each considered scope
of development, Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

Item - - - - - - - - -

Project Cost ($1,000) 1/
UFC
I.MP
LFC

UMP

Lands &amp; Damages

700

562

1,350

1,230

2,090

2,204

2,210

1,886

538

200

579

210

Dam and Appurtenances

5,680

5,065

7,602

Recreation Facilities - Initial

2,013

900

2,140

1,200

253

253

253

253

96

96

96

96

11,370

9,280

14,230

11,810

Relocations
Reservoir and Pool Pr eparation

Buildings , Grounds

&amp;

Utilities

Permanent Operating Equipment
Total Initial
Future Recreation Facilities
Total Project

600
12,720

9,880

'l:.l

6,935 l:._/

680
15,440

12,490

--------------------·-----!/

1966 val ues.

l:._/

Contingency factor of 15% used which is the same contingency factor
use~ at the upper site . It should be recognized that normal engineering practice is to use a higher contingency factor when adequate site
explorations have not been made .
10

�Annual economic charges are comput ed for each scope of development
on the basis of the applicable interest rate of 3-1/8 percent and
an economic life of 100 years. Loss of productivity is based on
the productive capability of project lands that is foregone by each
scope o f development . Operation and maintenance for initial and
future recreation facilities is computed at the rate of $0.20 per
visitor day for each of the multiple-purpose scopes of development
and at a rate of $0 .25 per visitor day for each of the flood control
scopes of developmen t . Th is difference is occasioned by the considerable
spread in visitation between projects of multiple-purpose and flood
control s cope and in recognition of the increased cost per visitor
day for the lesser utilizations. The costs of construction of future
recreation facilities is premised on paralleling the anticipated
visitation increase . All future costs are discounted to present
value s in arriving at annual economic char ges. The derivation and
summa r y of the annual economic charges for each considered scope
of development is presented in table 6.
Table 6 .

---

Derivation and summary of annual economic charges
for each considered scope of development
Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

---- -

____It em- ___

.._

- ---- --- - -- · - ---

Initial . Pr_2j~ ct_
Interest
Amortization
Loss of Productivity
Operation and Maintenance
:-1.aj or Repl acement
Total Initial
Future Recreation
--·----- --·-- - ----- Interest

and Amortization
Operation and Maintenance
Maj or Replacement
Total Future

TOTAL ANNUAL ECONOMIC CHARGES

-

UMP
378
18

472
23

94
23

308
15
4
65
14

98
24

392
19
9
73
16

518

406

628

509

31
52
8

14
22
4

28
49
7

16
25
4

91

40

84

45

609

446

712

554

5

------1/

Economic Chas_g_~_(§_l ,000) 1/
UFC
1.J.'1P
LFC

1966 values .

11

11

�c. Relation of annual benefits and annual economic charges for
each considered scope of development. A comparison of the annual
benefits attributable to each considered scope of development, as
developed in paragraph Illa, and the annual economic charges for
each considered level of development, as developed in paragraph lllb,
is sunnnarized for convenient reference in table 7.
Table 7.

Comparison of annual benefits and annual economic
charges for each considered scope of development
Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

Annua_l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Benefits ($1,000)
Charges ($1,000)
Benefit to Cost Ratio (to 1.0)
Excess of benefits over
Economic Charges ($1,000)

-

UMP

UFC

LNP

LFC

1,371

611

1,364

643

609

446

712

554

2.25

1.37

1.92

1.16

762

165

652

89

SECTION IV - PHYSICAL AND ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF THE
CONSIDERED SCOPES OF DEVELOPMENT
a. General . There have been a number of expressions of concern
over the project ' s effects on the geology, ecology and biota of the
Red River gorge. Because of the difference in geological conditions,
stream slopes and valley widths, the gorge area is divided naturally
into a lower and upper area. The lower gorge area lies between Ridge
Road b ridge (mile 59.6) and Indian Creek (mile 49 . 0) with the upper
gorge area lying upstream from Ridge Road bridge. This upper gorge
includes Swift Camp Creek and Clifty Creek, whereas the lower gorge
includes Gladie Creek, Indian Creek and Chimney Top Creek. The longitudinal extent of inundation of the gorge for each of the considered
scopes of development is presented in table 8 and shown graphically
on plate 4 . The information presented in table 8 and on plate 4
has been developed from detailed maps having a contour interval of
5 feet and a scale of l " = 200 feet.

12

�Table 8.

Extent that each considered scope of development
affects the gorge area and tributaries
Red River Reservoir, Kentucky

- - -- - -- -- --- --- ·- - - - -- ----------------Miles above mouth of stream

that
seasonal or minimum eools tail-out
___ Stream--·-- ______ _ __
UMP
UFC
LMP
LFC
(EL 757) (EL 712) (EL 717) (El.685)
Red River
Indian Creek
Clifty Creek
Gladie Creek
Chimney Top Creek
Swift Camp Creek
Wolf Pen Creek
Parched Corn Creek
Copperas Creek

62 .o
4.2
0.2
3.3
L8
2.1
0.9
0.3
0.1

59 . 4
3.0

60.1
3.2

Ll
0.6

L4
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.1

0.4
0.1

53.5
L3

Major areas of concern that have been expressed over construction
of Red River Reservoir pertain to disturbing the natural or native
state of the geology, ecology and biota of the area. Particular
concern has been expressed over the project ' s effect on:
Natural arches and other geologic features
Fish and wildlife
White water
Educational value
Wilderness setting
Other aesthetic considerations
An objective analysis of the effects that each considered scope
of development would have on the natural features is discussed in
the followi ng para graphs.
b . Natural arches_an~_other geological features. There are
about t hirty known natural arches in the general area. Only one
of the considered scopes of development, the UMP scope of development, would in any way affect any of these natural arches. The UMP
scope of development would have a slight effect on Moonshiners or
Hunters arch only when the level of water is above the seasonal pool
elevation, that is during short periods where flood flows are being
retarded. The elevation of various portions of this arch, along
with an estimated frequency of flooding, is as follows:

�Position
- ----

Elevation

- - - --

Estimated frequency
of flooding

Base

774

50 times per 100 years

Roof

803

Above flood control pool

Top

815

Above flood control pool

It is estimated that natural flooding has been over the base
of the arch at least three times in recent history. None of the
other known natural arches would be affected by any of the considered
scopes of development since they, along with the other geologic phenomona
of the area, are high on the cliffs. Generally, these cliffs are
about 600 feet above the floor of the gorge . It can be concluded
that none of the considered scopes of development would have a significant impact on either the natural arches or the other significant
geological features of the area .
c. Fish and wildlife. Both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources have advised that the net effect of all considered scopes of development
would result in a net benefit to this resource. Some concern has
been expressed regarding the wild turkey flocks and their willingness
to reestablish themselves if displaced. The effect from inundation
and increased visitation on these flocks would be about the same for
any of the four considered scopes of development. Provisions have
been made and costs included in each of the considered scopes of
development to provide land for the sustenance of the wild turkey
flocks. It should be noted that the two agencies mentioned above
did not consider the effects on all fish and on all wildlife but
only on those species having sport or commercial value. Without
question , there would be an impact on many species of fish and on
many species of animals that have neither sport nor commercial value.
There have been estimates from members of the academic community
that the Red River gorge provides an assemblage for a great number
of the fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals which inhabit
eastern Kentucky. It is believed that there are no species present
in the Red River gorge which are not present in other areas of eastern
Kentucky . However, opponents of the project have maintained that
the uniqueness of this assemblage lies in the numbers of species
which are found in this area while acknowledging that other areas
having similar assemblages have not been studied so intensively.
It should be concluded that all considered scopes of development
would have an impact on this assemblage, generally as indicated on
table 3. Information is not available whereby a quantative analysis
of these effects could be made.
d. White water . White water exists primarily in the upper
gorge as may be readily seen from an examination of the stream profiles

14

�shown on plate 4. The lower gorge is generally too flat to create
white water and the lower gorge tributaries, while steep enough to
develop white water, do not have sufficient sustained flows to create
white water conditions except during flood periods. Of the levels
of development considered, only the UMP scope would have any significant
impact on the white water . The upper multiple-purpose project inundates, at maximum seasonal pool elevations, the periodic white water
opportunities on the main stem from mile 62.0 to mile 60.5 or one
and one half miles generally during heavier spring runoff when sustained flows of the river support white water activities. The sustained pools of the other scopes of development would not extend into
the upper gorge to any significant degree.
e. Educational value. The Red River gorge is used by a number
of educational institutions as an outdoor laboratory for the teaching of ecology and biology. Each of the considered scopes of development
would have an adverse effect on such use. The adverse effect on
this particular use is almost directly proportional to the area of
the pool in the lower gorge area. Red River gorge is ideally suited
for this use due to the great assemblage of fishes, reptiles, mammals,
amphibians, and birds living in this area of diverse botanical variety
and in the ready accessibility into the area by highway from a number
of institutes of higher learning. The nature of most of the educational
field exercises consists of a half-day or a full day trip through
the gorge with the exercise itse~f generally fanning out from State
Hwy. 715. Although information is not readily available, it is estimated
that there are approximately 20 class days or about 500 student days
spent in the area each year . There are other nearby areas, although
not as extensive as the Red River area, that also offer high educational
opportunity. Generally, these areas at present are not as readily
accessible as the Red River gorge .
f. Wilderness setting-. Although "cut-over" from a timber standpoint, this area has many attributes of the type contributive to
a primative setting . This kind of area has intrinsic value since
it enables people to escape into a state of tranquility from the
every day pressures and frustrations of modern living. All of the
considered scopes of development would have some effect on a portion
of the wilderness setting with these being somewhat proportional
to the elevation of the sustained pool levels . The wilderness setting
of the area would be in great part retained with any of the considered scopes of development since a great portion of the wilderness
setting is well above all sustained pools and these pools would not
in fact interfere with the setting either physically or visually.
The UMP scope of development would have more effect on the wilderness
setting, because t his scope of development invades the upper gorge
to a greater degree than would the other scopes of development. It
is t he upper gorge which provides superior natural and native type
setting insofar as the wilderness values are concerned. But even
with the multiple-purpose project at the upper site, nature walks

15

�such as that publicized by Justice Douglas will still be available.
The upper 6 miles of Indian Creek, 7 miles of Gladie Creek , 12 miles
of Swift Camp Creek and several miles of Wolf Pen, Chimney Top, Parched
Corn, Copperas and Clifty Creeks will remain available above the
seasonal pool of the upper site as rugged wilderness areas f or the
hardy.
g. Ot..!_~_1:__&lt;!_esthet~_c considerations. Accesi:; to the gorge is
by way of highway 77 which crosses t he valley and by highway 715
which enters the gorge at Sky Bridge and runs clown the floor of the
gorge to highway 77. Highway 77 will be relocated in all of the
alternate plans and highway 715 can be retained by raising in place
in all plans except the UMP. For the Ui1P proj cct highway 715 would
still provide access to Sky Bridge and t he gorge in the vicinity
of the confluence of Clifty Creek and the North Branch. The steeper
terrain in this region would limit, under any plan, the recreational
facilities that could be provided. Because o f tliis limited opportunity
for developing mass recreational facilities in the upper reaches
of the reservoir and the superior natural values of the area, recreation
use of the upper proj e ct should l ean heavily toward such activities
as sightseeing, walking or hiking, and nature activities. There
would be an opportunity for some restricted motorless or low horsepower
boating, limited camping and swimming. Limited land areas on the
steep slopes would not permit mass recreation use of the project
and the developments should be planned accordingly. The quiet beauty
of the gorge with the enhancement of a lake in the shadows of its
lower levels, without vehicular traffic along its banks, should be
unsurpassed. Boaters will have a greater opportunity to view the ·
extraordinary geology and scenic areas than is available to present
visitors while at the same time enjoying - • • more continuous access
than now provided from route 715.
Appendix A presents an evaluation of recreation and natural
values related to the gorge area. This appendix was prepared by
a work-group consisting of personnel from the U.S. Forest Service Department of Agriculture, the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Department of the Interior, and the Bureau of Sports Fisheries and
Wildlife - Department of the Interior. Appendix B gives an analysis
presented recently by the Kentucky Section of the Great Lakes Chapter
of the Sierra Club.
SECTION V - SOCIAL EFFECTS
Each considered scope of development would affect a different
number of people as measured by the number of families affected and
the amount of private lands required . Institutional arrangements
a re affected by a decrease in tax revenue which is used to provide
social services by the county and State governmen ts. The gen eral
condition of t he land and i mprovements i s somewhat better for that

16

�land downstream from the upper site than for the land and i mprove ments upstream from the upper site . The numbers of families affected
for each considered scope of development a re: UMP affects 29 families - UFC affects 28 families - LMP affects 48 families - LFC affects
45 families. Similarly the estimated amount of private lands required
for each considered scope of development are: 2400 acres for UMP 2100 acres for UFC - 3800 acres for LMP and 2900 acres for LFC . The
projects at the lower site would inundate approximately 600 acres of
lands developable for more intensive farming or other purposes which
would be provided flood protection by projects at the upper site. It
should be noted that lands suitable for development in this part of
Appalachia are very limited. Effects on the tax base of the counties
are somewhat difficult to assess. However, it appears that the tax
base of the upper counties of Wolfe and Menifee would be affected by
about the same amount for each site . However, the future tax base of
Powell County would be lower for a project constructed at the lower
site than for one constructed at the upper site. It is estimated that
th"loss in tax revenue to Powell County1were the dam constructed at
the lower site,would be on the order of ~5,000 per year
}U
f zcocaac uutctpa:Cl I I
J
sO:LSS&amp;
L
' the I I
I d
based upon present land values. Changes in land use occasioned by the
project would tend to increase this disparity .
SECTION VI - SUMMARY DISCUSSION
It can be seen from Table 4 that the multiple-purpose scopes
of development exhibit considerable economic superiority over the
flood control scopes of development. The benefits which would be
foregone by the flood control only scopes of development amount to
over $700,000 annually. The capitalized value of these benefits
foregone during the economic life of the project amounts to some
$21,000,000. As indicated in Table 7, the UMP scope of development
exhibits a somewhat greater economic efficiency than does the LMP
scope of development, resulting principally from the greater cost
of construction at the lower site . For comparable functions, the
initial construction at the lower site would cost on the order of
$3 million more and delay completion one year beyond t hat at the
upper site. Thus, there is little question that construction at
the upper site has tangible economic advantage. A year's delay in
the completion of the project would result in one year's loss of
project benefits.
Water supply requirements forecast for the near future indicate
a shortage of economically feasible means of satisfying these requirements. The Commonwealth of Kentucky has reaffirmed its desire
to buy water supply storage in the Red River Reservoir in accordance
with PL 85-500, as amended, to assure adequate supplies for the
increasing needs of the Lexington area. Either multiple-purpose
project can provide the desired storage . Omission of such storage
would require a much more expensive development elsewhere .
17

�The revised water quality control storage for low flow augmentation is for the purpose of meeting the minimum flow requirements in
the Kentucky River as established by the FW,CA. The Booneville and
Red River ~eservoir projects working in co~nati on can provide the
needed storage to maintain quality standards and enhance recreation
and fish and wildlife on the Red and Kentucky Rivers. Again either
multiple-purpose project can provide the desired storage and alternativeswould be more costly and less effective.
All four studied project scopes provide essentially the same
flood control benefits except for the area between the two sites,
Here lands protected by the upper site projects woul d be inundated
by the lower site projects.
General recreation evaluations in terms of visitor days expected
can be related to the area of the reservoir water surface available.
Thus the LMP project has a small a~vantage over the UMP. However,
because of the sediment deposit problem with the LMP project, the
' UMP project is favored for general recreation and aesthetic values.
Either multiple-purpose project has considerable advantage over the
flood control only scoped projects.
The social effects are more closely related to the site of construction than to the scope of development at the site. Construction
at the upper site has less adverse effect on the social activities
of the project area in that: fewer family units would be displaced;
the tax base that provides both social and institutional services
is better than for the lower site; and flat land with a minimum flood
hazard, which is in extremely short supply in Eastern Kentucky and
Appalachia, is made available for flood-free development with ample
water supply.
Whereas the economic and social effects of the considered scopes
of development are reasonably conducive to objective evaluation, an
objective evaluation of the effects of the considered scopes of development on the aesthetics, the ecology and the biota of the gorge is
quite difficult. Some of the conclusions regarding aesthetics,
geology, ecology and biota which may reasonably be stated include:
(1) Natural values are affected less with the lower seasonal or
minimum pools.
(2) Higher quality general recreation values result from the
higher minimum or seasonal pool levels.
(3) Higher quality primitive recreation values will be retained
with the lower minimum or seasonal pool levels.
(4) Reservoir recreation facilities and operating rules would
need to be carefully developed in consonance with and in respect
to the natural setting of the area. For example, boating in the
upper pool above Iron Bridge could be restricted to canoes without
motors.

18

�(5) The effect on the ecology and biota of the area increases
generally in proportion to the elevation of the seasonal or minimum
pools. Informed judgments are that at the highest considered seasonal
pools, about half of the animals, excepting the birdlife, which now
inhabit the area would be shifted upstream, into tributary areas or
into other basins.
The effects on aesthetics of the gorge as improved or degraded
by a lake in the gorge bottom is a matter of opinion. Some feel that
the scenic values and the enjoyment of such values are enhanced by
the provision of the lake. Others feel that such an intrusion detracts from the natural beauty of the area. One fact is evident:
access by water into the gorge will make the beauties of this area
more accessible to a greater number of people than will preserving
the gorge in its present condition.
Also debatable is the uniqueness of the gorge with respect to
other areas of Eastern Kentucky. Preservation of an area becomes of
greater importance when the area is genuinely unique. Similar areas
do exist upstream of the projects considered in t his report. Other
basin areas have many of the features of the Red River gorge. The
geologic formations in the project area are for the most part untouched by any of the project scopes considered . Of cour se, no area
is identical to another area so that the degrees of difference are
op6n to debate.
Highway 715 offers a scenic drive which could be retained by
some improvement or alteration for all but the UHP project. With the
other 3 scoped projects, the highway would be subject to periodic
flooding.

SECTION VII - CONCLUSION
To satisfy the requirements of flood control, water supply and
water quality control storage a reservoir of multiple-purpose scope
is essential. Of the two potential sites in the Red River valley,
development of the upper site satisfies the project purposes and
offers the most economical solution based on tangible evaluations.
In addition, while it a lters ecologic and biotic values of the
gor ge, there are some gains in aesthetic and recreational values.
Therefore, on balance the lower site project that is estimated to
cost almost $3 million more, displace approximately 20 more families
that would otherwise be af forded flood protection, flood an additional 600 acres of developable land, create sediment deposition
problems and result in the loss of one year's benefits through the
delay in project completion, is less desirable than the upper site
project . It is concluded t hat the upper multiple-purpose site as
presently approved and under design is the preferable alternative.
The construction of the project at ci1is site should proceed .

19

�KENTUC KY RIVER BASIN

1
\

AGLE CREE
RESERVOIR

)
\

\ \

\

(Authorized)

\

\

\

~
FRANKFORT LOCAL n
PROTECTION

VERSAILLES

~ - - (Under Construction)

• \t

A

l
~ w1NcHEsTER •

MT. STERLING

Nic~~~1~~LfoN - ' \ _

LAWRENCEBURG ~ILMORE
I

:

. •

HARRODSBURG e \

DAN VILLE
I •

•RICHM

JACKSON
CUTOPF
(Completed)

NCASTER

j

•BERE
r-,.

'---~

I

DANIEL BOONE
NATIONAL FOREST
BOONE
RESER

KSO~

\

CARR FORK
RESERVOIIR

BUCKHORN
-·· RESERVOIR

KI NGDOM COME
RESERVOIR
-

-

-

(Considered) - - - - - '

(Completed)

RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KENTUCKY

DAM LOCATION AND POOL LEVELS STUDY

GENERAL MAP

PLATE I

�DAM LOCATION AND POOL LEVELS STUDY

CONSIDERED
DAM SITES
PlATE2

�UPPER SITE

UPPER SITE

Multiple Purpose

Flood Control

ELEV A AREA Y.QL.

ELEVA

looo fOOO

AREA YQ.L

1000

moo

785

2. 59

133. 4

712

0. 74

TION Ac res A.F .

TION Acr es A.f.

FLOOD CONTROL
POOL

1.87

71. 3
SEASONAL

POOL

WATER SlJ&gt;PLY AND
WATER CUALI TY
725

1 .03

24.0
M I NI MUM
POOL

LOWER SITE

LOWER SITE

Multiple Purpose

Flood Control

ELE V A AREA YQJ.,
TION TI5oo 1000
A.F.

755

12. 1

ELEVA

AREA Y..Ql.
~ foITT)

TION Acres A.F .

3.45 180.6

FLOOD

CONTROL

744

3.00

14

0

POOL

717
712

2 . 12 72. 8
1.95 62. 5

SEASON AL

POOL

WATER SUPPLY AND
WATER QUALITY
CONTROL POOL
688

1. 18 25.8
685

1.03 22. 7

MIN IMUM
POOL

RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KENTUCKY
DAM LOCATION AND POOL LEVELS STUDY

RELATIVE POOL LEVELS FOR CONSIDERED DAM SITES
PLATE 3

�soo-----"------------~-

Flood Control Pool ,U.M.P.) El. 801

790

Flood Control Pool (U F.C.) El. 785

780

w

w
....

!

~

770

;=w
w

~

Flood Control Pool (l.M.P.) El. 755

z

750

Q

7 AO ...Flood Control Pool (L.F.C.) El. 744 :1

&lt;
&gt;
w

&lt;
&gt;

....
w

w
....
w

730

Q

,-

&lt;

755

&gt;

w
....
w

744

I

7 0

730

SWIFT CAMP CREEK

. £ :~e::son.ol Pool (l.M.P.) El. 717

Seosonol Pool (l.M.P_) El. 717

720

'f:. Flood Control Pool (L.M.P.) El.

'£ Flood Contr~Pool (L.F.C.) El.

I-

I-

~

z

Seasonal Pool tU.M.P.J El. 757

....

Seosonol Pool (U.M.P.J El. 757

1-

Q

Flood Control Pool IU.F.C.! El. 785

~
V'I

!,

z

80r----------------. Flood Control Pool ,U.M.P. El. 801

810r----.-----,-------..-----,--,,----,

Flood Control Pool ,U.M.P. El. 801

Profile

M inimum Pool (U.F.C.) El. 712
710

GLADIE CREEK
Profile

700

2

5

3

MILES ABOVE MOUTH

Minimum Pool (L.F.C.) El. 685

680

2

IND/AN CREEK

3

4

5

MILES ABOVE MOUTH

Profile
660 _ _ _ _ _ _ _...__ ___.__ _ _.,___ ___.,_ ___,
2

0

3

4

5

6

MILES ABOVE MOUTH

UPPER DAMSITE

820
Flood Control Pool (U.M.P./ El. 801

LOWER DAMSITE

8

800

ii

~

Flood Control Pool (U.F.C.) El. 785

~--------------------,:__----------~---+-----~~""'~

780

O&lt;

w
C)

...
...

.,;

C)
0

760

!,
w

~

_ __Flood Control Pool (l.F.C.) El. 744 -'l, ____

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ___________ __ _ _
0

J

.&amp;;

::c"'

0
;=

&lt;

Seosonol Pool (U.M.P.) El. 757

"&gt;-

740

z

&gt;
w

ii:

-J..
. _ ·- . f": Flood C~ntrol Pool (L.M.P.) El. 755 . _. _. 1-__- .---.- -.---.-_-_..____- .--.•--.---.--•.- ------·~;;.._-_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._-.____
- , -----•.•-•.•_.._.._.._.._. ____..&amp;._._•.•-•.•-•.• -.--.--·--·•-•.•-•.-_.._._.,_._.;:__~__
-_-_.._-_.._:._.._
.._.._
.._._.__-,:
ii:

0

1-

w
....

0

720

· - · - · -· ['" Seasonal Pool (l.M.P./ El._717 ·-·-• -•

....
w

~

•-·-·- ·- ·- ·- ·- ·-·-·-•-•-•-•·2
.,, -··Minimum Pool (U.F.C.) El. 712 .
..l,

700
__ Minimum Pool (LF.C.) El. 68~:J _____-.;;-·
680

0

----- -- ...... _........

C

0

V

-,:,
~

~

0

Q,

660

I
58

RED RIVER RESERVOIR, KENTUCKY

_0

DAM LOCATION

V a.
~ E
0 0
.:, V

AND
POOL LEVELS STUDY

Q. -

0.~

o l

STREAM PROFILES &amp;

Vv,

II

POOL LEVELS CONSIDERED

60

M ILES ABOVE MOUTH
PLATE 4.

SHEET l 012

�820

820

800

800

820

820

800

800

Flood Control Pool (U. M. P. ) El . 80 1

800
ILLJ
LLJ
LL

Flood Control Pool U. F,C. El . 78

z

780

780

I-

LLJ
LLJ
LL

:z:

·-·-

:z:
0

I-

&lt;
&gt;

LLJ
LLJ
LL

760

740

---.--

easonal Poo l (UMP)El.757

760

z

0

:z

&lt;
&gt;

LLJ

LLJ

_J

_J

LLJ

LLJ

-----------

HO

_J

LLJ

760

760

I«:(

&gt;

LLJ

LLJ

_J

_J

LLJ

0

MILES

LLJ

740

740

CLIFTY CREEK
PROFILE
720

720

:z

0

,c(

Flood Control Pool

0

I-

760

&gt;

z

&lt;

&gt;

LLJ

z

I-

755

I-

LLJ
LLJ
LL

z

I-

780

0

I-

LLJ
LLJ
LL

I-

z

780

780

720

720
Minimum Pool (U,F. C,) El . 714

700

700

700

700

0

MILES

680 0- - - - - - - - - - - - -2
MI LES ABOVE MOUTH

PARCH ED CORN
CR EEK

680
2

0

3

O

MI LES

COP PERAS CR EEK
PROFILE

PROF I LE

MILES ABOVE MOUTH

WO LF PEN CREEK

CH IMNEY TOP CRE EK

PROFILE

PROF I LE

RED RIVER RESERVO IR, KENTUCKY
DAM LOCATION

AND
POOL LEVELS STUDY

STREAM PROFILES &amp;
POOL LEVELS CONSIDERED
PLATE 4 - SHEET 2 of 2

�EVALUATION OF RECREATION AND NATURAL _VALUES
A

Task Force Report

Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife
Forest Service
March 1, 1968

I.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this section is to assess the relative effects of alternative impoundments on the scenic-esthetic-cultural and recreational
opportunities of the North Fork of the Red River. Four impoundment
proposals were evaluated: a multiple-purpose project at the authorized
site, designated alt~~!ive _!_; a multiple-purpose project with the dam
located 5.3 miles downstream from the authorized project site, designated
alternative 2 ; a flood-control-only project, with a sediment pool at the
authorized site, designated ag~r1!.~!Jve 3; an&lt;l flood-control-only project,
with a sediment pool with the dam located 5 .3 miles downstream from the
authorized site, designated alternat!_y~~The economic and intangible values identified in this section are considered along with other values in the final conclusions and recommendations made in this report.
A basic assumption is that a reservoir will be constructed on the North

Fork.
II.

STUDY APPROACH

The basic working tools available for the analysis consisted of:
(1)

The reports of the Corps of Eneineers , the Forest Service,
Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, and t he Bureau of
Outdoor Recreation for the authorized project.

(2 )

Topographic maps on which the water elevation of tlic minimum
or seasonal pool and the flood control pool of each al ternative
were delineat ed.

(3)

A tabulation of the physical characteristics of each project.

(4)

Data on the operating characteristics of the alternative
project.

(5)

The expressed views of individuals and groups concerninR:
a.
b.
c.

The scenic beauty of the ''gor ge."
Retention of tlw ecological complex and assoc iat ed
scientific and educational values.
The maintenance of dispersed backwoods t ype r ecreation opportunities.

�(6)

,\ working knowledge of the Red River area . based on personal
visits of at least one member of each agency contributing to
the evaluation.

On the basis of this information, the capacity of each alternative to
accommodate reservoir oriented recreation use was established. This
was done by increasing or decreasing capacity on the basis of surface
area of the seasonal or minimum pool for each alternative. The projection of recreation use for the authorized project was the starting
point of these computations. Then, using the guidelines in Supplement
No . 1 to Senate Document No. 97, a dollar value was assigned. It was
recognized that low-flow releases probably would enhance general
recreation and fishing opportunities on the Red River downstream from
the tailwater. However, no estimate of use was made.

Lhe next step was to assess the impact of each alternative on scenic,
geologic, ecologic, fish, wildlife and recreation values. In doing
this, segments of the North Fork mainstem and tributaries possessing
such values were identified. Then, the effects of permanent inundation and seasonal flooding on these segments with alternate projects
were calculated and described.
For purposes of this study, the area considered consists of the North
Fork of the Red River from streambed to the paralleling canyon rims
anci upstream along the mainstem and tributaries to points where their
physical character changes from heavily forested, deeply entrenched
valleys to lower gradient agricultural lands. This area is further
aivided into a 28.!".8~_ .?_~e..?.. consisting of the mainstem below the mouth
of Swift Camp Creek, and the lower tributaries down to the Highway 77
crossing; and a roughs_~i:-e~ consisting of the upper mainstem above the
mouth of Swift Camp Creek and principal tributaries. The dividing point
between the gorge and the roughs is based on streambed gradient, the
upper area being significantly steeper than the lower area . Table 1
identifies by distance each of the important stream reaches.
Ill. DESCRIPTION OF TUE STUDY AREA

The North Fork is t he largest of t hree tributaries of the Red River
which drains the rugged hill country of Wolfe, Menifee, and Powell
Counties, Kentucky. Except for about 7,000 acres in the roughs, the
drainage area of the Nortl1 Fork, within t he study area, is within
the boundaries of the Daniel Boone National Forest. The topography
of t he a rea is characterized by narrow valleys and sheer flat-topped
bluffs which rise abruptly from streambed to lieights exceeding 500 feet.
The valley floor and tops of the bluffs are heavily wooded . Some
limited fanning and grazing is carried on in the wider valley floor of
t he lowermost reaches of the stream.

2

APPENDIX "A"

�Gorge:

Iron Bridge (mile 51. 6) to Highway No. 715 crossing
(Mile 59.6) and tributaries
STREAM

MILES

Hain Stem

8.0

Chimney Top Creek

3.7

Parched Corn Creek

1.8

Gladie Creek

3.4

Wolfpen Creek

1.5
Sub-total

Roughs:

18.4

Highway No. 715 (mile 59.6) upstream to mile 68.0
and tributaries
STREAH

MILl.:S
---·-·-

Main Stem

8.4

Swift Camp Creek

8.4

Clifty Creek

3.4

Stillwater Creek

1.8

3

Sub-total

22.0

TOTAL

40.4

APPENDIX "A"

�A large numbe r of interesting geologic formations occur along the
- clif f line o f the main val] ey and tributaries. The most unusual of
these are the 23 natural rock arches, the largest of which is Sky Bridge
located near the mouth of Swift Car.ip Creek. All but one of the arches
are sandstone. Moonshiners Arch, located on the mainstem above Highway 715 crossing is limes tone.
Access to the area is provided by three principal roads. Highway 77
enters the watershed through Nada Tunnel and crosses the North Fork
at about rive r mile 52 . It connects with Highway 715, which parallels
the north side of the stream to about river mile 60. At that point,
near the mouth of Swift Camp Creek, the highway crosses the river and
leads out of the valley . A loop road connects the highway with a
road leading to the Sky Bridge arch and overlook located at the rim of
the gorge. This overlook is maintained by the Forest Service. Highway 613 enters the North Fork from its mouth along the north side of
the str eam and connects with Highway 715 above the highway 77 crossing.
All of the roads r.1en tioned are partly or entirely gravel. In addition
there are a number of other gravel roads in various stages of servicea b ility which provide access to the valley along tributary creeks and
to the platea us overlooking the valley.
:··1ost of the land in the Nor th Fork gorge area is owned by the Federal
Gove rnment and administered as a part of the Daniel Boone National
Forest . A l a rge portion of the cleared land, in the lower reaches of
the val ley , is in private ownership. Also, most of the cleared land
in t he upper watershed area outside of the gorge is in private ownership .
Rap id runoff from the upper watershed areas , outside the study area,
sub jects the stream to annual or more frequent flooding--up to 22 feet
above the elevation of the normal flow. "These flood peaks--characteristically sediment laden-- cause periodic flushing of the stream channel
and, during recession periods, deposit sediment and debris throughout
the lower par t of the gorge.
Despite pe riodic flooding, high quality stream fishery habitat occurs
in both the mainstem and major tributaries (Swift Camp Creek, Chimney
Top Creek, and Gladie Creek) . Swift Camp Creek and Chimney Top Creek
have been stocked with trout on a "put and take " basis. Principal
native species found in the stream include smallmouth bass, rock bass,
other sunfishes, muskel lunge, catfish, and various suckers. Rock bass
and catfish are the more commonly caught species.

4

APPENDIX "A"

�'rhe study area provides habitat for squirrel, raccoon, rabbit, quail,
grouse, deer, and of particular importance for wild turkey. Fur
animals present are mink, muskrat, fox, beaver, and opossum . ueer and
turkey have been stocked in the area--150 deer in 1954 and 84 turkeys
in 1957. The turkey population established has become om' of t he
highest in the State on a per acre basis. Indications are that the
area is conducive to even greater increase, with a potential for being
Kentucky's prime area for turkey.
The overall character of the valley is one of rugged beauty. The
sandstone cliffs serve to insulate the valley from its surroundings.
It is this topographic entity, with its highly varied fauna and flora
and concentration of distinctive geologic formations, which combine
to make this an exceptional area for natural history and educational
study as well as high quality dispersed recreation. This area has been
the locale for natural science studies by college professors and their
classes; hence, its ecology is better known than is the case o f many
other similar valleys in this part of Kentucky.
Present use of the area for all purposes is light. Hunters and fishermen, as well as sichtseers and students, use Hi ghway 715--a convenient
and scenic access to the length of the main valley. This road provides
an enjoyable and relaxing automobile drive through a scenic forest
environment. A primative road extends along Swift Camp Creek. for a
short distance. From this point a low standard trail fo llows the creek
to its upper reaches. Swift Camp Creek provides an opportunity f~r a
rugged one-day back country hiking experience with better-than-usual
fishing. One of the most unusual of tht: valley's rock arcbes--Rock
Bridge--spans Swift Camp Creek in this area.
IV.

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVI.: Ii·1POUNDi'fEH1'S

A. ,!'_r.£j_~_~_t_ _d_a~&lt;!_- The physical characteris t ics of eaci1 alternative proj ect a re shown in Table 2. Operation of the two multiple-purpose alternatives would be similar. Generally, during April the reservoir would
be raised or lowered to seasonal pool elevation and maintained at or
near this l evel through September . Seasonal storage would then be
uniformly reduced to reach the desired winter pool h y 1',ovember 30.
Operation of the two flood-control-only alternatives would maintain
minimum pool elevation yearlong, except during periods of _flood storage.
There woul&lt;l be no drawdown below the minimum pool other than that due
to evaporation and seepage .
Evacuation rate of t he flood watE.rs in all cases is governed by the flow
at Clay City, which flow cannot exceed 4,500 cfs. 'l'he acre-feet
allocated to flood storage in all alternatives is similar. Ordinarily
maximum flood waters would be evacuated during a three week pe riod at
all alternatives .

5

APPl.NDI:X " /\ "

�B. -~.m.i~as.£..__o_r,:!__ p._a~~~}-__v~.!_u~?__o_ther than fish and y,Jld...!-if~.· The factors
of uwjor consideration in the evaluation of the impact of these proj ects
on natural values and recreation opportunities are discussed under each
alternative. The stream miles affected and the estimated recreation use
are shown in Table 3.
Alternative 1 would affect more of the existing environmental values
of the Norti1 Fork than would other alternatives . The seasonal pool of
the reservoir would inundate all of the free-flowing stream and associated
flora and fauna in the ''main gorge" and raise the level of the valley
floor with water.
Alternat1ve 1 would also affect a larger portion of the "roughs" than
woulci other alternatives. To illustrate, in Swift Camp Creek the
seasonal pool of alternative 1 would extend 2.1 miles up the creek, a
short distance beyond the end of the existing road; and alternative 2
would extend 0.2 miles, while the permanent pools of alternatives 3 and 4
would not extend into this tributary. Moonsl:iners Arch, the only known
natural limstone arch in the North Fork, would be partially inundated
during full flood storage at alternative 1.
The scenic environment of the area within the project would be enhanced
or degraded--dependin~ on one ' s point of view . At present, the view as
seen from above is limited to the cliff lines and the vegetation covering
the slopes and the " gorge ' ' area. During the foliage season, the stream
itself is not visible from the overlook. Fron the valley along Highway
715 one's view is sharply restricted to the roadside vegetation and the
stream bottom environment with only occasional glimpses of the more
spectacular scenery of the upper s l opes and the geologic fo r mations.
The seaonsal pool of alternative 1 would provide the added attraction-when viewed from above---of a relatively narrow band of water meandering
between slopes with a dense cover of coniferous and IIBrdwood trees.
The reservoir itself, because of the clearing within the seasonal pool,
would affo rd opportunities for viewing a continuous panorama of both
the slopes and the cliff lines.
Alternativt: 2 would affect the scenic an&lt;l natural values slightly less
than nlternati11e 1. About 1.9 miles of the main slem within the " roughs 'would be kept fr ee from permanent inundation as would an equal mileage
1,1ithin Swj ft Camp Creek . ;1oonsiiiners Arch would not be affected. The
scenic attrib utes would be substantially the same as in the case of
alternative 1. Hm,:ever , this sce nic environment would be significantly
marred with tl1 e r elocation of Kentucky Highway 715, which would probably
occur if this alternative was selected .

•

The analysis of the soil-debris ci1aract er istics of the tributary streams
indicates that the flats where IU s hway 715 would intersect the r eservoir
and the l ower portion of Swift Camp Creek would be tile primary areas of
depo s it ion unde r the ope rating characteris tics of al ternatlve 2. The
r esulting deposi ts at this prir:iary acccsi, point woul d detract from
the scen ic and utility val ue of this acce s s point .
6

�.,.,

TABLE 2:

Alternatives

Damsite
River Mile

Physical Characteristics of Alternates

Recreation Pool
Surface
River
Elevation
Area
Mile Limit

Flood Pool
Surface
River
Elevation
Area
Mile Limit

--------Seasonal---- - - - - - Alternate (1)
Approved plan
and site

47.5

757

1 , 870

62.0

801

3,180

65.6

755

3,450

61.9

785

2,590

63.9

744

3,060

61.2

- -------Seasonal------------..J

Alternate (2)
Approved plan
downstream site

42.2

717

2,120

60 . 1

-------- Permanent--------Alternate (3)
Approved site
flood control
only

47.5

712

740

59 .4

-------- Pe~a_E~ ------ ---

&gt;
re,
"'C

tr.

z

t:::
H

&gt;&lt;

::,:·

Alternate (4)
Downstream site
flood control
only

42 . 2

685

1,080

53 . 5

�TAllLE 3:
·-

A.l~e!"Ila ti ves

0,

-

Stream Miles Affected and Recreation Use

-----

----- .----··- - - - - -- - - -- -- - ----. . --- -- -- --·-- -- --- - ·}tiles of .}lain - ------·- - -----Miles of Roughs Affectedand !ribs. Affected
Main Cor11e and !ribs .
Ini tial Recreation
_ _ _--'A~b~ove Mil~ 51 ..:.6_ _ __
Above Mile 59. 6
Surface
Use (Year-1972)
Permanent
Permanent
Acres
and/or
and/or
of
Seasonal Pool ll Flood Pool 1/ Seasonal Po.9_1_1/ Flood Pool 1/
Pool
Visitor Days 2/ Value ($)

Cor-ge ___ _

Ul timate Recreation
Use (Year-2020)
Visitor Days 2/

Value ($)

Alternate (1)
Approved plan
and site

14 . 3

(4.1)

16.9

(1.5)

4.7

(17.3)

11.3

(10. 7)

1,870

220,000

310,000

600,000

900,000

Alternate (2)
Approved plan
d01mstream site

10.6

(7.8)

14.l

(4.3)

.7

(21.3)

4.5

(17.5)

2,120

240,000

335,000

600,000

900,000

Alternate (3)
Approved site
flood control
only

10.0

(8.4)

16.0

(2.4)

(22.00)

9.1

(12.9)

740

80,000

80,000

200,000

200,000

1.9 (16.5)

12.9

(5.5)

(22 .00)

3.2

(18.8)

1,080

110,000

110,000

250 ,000

250,000

Alternate (4)
Downstream site
flood control
onl y
~
....

z
"'
C:

;;;; l.l
= 2/

:»; -

Figures in parentheses are residual miles.
Includes fishing use.

�Alternative 3 would have substantially the same effects as alternative
2 in that the permanent inundation of portions of the "gorge' ' is about
the same . There would, however, be no permanent inundation of the
''roughs " under this alternative.
Alternative 4 offers the best opportunity to maintain the "gorge " and
the ''roughs.' · The permanent pool of the project would inundate only
about 1. 9 miles of the "gorge 1• area and none of the " roughs .'' The
flood storage at ful l pool elevation would affect all of the ''gorge " and
some of the lower reaches of the '· roughs.'' This alternative would
per mit retention of Highway 715 and keep the upper portion of the main
''gorge '' as a setting for a scenic drive even though segments of the
road might be subject to periodic flooding.
Both alternatives 3 and 4 would provide bodies of water in a highly
scenic setting, but neither would afford the amount or diversity of
reservoir oriented recreation as would alternatives 1 and 2.
Fish_ and wildlife values. Reservoir development under any of
the considered alternatives would result in the loss of high- quality
stream habitat. Present conditions favoring the reproduction and
c rowth of muskellunge, smallmouth bass and rock bass will be markedly
changed, and these fishes will be gradually eliminated in the inundated
segment of Red River. Alternatives 1 and 2 would provide more flexi- ·
bility for managing a downstream fishery .
C.

Sport fishin g benefits in the reservoir and tailwater are included in
Table 3. In addition the re would be a commercial fishing potential
valued at about $8,000 annually with a reservoir provided under alternatives l or 2.
Inundation will adversely affect the wildlife resources . Woodland
species would be the most severely affected, especially the wild
turkey. Hab itat inundated (including vital openings in bottomland
areas) and the disturbance of the solitude-seeking species by
recreationists could result in a pronounced decline in the nowexpanding population.
This adverse effect can be mitigated in large part by providing
additional openings above the inundated area in combination with a
type of n ~creation use whic,1 holds noise and human occupancy at a
low level.
In terms of overall fish and wildlife values (both preserved and project created) alternatives 3 and 4 are most desirable. Alternative 2
is preferred for reservoir fis h ing, but it also would have the greates t
impact on wild turkey. This would especially be true if a perimeter
road is located within the area under alternative 2 .
D. _!!.!!E_a_ct on res&lt;::._r_yoi.,r oriented recr:_eation potentials_. The recreat i on
potential of each alternative was evaluated on the basis of quality
of t he i mpoundrnent, access and development opportunities. The recreation
use and benefits were estimated for each alternative .

9

APPENDIX "A''

�Al~ of the alternatives will provide quality recreation opportunities.
Alternatives 1 and 2 could afford higher quality experiences because of
the capaci ty and scenic variety of the larger seasonal pools. Due to
the flatter stream gradient of alternative 2, the rate of sedimentation
and corresponding buildup of exposed f l ats visib l e during seasonal
drawdown would be greater in this impoundment.
Reser voir access to each alternative would be pr ovided to serve the
using public. It is evident that because of topographic limitations
access t o alternatives 3 and 4 would require substantially more costly
and more sophisticated access facilities than would be the case for
alt ernatives 1 and 2. It also appears that because of the lower
elevation of the seasonal pool, alternative 2 would present IOOre costly
and more difficult-to-maintain access facilities than would alternative 1.
Recreation use at all impoundments would lean heavily toward such activities
as s i ghtseeing, fishing, hiking, nature activities and picnicking due
to the limited developable shoreline and the superior n~tural values
of the area.
Boat launching r amps , along wit h par king, picnicking, and sanitary
facilities would be provided a t road access points. Scenic and connecting trails would be constructed. Other facility development such
as camping would have to be provided on the uplands away from the
reservoir.

V.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

We find that with any of the alternatives the Red River Gorge, will
continue to offer an unusual combination of scenic, geologic, and
ecologic attributes deserving of special effort to assure its
continued availability for the people of Kentucky and the United
States. Nearby gorges are similar to the Red River Gorge in their
natural attributes although perhaps not as spectacular. Without a complete survey of the flora, fauna, and geology of all the canyons in the
vicinity, it is not possible to state unequivocally that certain species
of plants and animals and examples of geological processes occur only in
the Red River Gor ge . However, the "gorge" of the Red River is probably
unique as a single entity in having the greatest physical dimensions with
so many natural features.
The objective of management under any of the alternative s would be
oriented toward the protection and enhancement of the s cenic, geologic,
and ecologic attributes of the area .
An analysis of the key values which would affect this objective was
made and resulted in the followin g a s sessment of alterna tive s:
Alternative 1, a multiple-purpose project at the authorized site ,
would unde r seasonal pool conditions inundate more mil es of the
'·rou~hs '' than would any other alternative. At maximum flood pool

10

APPENDI X "A"

�Moonshiners Arch would be partially inundated for short periods
of time. Because of stream gradients at the upper reaches of the
seasonal pool this project would minimize problems of sedimentation
and debris deposition. The project would also have the greatest
potential for providing for extensive r ecreation use in a secluded
environment.
~l ternative 2, a multiple-purpose project at the lower site would,
under normal pool conditions inundate slightly less mileage in the
"roughs" than would alternative 1 . Moonshiners Arch would not be
affected. This alternative would create an unsightly and difficult to use sediment and debris deposit at the mouth of Swift
Camp Creek the principal access point to the upper "gorge" area.
The relocation of the perimeter road along the upper "gorge''
portion of the seasonal pool would mar the scenic qualitities of the
slopes above the pool.
Alternative 3, a flood control only project at the authorized
site, would alter the main ''gorge" by permanent inundation almost
to the same extent as would the multiple-purpose projects without
providing many of the enhancement features of these projects.
Alternative 4, a flood control only project at the lower site, would
minimize the mileage of stream which would be inundated in the
"gorge." It would have little if any lasting effect on the "roughs"
portion of the area, and would, except during maximum flood periods,
retain much of the existing qualities of the upper portion of the
'·gorge." There would be serious adverse effects due to sedimentation
and debris deposition in the lower portion of the "gorge" above the
permanent pool.

11

APPENDIX "A"

�SIERRA CLUB
KE:NTUCKY SE:CTION
GREAT LAKES CHA?TER

3307 Pineneedle Lane
Louisville, Kentucky 40222
March 6_, 1968

Gen. H. G. Woodbury , Jr.
Department of the Army
Office of the Chief of Engineers
Washington , D.C. 20315
Dear Gen. Woodbury:
On August 16, 1967, a Sierra Club representative
read the following state@ent during a Corps of Engineers
land ~cquisition meeting at Stanton, Kentucky:
"The Sierra Club is opposed to the dam on the
Red River in its present location . We believe
t hat the dam is not compa tible with the best end
use of the area within the Daniel Boone National
Forest. We request th a t the sponsor obtain an
alternate location for the dam that will avoid
flooding this very fine wilderness area."
This marked the beginning of a vigorous, last-hour
effort to c a ll the attention of our leaders to the destructive impa ct of the d am on wha t Hr . Justice ;lilliam

o.

Douglas has called "one of t h e great wonders of America."
An alternate site h a s been announced, and is now

under reconnaissance study.

We find that the alternate

site is much less destructive to wilderness and scenic
values than the orig inal site. It also provides a much
wider range of recre a tional opp ortunities without affecting the flood control or wa ter storage objectives.
We have been asked tu state the Sierra Club objectives in the Red River Gorge. The attached statement
discusses what we feel must be preserved.
afford to s a ve less .

We can hardly

Very truly yours,

w.

R. Holstein, Chairman
APPENDIX ''B"

�A Compr.chcrn, ivc ;, n o lysis of the Sierr,~ Club Position P.egarding
the J,ec1 River R.es&lt;?rvoir , with Pnr.ticul a r Reference to the Altern rt tc ( Dc,i!n.•; t:r.c ,1ni) Site.
We believe th □ t the vital objectives of the Red River
Reservoir Project can be achieved by a dam ~t the downstream
site , with a seasonal pool level of 700-710 feet.
If the
seasonal pool is kept within these limits , many of t he importa nt scenic and recreational fe atures of the Gorge can b e
preserved , ns well as most of its value as an outdoor biologic ~l l~bor ato~y.
Areas of the Gorge about which the Sierra Club is particul ~rl y c oncerned ~re l isted and briefly described .
Effects
of a dam at either of the two proposed sites are evaluc:Jted
on the b ~s is of a seasonal pool elevation of 767 feet at the
authorized site c\Dd 700-710 feet at the downstrenm site.
l . The Upper Gorge of the Red River .
This section upstream from the r,1outh of Swift Camp Creek r.1eri ts highest
priority as .J.n .::rea that must remain undeveloped, unspoiled,
and protected .
This p~rt of the river is of inestimable
value a s one of the few rema ining stretches of white wa ter
in l~cntucky.
It is used by a growing numher of canoeists
and "flo.:it-bo;: ters"; both individuuls and groups ~uch as
Explorer. Scouts , c a noe clubs , and the Ohio Sierra Club ,
,-.,hich h;:is conducted several trips a nnua lly down the river
for a number of yen rs .
Recreational us~ of this part of the
river a nd i ts tributa ries can be expected to increose r ap idly
due to the publicity the Gorge has received and to the exploding of the myth of its ina ccessibility .
Tailw~ters of a reservoir ut the authorized site wou ld
extend up thi s part of the river to the vicinity of Pecks
Branch , a dist~nce of about 2½ miles above Suift Camp Creek ,
inund c&gt;. ti.ng a coni3iderable purt of the "Roughs of the Red" and
gn:.---.. tJ y d :i.;,1in i shj_ny its i:ltt;.·acti veness as a c ancoL-,g strev.n .
Moreover , bec a use of the n a rrow stream b e d and the presence
of numerous bould~rs , this section of the reservoir would be
of little use for l a ke-type recrcntional boating. The "boulder~trtwn" areu , genera lly reg;,1rded ns one of the choice scenic
feature~ of the Gorge , would be partly inundated.
In contras t , n reservoir at the downstre an site , with a
700-710 foot pool , would nnt intrude in to this portion of the
Gorge.
The scenic boulder-strewn area , the white water , the
Roughs of the Red , could be set aside for wilderness hiking,
c ~nocing , and str0 am fishing , without depriving power boate:;:-s
of their enjoyment of the reservoir down stream .
We regard
t hi::; a~ a n extre,,1ely ir,1por-t:, rnt advunta~;e in favor OJ: the
APPENDIX 1'B11

�-

2 -·

downstream site .
This wilderness are~ should be exlended
th r ough the purch~se of private l ~nd to tho cast , possibly
to State Higl111ay 719 , in order th a t c1 ll o f the Upper Gor~Jc
wil l b e under public own ership .
2. The Lower Gorge of the Red River and the e xisti ng
ro a d.
It is desir able to discuss t he$e fe.\tures together
b e c ause their v a lu e s are closely rela·ted .
'1'his is the are;:i
between the steel bridge {Highway 77) c.1nd the concre t e bridge
(Highway 715), where the road follows t:1e river fo r approxi mately e ight miles .
This is the heart of the loop d ri ve th a t
leaves Ky . 15 at Pine Ridge a n d rejoins it at Nada , which h as
been accurately described as Kentu c ky ' s mos t s c enic byway .
'1'liis p art of the Red River Gorge is seen by thousands of motorists every ye a r , accordi ng to offici a l visitor counts b y the
U. S. Forest Servic e . Al l of the major "landmark" rocks of the
v a l ley, including IIay st;:icJ~ and Chimney 'I 'op Rock , c an be seen
f rom t he road .
The vi ew of Sky Bridge fro m the vall.ey floor
along Highwciy 715 is superb .
This portion of Hig h way 715 would be completely inundated
by a r eservoir at the authori z e d s i te , restricting the recreation a l enjoyment of the valley a nd its magnifi c ent views to
bo aters .
Despite the g r ow th o f recreation a l bo at ing in the
United States , boating enthusi asts a re still ~ar outnu1~ered
by the recreation-seeking motor i st wh o chooses to enjoy the
scener y from his car window. This multitude includes many
older pe ople a nd others who may l ack the n e c essary p h ysical
or fin a nci a l resources to engage in bo a ting .
Utilization o f the downstream site for the reservoir ,
with a seasonal pool of 700-71 0 feet, would sav e Highway 715
through the Gorge .
It would b e possible to raise the short
s ection of the road which might be flooded ~t the lower end .
Motorists could continue to enjoy the scenic drive wi thout
interfering with any of the forms of wa ter r ecr eation p l an n ed
for the res ervoir. Moreover , midwinter weekend observa tion of
the ro a d h a s revealed a surpr i sing n umber of non-local c a rs,
an argument for its growing ye a r-round use in contras t with
the rel a tively short summer se nson of popul~r we ter r ecreatio n.
The rock formations of the Gorge a r e a ctual ly nore view~ble
in winter, when th ey are uno bscure d by f ol iage .

(

We fe e l strongly t ha t traffic fl o w on Highwa y 71 5 fro m
the Sky Bridge turnoff to t he F r en c hburg Road s hould be controlled by ma king this r oad one-wa y {TTest) and lowering the
~peed l imit , r ather t han by constructing a wid e r h ighwa y
which would disrupt th e natural beauty a n d i ncr e ~ce silt~t ion
in the river . A precedent for such low-speed , one-way scenic
ro ads may be found in the Cades Cove toop RoDd in Great Smoky
Mountains National Park. A new bridge to repl a ce the s t ee l
It is r espectful l y requested t h~t
b ridge will be needed .

APPENDIX "B"

�-

3

-

Sic!rr;.1 Clnh r cprr.::-~cnt c:i l._.i.v cs b~ permitted to e x press thei r
v .i. e,•1::; on prop o .soc1 ro &lt;.1.d relocations bef ore i..lwce c1rc finc:ilized .
'fa iJx~ters ·of a r c servoj.r ?. t the 2. l tornc1te s i te (po ol
e lcv il t ion 700-710 fe e t) would extend to a po int just upstream
£ror.1 Gl&lt;i dic Creek , s :.lving five uddi tional rnilcs of the free £ lm-,ing rive r in the Gorge , -3.S comp, ired wi t.h the authorized
s i te.
This is a trc Llondous ly significan t improvement , wi th
r 0 spect to the i r-i:&gt;~: ct on the pJ.,rnt a nd anima l life of the
v a lley as ,,ell a s i ts potenti a l fo r v a ried recreational uses .
'l'he ste el bridge is a logical lower boundc::.ry for a
buf fer ,wne bct;-10cn t li 0. br.i.cges , s e p ,1 rc1tin q the wildeJ~ness
a r 0 c1 . u ps t.r.e ,.: m :trorn tlic intensive u se a rea dm·mstream.
Boating o n th e river betwee n the bridge s should be limited to
n on - mo t ori zed c ra ft .
No auto c a mp grounds , picnic areas , boat
d ock s , or s.i.mil ar develop1:icn ts should be permitted in the
b u f f c-!r z one .

3 . The major tributaries .
Three of the several cre eks
e mp tying in'~o l:{ed Hiver in the L0\·1 er Gorge will be discussed
h ere .
a ) Swift Cam~ Creek .
This creek f lows through a c anyon
pos s0st: i ng 1;iu ch of the taajcs tic beauty of the main Gorge , on
a sm~ll cr sc ~le.
A Forest Service Trail now extends for seven
mi l es a long the creek , prov iding access to some choice primi t ive c ,11nps i le~ at creekside .
Some of these c ampsites and the
J. o\•:er pnr t o f tlie t rcd l would be inundated by the authorized
r e s ervoir , Hith t a i h1c1 ters exte nding approximate ly three miles
u p t he creek .
Swift Camp Cre e k would be completely preserved as a
fre e - f l ow i ng strcan if the d am is built at the downstream
sjLc {pool elev a tion 700-710 feet) , p:r.ov iding unexcelled
o pporttinities for wilderness recreation .
b ) Chi1m1ey Top Creek .
A one-mile section of the Forest
S e r vic e tr~ il following this c r e ek woul d be flooded by a
r 0s crvo i r a t the a uthorize d site , but would remain untouched
by t h e d oim s trearn res e rvoir .
t-lild flowers are of particul a r
s i g ni fi c ~nce along thi s tra il , including the relatively un Such
c ommon s h owy orchis a nd the yellow lady's s lipper .
p l -:.nts ,md flo Her s seem i nsigni ficant from a purely e conomic
vi c wpoin b, but ma ny people derive recreational p le asure frora
s c e i n &lt;;i , i dcntifyi ug, photog r a phing , c1 nd sketching them.
The
s ucc ess of t h e annu a l 1\p ril Hildfl o wer Pilgrimage in Gatlinb urg , TcnnesP-e e , is a c a se in point . ·
c) Gl a die Cre ek .
This creek is bordered by considerable
o p en b o ttom l a nd for about a mile above its mouth .
Portion s
of t he l a n d ,,r e n o w priv ately o,.med a nd the existing trail is
e s ~cn t i a lly a c ow~a th , providin g access to the remote hc~dwaters

APPENDIX "B"

�4 -

of the creek .
This is a prime ~rea for g rouse and wild turkey , and h e l ps prov ide a food suppl y for many of lhe other
animals of the Gorg8.
All of the Gl a die Crc-)ck bottornl,111ds
would b e flooded by a d am a t the authorized s ite .
In direct
contras t, ne arly a l l of the.se arezis would be saved if the darn
were built at the l ower site .
The private l~ndhol&lt;lings here
and el°s ewpere in the G o r g e ~ be purchased .

I n conclusion , we wish to comment briefly on the stated
ob jectives of the reservoir in relation to the downstream
site with its lowered seasona l pool l evel.
a) Flood control .
We recognize the vital interest of
the Red River Va ll ey inhabi tan ts in flood control , but we
beli eve the flood control ohj ect i ve c ,111 b e equally well a chieved by a dam at either site .
No evidence to the contr a r y
Flood control benefits account for nbout
h as been presented .
38% of the total projected benefits o f the reservoir.
b) Water supply .
We recogn ize the d esire of stnte officials to p l an for an ade quate future water supply for Central
Kentucky .
However , we h a ve b een adv is ed· by the Commissione r
of Natural Resources that the Comnonwcnlth j_s v1illing to change
the woter storage objective to the do M1s t ream s i te , in order
th ~t the Red River Gorge may be saved .
Discussions between
state o fficia ls a nd the Corps of Engineers on this point should
be reviewed. Water storoge benefits comprise about 11% of the
total projected benefits .
c) Water quality con trol .
It i s recognized th~t lowering
the water quality control pool to ach ieve a pool elevation of
700-710 feet will somewhat d i mini s l1 the projected benefits from
t h is objective (about 1 2% of total projected benefits) .
However , i t is re~sonabl e to ask whether water quality control by
di l ution of eff luent is still as valid a concept vs i t was when
this dDm was authorized.
The Wnter Quality Control ~ct of 1965 ,
incorporating water qual ity stand;:i rds a nd enforccnent provisions
Hith F c('i.er:.&gt;.l fin ,mc:i ;;, J 2.s::.- :i.f: t,;r:c:-E&gt;- , see:ns to 5ndic? te gov0 r1:- mental recognition that restora tion of used w~ter must be the
ultim~te solut ion to mainta ining water quality .
In any c ose ,
no reason has been advanced as to why other dams in t he Kentucky River Basin could not be used t o augment wa ter qu~lity .

(

d) R'ecre.:ition .
We believe that the recreationz.l u ses
envisioned by the planners of this dam ( about 39% of tota l
projected benefits) will be n c complished by a dam a·l: either
site. However , the additional recrea t ional benefits to be
derived from preserving the Red River Gorge as a n aturnl area
would add significantJ.;.y to the total recreational b e nefits of
the project.
It is dif f icult to see how the tremendous

APPENDIX "B"

�-

5 -

recreat ion ? l v a lue o f t he un Flooded Gorge c ,~n be ignored i n
these consider,,tion.s .
Finally , we believe the a ntic ipated addit ion a l c ost of
building the d a rn at the downs tream loc a tion is a sm~l l price
to p a y for the irreplace a ble scenic a nd recreationa l a ssets
of the a rea tha t will be s 2.v cd .

'fhe viei•;s o f the Sierra Club , Kentucky Section, Grei't t
La kes Chapte r , h aVe be e n presented in .this p nper .
The Sierra
Club requests the opportunity for its represent~tivcs to further d i scuss t:her:H:'.) views before the iippropr i a te Congres.'~i on::i l
Committees and al l other interested ~gen cies .

f1

APPENDIX "B"

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="58">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57609">
                  <text>Perkins, Carl D. Congressional Papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57610">
                  <text>Carl D. Perkins (1912-1984) served eastern Kentucky as a US Representative between 1948 and 1984. His papers contain legal documents and correspondence related to his activities in Congress and focus heavily on coal mining, flood control, education and labor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only a portion of this collection has been digitized. See the &lt;a href="http://ekufindingaids.libraryhost.com/index.php?p=collections/controlcard&amp;amp;id=188"&gt;Finding Aid&lt;/a&gt; for a description of the entire collection.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57611">
                  <text>Perkins, Carl D.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57612">
                  <text>1948-1984</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57613">
                  <text>text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57614">
                  <text>photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57615">
                  <text>reel to reel</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57616">
                  <text>film</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57617">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57618">
                  <text>collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57619">
                  <text>2005a002</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721020">
                <text>Army Engineers - Red River</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721021">
                <text>Constituent correspondence regarding a flood control project on the Red River in eastern Kentucky.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721022">
                <text>Perkins, Carl D. Papers</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721023">
                <text>1967-1968</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721024">
                <text>correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="721028">
                <text>news clipping</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="721029">
                <text>press release</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="721030">
                <text>brochure</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="721031">
                <text>report</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721025">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721026">
                <text>text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="721027">
                <text>2005a002-bd058-f04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="635">
        <name>flood control</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3014">
        <name>Red River</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="835">
        <name>Red River Gorge</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="100127" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="129349">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.eku.edu/files/original/6b66fb15be4d06dc9ab13533da520ffc.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9fc3c9771b0eb02578658513ad588115</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="54">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="841824">
                    <text>.............

Volume XXXVIII~ N&lt;&gt;~ 26
10c Per Copy

THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 1966

ONE SECTION

OF NETWORK
%IN EAST KY.
,r s

tl.
nt
)1.

Ashland-to-Jenkins ·
Kentucky Work Cost
Around $26 Million

Announcement was made in
ir New York Tuesday that the
at American Electric , Power Company will build a 1,050-mile elec~: tric transmission network in Kenal tucky ·a nd adjoining states at an
estimatecj cost of $200 million.
Kentucky Power Company, an
affiliate of American Power, said
• 136 miles of the network will run
) through Eastern Kentucky, be•
ginning at Ashland and running
up the Big Sandy valley to Jenkins. The Kentucky work will
cost about $26 million.
The giant, 765,000-volt grid will
~
be the largest in the world.
(W. W. Burchett, Prestonsburg,
chairman of the Kentucky Public
Service Commission, and J.
1e David Francis, member of the
ve Commission, were among those
;ts summ·o ned to New York f or
Tuesday's announcement.)
·sThe Kentucky link will be
in started first to provide a tie-in
10 with a new $100 million, 1100,000:ig kilowatt generating unit to be
er built at American Power's Big
ch Sandy station, near Louisa.
nd
Completion of both the Louisa
ti's plant and the Kentucky leg of the
!en extra-h i g h-voltage transmission
oircuit are scheduled for 1969.
'as
Donald C. Cook, president ol
Nis American Power, said the new
t1nt n e t w o r k anticipates electric
on- energy needs of the company's
om · service area for decades to come.
ter The extra-high voltages will
ras call for new designs in steel and
lumimmi. towers-. The ~'back•
bone" grid calls for 4,000 such
,ar towers, ranging in height from
ay 110 feet to 145 feet. The average
,nt tower on AEP's present 345,000~ai volt system is 105 feet tall.
·h t
The towers will be placed
of along a 200-f oot cleared right-of•
a way an average of about 9
1e quarter-nule apart. In this mounid tainous section of Kentucky, howe- ever, the towers at times will
~Y su-p port spans of 2,000 feet or
1t m ore reac·hing from one moun-tain height to another..
1,y

....

~~

��RICHARD L. OTTINGER

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFFICS.:;
ROOM 214 MAIN POST OFFICE

25TH DISTRICT, NEW YORK

YONKERS, NEW YORK

YO 5-0300
1215 LONGWORTH BUILDING

225-5536 (202)

COMMITTEE ON
BANKING AND CURRENCY
SUBCOMMITTEES:

&lt;d:ongtt55 of tbt Wnittb gi)tatts

1 VAN

1!,ouse of l\epresentatibt5

WART STREET

ELMSFORD, NEW YORK

LY 2-5300

Mlajbfngton, II.~. 20515

NORTHERN DISTRICT OFFICE:

SMALL BUSINESS
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE

CENTRAL DISTRICT OFFICE:

April 29, 1966

50

MAIN STREET

BREWSTER, NEW YORK
BR

9-8089

Dear Sir:
The announcement this week that the American Power Company will
build a gigantic new power line through Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia and Virginia poses serious problems for every legislator from that
five-State region.
The new line -- the largest ever built -- will have a tr.e mendous
impact on power technology in America, but I can tell you from personal
experience that it will have an even greater · impact on the towns and villages through which the 150-foot steel and aluminum towers and the network
of cables will run.

As the route for the 200-foot power corridor is announced, I can
assure you that you will be besieged by planning officials, town councils
and property owners distressed at the disruption, devaluation and tax
losses that will result. There will also be widespread concern over aesthetic damage,,
These problems are very real and the public feeling on the·m is
much more powerful than you might expect -- until you are faced with an
outraged constituency,

No one denies the need for expanding power syste-ms and everyone
agrees that some way must be found to minimize the damage. The most
obvious way is to put the lines underground, but the United States utility
industry has lagged behind in developing the technology neeced to · go- 11.nder-ground and the Federal Government has failed, until very recently, to take
an active roleo
Power line fights, such as you now face in your State in connection with the _American Power Company, are raging all over the United States.
Recently a fight between Woodside, California and Pacific Gas and Electric
had to be decided in Congress. A New York battle is now before the Supreme
Court.
As a result of this growing conflict, the Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled hearings next week on two bills Senator Neuberger and I
introduced to help stimulate the placem.e nt of large transmission lines
undergroundo I am attaching information on the bills and on the hearings
in the event that you may be interested.
Sincerely,

_--_

~~

L. t

Richard L. Ottinge
1.1ember of c .o ngress

�.· { ?·
!,. :.
•t.~
. ..
,
:-'!;:
, '.

.

.; .

~~~:~

.. L

~·

.

.

i:.-.

~"

.

;,,

,;. ·~ ..,

\ .::.:~ ..

/

t :-

..

,

I

,,

,

!'

''

'--

.....
.- .. ,

'

,, \' '· .

f' . :.. ~

':

. ~

�INFORMATION SHEET
SENATE POWERLINE HEARINGS

HEARING DATE:
PLACE:
TIME:

May 4, 5, &amp; 6, 1966
Room 5202 New Senate Office Building
10 O'Clock A. M.
H. R. 10514 (S.2508)

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a program of research and
development to encourage the use of underground transmission of electrical
power and to undertake projects to evaluate and demonstrate the economical and
technical feasibility of such transmission.
H. -R. 10513 (S.250i)

To authorize the Secretary of Interior to conduct a program of research regarding
overhead electric transmission lines and the effect of such lines upon the
health and welfare of citizens, community_·planning and zoning, real estate values
and tax revenues, and the natural beat1ty of our country.

SPONSORS OF UNDERGROUND POWERLINES LEGISLATION
HOUSE

SENATE

Hon. Richard L. Ottinger
August 17, 1965

Hon. 'Ihomas L . Ashley
August 25, 1965
Hon. Clarence D. Long
August 19, 1965

(NY)

HR 10513

Hon. Maurine B. N~uberger
September 8, 1965

Ore.

Hon. Paul H . Douglas

Ill.

Hon. Joseph S. Clark

Pa.

HR 10576
HR 10577

Hon. Lee Metcalf

Montane

HR 13490

Hon. Frank Church

Idaho

Hon. Ernest Gruening

Alaska

Hon. Wayne Morse

Ore.

HR -10514
Ohio

(Md)

Hon. William B. Widnall (NJ)
March 14, 1966

HR 10663
HR 10664

MEMBERS OF SENATE COMMERCE COMMITTEE
Washington
Chairman, Warren G. Magnuson
Rhode Island
John 0. Pastore
A. S. Mike Monroney
Oklahoma
Ohio
Frank J. Lausch~
Alaska
E. L. Bartlett
Indiana
Vance Hartke
Gale W. McGee
Wy9ming
1\1:ichigan
Philip A. Hart
!'Tevada
Howard W. Cannon
Daniel B. Brewster
Maryland
Oregon
Maurine B. Neuberger
Tennessee
Ross Bass
New Hampshire
Norris Cotton
Kentucky
Thruston B. Morton
Pennsylvania
Hugh Scott
Vermont
Wi nston L. Prouty
Kansas
Jrunes B. Pearson
Colorado
Peter H. Dominick
Edward Jarrett, Chief Clerk
Suite 5202 -NSOB

Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite

127 - OSOB
3215 - NSOB
6205 - NSOB
1327 - NSOB
248 - OSOB
451 - 0S08
344 - OSOB
362 - · OSOB

259 - OSOB

Suite 240 - 0S08

Suite
Suite
Sui te
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite
Suite

431 - OSOB
232 - 0S08
5109 - NSOB
437 - OSOB
260 - OSOB
444 - OSOB
6317 - NSOB
140 - OSOB

S.2507
S.2508

�(Not printed at Governnie11t expense)

United States
of America

PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE

89 th

CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Getting Powerlines Underground
SPEECH
OF

HON. RICHARD L. OTTINGER
OF NEW YORK

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESEN'TATIVES

Tuesday, August 17, 1965

Mr. OTTINGER. Mr. Speaker, today
I have introduced three bills to attack
the mom1ting problem of overhead transmission lines v1hich are challenging all
of our efforts to save and restore the
natural beauty of· the Nation. ·
The first bill directs the Secretary of
tl1e Interior to undertake ·an immediate
program to compile necessary information about the extent of the overhead
transmission problem . and the economic
and other damage t}:lat such lines have
done and will do in the future.
The second bill amends the Internal
Revenue Code so as to provide effective
tax incentives to private power companies to start immediately on the
underground installation of lines.
ri11e third bill directs the Secretary of
tl1e Interior to undertake an immediate
progra1n of research to dev-elop the most
economical and technically efficient
methods of underground transmission.
It also directs the Secretary .to undertake demonstration projects and to make
certain grants and loans to non-Federal
systems to enable them to take part in
this program.
ECONOMICS OF BEAUTY

The problem that we are attacking
here is more than just a simple question
of beatity versus power. ·It is an issue
of tl1e utmost economic importance and
one that affects particularly our spreading urban complexes and the health and
,velfare of citize11s who live in and
around these growing metropolitan
cer1ters.
Utility companies a11d Government
a gencies, wl1en dealing with transmission line problems, have al,vays compared the costs of underground wi tl1
those of overhead construction. They
have never taken into account the very
real economic costs that overhead transmission li11es inflict on the communities
through ,vhicl1 they pass. The first bill
provides, for the first time, for measurement of th.ese local costs so that they
may be weighed in the balance of future
transmission line decisions.
785-358-99409

I l1ave long agreed with experts who
hold that aesthetics is good economics.
The first of the bills tl1at I have introduced is intended to instruct the Secretary of Interior to develop sta tis ti cal,
dollars.:. a11d-cents evidence in support of
tl1is view.
Today, more than 300,000 miles of
overhead transmission lines cut across
the ope11 spaces and througl1 tl1e towns
and villages .of America. These lines
eat up a total of nearly 7 million acres
and have a detrimental effect on many,
many m'illions more.
· ·
STATISTICS LACKING

Of course, these figures are estimates.
In fact, so little real concern has been
shown over this problem by the industry
and by responsible Government officials
that even today there is . no reliable
source of infor1nation and statistics.
But this niucl1 we do kno~r. We know
that expert evaluation has show11 that
po,ver corridors through certaih developed communities l1ave devalued as
much as· 300 acres of property for every
mile of powerline.
We know that the Federal Power Commission estimates that present transmission facilities will be more than trebled
by 1980. This means close to 1 million
miles of overhead lines in the United
States in 15 years. It also means that
11early 20 million acres of our Nation's
land~nearly twice as much land as is
110w preserved in our entire national
park system-will be eaten up as rightof-way for power corridors.
We know that there _is, today, no incentive for utilities to develop economically and technically feasible methods of
underground transmission and that the
private citizen and the local community
have little or no protection from over-head lines under the existing law.
No citizen would depy that as the industrial plant and population of the Nation gro,v, there is a real a11d genuine
need to find new sources of power. Electrical power produced by plants at or
near the point of use will no longer meet
the need. It is becoming necessary to
tap cheaper a11d more abundant supplies
farther and farther from the point of
use. -T his )is essential to our continued
growth and no citizen would have it
otherwise.
IIowever, there are conflicting needs of
equal urgency-needs that t11e President

sing1ed out in his message on natural
beauty last February as deserving the
urgent attention of the Nation. For the
tremendous expansion of overhead lines
in the future will not be spread out all
over the Nation, it will be concentrated
where industry· is, where people are: in
the growing cities of the Nation and their
all-important suburbs.
Within 15 years, unless we act no,v, a
forest of steel towers and high-voltage
lines will be knifing through the very
areas where dwindling reserves of .land
and an expanding population are posing
the greatest challeng•e to the President's
"new conservation."
This is a conflict that can be resolved,
but not with pleasant words about natural beauty, not with study groups or
conferences. It is going to take concerted action-and money.
The power industry itself is obviously
not prepared to act on its own. The
costs are said to be too great. The responsible Federal agencies have not
assumed the necessary leadership. In
such a situation, the ultimate responsibility rests with Congress.
RESEAR'cH PROVIDED

First and foremost, we need information. We must begin to com.pile the statistics and projections that will enable
us to cope with the problem.
For that reason, my first bill directs
the Secretary of In.terior to undertake a
comprehensive program of research into
the extent and the economic and social
impact of overhead transmission and to
report to the President and the Congress
at the opening of the next regular
session.
But ,ve also need direct action. There
are technical and economic problems and
questions ,that can only be answered· by
experience. We have abundant evidence
that study without action is fruitless.
Private power co1npanies generate
considerably more than 70 percent of the
Nation's power. They . have enormous
engineering capability to resolve the
technical problems of underground
transmission. I am sure that if they
are given the incentive they have the
ability to make significant contributions
to solving this problem. I have therefore
introduced an amendment to the Internal
Revenue Code which provides real economic incentive to these companies to

�2

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD

start buildi11g underground powerlines.
The incentive, in the form of rapid writeoff and a short-term tax credit, will, in
effect, bring the costs of underground
transn1ission down almost to parity with
overhead construction costs. Prelimi11.ary estimates indicate that it will cost
the Treasury roughly $25 million a year
over the next 1 o years.
Experience with tax credits a11d accelerated depreciation in .the past in.d icates that this figure would be reduced
by increased revenues resulting from the
increased expenditure and business acti vi ty. But even without this reduction,
I believe that the benefits obtained for
the investment would be cheap at the
price.
We can afford to spend $25 million a
year for the next 10 years to avoid the
tremendous expenditures that ,vill be invo'lved if we fail to act now. In fact,
we cannot afford 11ot to spend it.
. Experience has shown .us the folly of
''P.enny-wise, pound-foolish" . spending
011 impor.tan t national programs such as
this. When the Federal Highway Act
v1as passed in 1950, there were many
who urged that it include additional appropriations for clea11ing up, restoring
and beautifying our highways. They
were not heeded. In tl1is session of
Congress we are asked to spend about
$90 million a year to correct. what could
have been prevented by modest expenditures 15 years ago. When Will we
learn to act in time?

eral and State regulation, l1as spent far
too little on research to date.
In 1962, according to Federal Power
Commission figures, the private utility
companies spent a total of $30 million
on all research projects. This represented about 1.5 percent of the companies' net income of $2,050 million. But
· the lion's share, some $26 million of this
pathetically small research budget, was
devoted to nuclear projects. Only $4
million, two-tenths of 1 percent of
net revenue, went i11to all other forms of
research, including underground power.
According to the Edison Electric Institute, an industry source, the percentage of the budget devoted to research
actually decreased in 1964. Last year,
the industry spe11t a total of $46 million
on all forms of research which is only
nine-tenths of 1 percent of the _industry's net revenue of $4,880 million in that
year. By contrast, the suppliers of
equipment to the utility industry spent
$105 million on research. In general,
this averages to between 4 and 5 percent
of their net revenues.
The tendency to treat transmission
problems as the "poor cousin''; of the
power industry is reflected in a breakdown of industry costs. Today, less than
14 cents out of the utility construction
dollar is spent on transmission facilities.
By comparison, the industry spends 47
cents of its construction dollar on generation facilities and 39 cents on distribution facilities.

TAX SPUR

INDUSTRY CAN DO

The combination of accelerated depreciation and tax credit is uniquely
geared to the operating realities of the
utility industry.
First, tl1e major reason that the private utilities have failed to undertake
even limited programs before now, they
say, is the fear that once they start
going underground, they will be forced
to put all lines underground. This is a
vicious circle. Fear of added i11itial expense has prevented the private companies from undertaking the very projects that would lead to reductions in
cost.
Second, over the past decade the utility industry has come to rely almost entirely upon internally generated funds
from_depreciation, rather than upon external financing for its new construction.
The ince11tive I am proposing is, therefore, targeted to the very funds now
used for construction.
In urging that programs be undertaken in1mediately to meet the challenge
to beauty posed by unsightly power complexes, President Johnson in his message on natural beauty also pointed out
that:

Public welfare demands that this lag
be overcome with larger expenditures in
research and development as well as construction.
There can be no question that with
proper incentives the industry can develop economically feasible methods of
underground transmission.
Ten years ago these same utilities were
fighting efforts to make them put distribution lines underground. They reported that such installations cost 10
times as much as overhead li11es and were
uneconomic.
Iri this .c ase they lacked the Federal
protection and, under pressure from local zoning ordinances, they quickly
learned cost-saving techniques. Today,
these utilities boast that they have reduced the cost ratio to less than 1 ½ to 1
and they vie with each other in praise of
their efforts at beautification.
I share with most power experts a
faith in the ability of the power industry
to accomplish the same miracle with
transmission lines, if they are properly
motivated.
This is how the tax incentive that I
have proposed would operate. It would:
F1rst. Provide for a tax deduction for
amortization of funds spent after January 1, 1965 on underground transmission facilities completed after December
31, 1965 and before December 31, 1974.
Amortization shall be permitted over a
period of 60 months as against the 360
months currently allo,ved for transmission facilities.
Second. Prohibit the sale of tra11smission lines amortized under the bill from
yielding capital gains.

The greatest single force that shapes the
American landscape is private economic development. Our taxation policies should
not penalize or discourage conservation and
the preservation of beauty.

The incentive in this bill will mobilize
·our taxation policies as a potent force to
encourage conservation policy in the economic development of the private sector
of the economy.
Third, the power industry, insulated
from competition by a blanket of Fed785-358-99409

Tl1ird. Provide for a 49-percent tax
credit for the capital and construction
costs of underground transmission facilities built after January 1, 1965 and completed on or before December 31, 1969.
Fourth. Set up a reserve equal to 46
percent of the credit-excluding the 3percent tax credit now permitted utilities-and provide that the ·reserve may
be reduced by the amounts spent on capital investment or construction of new
underground transmission facilities on
or before December 31, 1974, but after
December 31, 1969. Provide that funds
remaining in the reserve after December
31, 197 4 and not expended, shall be taxed.
Fifth. Provide that the credit or the
amortization are not to be used to reduce
the taxpayer's income tax for the purpose
of establishing cost of service.
Sixth. Provide that no portion of the
investment covered ·by the tax credit is
to be added to cost of service for the purpose of increasing rates .
Through these .amendments t,o the Internal Revenue Code, we will have provided effective incentives for the private
sector of the utility industry. This will
be a tremendous achievement. It will
reach some 320 separate companies accounting f.o r better than 70 percent of
the electricity transmitted in the United
States and serving 47,500,000 consumers.
However, it is important that the
nearly 1,000 other utility systems be included in thls effort as well. These
systems, including those owned by the
Federal Government and by the States
and municipalities, as wel: as the important cooperatives, play an important
role in transmission.
The third bill that I have introduced
today will direct the Secretary of Interior
to enter into research, development and
demonstration projects with such systems. This bill will also cover the 21,000
miles of overhead transmission linesapproximately 7 percent of the Nation's
total transmission facility-,vhich is under the Secretary's authority.
PEOPLE ASK HELP

Overhead transmission lines pose a
problem that deserves forceful and immediate action by the Federal Government. With increasing frequency American citizens are turning to the Federal
Government-to administration officials,
to the Federal courts and to Congress! or help in defending their homes and
property against defacement and devalution.
Can they be anything but disillusioned
and discouraged to find that the Government that speaks of natural beauty, that
calls for action, is unwilling or unable to
act?
In February, President Johnson said:
I am l1opeful that we can summon such a
national effort. For we have not chosen to
have an ugly America. We have been careless, and often neglectful. But now that the
danger is clear and the hour is late this
people can place themselves· in th.e path of
a tide of blight which is often irreversible
and always destructive.
'

We know what the problem is. We
know what must be done. I urge my
colleagues in both Houses of Congress to
step to the forefront of a great national
effort to keep America ·beautiful.
U.S . GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1965

�BIBLIOGRAPHY - CONGRESSIONAL RECORD
ON UNDERGROUND POWERLINES TRANSMISSION

Three Bills Introduced at Attacking Overhead Powerlines Problem to Beautify
America, September 7, 1965, pgs. 22181-22182
'lhe Beautiful Pedernales, September 8, 1965, pgs. 22356-22357

Powerlines and Public Safety, September 22, 1965, pgs 23826-23828

Metropolitan Dade County Florida Supports HR 10513, HR 10514 and HR 10515,
September 22, 1965, pgs. 23820-23821

Support for Underground Transmission Lines, October 11, 1965, pgs. 25629-25630

To Encourage and Assist Underground Power Transmission by Means of Tax Incentives
and Research, March 1 4 , 1956, pgs. 5489-5491

Speed Installation of Underground Transmission Lines. March 14, 1966, pg. 5506

�,}./

l

CARL D.- PERKINS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATI VES
WASHINGTON.. D.. c.

..

V..,,.

J··--F

, ••

t '

2-1-66

'

I,

IT

s.cREAMS!

\J\'hitesburg, Letcher County, l&lt;entucky, Thursday, June 10, 1965 Vo l. 58, No. 4'

··-:--;

¾.

...•.

~

•

.❖·•· «•
·- ::-:: . . ....,

\&gt;:: : :;J}:\i\~:: ::;- _-_:·

.

Ci;)}S . T \;
A ··
· ·· ®

·1

WI
I :'
·; ·:•;·.:•.•.i.:.~.•.•·••·!.

1
.:. r. ·.:.!.:.. :.

!.. l.i.l.~.1..l.I:.~.i.l.r( ::-:

1. 1.!.\.

. ·, . .: : ::i·. . . ·
·;;· .,

e

·:-~::::. ·-: :-:-:: :-:;: :::::_=_=:· -:::::::::: --

.··.•.•.•·· / .=·=·.·.·
~ ..... ·. :.···
~ ~ :..•••.·••.:.1.t.:
·:«-.•
..••.·.•.· •·•.&gt;"'·

:_:·::::li~i;;~~:i::/~--

•

f
azar
UI

I
A formal announceme nt is excipal power outlets in Maine,
&lt;&lt;F\~t::=&lt;;1f\i\!~~!jil i):ni. - :. ~-;: ·=·:-_._-_::~pected within the next several
:tvlassachusetts, Vermont, New
-:-:-.-. -=·· ·- ..: .·.
days of a giant new power plant
Hampshire , Rhode Island, Con•
t o be built on the Kentucky Ri ver nectic ut, Pennyslva ni a, New Jerbelow Haz ard by combined pubsey •~Matyland, De laware, West
lie and private power interests.
Virgini a , Virginia , North CaroThe plant is expected t o be one lina , South Carolina, Georgia,
'
of the largest in the world, and
· Alabama, Kentucky and Florida.
will devastate large areas of EasIn its initial announcement,
tern Kentucky in its quest for the
Yankee- Dix ie said it hoped that
che apest possible sources of strip
private power companies would
,.
mined cctal.
·
"join in. fl
'
T he plant will be built by a
The giant American Electric
combine of the Americ an ElecPower Co. , one of the world's
tric Power Company, owne r of
l argest with extensive operations
the Kentucky Power Company,
in Ohio, · Ke ntucky , Virginia , Pennand major segments of t he nasyl vania and West Virginia, appar/ ')_;: ~¾=, ~- ❖ ❖•
•❖❖
..*'j. «- ·%i ~· ·
❖ ~
·- -,
~ ~ -~s--x;/4i · . . . ·· ·-~: ·_
:-:--~-~;:_
-.:~\
t =.
t ion :s rural electric co-operaently has done so.
; , ~ -·n.- ·
.·.
._ ·---~-. ..½
··. ~-.- :·~ ❖
.···«...~::..
...rtr·
~,.,. .,_ .
~ ·,g..
_ ;,;',; .,,, .• .
. .. .
.~ .' .../.
tives, led by the East Kentucky
The AEP has as its president DonRural Ele ctric Co-Operat ive Corp . ald Cook, Ne w York, a former
'
at Wincheste r.
chairm an of the federal Securities
One inforrned source said the
and Exchange Commission, Cook
:;/:~:--.
plant ultimately will have a gen- is regarded as a long-time perscn~
erating capacity of t wo m illion
al friood of President Lyndon B.
kilowatts and will be the largest
Johnson, and reportedly only a few
steam-coal power plant in t he
weeks ago turned down Jol:u1son 1s
«.-.-·J:.~-1--·-·- -..
world. Cost estimates exceed
bid t o m ake him secretary of the
$200, 000, 000.
treasury.
.
ether sources, however, said the
Cook is re~arded as one of a
initial construction probably would "new breed ' of ma11agement µien
include a plant of one million kil- who look vrith fa vor on a fusion of
owatt c apacity, still one of the
public and private in vestme nts and
largest: in the world .
m anagement. He recently was aHugl1 L. Spurlock, Winchester,
warded the Herbert H. Lehman
m anager of t he East Kentucky Ru- medal by the Jewish Theological
ral Electric Co- Op , has been ne- Seminary of .c\ merica. The award
gotiating with major coal figures
is made annually in memory of the
in Eastern Kentucky in recent
lat.e U . s. Senator and l\lew York
weeks seeking long-term congovernor and is presented to " distracts for cheap coal.
tinguished Americans" who best
Spurlock reportedly is "demand- exemplify "the quest for e thical
COVEREE&gt; UP-·This heme in the Clear Creek sectiCi&gt;n of Knott County was moved from its foundation when debr:is;, from the strip mine site visible at the t0p of the hill behind the house slipped dow n ing coal at a price that eliminates and moral truth" as espoused by
,
against it., The, famil}'. didn't even have time to get i ts furniture out. Good - size d trees were pushed the possibility of deep- mine coal, " Lehman.
one informed s~urce said_, " l_ie
The original Yankee- Dixie anon top of the house. (Photo by Gurne v Norman courtesy of the Hazard Hera ld).
wants and he wi~ get strip mine
nouncement conce rning power
coal a~ a low pr1ce--a~ such a
plants said conside ration was below price that there will be no
ing given to use of -a portion of
P?.ssibil ity of strip mine reclama- the power 'Sales reve nue to estabI ~
t 10n, fl the source added. .
. . lish a fund for Appalachian area
Tllls ma jor-ctevelopment in the ; economic development . It did
A large groµp of citizens in ev ship of the group comes from oth- have been invited join i n wha~ is coa_l fiel~, ':oupled with a step- ; not go into further detail as to h~w
ery way typical of the population
er sections of the county and from regarded as a crusade to save .l:!as- up m del1ver1es of coal to the
: the fund would be set up or how it
of Eastern Kent ucky organized this
other counties , indicating the e x - tern Kent ucky from t otal de struc Tennessee Valley Authority for
· would be administered.
week in an effort t o save mountain tent of the great discontent e xi st- tion.
.
its giant ne w ·aull Run ste~m
Informed sources say that t he cohomes and farms fr om being
·
ing over strip mining.
The group wil~ hold a public ,
plant, again one of the largest
ops and the private power c ompany
crushed beneath the area's enorLandowners and public spirited
three-county r allv at the Carr . i n the world, will more than triple with wr1..ich they have been dealing
mous a nd politically powerful
citizer,&lt;: from throughout the are a
(Continued on Page 12)
the volume of strip coal m ining
• now ha ve abandoned any real constrip mine industry.
in Perry, Knott, Letche r and sur- : side ration of such an effort to plow
The group is composed of some
rounding coal field c ounties.
. part of the profits into an e.ffort t o
125 persons, mostly landowners,
Major rural electric c o-ope ra• assist the poverty stricken of Aprepresenti ng many differe nt fac tives and major municipal power . palachiq.
.
.
ets of life in the mountains- -mi aficials of t he Office of Ecothe Appalachian area announce d
firms throughout the Eastern half · "All they are interested in is e xners, school teachers, merchants, nomic Opportunity and several
in Washington t liis week. .
of the Unit ed States .c ombined t o
plaiting the resources of the mounfarmers.
other state and federal agencies
The l arge-sc ale project is beiform the Yankee- Dixie Power &amp; - tains under the guise of doing someThey chose as their name The
will be in Whitesburg ne xt week . ginning in Kentucky with the Ap- sociation tw9 m onths ago, with
thing to help you, " the sources said.
Appalachi an Group to Save the . to discuss setting up a pilot pro•
palachlan Regional Hospitals, ·
t he announced intention of build·
"They are planning to go -into
Land and the People. .
ject for health c are of rural area
whic h this week received a $1. 2
ing giant power plants in Eastern .competition with t he Tennessee
. They elected Knott County .
residents in Letcher County.
million grant from t he ,Offiiire of
Kentucky, Pennsylvania and AlaValley Authority and hope to be· . .
schooltea cher Leroy Martin as theiI The project would be" located at Economic D_pportunity to keep
bama to furnish low-c ost to e ascome t he major source of c heap
chairman and chose c o-chairmen Blackey and would/rovide a pub• them operat mg. The hospitals
tern United States population cen- power east of the h.1ississippi River,
from Letcher .and Perry counties.
lie health nurse an various adv:is- have been operating in the black
te rs. .
·
"You m ay as well face it. EasThey picked Perry Com rr1onory servtGes.for residents of the
recently but needed additional
The Yankee-Dixie Power Assotern Ke ntuckians who want to halt
wealth's Atty . T olbert Combs as
area. T he initial budget for the
funds t o pay off two l arge l oans
c iat ion named Spurlock as chair- · ::ir control strip mining now face a
co-chairman from that county and project would be $30, OQO.,
which are comjng due.
man of its steering c ommittee and combination of vast and influential
Jenkins High School Principal El- · The project will be outlined at
OEO made the grant to the hos- said it would spend $1. 037 billion private power companies with the
don Davidson as co-chairman from a meet~g of the Letcher County
p~tals through_t~ Appal_achian Re'.'" for the three power plants and
rural electi;ic c o-operatives and the
Letcher County.
Economic Opportunity Com mit- . fiional Com ~~ion , which has
· transmission line s t o serve an area Tennessee ;va-11ey Authority , the
The organization was sparked by tee at the c eurthoure Monday night unds for buildmg new ~eal th cen- including more than 400 munici•
rnunicipal pl ants and the coal comrecent strip -rn_ining developments and at a me~ting of. Blackey area · ters but ~one for operatmg those
pally dwned electric utilities and
panies. _T he~ people will all have
and court actions asa inst landown- residents at Blacke y Tuesday nii ht· a~ady in _exiStence . . Sarge~t
m ore than 200 rur al electric coa veste d interest in gutting Eastern
ers by strip m i ners 1n the C~ear
T he project apparent ly is not Q.aI1 Shri ~er! director of OE~, said the operatives.
Kentucky for che.a p coal and there
Creek section of Knott County.
of a $100,000,000 plan for region.;. hospitaJ.s and other mul~i-c~unty
Yankee-Dixie said its members
is nothing you can do to stop it,"
However. most of the mE;mbera1 health f:ic ilities ·and services in health cente~ to be built with
included rural co-ops and munithe sources said .
· (Cont inued on Page 12;
(

·;::;:::::::::_:::-:-:-:-:-: .

m - .- ~- •

•

,.,. ;.:

•

-··- -·~:: :~.:·~
-. -·
•

,::;:'.:_:::::: ~ ·~ • • :

·::-•• ~ -

.

•

•

•

•

:

-- -

=· /:: -:

~:

-·-·- : - .

.

•
I
't
"
•
•,
n
tt
•r1r
n.
,
n
l,.n
rgonizolion lo 1:, , ~, /'/'III:,
an. test .Center

ourt
The Kentucky Court of Appeals
opened the way this week for a
possible start within the next two
years on all the school buildings
needed in Letcher County . .
The court, ruling in a case from
Jefferson County , said all property
listed for taxation in Kentucky
must be assessed at 100 per cent
of its actual cash value .
In Letcher County, property is
now assessed at 2 7. 9 per cent of

• •

ec1s1on ma y·
i

its actual value . The school system ' s bonding potential is based
on local assessments and is presently $1 , 500, 000 . The new rul.,
ing will permit at le ast a tripling
and ~most a qyadrupling of the
b9nd1ng potential . T hus the county schools , which now are bonded
to the limit of their capacity to
finance ·schools now under construction, will have a vailable a
bonding capacity of at least three

•

UI

t

newsc

million additional dollars and per4 . New construction at Kingdom
haps as much as four million.
Come High School on Linefork .
The great needs ·in ·the way of
5. New gymnasia at Let~her and
buildings in the cour:icy system are Fleming- Neon high schools .
these :
Estimates are that the Whitesburg
1. A new grade school in West
Grade School, which would be a ..
Whitesburg .
· 30-classroom unit with additiona l
2 . A new grade school to serve service rooms, would cost a bout
th_p Hot Spot area, where a school three fourths of a million dollars.
burne:d a few years ago .
.
The high school plant at Whites. 3. New c onstruction to complete burg would cost about the same athe high school plant in Whitesburg mount. T his would include dern n-

lition of t he present old high school
building and construction of new
quarters on the site, as well as ad~
dition of a lunchroom, library, a nd
other facilities . The English and
Science buildings and the gymnasium would be retained, ancl. the
present grade school building would
be used a.s high school classrooms
· until t he new structure could be
completed_.
( Continued on Page 12)

.•

�\

1.' HE 1v10 UNT AIN EAGL E •

•

•

\✓

H I T E S B 1:J RG ,

L E T C H E R C O U N T '{ , I( E tJ T U C I&lt; Y

•

•

•

1' I-I U R S D A Y ,

JUN E 1 0 , 1 9 65 •

•

•

PAGE 2

Current comment:
.

,I

Giant influences so powerful financ ially and politically that
seemingly they can c ontrol t he fate of Kentu_cky m ountain fa~'ilies are joining together to rav age and plunde r the_ Appalachian
area and take from the people the very l.a nd on which they walk .
Tl1e T ennessee Valley Authority, the rural electric co-operat ives, · t he coal operators, private power c ompanies, city~owned
· power company--each in its own way is a cen~r ~f polit_ical power and influence that has shaped the face of America• as it exists ,
'
t odw .
.
Now, they have combined to take from t he pe ople of Eastern .
Kentucky t11eir land, t heir coal, their rivers' and even the very air
they bre_athe.
And in one of the most blasphemous acts ever played before the
American public, they rape and pillage in the name of helping
the poor, the poverty stricken of Eastern Kentucky.'
Seemingly there are no limits to what some of these people and
the organizations they represent will do in their mad quest . ..
One middle- aged ,voman, who knows that the next Jew swipes
of the bulldozers and highlifts will bury her m ountain home, told
a few days ago a tale of horror that should lie on the conscience
of every public offici al, of every citizen of the nation who has a
concern for rr1oral and ethical values in this era of the Great So•
c iety.
.
"I pray t o God every day that n1y man will let them take ?ur
l and and our home and not try to stop them. I'm even afraid
for him even to go to court.
·
.
.
"They (the strip mine firms) have hired the worst gun thugs 1n
Easte rn I&lt;entucky to make us give then1 our land. They will kill
us i f v-re don't.
"What can we, do ? They've got the courts and the state police
and the killers on their side. "
The woman has been reduced to a level of despair beyond reckoning .
·
Her statements ,vere supported by two neighboring women:
"The men in this country all are scared to death. T.hey know
that if they do anything our homes will be dynamited or they
will be stopped on the road some night and shot to death."
The coal that is obtained by these tactics is used to fuel the
vast furnaces of the TVA. By purchasing coal from coal operat ors at such low prices it cannot be delivered except by use of
these or similar tactics, the T VA brings terror to the mountain
wornen of Eastern Kentucky who fear for the very lives of their
husbands and sons .
Now , there is firm indication t hat the volume of strip mining
't hat has been going on is but a mere trickle compared to that
which will be under way in a matter of a few weeks or months.
Within a few weeks, the hills of Perry and Knott counties will
be gutted for an additional 50, 000 tons of c oal each ~eek to
feed the giant new T VA Bull Run steam plant. And Just .around
the corner is another giant facility, probably the largest m the
world, to be built on the Kentucky River beJow Hazard by a
combine representing rural electric co-ops, municipal power
systems and a private power company.
This situation must be changed, now.
.
We say to Sen. John Sherman Cooper, to Sen. Thruston Morton , and to Congressman Carl D. Perkins that the single most_
important problem facing Kent~cky is 1:1-ot Vietnam or the nation. ,,, . -- ~bi:2P~get or any of the other thmgs which usually occupy the at;,,t'' _-'Jlff~ri of Cong~e~s.
.
. . ·
.
: . r'imrii.th'.'.greatest crisis confronting K:entue-ky J.S,..here 111, the moun·..;~tt~iit~'~; T Eastern-Kentuck¥ • . (An~ we hasten to add there i~ n_o.
• l~s~~,!li1tional problem 1n the hills of Tennessee, West Virginia
"riliil.'.li ~V~ginia.)
·
,
· We urgently call upon our senators and congressmen ~o launch
a full-scale investigation into the strip mine industry m Eastern
Kentucky. It is time for a thorou~h natio~al ai~ing of th_e great
damage being done, of the thug-like tactics being used in obtaining coal lands, of the role of the_ Tennessee Valley 1?-uthority
as it plunders a great area of the nation, of the prospective combin ation of the REAs with private concerns for still additional
plunder.
And we say to Gov. Edward T. Breathitt that the time has ~ome
. to fire State Commissioner of Natural Resources J. 0, Matlick
and to replace him with som~one who kno_ws the me_anin~ ?f the
word conservation. Matlick 1s not enforcing the strip minwg
laws in Eastern Kentucky. Give us a commissioner who will.
We also say to Governor Breathitt that the time has come for a
m ost careful arcl thorough investigation into the role played by
state police in such matters in Eastern Kentucky. State police
a·re rapidly becoming the center of deep hatred and contempt
among Eastern Kentuckians because of"the rqle they play as
armed guards for the strip mine operators.
·
And we say to County Judge James M. Caudill and t~ every
other public official in Letcher, Knott and Perry counties: the·
t i me has come for you to speak out and take a role of leader- ·
ship in the fight to halt strip mining. Either you are on the
side of trie people of Eastern Kentucky,. or you are aga~nst t_h~m.
And we say to President Johnson: Until and unless ~trip mining
is brought under respectable control in t!1,e Appa~achian area, the
n1ountains are doomed to total devastation w1thi11 a decade. It
rnatters not what you do or atter11pt to do for the people here under the poverty or Appalachian development progra:ns. . Both ~re
doomed to failure through the very nature of the strip mwe crisis.
To Aubrey Wagner, chairman of the Tennessee Valley Aut!1ority Boaiu. of Dire~tors; we say: You a_nd your agency are a disgrace to the nation. How dare you f1nance the plunde~ of E_astern
Kentucky by your insane quest for cheap coal~ You brmg disgrace .
to the name of the 1 ate Senator Norris, the founder of TVA, and
you defame the very people you should be helping--the povertystricken of the Appalachians.
.

A VO ICE
FOR THE POOR

(

l

their destruction every day by
Whether, under the present disstrip mine operators ? How can he
pensation, American po verty in
belie ve he should, and why should
T o the editor:
the midst of American affluence
he, buy a license m hunt or fish
can_ be significantly reduce~ rePrior to nlakino(J a portion of the when he sees a lackadaisical Di vimams to be seen. The nation
sion of Fish and Game permit
may turn instead to still larger
\Vest Whitesburg Urban Renewal
their wholesale destruction every
expenditures for war--the primland available to the Letcher
day by these same operators? Yes ,
rose path of statesmanship. One
County school board for a new
even a child knows when the anithing, however, is plain: the
elementary sc.h ool pla~t, it was
mals of the forest are being buried
poo~ cannot be lifted up singlenecessary to fill low- lying secand the fish in the streams are.behandedly by the well-to-do; they
tions _in order to prevent tuture
ing poisoned by acid mine wate~.
must play a part in their own re- . flood1n~ •
;
.
We notice that J. O. Matlick is
habilitation. The poor know pov- . The B1.z zack Const ruct . . on Co~- sponsoring a three-day _sym1:osium
erty from the inside; it is, so to
pany, Frankfort, Ky .. , ,h~s a con
on strip mining anti strip- mine
speak, their specialty. .Hence
tract to. construct a lin k 111 ithe
reclamation beginning June 2~.
the importance of recent &lt;levelMountain P_arkway system "ust _
It is the hope of the Appalachian
opments on the Philadelphia .front
west ~f Wh~tesburg. The com
Group to Save the Land a~ Peoof the war on poverty . . That it
pany 1s ,obl1gat~~ to select the
ple that Mr. Matlick will at least
happened in Philadelphia is chance; areas fo r depo.s1t1ng excess cut
give us time to speak equal to that
the problem is nationwide and other material. It _1s natural that the
given t o the gover~or. Yes,_ we recities will have to learn from the
contractor wcu_ld dump his waste
quest a voice at this symposium bePhiladelphia experience, ~nd from dirt in areas with shortest haul
e a use we are the ones who are being
one another.
and less. expense. .
driven from our homes in the middle
Philadelphia has twelve so-called
Mr. _B1::..,z ack and Mr . Wallace,
of the ni aht by strip mine floods, we
poverty districts, with a population super1nte~dents for the 81 zzack
are the o~es whose lifetime investof 500, 000 of voting age. Using
Construction Company'. have ha_d n1ents are being buried in a single
city votiq:; machines, an election numero~s reque sts for fill material day and we are the ones who are
was held to choose 144 persons from from pri vate land owners ; howpaying the taxes on the prbperty
354 candidates who had been certi- eve_r , upon learn1ng that the .
now being destr 0yed. In return_,
fied as being poor--twelve from
'i-Vh1t~sburg Urban Renewal .ComMr. Matlick, we offer our services
each district. This group in turn is mission needed a large amount of as guides through this "Ra vaged
to select one person to represent
d rt 111 order to prE:par_e the lan_d
Land."
each district on the Gity-wide an- . f~r a new school s~te it was de
ti-poverty governing board. Only c1ded that the school plans should ELDON DAVIDSON
the candid ates were certified as
c ume. f 1rst , and that the best way Jenkins, ·Ky.
poor; residents of the district gent o as_s1st all the people in _the comerall were ermitted to vote.
mun~ty would be ~o help 111 a
The ~ity-wi~e committee will
public-owne~ pr_oJ~ct, showing no
also include nineteen persons desfavor to any_ 1nd1 vidua 1.
·
h
1-iea vy equipment began t ,_ move To the editor:
ignated by _t e mayor.
·
fill material t o the future school
The editorial from Irving Stone's
The relatively low turn-out -site on June 7 and .the operation is
less than 13,000. or
about
2. 5 __
per
t·inu111g,
.
t n o. cost to theUrweekly which was republished in
"bl
t
con
a
f
h
1
your April 29, 1965, edition has
&lt;?ent _0 t ?se e igi e O vote
ban Renewal Commission or the
just come to my attention. I want
lS ~mg cited ~ an argument acitizens of Letcher County. It
ga1nst the election _proces_s by
appears that the Biz z ack Conyou to know that he presents a onesided and therefore misleading·
thost: ~ho seek to discre~1t a ~ey
struction Company is making a
provisi_on of the Economic Op
big effort to assist our community, · picture. •
In that editorial, Mr. Stone
portunity Act of 1964, ,?ame_ly,
even at expense to itself, . for
clairris that the poverty program is
that _there sh~~ be _th~, maxunum
dirt could have been deposited in
being r.un by big businessmen and
feasible partic~pati~n. by those , other places at less hauling costs.
whom the pro&amp;ram 1s 1nten~ed to
Thank you, Mr . Johnny Bizz ack . high-powered analysts from the
Defense Department to the exhelp. But various explanat1o~s
and Mr. Virgil Wallace, for exclusion of poor people. I-Ie is
have _been ~dv:anced to explain
emplar interest in the welfare
the disappomting response. The
of all the citizens in the comm Ln- wrong. The poverty program is
poor know they are poor but they
. •
h • h you work
·
being run by bu~inessmen, some
1
don't like to parade the facr. Alty i~ 'vi ic
. . .· ,
·.
analysts with Defense backgrounds,
so, illitera.t es were, theoritically
Wh1tes?u~g Mun1c1pal rlous1ng
and poor people.
at least, not qualified to vote. ·
Commission
Mr. Stone mentioned several
In fact, literacy tests wer.e not
businessmen now working on the
given, but no doubt some voters .
poverty program as proof they had
stayed away because it had been
a monopoly. But he neglected to
announced that literacy was a remention, for instance, that both
To the editor:
quirement . . This was merely a
men who develo2ed the basic ed.. .
convenience. In some districts
ucatlon program for the Job C?rps
Today, in Eastern Kentucky- there were as many as forty-seven . Perry County- - I watched another
were hign school dropouts. !Ii
candidates and it seemed~unnecfact, Wade Robinson, Associate
mountain die. It was a beautiful
essarily time consuming to read
mountain and it faced the proper- Director of the Job Corps, ne~r
this list to voters who were illitty on which I hoped that some day did get a high school diploma,
erate. Arthur Mohr, regional
alt~ugh 'many years later he
I would build my home. Now it
manager of the American Arbiis gone, gone under ·the blades of received a Ph. D. from Harvard.
tration Association, which superMr. Stone failed to mention
•
strip mine bulldozers .
vised the election, said in a teleSam Yette, my Special Assistant
Today was Memorial Day and
ohone interview with Eve Edstrom
for. Equal Opportunity, who not
while people knelt to place
of The Washington Post: "These
long ago was a poorrural Negro.
wreaths by the graves of loved
people are proud and don't want
Recently Sam 1:iecame an H6ho:~
.ones they kept a wary eye on the
to be embarrassed. I even saw an
ary Citizen of Nas-hville, Tennesdying mountain lest the ever inelderly man carry a large book in- creasing overburden and the
see.
to a polling place to give the im- ,. growling bulldozers send more
And Mr. Stone failed to mention
pression that he coulo read. But
that poor people participate in
rocks plunging down the mounhe couldn't. " All things considhelping to plan and supervise e vtain and into the cemetery nestered, it was impressive that, in
ery commu~ity action pro_g~am:
led at the foot of the slope .
such a novel experiment, 'as n:iany
Never since the rape and slaugh- This is required by a provision 1n
as 13, 000 oarticipated.
·
the law which was specifically re·ter of the American Indian has t
'there been a group of people as
Better ~ xpedients will no doubt
quested by the President last year.
be devisedto meet the requireI thought you would want to know
d0wntrodden and negkected; so
ment of "maximum feasible part- · let down by every court in the
these facts so that your readers
·
icipation. " The real question is
would have the full story .
land as these people whose land
not whether the poor should vote
. With best wishes.
is now under the ruthless blade
but whether they should have .a
Sincerely,
of strip mine · bulldozers. Bull- ·
voice ih a Frogram designed for
SARGENT S I-IRIVER
dozers which at this very minute
their benefit. No one suggests
Director, Off~ce of Economic
are destroying entire mountain
that the poor should administer · slopes for a ton of outcrop coal.
Opportunity
the program ot control the funds . .
It is regrettable indeed to see
What is needed-- and what is
PS. He also failed to mention
our University, Berea College
sought-·is some means by which ·
that top qfficials of OEO include
and even the natural resources
the poor can express a prespect- . commissioner join in these smoke- labor leaders, political leaders,
ive on the program and an evalscreen experiments wrth elderber- ~ educators, businessmen, social
uation of wnat is being done under ry bushes., fruit trees and the like, workers, etc.
it. This they can do better than
RSS.
thereby lending to these ruthless
others, nor need they be literate
operators and their land agent an
to do it. Unlike politicians, the
air of respectability. At a time
~oor are not concerneq. with their
· when neither of these schools has
To the editor:
'imagen or, like social workers,
A representative of the Office of Economic ~portunity who
. shown us how t be successful ewith' their careers. But they do
was in our office the other day remarked tl1at ·' the glamou~ is .
ven on bottom land they are now
I know the deep concern of the
know how .to appraise services
all gone from Appalachian poverty, and you people are gomg
spending money, our money, .
people of ·L etcher; Harlan and
designed for their benefit. There
.to have to figpt for everything you get." The meaning was
seeking ways to help the coal op, is nothing povel about the notion
Belf Counties, and adjacent co~
that passage of the Appalachian Development Act and the start
erators.
that the bentficiaries of a federal
ties, that u. s. 119 be included
of the War on Poverty have pretty well erased Appalachia from
Each year the Courier- Journal
program should be consulted about asks the schools of Kentucky to ·
the active conscience of the American people--th~i . think needs
under the -Appalachian Regional
it. If the poor were called "farhere are being met; afid it will take some time for them to know
Development highway program.
have students write essays on soil,
mers(1 or "miners" or '.'shippers, "
t hat they are not. Alaskans. Indians and the Samoan Islands are
Last week, I again talked to Mr.
water, forest and wildlife consercoming on big now, it seems. C'est la guerre contre la pauvrete' ! no questions would be raised. It . vation. .I-low can any child write
John L. Sweeney, the Federal Cois time we d:i.5C ~ d the concept · with enthusiasm about this topic
. chairman of the Appalachian ReTHE MOUNTAIN EAGLE is published every Thurjday at 120 West
we have of the paot as outeasts,
~ional Commission, about the
when he knows how little his state
Main Street, Whitesburg, Letcher Coun:cy, Kentucky, 41@58. ·
dropouts and misfits, and be~an
importance of this highway to
really cares about conservation? ·.
Thomas E. Gish is the editor and publislier • . Second-class postage to think of them as a new leisure
you and the region, and I urged
How can he be emhusiastic about
is paid at Whitesburg, Kentucky. Subsc~iption rar.es~ $3 a year
cl~ spawned by an affluent socthat it be ~_proved by the Comforest conservation and the preinside Letcher County, $5 a year outside Letcher County. Single
iety.
mission. After our talk, I wrote
vention of forest fires when he
1
copies, 10 cents each. This is Number 4 of Volume 58.
---THE NATION, June 14, 1965
(Continued on Page 11)
sees our state government permit

We've lost our sparkle

Th an ks contractor

Shriver disputes Stone

Death of a mountain

Cooper on 119

.

I

t

�T HE MOUNTAIN EAGLE •

•

• WHITESBURG, LET Cl-I E R COUNT Y • KENTUCKY •

•

• THUR SDAY , J UNE

l O,

19G 5

•

•

•

P AG E 3

''Just sitti ng here
watching for the hi 11
to come off on us11 is
the way Mrs . Susan
Ritchie, 72, des er ibes
what she is doing.
Mrs . Ritchie and her
family are among many
in the CI ear Creek
section of Knott County
whose homes have been
destroyed or who fear
their homes will be lost.
as a res uIt of st r ip mi ni ng activity now going
on in the hills above
them. Mrs. Ritchie
said she and her family
were forced to .leave the
home (below) in the middle of the night last week
when they heard a slide
begin on the top of ,the
mountain where stripping
had been done. Mud
blocked the steps and
fi I led the open area.
Mine firm trucks later
removed it but recent
rains have made what's
_left almost impassable.

...

1

i

,

'

(Photos by Gurney
Norman. courtesy
Hazard Herald)

I

):. .,;,

r:·..

•:·

·0:·

.:~r·.=:

&gt;·::t::.

•

~•.:•·

-~=:

:~(ii::~Ir\r..·.:- :·.:.~ - '"'""' "'"'"'

·. .-·•·•.·

''.&lt;"•'"'"' •,:

~&gt;--·=· .::~:=:=.::.::=:=::::::~=·.

-:=:=·=· .;.

'

t

�'f HE 'ti

'fI·l E }A OLJNT AIN E ii GL E _ • •

vi HITES BtJ RG , LET C I-JER CO .tr N 'f Y • I( E N 1' U CK Y
•

Services held at Roxana for N1rs. Caudill
-

Funeral i;ervices for Mrs. I{atie
Callahan Caudt ll, ·•,vi fe o f \•/i]lic
Ca udill, \V ere cond uct ed J,1ne 5
~t Tolson ~re ek Regular_ Bapti st
vhurch a,t Roxa na by Elders 1v1a~us I_s_on ,
D. Back a nd Herma n
L-aUcllll. :
Buxial \vas in the 'v'l hitaker cen1etery at Roxana,
.
·
Mrs . Caudill died J une 3 at t he
· Harlan
. hospital after a three - .
we~k i llness ,· She was 79.
·
. . Sne was a da ughter of Hirc1m and
Sally ,C:a udill Callihan. She wa s
a_rrie,mbe~ :of the Old Regular Bapt1 :t Cht:rcn: r
•
.
Early 1n l11e she was married t o
Thornas Stamper, who died, and
later to Arlie Cornett, who also
died. T\venty-five years ago she
m arried Wil lie Caudill, who survives her,
She i s survived a lso by the fo l :--

1·

•

•

•

1' HUR S D ;\ Y • J U N E 1 0 ,

1 965

•

•

,

PA G E

4

r
'
j

lo\,ri n g children: v✓ illie Stamper . :
l;.rJr:ago, Ill. ; Nov a \!Jhita ker,
.
H.oxana ; i'~or a Day , Kingscreek ;
:
~iary Grat te ,_ Chicago ; Hir3:_rI1
:::.ta111per, Ct11cago ; Oa kle.y St amper.,
McHenry , Ill , ; i'&gt;olly Ann Hem i
mer li ng, Niles . Ill. ; Rose O&amp;Nan, j
Jeffersonv ille , Ind .; Ira Cornett,
!
Lawrenceb urq: ; Edward Corne t t.
I
Bri stol, \Vis.~ Alta Iv1 etcalf.
Thoma svi lle, Ga.; seven stepchil - I'
dren, Mrs . Ollie Fields and Mrs.
Eva Ison, both of Rox a na ; George
Caudill, \vhitesburg; Charlie Caudill, Vicco; Kerney Caudi ll, Ohio;
Boyd Caudill, Indiana ; and ' Marian
Caudill, Pennsy lvania; and two
hal f sisters, Ivirs. lvlary Callahan
a nd lvirs. Nora Callaha n, bot h of

i

BIG~BIG

!

DOUBLE-DOOR

..

14e1

REFRIGERATOR-FREEZER

Cubic Foot

• Big 14.1 cu. ft. .
capacity with ·109-Ib.
freezer.
• Automatic defrosting
refrigerator section. .·
• Super-storage door
.
·with built-in egg racks, · ·

Rox ana .
Moore and Craft Funeral Home
handled funeral arrangements.

butter keeper. · ·

\

·

• MILLION-MAGNET
door seals tightly at ·a
touch. Opens easilyo· .

Fur1eral rites held for Jan1es S. Fields
I

ther. Ambrose Fields , White sburg;
Funeral services for Ja mes s~
Fields, 79, were conducted Sun - · a si ster, Maggie Stam pet, Warsaw.
Ind. , 4 6 grandchildren and 32
day at the lVlcRoberts Re gular
great -grandchildren.
Baptist Church by Elder.s Ja mes
Moore and Craft Funeral 'Home
Wright , Henry Welch, Bill Sparks

ENGA1

hand led funeral arra ngeme nts ,

Whitesburg Hospital .
Mr. Fie ld s was a son of Joe and
Nannie Caudill Fields, He was a

Je ffery Hall , day-old son of

NEW

Hall baby su ccumbs
.

LOW

-

PRICES

John and 1v1ary Roberta Quil len .
Hall , die d June 3 at the White smember o:f the McRoberts churc h., burg hospital,
Funeral services and bur ial were
Mr . Fiel1ds was married early in
life to Elea nor Da:y, \vho died. In held June 4 at t he family c eme 1919 he was married to'Jane Mul- tery.
Survivor s besides t he parents are
lins . who survives him.
five sisters and three~brothers.
Other sw;vivors besides his wife
:tv1oore and Craft Funeral Home
are four sons, Denver Fields, St.
had charge of funeral arrange Louis. lvlo'. ; Ralph Fields, 1' olements.
do, Ohio; !Raymond Fields , Science Hill ;: and Lovell Fields, Louisvi l le ; six daughters, Mrs. Vada
Caudill, Vw arsa,v, Ind, ; Mrs. Minnie I-Io\vell, .Langley; Mrs. Nannie IDLE 1-IOURS make do llars - -,.,, hen
you use this tirr:ie showing ·Avon
Ha v,kins, Sydney, Ohio; Mrs. RuCosmetics. · \.Ve show you how,
by Prater, i West Carrollton , Ohio;
Mrs. Eunice Sturgill, Er1ni ne ; Mrs. Write Lucille He ns le y, Box 454,
Euna Cau~ill, V{hitesburg; a bro- · Hai:lan, Ke ntucky~

the e11

tis, SC
a nd M
lege.
Accoi.:
14 at

Class

re un

U•• of ifqdemcrl!t

@

oftd RCA l&gt;y Whirlpool Corp«ction, mo~11focfur&amp;r ·

.

of RCA WHIRLPOOt oppli&lt;mcces, a uthorized by llodio Corporation of

.-.,,;.,ica.
.

HELP WANTED

The Vil

gradua_ti1
a reu n101
Letcher I
,.... - About :
to attend
and the i1

The c l,
Fu rther

Look at th ese used car bargains today!!!

tained fr,
Whitesbu

•

FAT

S PEC·I A L V A CA T I ON

'

..
'

'I

l

Availab l
tor's pre:

'

and Ismay Sparks. Buri a l wa s i h
the Lewis
Cemetery
at White s- .
.
I
•
b urg.
•
.
.
Mr. Fields died June 3 at the

,

called G
ugly fat
Galaxon
sw a llowE
and live
on this g
for any r
pa ckage
your full
tions a sl,;
. this guar

Store, VI ·
postage
I

Jenkins , l(y e Phone 832-2000
See 'Bill Jordan for that Used Car Bargain

THE (

?..:.
-

111
-.

S PECI A.l.·
.....
-:

\

The Ch .

One No·

Plea.s
M on itor

1962 Comet

4-Door Autorr,atic
1 o,.,,ner

$1195. 00

1961 Ra mb ier

Station Vv agon, Standard
rr ransrnission, 1 Ov,1 ner

$

1961 Plymouth

Six .. cylinder , Standard
T ra nsrr1ission; l Ov,,r ne r

$ 9 95 ~ 0□

Name._

Street ....
City......•

$fgt,.::,.;

.

1960 Dodge Six

Standard transn1ission, e xtra

1960 Valiant

Standard transmi.ssion

1959 Rambler,

low. I e

0 1 YE

I

Sedan, Automati c
1961 Co•, rv·a·i·r 700. 4-Door
Transm ission, 1 0 1v ner
\
CHECI&lt; THESE BARGA INS
1964,. Dodge Dart 4-l)
oor , St andard Trans$15956
00
mission , 1 Ov: ner
l ,ir Conditioned $22
1962 Ch rys ler Imperial Full Power
.· 95. 00
'

f
---

J.

1959 Mercu ry

, ,.1.," , 0' 0 , ooo
. 1 .i;:;
n'"
· n1·'1
"'s
0

995. 00

$

895. 00

$

695~00

2 - Door American, Standard
T ransmiss ion

$

9-passenger Station vva gon

$

495. OQ

795e 00

SPECIAL
1955 FORD $75. 00 Cash
Stop by today and mal&lt;e us an offer-30 :Cars and Trucks to choose from

l_

COMPLETE I&lt; ITCHENS

and

PLU~/\B f NG
. SUPPLIES

BATHROOrv,s
- - ·-··· ·-····· · · - -

- -- ----c-

Ho-r WATER. STEAM. AND

WAR M AIR HEAT ING
SYSTEMS

-'-'--~- - - - , - ' - - --

-

-- -- - - - --· -- - - -

SP EC I ALS: :
22- inch gravi ty fur nace $219. 95
3-pi ece bath less trim $99. 95
22-i nch for ced air 'furn ace $369. 95
3- pi ece bath, color. less trim $129. 95
50-ga llon tab letop water
11
66 sinl&lt; with for mica top $1 09. 95
heater s only $89. 95
USE OlJR LOW PRICES AN D CONVEN I EN·r TER MS

1 ---------"'.9-1
\

HB
8

8

STOP IN OR MAIL COUPON TO . ·--- - - - - -- Rr:EDYP.LUMBING, HEATING a BUILDING CONT
·

"

PHONE 21 2 t

I
I GENTLEMEN: I am inter, ,ted in 1J014r

f

.

r

·

W H ITEIIIU'ftG, KY.

fr•• , ,timat, cm home im;,rovemenu.

.___,_~allill-------------------------------------

I NAME ....
1 STREET -- - - ~ - _ _ ._ _ ..__,.,__..,.
. .
. _ Cf'TIV'
, ____
.
_ _
rA:A _._ .,,_
I
I
I

_ ..., _ _ _ _ _ _ _ caa.

ST~'½.TE _ ....,___ ..... -- - - - - - - - ,.. , - -. -. ·,·
. , ·,
. · · PHON11t
- - - --- - - - - - ~ . . . ,I:,

·

._._. ___~~----Doi'ilGib ___________.,_..._;~-.. .-----------.
.4. . . -------------.

!

i

\ '

_ _. _ _ _ , _ _ _

�__

.,.

&lt;

THE :tv10U!-J1' i\IN EAGLE.

•

•

W H I T E S B U RG •

L E 1' C Fl EH C l) U N 'l' Y ,

K E N 'f U C l( Y

•

•

•

"f'FlU k SD A Y ,

l

J

'L,T &gt;J."i
,i

r

......,

1
· . r,
v ,

1 9 00

•

•

•

PA G E

5

I
)

ut

Guests of :tvl rs. John M. Adam s
visit with her parents, t he 1'lick
Le xingt on. I-le is e n1ployed as a.·
this week are her c hildren, Mrs.
'\,v'rights. I-Ier sister, Ritter :tvlarpharn1acist at Quillen Drug Co .
Hayden Vlilson and son, Thurn1an garet Wright, went back wit h thern tv1r. Rey no lds is the son of 1vlr . . .
1-Iayden of Gro ve Port, Ohio, and for a visit. :tv1r. Co llins' br 0ther, and :t\1rs. Joe Reynolds of vlhitesM/S gt. Charles Adams, Mrs. Ad- Cecil Collins, als0 will visit with burg , 1'.1rs. Reynolds is the forn1er ,
ams and their daughter, Barbara, the m for a while.
\Vanda Rodgers, daughter of the
i
of Bunker 1-Iill Air Force Base, Ind.
All Letcher Countians in Lou isRev, Clel B. Rodgers, forn1er pas- !
Dr. and Mrs. Walter L. Owens, ville are in vited to attend the an- tor of the First Baptist Church, and!
,formerly of Vlhitesburg, ha v~ ,
nual Letc her County picnic at the Mrs .. Rodgers.
moveq. fron1 Fargo, N . D., to
t op of the hill in Iroquo is Park in
Mr. and h1 rs. Roger Kersey of
Bloomington, Ind.
Louisville June 20 . Friends are
Lexin 0Pton were recent visitors in
Mrs. Ismay Sparks is doing fine
inv ited to come early and stay
Vlhitesb urg .
after underg oing surgery on her
late. Furrl1er infurn1ation may be
Miss I-Ie len Fields, daughter of
arm at the \,v'hitesburg hospital
obtained fr on1 Joe 1-Iall , 1 700
Mr . and 1v1rs. I-Ie;rn1an Fields, is
last week.
Shady Lane , Louisville 5, Ky. ,
hon1e fron1 Berea College for the
I-louse guest this week of Mr. and or by calling 451-9 710 in Louissu n1mer .
Mrs. Brack Whitaker is her sister, ville.
1v1rs . J. D. Fairchild is in the
Mrs. Tom Webb of Neon.
Mrs. Coy franklin and Mrs. John Good San1aritan Hospital at Le x. Mr. and Mrs . John Enns attend- Engle were in Le xinGt on one day
ington for a check up.
0
ed a dinner s~r ved by the Elizabeth last week.
Li nda l-!o ln1es , daughter of Mr.
Church on M1llst_one Sund_a y .
Remus Pratt is doing fine afte r
and M.rs. Lloy d I-Iolmes, for1nerly
Mrs. B_rack V/h1taker enJoyed a
surgery in the Jenk ins hospit al.
of Whitesbu rg , will begin the stuhappy birthday last week when her
Mr. and Mrs, Jo hn R. Niece are dy of radiol ogy at a Huntington,
c hildren called, Son Luc ian Bates visiting their children, Mr . and
W. Va. , hospital this sumn1er.
called fr on1 Westport, Ind., _and
Mrs. Bob Niece and t heir three
1-!er fami ly lives now at Point
daughter ]'v1rs . 1v11ldred _C audill_
daughters; Mona, Ann and Marie, Pleasa nt, W. Va . She is a niece
called from her home 111 Dunv1lle. in California this wee k. An other of 1vlrs . Clyde Lucas.
Friends of 1-Ierbert W. Web_b, for- son, John R. Niece Jr., lives in
1'.1r. and Mrs. L. P 1'.1aggard at1nerly of Letche r County, will be. Dayt ona Beach, Fla.
tended church at Mayk ing Sunday .
glad t o learn he 1s now employed
Shade Adams has again been a
The Thornton Regular Baptist
I
~t Cape Kennedy., I-~e 11ves at .
patient in the Veterans Hosp ital
Church there has recently com165 Forest Road, Indian River Ciin Johnson City , Tenn.
pleted reno vation of the building's
ty, Fla.
.
Mr. and Mrs. Cecil :tv1aggard
interior . New seats and carpets and :tv1rs. Pl1il Bentley and
and dau ghters, Karen and Belinhave been installed .
their two daughters of I--lunt sv1lle, da ha ve returned from a visit with Mrs. Rush 1-Ioskins ( Beth) and
Drycleaning restores luster, life a.nd body to
Al a. , _have been here for a visit
he; mother and stepfather, Mr. and daughter Jill spent las~ week with
every fiber. It avoids tliat washed-out look.
with his parent~, Mr . and Mrs.
Mrs. Willard Browning, in Cynthi- her parents, the Cly de Luca se s._
Zenneth Bentley ..
.
. ana . There they all enjoyed a
_Mr . l-i~sk1ns, a teacher of h 1st01y
It's the extra care tliat keeps you well groomed and
Dr. _and Mrs. G1d Wh1take~ are
birthday dinner for four members at Leslie County l-I1gh Schoo l ,
spending a few'_weeks 111 Whites~
of the fanlily-- Mr. Br ~wning, Mrs. was 1n Washington with the secosts so little. Never se ttle for less than
burg . _T he \'l'.1itakers make their
Maggard, Karen and a nephew,
n_1ors. :tv1rs. Hoskins teaches Enghome 111 Florida most of the year. David Adams Gasser.
·
l1sh at the sarne school.
:tv1r_. and Mrs. 1:-(arry Caudill and
Mr. and Mrs. Tandy c. Stidhan1 Mr. an_d 1'.Jrs. v_ . ,D. P icklesim f am ily are spending several days
are here from Valparaiso, Fla. ,
er were 111 Imoxv1lle late 111 May
at My rtle Beach, S. C .
for a visit with relatives. :tv1rs.
f0r the wedd ing of a granddaughAr~hur Banks of Louis v ille; fo_rStidham is the former Ellen Mag- t~r, :tv1 iss Judy Pic,J~sime_r, to
mer~y of vVh1tesburg, was a v1s1tor gard, who worked in the Dawahare First Lt. C_h arl~s Belitz ot the A .r
here last wee~.
Department Store for some tin1e.
Furce . Miss Picklesimer 1s the
Coy Holste_in Jr. is the owner of
Mr. and Mrs. James Reynolds
dau_ghter of Dr . and ~Mrs. Marion
Cop yright 1961; by the National I nstitute of Drycleaning for the t'xdu~it· e
oj it s mf·m bcnL
a Jaguar, bright red. 1-Ie and his
have moved to Whitesbur from
(.Continued on t'a e 6)
father returned fron1 a trip to Central Kentucky with it.
Yarlette and John Swisher have a
new Vo lkswagen.
Miss Betty r,Iamm ock is at home
fr om Morehead $tate College for
a few weeks with her parents, Mr.
and Mrs. Vernon Hammock .
Mr . and Mrs. Ballard Morgan
are parents of a daughter , born
recently at Le xington
_
Mr. a nd Mrs. Ray Collins have
returned home after spending a
week in Washington, D. C. ,
where they attended a national
bottlers' meeting. Last week the
·-·.
Coll inses and three of their &lt;laugh- ·
-~. ·~·- - .
.
.' ·.:s';. .,. -- ters, Rebecca, Cordelia and Cecil~§
·. ..
ia, spent a few days in Lou isvil le
.S.---.
and Central Kentucky.
h1 r. and Mrs. Billy Paul Frazier
and sons, Scott and Paul Mark, of
Lexington, were recent guests of
her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Archie
Craft, and his parents, Mr. and
:tvlrs. Dan Fraz ier. The younger
Fraziers li ve in Lexington.
Clyde Lucas recently underwent
surgery at the Whitesburg hospital.
Emery L. ,Fr~ier of \vashington,
'
D . C . , was a guest in town over
the 1v1emorial Day holiday.
·
Mrs. Bill Adams is a patient at
the Uni vers ity of Kentucky 1'.-1edica l Center in Le xingt on.
Stephen J . Cornett of Charlottesville , Va . , was a visitor in Whitesburg last week.
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Gatton plan
t o return to Whitesburg to 1~ ve in
the fall . They ha ve been in Lexington for the past year.
Mr. and Mrs. Teddy Fields and
son, Donnie, and daughter, Dot,
have been guests of her parEonts,
the Forest Browns, and his parents, the Ted Fieldses. They are
moving from Manchester t o I-Iuntington, W. Va. Jill Brown, Mrs.
Fields 's sister, will spend several
days in 1-Iuntington with them.
Mr. and Mrs, Lawrence Lewis
were in Le xington several days
Come on in. Have a plush vinyl-covered bucket seat.
last week . Mr. Lewis was in the
Stretch out and relax. You'll find the '65 Chevrolet gives
hospital for a !11edical check up
you more room to live in.
SEE THE U.S.A.
and Mrs. Lewis did some shopAnd wait'll you see what's under the hood:
ping, and they both did some· vis- .
THE N0.1 WAY
· Living voom !
iting. They visited their daughter,
Mrs. Robert Welliver, .an·d her
But the thing that should really get you going is the price of
family . During their visit, a
one of these racy Impala Super Sport Coupes or Co,nvertibles.
friend of Mrs. Welliver, Miss Elli
The cost of living in one isn't as high as it looks.
Eikat, and her fiance, ~aul Bascara, flew from Rochester, N. Y. ,
Red Hot and Rolling! See your Chevrolet dealer f9r a new CHEVROLET· CHEVELLE _•_CHEVYD _•_CORV~~~---·
for a visit with the Wellivers. The
-- ------------- ----- -- ---------- --- --- ---- -- ----- ------ - . ·---------------- ----------------- ---- -- ---- ------ ----- ------ --------- -- ---- .
Wellivers plan to fly to New York
· lo-9151
for the wedding of Miss Eikat and
Jenkins:
Authorized Chevrolet dealer in Whitesburg:
Mr. Bascara on July 3.
Mr. and Mrs, Johnny Ray Adams

I

M:.

THAT PROFESSIONALliY GROOMED LOOK
CALL 2537

ers

UBC

I

--

-

-~"'·'~.;:- , :;;

[

'

-,

~~~

'

Chevrolet Impala Super Sport

.

have a new daughter, Jotanna Rae .

Mr. and Mrs. James A. Collins
(Inez Pratt) have returned to their
home in New Mexico after a long

,,

BOONE MOTOR CO.·, Inc.

BOONE MOTOR SAlE,S, Inc.

Madison St..

Highway 23

Phone 2159

Phone 782

•

�I

'•

l' '

•

•1T1·
1• (• ,,
,
1_••
\
I
._,)
;· .\.l

T

I .

f-! L I\

c: l 'l l ~ :'.'\ 1· ':'

,

\,_: [ ): l l i ( _: [.,: Y
·ren1ple 1', : ,s sionar&gt; .:; c[i.. 01. · Sl1e
\vi ll ren1a1n ther e u11t 1l A U\ZUSt,
\,1hen she \vill gc re Sp ringfiel d,
&gt;.Io .. t o fi nish her studies as a rn issiu nary at the Bapt ist Bible College.
t\'lrs . \ :icki i\J artin i s here f rc rn ·
:\ le lbou rne , Fla ., for a visit with
lier sist er , tvirs, Le roy Fields, and
\'Ir. Field s.
1\:Jrs. Fe.rest Bro\vn a nd daught er ,
i\I rs . Teddy fi elds , visited her
parents, Iv1r. and 1\•1rs . C. L. K1 lgure , in Le xingt on over the we ek
end .
1v1r. and 1vl rs. J . G . Ha rt and sons
are spe nding a vac at ion in \Vestern
l&lt;e ntu cky.
}/i r s. \Va lte r Enlov.,r and i\.1iss Hes-

• • THL' l'lS I) !\ '{, J lIN[ 10,
t er D2y \,1ere in Le xin gt on for a
•

fevv d ?ys thi s\v-eel, .

19 05

•

•

•

P i\GE G

Receives degree

1\1iss Barbara Yvonne I--Ielton,
dau 0hter of 1v1rs. Madel ine R.
1--Ielton of Linefork, con1pleted
t he . requirerne nts for the bachelor
..=on1rnodore C raft Jr. of Thorr1 - of sc ienc e degree at Un ion C 0llege this month.
.
ron re c eive d P ihe ville Colle 3e 's
1v1 iss 1-Ieltcn is a graduate of
t cp c :,n1 n,encen1ent a ward at the
l( ingd un, C on1e I--Ii gh Schuol, Linec ,:,l le 0e 's graduation e;:ercises
fork .
'Ii~·,
!',l et),- 000
She is gra du ~ting with a n1ajor
The award , the Dr . VI , C. Cond it 1,vatch, wer1t t o C ra ft fo r ha v- in Englis11 and a m inor in history.
inQ"u t he_ best ._,,e:rades in the d'ora_d ua- She has been a member of the Int inz c l ass, 1-Ie had a stan ing of ternationa l Relations Club and Union c·ollege Chr istian Association
3. 64 qual it y p oints per sen1ester
while attending c ollege .
hour ;J f a possible 4- . 00 .

Craft wins highest ,
hon ors at Pi kevi 11 e

You don't have to like golf to like_

out Buick ''Svvinging Sales Spree:'

d saving tnoney.)

Just driving.
L' ' '. . 'A . . E jJ
'' , -. d,. _. c' r.....,.:
'.
'
L
. :. -~ Li u -. --.,·--~. ~~
l:'•.'
__, ::, ',,, .:tJ Ore
,
.

u ·f ."·l
. 1 .I. .

d iv,\ 'l r's.
Ferdinand i\,,1 oorc , will ;)l' iil8rr1ed Jul·: :3 ,n Fort Lauderdale ,
'
Fl a . . tG Capt. Robert Dan,e l bake r, of
tlte G05 Air Con, mando
Squadron, IIo'ward Air F0 rce Base, Panama Canal Lone. C apt.
Baker is the son of 1\,1 r. and lv1rs . Ro bert J. Baker of Jvloundsville,
W. Va. lvliss lv1oore is a graduate of 'i/hitesburg I-iigh School
and attended the Uni versity of Kent ucky. She was graduated
fron1 the Unive rsity of Louis ville schoo l o f de ntal hy gie ne. For
the p ast fi ve yea rs she has been a dental hygienist i n Sarasota ,
Fla. She is a rne1nbe r of t he Spinsters Club, Florida Aero Cl u.b,
Grasshoppers, Airplane Owners and Pilots A~sn. , the Ninety1,Jines Inc~, an internatiqnal or ganization oi ,.,,-ome n pilots, and
Sarasota Search and Resc ue Squadron. She i:s affiliated with the
Arnerican Dental 1-Iygie ni.sts Assn. , Flo rida De r;tal I--Iygienist s
Assn. and Florida v\7 est Coast Dental I--Iygienists Assn.

V\.1hitesb_urg .

"

. " · . i''.
, ..
L·\ d,.:
,_. 1Le1

~n
c&lt;t1

,·

" .·

·.

'
\:..·· •:;.

. '.• -=:=;:- ·.

'.

(from Page 5)

1?1ckles1u1er .
amson, W . Va., and Mr. and :tvlrs .
lvlrs. Le na 1--Iill is here fron1 Fl or- Dee Da\vahare a nd daughters of
ida fo r a visit with her parents,
Pikeville. lvlrs . I&lt;:awaja was called
t he Le ,,nard Collinses, and othe r
home because of the de ath of her
relatives in and around Vv hitesburg . n1othe r- in- l;:i\,,
lv1rs . Hi ll als9 will visit her hus Iv1iss R.oselrna Swift ,, nu rse at the.
band's par_ents, Mr . and lvlrs . C_as- Whitesburg hospital, has a group
per I--I1lL , 111 Carrollton. Mr. Hill o f fam ily visitors, inc luding her
was killed 1n vv c,r d War II·.
parents, 1\,1r . and Mrs. Clyde
l'vlr. an_d ,Mrs. E111ery ~e \v1s ~ave Swift of Re public, Pa.; he r sister
Proposed legislation to reduce excise tax on new passenger automobiles provides
be en v1s1t 1ng relatives 111 Lo uisa nd her husband, Mr. and Mrs.
a refund of such tax reduction where a passenger automobile ' is sold to a retail
purchaser after May 14, 1965 and before July 1, 1965, when the excise tax reduc•
v lle.
_
.
Charles Dinkey and son, Edward,
1\11r. and Mrs . Mar vin J .. Holof Lor ain, Ohio; :tvlrs .. Mildred
tion becomes effective. Where a refund is authorized by this legislation, General
brook, lv1r . and Mrs. O_rvar H,ughes Funk and son, Billy , of Un ionMotors· Corporation will make a cash payment to such a purchaser in the
and Mr. and l\,1rs_, &lt;=:0ssie Qu11len town, pa . Mrs. Funk and B lly
an1ount of the excise tax reduction.
have been '- acat1oning 111 :tvly rtle
will-go t.o Hun,,ts ville , Ala. , for
Enjoy your new Buick now!
.
Beac}1. .
.
.
a vis it with a daughter and her _
Mrs. Bill Fields and daughter,
husband, Mr. and lv1rs. Dale Ruth .
--There's an aut~orized Buick dealer near you. See his "°ou~le-Checked used cars, too. - ~hannon Banks, ¼'.ere r~c ent visMr. Ruth is a physicist at Re dstone
1to rs of relatives 111 Whitesburg .
Arsen al at Huntsville , Afte r a
Kendall ls(J!1 of Dongula, for11_1er two week visit they wil l come back
'
*
teacher at C?wan El;mentary
by Whitesburg. Mr . and Mrs. DinSchool, received a l,... entucky
key c ame by Chattanooga, where a
colonelcy fr om _the .C?owan PTO
daug hter, Mary Lo u, ,will go t o misat an apprec1at1on dinner for all
sionary scho ol at the Chattanooga
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Seethe Buick Exhibit at the General Motors ~~a-H'ltc..- -New York World's Fair
the teachers of the scho ol . rle is _______:__ _ _ __ _ _ _:_
· -~-- L - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~- -- - - -n o,v e n1 ploye d at the Letcher
II IIll IIlll llill l!II II11111111 1111 11 11111 111 111 111 111111111111111111 111 ill 1111 11 11 !11111 11illl 111 111 11 11 11 11 1111111111 111 1111 11 111III IIIIII I!111 11 111 11111111111 111111 111 1111 11111111111111 1111 11 1111 111 1111111111 !111111111111 111 11 111 IIII IIl!II II11 111111 111 111 1111 1II IIII IIII II IIIIII IIIII IIllll]llllll lll llllilll!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
County o ffice of the Department
of Economic Sec urity Div is ion of
Pub l ic Assistance .
Mrs. Pebble Craft wa s one of
the chaperones to accompany the
C ulson e ighth grade class t c.: Lexingtvn, Frankfort, Bardstown and
1
cotton
knit
tops
&amp;
other points of interest recently.
At Frankf crt they visited the Capgabardine bottoms
\/://
itol and saw the flora l clock. At
Lexington they saw the airport and
the ho1n e of Henry Cl ay and at
·
...,
Bardsto wn thev
, saw the Old I&lt;:ent ucky hlome. They also visited
'
the Lincoln homestead and t he
Lincoln h1emorial.
The home of l\1rs. B. F . Salyer
'
by
on I--Iays Street has a new face .
.,
The front porch has been enclosed
.,,,,1
and new windows and new siding
added . R. B. Salyer of Salyer Ra{/[l:/;\
dio Co . and his sister, l\11ss Elline
{ :=:-::I '
Salyer, live ,vith their mo ther.
Ou r alluri ng, eye- c atchLeonard Kelsey, brother- in- law
ing play-to~s go to of Leroy W. Fields and Mrs . Don
gether like fun a nd sun,
r
Bro\vn, died recently in Florida .
like guys and gals! The
His funer al was conducted and his
c otton knit T-shirt tops
body was brought back here for
are color-keyed to
::::::.
buri a l . A short funeral was conn1atch the shorts and
d ucted at the Methodist Church
pants of fine combed
here by the Rev . H . M . Wiley.
cotton gaba rdine. All in
'.'
An1ong those from out of town
f ashi on-new colors . In
here for the funeral were Mr. and
sizes 6-18 , 5-17 , 34-40.
l\.1rs. 0. W. Danner, Knoxvil le ;
T-shirt (le ft &amp; center) . $3, 98
rv1r. and Mrs. Troy Thompson and
l\1r, and Mrs . Carl Davis , LexingT- shirt (right) , . . . $2. 98
'
ton; Emery L. Frazier, Washingjf\ .
,:!/~:/
. . $::l,98
Jamaica sh orts .
ton, D. C.; :tvl r. and Mrs. Gus
))} ..
Sn1ith and l\.1rs. E;dna \vhtclow of
.$6. 98
Tapered pants .
Lexington and D. W. Fields and
::~:.": .
Deck
pants
.
.
.
.
$5.
98
1\,1r. and Mrs . John Kelsey of Flor1da .
The Dawahares we re in Whites-,
.
b urg over 11.1e1norial Day wee k end
visit ing with l'vlartin and rloove r
Dawahare. There were 1v1 rs . Woodrow Dawahr re and children of Lexington; Mrs : Hardir; 6 Da wahare and
children of P ike ville, Mr. and Mrs.
Ed Dawhare 0f Ha;,,ard l\1rs. Abe
'
'
11111111111
1
1111111111111111111111111111111111111III1111111111111111111111111111111
I
I
Ill
111
llllll
If!
1111111111
mi
1111111111
i
Ill
II
1111111111111
ii
I
I
I
Ill
I
I
I
I
II
I
111111111111111
II
lltlllllllll
IIllllttllllllllllllmlllllllllllllllllllllll
1
11111
II
111111
ii
111
i
1
11
111111
11
1111
I
I
111111111111111
111
m
1111,
,.,
..
Kawaja and son, Lewis, of Willi-

Main Street

KYV A-MOTOR CO., I n c.

l

j

'

iJ! \i(Jc

1

A..LI

ii: '.

,
L

ih

:rr.

'

•,

;,

')\

·'·'•

lY

j)

'.:,:,;.

SHO PPE

'

"

'

�'fl-IE lvlOUNT A I N E .A. GLE

.

•

•

•

l

•

::1 o. i

0

•

•

PA G E · 7

Sol Frazier of V' hitesburg ,succumbs

Li fes avi nq course set

WHITESBURG LITTLE LEAGUE RELEASES
SCHEDULE OF GAMES THROUGH JULY 16

•

Funeral ser1 1ces for ~:ulF raLier ,.
'Ille Red c-::ross Cert 1fc [,t i ,1 n
:;o , of \ \1 hi tes b ur g, \Ve re held at
c (;lJ rse
in
sen
hcf
lifesa
VlJ1•'
\✓
ill
-._.
ti ,s res idenc e J une :S by Ro bert
be o ttered ::,t the. V/il ,tes:)uru0 .\iu\'/ils on and fl ,11 f-lo wa rd. Bur ial
1--Iere is the schedule o f V!hitesTuesda y , June 29 - -l~ loc o - Ccke , nl c ipaJ ~;w in 1rnin·, P , ol :\;:.,nd a·-. ,va s in the Di anah Bla u· cerne tery
bu rg Little Le a ~ue base ball g a n1es 6 :A&amp;B- Da wah ares , 8.
Fri day , June 14for qual ified
at Day .
·
Thursd ay , July l- - vF\:I- G10c, ,6; sw i1nmers .
fr o1n lvJc nday t hrough July 16:
i 11r . Frazie r died June 2 a t the
( r lome t ean1s a re· 1isted first) .
C oke- RC, 8 .
Eli 0( ib i lity require1 nents in cl ude
\v llitesbu r~•-,, h ospit al , ,. , 11ere he
Iv1onday , June 14- - Gluco - \/FW ,
Friday , July 2 - - VF\v' - RC, 6: A&amp; be in q at least 16 yea rs of a ,-c o r
0
O
,
,
d
d
6 p . m . ; C oke - RC, 8 p . 111 .
B- Oilers , 8 .
in t ne llt11 :.,:ra e an a reas onab lv1 had bee n a IJat 1ent fur t\vO d ays.
~
!-le
\v
a.s
d nat ive o f t he C (: \van
1'ue sday, June 15- - Gloc o- Coke ,
Monday , July 5~- RC- Gloco , 6:
st rong sw irnn1er.
,~ ,~. ___ ~6; Dawah are s- Cilers , 8.
VF Vv- C 0Le ' 8 .
Instr ucti on \vil l be l ll t\✓ O - hu ur, :
ThursdavI , June 17 - - \'FV✓ -G l oco ,
T ue sd ay , July 6- - RC - VFW, 6;
.
n ightly sess ions by a reg istered
. '.
6; ~ ol&lt;e - RC, 8 .
· ·
Da wah are s- Oile rs, s·.
instruct or. Addi t ional ,nL:-rn1 2c Fr id aJ, June 18 - - VFV!-RC , 6;
T hursd ay, July 8- - RC - C uke , 6;
t i on a nd re s ist ration are a vailable j. ,
Dawaha res-A &amp;B, 8. •
Gl oco-VFV! , 8.
at the pool .
I
:tvlonday , June 21- - RC- Gloc c, 6; , Frid ay , Ju ly 9-- Gloc o - Colze, 6 ;
C oke- VFV!, 8.
Da w ah ares- A 8,:B , 8 .
-:-·.:·;:;:;:\:::::::::::::;::.
Nionday , July 12 - -G loc o-RC , G;
T uesday , June 2 2 --RC- '✓ FV! , 6 ;
Arrny Pfc . Paul D . Anderson,
:: /\\..
Oilers- A&amp;;B, 8.
C oke - VFVl, 8 .
.
son of l'vlr. and lvi rs. Vir "i l \ v .
T ue sday, July 13- - Coke - G loc 6 ,
T hu rsda y, June 2 4-- RC - Coke , 6;
At1de rsbn o f Rocky BrancT1, was
Vf vv' - Gloco, 8.
6; Oilers , A2'.L B, .8 .
gra duated rec ent ly fron1 the I
T h ursd a y , Ju ly 15- - VF Vv-C oke,
Friday, June 25- - C oke- Gl oc o , 6 ;
C urps Artille ry Specialist Aca d- '
6; Gloco- RC , 8 .
Oile rs- Dawahares , 8.
e11iy 1n Kore.a.
Friday , July l6- - VFvv'-RC , 6;
:tvlonday , June 28 - - Gluco- RC, 6 ;
I-le is a n operat ions an d intell iOiler_s - Daw a hares , · 8 .
Coke- Vf\v , 8.
gence a ss ist ant 111 Bat tery B, 1st
Batt a l ion of the '17t l1 Art il lerv .
_::: :;:;::,:'(:-

iEl

1

sec t ,on of Le LC iler c:ount ) .
Sur vi, ors are h is wife , 1v1rs.
I--iattie Day Frazier ; a daughte r ,
I.Ja nn ie :.:a therine Fraz se1·, at
hurne : t h ree sons, Willian1 Rile&gt; , J. L. a nd Joe Frazier, ~11
at hon1e , and a bro t ber, · Earl Frazier , De t ro it , i,:1c h .
Bl::ii r Func ra i l-Jon1e handle d fu ner a l arra nge rnents .

Get it off your chest ... and into ours

~

C

~

Serves in Korea

I am humbly gratef uI to the good people of Letcher Cou nty for nominating
me for County Commi ssioner, District
#3. I shall forever ch erish this vote of
confid ence, from a wonderf uI people.

l

C. C8 Tucker dies

l' Fu ner a l se rvic es for Christ opher ·

. '

! Colu rnb us T.ucker , 70, were t o be
i he ld t od ay at h is home at Burd ine

.~.&gt;:&lt;:?&gt;+:::&gt;:

l by

There are tremendous tasks ahead for
the people of Letcher County in addition
to the great projects al ready accomplished
and under wav. -· I pledge to you .if elected
yo ur County Commissioner, to further
every worthwhi le-project, whether it be
spon sored by th e County, State or Feder- .
al government, or private effort for the
betterment of the looks and the livinq of
Letcher Co unty people both De mocrats
and Republ icans.

Elders Edga r Ba ltiniore a-nd
i Dallas I(e l ly. Burial was to be in
' Le tc he r Cou nty :tvlen1or ial Garde ilS
at Pay ne Ga p.
lv1r. Tucker d ie d June 7 at the
Mount a in l-Iun1~ Ve terans I-Iosp ital
in Johnson Cit y, T enn., where he
h ad been a p at ie nt for three day s.
I-le was a nat ive of Burd ine. and
a 111e n1 be_r of t he She lby Gap Regul ar Bapt ist C h urc h . ·
i Sur vi vors are h is wife, :tv1rs .
:Pe a rl P_otter Tucker; t h ree sons,
f
.i
i Gra dy T uc ker, Neon; l(enne t h
I
! T uc ker, C incinnati, Oh io. and
i J in1 Tuc!zer , ~he l by Gap , I(y . ;
1 a d aughte r , l\/lrs.
A.vanell Rose,
She l by Gap ; thre e br?)t hers , I-Iobe rt T ucker, Payne Bap , and
. En1e ry and J im T ucker, both of
IShelby Gap, 1 5 gr and chi ld ren and
se ven great- gra ndchi ldren .
_A n1e rican Legion Post 66 _a t Jen- I
kins co nd uc ted n ilita ry funeral
1
se rvices .
1
Bl ai r Funeral I-Ici rne han dle d fu ne ra l arrangen1ents .

-

'

-

- - --'---

Put preci ous mementos, importa nt papers and valuables wh ere they'll be out of harrn's way- guarded
ni ght and day in a SAFE DEPOSIT BOX. Cost - just
pennies a day.

THE ~-.IRST SECUR I"TY BANK
Wh itesburg

Neon

'

---------- -•

On Naw:

Let us now join hands for the great
wor k we are plan ni ng.

L

Vote county-wide for
'

•

•

for County Com missioner - District #3
Ford sales are way up ...,.because
Ford for '65 is the best-built,
best-performing Ford that ever
hit the, American road ! Ford's
sales success means a great deal
to you.-because we Ford Dealers
still aren't satisfied-we
want bigger increases! So we're
giving " Success Sale" deals
on every model in stock!
Limited time ·only! _-·

combines old-fashioned charm
with modern resorts and fine
n ew h igh w ays for your vacation _
'

'

'65 Ga laxie : quieter tha'n RollsRoyce !* Powerful, too, with new Big
-

Kentuc ky's bluegrass hor se f arms add interest to a Ke ntuc ky vacat ion.

.

. .

Six (winner of the Battl,e of t he Sixes
vs. Chevy and Plym outh) orV-8 options
up t o 425 hp!

---

Re I ax at one of Kentuc ky' s 12 St ate
Reso rt Parks .

•Leading acousti cal consu ltants cond ucted· tests in which 1965
Fords (Galaxie 500 Sedan, XL and LTD Hardtops) w ith 289-cu. in• .
V-8 engines and automat ic transmlsSJons rode quieter than a new
Rolls- Royce. These t ests were certified by l h'e U.S. Auto Club.

Biggest 1st year seller in history!
No wo nder with its sports-car
fe atu res and luxury at a low
price! Doesn 't that fi t your fan cy
and f unds?
Sw im, sai l, f ish, .or water ski on spa rkling
Ke ntucky lakes.

SEN D FOR FREE KE NT UCKY
VA CATI ON · PLA NNIN G KIT!
Tells all about
Kentu cky vaca ti on attracti ons,
pl us information
on acc ommodati.ons . . .
to hel p yo y ha ve
the be st vacat ion ever.

Where ve r you go m · KentucKy yo u can
travel on mode rn highways.

r----•-••-----~-~
I
I
I

Travel Divi sion , Pu b lic Information Depa rt men t
Capi tol An nex Buildi ng,_ Fran kfort, Kentucky 40 60 1

Pl ea se send me complet_e Kentu cky v: c_ation Plan ning Kit.

I
I
I

I.

Md~•
Na m e -S--=---=---=---=---=---=--=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=--=--=--=

I

I

I

Dept . 00 00

c·,ty

State--

.
-

-

-

-

--Zip Code---

I

~---•••••••••••-~

BULLETIN: No reason to hold off buyin g a new Ford car! Excise Tax cut, if passed as proposed, will be retroactive to May 15.

''Wehr not /Jragg_in:..
.
. Wllhl deli/in'''

·HARLO
Whitesburg

Your Ford Dealer
OTORC •
Neon

.

,

�• • Pi, G E

Funeral serviGes r1eld for Fayette Var1over
t'unera1 services for Fayette Vanover, 74, were conducted at his
residence June 4 by Dewey Cantrell, Or.v ille Short and Elrner
Cantrell. Burial was in t he Vanover Cemetery at Bold Camp, Va.
Mr. Vanover died June 1 in the
Park Avenue Hospital at Norton,
Va. , where he had been a patient
· for more t han five weeks.
He was born in •Kentucky and was
a m ember of the Bold Carnp Regu-

lar Baptist Churc h .
Survivors are hfs wife, Mrs. Del·
phia :tvlullins Vanover; two daughters, Mrs. Edith Hayes, Jenkins;
and Mrs . Lena Stallard , Pound,
Va.; fo ur sons, Carl, Bruce, Billy and Josep11 Vanover, all of
Pound, and a brother, Burton Vanover, also of Pound; 23 grandchildren and 20 great- grandchildren.
Blair Funeral Home handled funeral arrangements .

Burdine soldier
sent to Vietnam

8

Two Letcher students graduated at Berea

Nlc Arthur Watts and Arnold R,
US FORCES, Vietnam-- Army
Frazier were amom;g the 191 seniors
Pfc. Franklin M. Fleming, grand· to be graduated from Berea College
son tf Mrs. Bertie Fleming o1 Bur- June 6.
dine, has been assigned to the U ., Warts received the bache lor of
S. P~rmy Support Command in
arts degree in biology and Fraz iiir
Vietnam as a track vehicle mereceived the bac helor of art s dechanic.
gree in chemistry.
Fiem ing was l ast assigned ;:it
Watts is the son of Mr. and 1vlrs.
Fort l-Iood, 'l"exas. He is 2 0 and Arthur Watts of Hallie . He is a
attended Jenkins I-Iigh School .
graduate of Le tcher Hi2:h School .

Fraz ier, the son of Mr . and tv1rs.
James S .. Frazier of Premium, is
a 1961 g raduate of Whitesburg
High Scbool. At Berea , he was
a member of Ph i Kappa Phi and
Pi Alpha honor societies and president of the Berea cha pter of the
Americ an Chemical Socie.ty .
Frazier plans to attend medical
school at the University of Ken·tuckv in Le xington .

\

-.--. ,': -:·:

•

.. . . .. .....
. . .-

. . .·.. ·: &lt;?::-,:'.'.\ :,::r,:::.,. : ':/

1:;i::1,

...."i&gt;;·\ :\(-; _
::&gt;:·: :' :_:.: ;.·:· :
. . . ... -: : : .. . . : _&gt;: : : . :· -·

SUGAR
FREE

\

Ill
\

/'?f:

.

. -·· .·

·: ;--"· -..:

11.~~:mt:J~::··:.,;-r · .

.·,' ' : : ,:i.tl1~:iw.·'::

.. . ' .':- :- :-:-:

•

a

'

.

•
'

E verybody!

* Because it's by far
the best-tasting cola of all

* Better-tasting tha:n old-time col as
... or their low-calorie offshoots
~:: =

* No sugar at all. Less

.. /,.-::::::::/· .

than 1 calorie per bottle

* America's favorite
low..:calorie cola -just
right for y:our f a1nily·, too

,•

,,,::} :}:i:i['
,
\

America's no.1
-low-calorie cola

!'DI ET-RITE" Reg, U.S. Pal. Off.;@ 1965, Royal Crown Cola Co.

�T H E M O U N T A I N E AG L E •

•

•

W H I T .E S B U RG , L E T C H E R C O l J N T Y • K E N T U CK Y •

Millstone.
PROBLEM: . ARE ASTRONAUTS ·TWO MONTHS OR FOUR DAYS OLDER?

•

•

13 S

•

,

,

P ,\ G E 9

Atte nd the anti-str ip mi ne meeting at 7:30
p.
m
.
Jun
e
16
at
the
Carr
Creek
gyrrin.
a
siurn.
,
-~--'----- - - - - -- -- -'---~
·---·- ---·------ ----- _

By MABEL KISER

Regular Baptist Church on Millso meone left an alun1inum t op
stone . If you are a Iv1eade or m ar- t o a cake plate and a brown ear- l
Millstoners were too busy watch- ried a :tv1eade, cpme and bring a
t hen,vare bowl. · The owners may ;
ing history being made this week to basket of food and enjoy the d ay . pic k the m up at t he ho me of Mr. I '
tell me much persona] news, so the
Norma !v1 ilt0n -and Jimm y Meade. and lv1rs . Blaine Kiser . ·
l:
news items are short.
were, married late last rnonth .
. Mrs. Bi ll (Je an) Rale igh and chil- 1 .
Now that Gemini 4 is history, are Jimmy is the son of Sherman and
dren, Steve a nd Sherlon Jean, of .
·•. the men, who saw 62 sunrises and
Mabelle Baker Meade and Norm a West Virginia are visit ing t he Har- 1 ·
62 sunsets, two months older or four is the daughter o f Mr. and Mrs.
. old Raleighs of Oven Fork . Also '
. days older? H.· istorl is being :nade David Milton,_ al~ of Millstone.
. visiting tf1e Raleighs were a daught oo fast for most o us to follow.
The c ouple w1ll l1ve at McRoberts . ter and her family, Mts . William
Jeft'McElroy, first gra der in Mrs .. Jimmy is an employee of the Neon Harold .Kiser of Valley Station.
Isorr1 Sergent's room•at Lower Mill- A&amp;P Store: .
.
.
Mack Con1bs of Craft's Colly is
stone, .s very_ proud of the three
Recent v1s1tors 1n the B111 Stamp- not well . Mr. Combs is in his
Kennedy half dollars he won this
er home were Mr. and Mrs . James late SO's.
year--two were for not missing a
Sext_on and son, M icky; Mrs. Thel- :tvl r. and Mr_s. Willard Caudill
day 0 1 school this year and one
ma Huff and dahlghters, Lora Ann were visiting in 1'.1orehead last
was for making the most head
and Kathy, all of Cleveland; .Wess week . They ha ve a new grandmarks. All th is _reminds me of a
Stamper of Blackey, Hiram and
.child, Janet Leigh, daughter of
prize I.won l9ng ago fe r making
Steve, Stampe_r o r Isom .a·nd Marion Mr, and :tv1rs . Burnel Clay Blair.
the most head marks in spelling.
Stapiper of Lincoln County .
Janet is the second c hild and first
The priz·e was a pencil with a ..
H_a ve yo u ndtic~d_what a heavy
daughter of the couple. Sunday
bronzed head of Al Smith on the
foliage we have this summer? Old the Caudills were visiting rv1rs .
end of the pencil. I am a Repub- · timers always said ·this denoted _a
Victoria WJ'litaker on Linefork.
lie an.
severe c old weather the follow ing
Mr. and Mrs . Curtis Collins of
· Miss Gloria Cook and Miss Debwinter .
.
Kona, Mr. and Mrs. J. S. I-Iolorah Mason, daughters of Mr. and · The very welcome guests of the
brook and Miss Susie Meade atMrs. Sonny Coo.k and Mr.· .and Mrs. Ballard Meades in Fle1ning were
tended the gradua tion of Brenda
Okie Mason, ye~terdaywere very . their children, Mr. a ;d Mrs . Arch- Jo C ollins at Jenkins,
little girls but todaY: are quite .
· ie C!aft of Springfield, Ohio , and
Friends of \V'il lie P , We_b b of
grown up young lad1es and have
Da~1e l Meade of Dayton~
Sergent are glad to see him up
entered a school, of cosmetology
. Dinner guests of the Bailard
.
and about after major surgery
in Cleveland .
_ . · .•
.·.·
·. Meades were Elders John Hess of
in the Whitesburg hospital .
Ctho Bentley '. has suffered a very
Virginia and Ar ville Tackett of
Recent guests in the ho_n1e of
severe stroke :and is very ill in the Dorton . ·
'
the J. S . Holbrooks were Mr. and
1-Iarlan I-lospital~ To see him reThe Eliz abeth Regular Baptist
Mrs. Jim Boyd a nd son Paul of
cently were rv1 r. and Mrs. Oscar .
Church on !v1illstone served a din- Lawrenceburg ; lv1 r. and Mrs. 1-IenSalyer, Batavia, Ohio; Mr. and
ner Sunday _to a large c ongregation. ry Potter of Ohio; Mr. and :tvlrs.
Mrs. Walter (Junior) Green and
Proceeds fr om the dinner will g o
Jed Mosgrove and Mrs, Bough1nan
son, George, Cincinnati; Mrs. ·
toward building a new church
of Mayking . The Boyds also vis:.
Frances Potter, Dayt,,n ; Judge and house, to be erected where the
ited his mother, lvirs, Nora Boyd,
Mrs. James 1\1 . Caudill, 1\Jeon;
old one stands.
in Whitesburg . The Henry Potters
Mr. and Mrs. Fredd ie Bentley,
Now is the t 1n1e to read Revevisited brothers Le x ie Potte r of
Payne Gap; Mr. and 1-1rs. D. V.
lations 1-7 and Ezekiel 1-28 .
Whitesburg and Sam Potter of JenBentley ; Eddie and Yvonne ; -Bruce
Mrs . W. D . Bent ley is home
kins .
Qu illen; Miss Rebecca Pass, ..Ercel ·· from visiting her c hildren in InThe Jirn Boyds, the J . S. I-IolSlone , 1'.1rs. Karo Bentley artd sons , d ianapo lis. A granddau ghter,
brooks and !virs . No ra Boyd all had
Allen, Je rry and Roy; Mr. _a,nd Mrs. Jane ,Ann, cam e ho.r:ne for a vis it
(Continued on Pa ge 10) ·
Sam Bent ley, Payne Gap ; Elders . ·. with her this surn m et . _Jane Ann
Lawson 1-Iall and Felix Sexton and · is the daughter of rv1r . and K1 rs .
I,
a grands on and his wife, Mr. and
Gilbert 11eade and Sllso will visit
. ,
Mrs . Charles Stallard of Fleming. ·· he r paternal grandparents, . the
'
1
Charles .is the son of John alllJd. _L aura Lloyd _Meades.
. ·
.·
i
Bentley Stallard, f,crn1erly of Neon·, l\1r . and Mrs, Leonard Kiser of
1
,
now of Florida.
Craft.'s
Collv
are
home
fron1
a
.
,
l\11rs . Opal Ha ll spent Saturday. . visit with he r sister and her famnight with her sister, Mrs. Eunice ily, Mr . and Mrs , Le c nard MuFl\1eade . They attende d E liz abetl-i lins of Detro it . A nephew , LeonRegular Baptist Church Saturday
ard Mull ins, and a niece, l\ilrs .
night and d inner at the church on · · Vi vian Combs Se xton, acc omSunday.
r
parried them home.
__ __
The Meades are- having a -re'Ul'li ort- 0• ·At the dinner Sunday at the E.:.
Sunday , · June 2 7, at the El izabe th · 1izabeth Re ular Bapt ist Church

r-·

T H U R S D A Y , J IJ tJ E 1 0 , 1 q

_.,

'

rNJ(O)lf If CIE I O DAILll 11\fElic (Cffil~rffllf S
.

The ·E. . W. KrNG COMPANY
Of Bristol, Ten n.

'

invites you to visit their

1965

CHRISTMAS

,

TOY
..

AND G I FT SH OW f NG

,,.

JUNE 13 through JUNE 20 .

at their PRESTONSBURG, l&lt;ENTUCKY,
Showroom, downtown Pre·stonsburg,
next door to the Ffrst National ·Ba nk
WHOLESALE

ON I_ Y
•

'

Open daily, including SUNDAYS
,
10 a. m. to 10 p. m.
For further information,
Phone COLLECT, Prestonsbu rg
886-2903 or 886-2237
MARY-ALLENE RIFFE
Kentucky
Sales
Representative
- -~-_:_--~-------- ---- ------------,- ---- -

•

,

•

i
1

•

·•• :,::c,.
~ ·=: } \
......

NOTICE ·
•

·. ·.,

;;,id
· • •l••
~

The City of V\'hitesburg Auto Stickers go
on sale June 14, 1965, for those who
work and/or live in \A'hite··burg, and must
be placed on windshields on or before -July
1, 1965.
I

'

: :::::::::: :::: :t.-·., .
·.·. . ·-::•:•&gt; . .· .

·-·-.-· ·-· .
. . .

.

,

.-- .

'

_..·.;.;___,; ~~;- =: '.",_'."' :· ·_.

FERDINAND -MOORE'
Mayor, City of \A 1h itesbu rg
I

...
'
•

I.

to make' sure Pet Fresh M.i lk

is good enough for your:family
.

.

.,T a~e

l .

?, goo,1 close look at the subject of making yov.r sa vir1gs .

grow fa ster. You will find tl;ia t the clu e to fina n cial su ccess is
.

.

as simple as this: ( 1 ) Schedule yourself tr.1 save a (lefi n.it e
·.

. '

a1nou11t of your salary e,,e:ry p ayday a11d ( 2 ) P rrt yo ur savings
here lvhere they can '

earr1
.

:f..'1 () R E f or

)' Oll

witlt i11sured safety.

· The Inoney y ou. save PLT_JS the .extr a m oney your sa,wgs. ear n
..
h ere ¼'ill
{&amp;. bt , Sta rt sa·ving here .

•

1,

.'
.

PET

• M ILK COMP..t. N'(

DAIRY DIVISION

'

'

.; '

"A GOOD BANK IN A GOOD COUNTY "

•

•

•

�1'HE MOUNTAIN EAGL E •

•

•

WHITES BURG.

IFTCH ER COUN T Y• I(ENTUCKY

Millstone .

•

•

•

T HU RST) AY , JUN E 10 .

(from Page 9)

"

1 965

.

•

•

P AG E 1 0

Ver mi Ilion honored

.1inner with fv1rs, Martha· Jane PotSharon :t\1eade rec ently spent a
w. I. Vermillion (Billy) celei:er :tvlonday night.
p leasant week end at :tv1y rtle Beach . bra ted hi s 85 th birthday June 6
Others visiting Mrs. Potter were
l\ll r , a nd 1vlrs. Shern1 an Ivleade
·
~
.
d d.
~ ·. , _.:·._-;i(i:/; ': ::: \,1rs. Bob Gibsun of Kuna artd her
went t o North Carolina t o vis it
wit,h a iami ly reunion an
inner
:;ister, Elsie Gibson of Davton ,
tl,eir ill son, Wen dell, who is ve ry at t he home o f his younge st son,
and Paul Bates , a for mei: student
l itt le in1pro ·ved but will go hon1e
Eugene Vermillion, a nd Mrs .
of Mrs. Potter who is no \v a solthis week. Mrs. 1v1e a de st ayed in
Vermillior, in Whitesburg. Twend·
North C::trol ina .
t y -eight members of his family
ie r ·
were present, including his wife.
lvl r, and Mrs. William Reyno lds,
M
G
d V
· 11·
Mr
cousins of 1vlrs . 1v1artha Po tt er and ,
r$.. e rtru e ermi ion;
•
l. i
s
lb
k
and Mrs. J. c. Black, Mr. and
1v'l rs. J. . Ho roo , we re visitMrs . Richard Hicks, Mrs. Wilton
th
t
ing em laS Friday· .
USS I NTREPID-- Gunner's . Mate
Kelley and son, John Edward, of
8
nd
l!ncle 1e1n fF rankl in /s home.a h First Cl ass Charles T. Jones , USN , Chattanooga, Tenn.; Mrs. T. K.
d 01
ns we a. ter an°! 1:e.r st a~ in t e son of Mr. and l'v1rs. Cla ude Jones.
Walters, Jennie and Cheryl WalJe nkins hospit al. Visiting him re - O f w h 1·tesb urg p art icipated in for- ters· Mr and Mrs Holland Norcently were Mr. and l\llrs . Rem us
'
.
.
,
•
•
.
.
.
111al c ha n cre of c on1mand c e re monies man, Mr. and Mrs. J. E. Carr:,
;arkk 1.Michd last m o ntg while ser ving a board t.h e Joanne, David, Virginia a'nd Ma (tlbro.ok ~f .Li~c~ln
agg ie. v.isit e .t 1e ran ins an
ant i- subn1arine warfare support a ir- ry, all of Knoxville, Tenn, ; Miss
Reml us vHisiltbe d hkis mtotHhe r, Mrds)..
c ra ft c arrie r Intre p id at Brooklyn ,
Virgi nia Vermillion, Billy Cooper
S
y van · o F· roo kl., a daymo R
n ,
N ,r
v erm1· i1·10n, Mr. and Mrs . Haro Id
d
,
.
1
.
M rs. 8 111y ran 1n an son an y
T l1e Tntre p1•d 1s
· un d ergo1ng
·
· _ v erm1· 11·1011, M r. an d M rs. Eugene
f p bl ·~ oh·10
d M
B.11
a six
1
~
e.f
Ch
• ~n k r~i .
m o nth overhaul at t he 1--lew York
Ve rmillion, Sc ott, Karl and Lu1
0
1
n v1s 1·reedrrhyer or
' t s,~ t,he
Na val Shipya rd at Brooklyn.
ann,
Whitesburg.
wrhan
o a 1so
p aren
. -~
Randall 1v1aggards a t Sackett .
This year Billy Frankl in cou ld
not keep his yearly rendezvous
,
at t he grade of We nde ll Le wis , a !
fal len c omrade of t he I(orean War, i
so son Randy pl ace d a flag on t he
grave of his fat ~e r 's fr ie nd , This I
is t he fi rst time Billy has rr1issed
p lac ing a flag on t he gra ve of his
friend . Others visiting here were
Mr . and Mrs. John ny Frank lin and
d aughter of Ju nction C ity , Ga . .
Mrs. Virgie Johnson is here for
a visit with he r daughte r and sonENGAGED--Mr. and Mrs. Conley Price of Whitesburg announce
in- law , Mr . ·a nd Mrs. Bennie
the engagement of their daughte r , La Donna Sue, t o John W . ArFra nklin.
tis, son of Mr, and Mrs. John Artis of Ash land. Both Mr, Artis
· Alvin Sext on , son of Mr . and
and Miss Price are June graduates of Eastern Kentucky St ate Co l Mrs . Felix Sext on, is in the hos lege. Presently Mr. Artis is emp loyed by Kell y and Galloway
p it al fo r t reatment of an arm inAccounting firm in Ashland, The wedding will ta,ke place Aug .
jury. Alvin is in the Air Force
14 at the Whitesburg Methodist Church.
and is st ationed in C a lifo rn ia,
How t im e cha nges ~ very t hing
was m ade evident recently when
I read some old Mount ain Eagles.
••
Some of the af vertis mg sounded
' \ 'I
strange. In a November, 1919 ,
• •
•• ••
The Whitesburg High School
The marriage of Miss De lora
e d it ion was advertising for the
'
graduating class of 1928 will hold Sue Cook and Bud Frazier wil l
• •
Pe e rless Variety Store, Neon;
•• ••
a reunion at 7 p. m. July 3 at the take place a t 10:30 a , m. June
t he Blackey State Ban k , Blac k••
Letcher Lanes dining room here.
1 9 at th e Eaton Baptist Temple
ey; Sl im- Buic k Mot o r Co . , Inc . ,
About 30 persons are expected
i n Eaton, Ohi o . The Rev. Lynn
Millstone ; t he National Real Esto attend, including graduates
Ra nda ll wi ll offi c iate ,
t at e Exch ange, Whitesburg , and
and their husba.11ds or wives.
Miss Cook is the daughter of
mahy m ore that h a ve 1 ong since
The class included 23 mernbers. Mr. and Mrs. Elmer Cook of West · left Letcher County. A personal
Further information may be o b- Alexandria, · Ohio, formerly of
item was the announcement of thf
tained from Mrs , Leonard Lewis,
Wqajtesbur g.
·
. b irt h of a baby girl t o Mr. and
•• •••
DAIRY DIVISION
Whitesburg .
A reception will be held at the
•
Mrs. Willie Long-- just announcehome of the bride's parents im ment, no address. T_his l itt le girl
- -.-.,::-- - -- - - - - - - - - rne;:dia tel y a ft e r t he ceremony .
would now be a woman of 4 6. · If
· All friend s and re latives of the
she reads The Mountain Eagle v .
c ouple are i nvite d. to atteI?-d ,
_ would like to hear fr om he r.
Available to .you without a doctor's prescription, our product
called Galaxon. You must lose
ugly fat or your money back,
Galaxon is a tablet and easily
sw allowed. Get rid of excess fa t
and live longer. Galax on is sold
on this guarantee: if not sa tisfied
for any reason, just return the
package to your druggist and get
your full money back. No questions asked. Galaxon is sold with ·
this guarantee by Quillen Drug
Store, Whitesburg. Add 20¢ for
postage and sa les tax.
.•.•.·· · .

Serves ·,n Brooklyn

t1· ° .

I

. ... to make sure it's
good enough for your family

Class of 1928 sets
re union here July .3

Mi ss Delora Cook
to marry June 19

.

. .

PET
MILKCOMPA~Y -

FAT .OVERWEI GHT

•

THE CIDUSTIAN
•

CE

- ··

,,

•

MoNlTOR
-·

-- -~ ~:-:~

R~ Face-Up

#'....

vvorld
neVV's

. Put that Young Ho spirit in
your car! Crisp as a forehand
smash, the response you get from
Chevron*, the livelier gasolines.
And you'll love their flashing getaway, their
long-running economy. Their new whisperquiet performance, too. So start today,
swinging with a winner. Tank up and take
off in style at your nearest Standard Oil
station, where we take better care of your car.

::;::A-F:_-:&gt;·· .

1n
ll

.

:- ..

\/::,

..

fecus
The Christion Science Monitor
One Norway St., Boston, Moss. 02 115
Please enter my subscription to the
Monitor for the period checked below. I enclose $ .......·--··· ( U.S. Funds I

·::-

&gt;nrtrtr1rrt

0 I YEAR $24 0 6 mon~ $12
O 3 months $6
Nome·-····•·-•··------ - - - Stn,et.............,. _____ ... ___ _____

,::::::-

:-:-:-:-:

City.....·- -··••-·-·--····-c-.- - - , - - - -

$fgt,;:·'"'·-~--.-=·- zi'P....,(;ode._,_ __

*Tradema rks CHEVRON an d CH EVRON design®

J. D.; LARKEY(AGENT)
F·LEMING ·

•

�- .- -~ -

"

""'"'9"-

=.=== =.==~ - - - - - - - - - -= ~ --.L.....- ~¼------------'--

THE MOUNT AI N E AG LE

•

•

•

-

-

---'---= -

WHI TE SB U RG , LETC H ER COT JNT Y .

- =-

-

- --==~=F
c'::--:--':'--:=-----,-------

KE N 'f UC KY

•••

-

-

·-;;-;;--=--___::__:_:=--'--- - - - - - - - - - - - --

THU RSD i\Y , JUN E

.

.•

P A. GE 1 1

VI RGI NIA WON,Ar~ HERE FOR VIS11"

objec t i ves of the Act, and I wa nt
Funeral services for Mrs, Eva
::iorry to. learn t t1at' t I1e hom e. of
to state again that the additiona,I Caudill, wife of Lonzo Caµdill,
By MRS. J!M REVIS
Clay Hall, btot~er of Sheriff Le wcorridor in Lethcer, Harlan and
were conducted Tuesday at the
is Hall, burned down Tuesday
Bell Counties would clearly fit
· Smithsboro Baptist Church by the
Mrs. Aaron Hall of Conway,
morning. The hom e was owned
these objectives. _
Rev. I r a Henderson . . Burial was
Va· • was here this week visiting
b Howard Johnson .
Again, I thank you for the full
in the Blair and Adams cemetery Mrs. Carrie Hall of McRobert s,
and she stbpped by for a visit with
ancf thoughtful consideration yoµ at Jeremiah.
are giving to this matter.
Mrs. Caudill died June 5 at her Mrs. W • M. Dempsey and Mrs.
home. She was 39.
.
Mary Wright. Mrs. Hall is recovJOHN SHERMAN COOPER
LETCHER COUNTY COURT
She was the daughter of Stephen ering from a bad heart attack and
..
and Nancy Mar~aret Adams Craft. seems to be doing fine,
..
IN THE MATTER OF LAURA
Survivors besides her husband
Our sympathy goes to the family
To the editor:
SMITH, GUARDIAN FOR LINDA
are two children, Lynn Douglas
of Mr. and M!s. Hubert Baker,
SUE BURROWS, AN INFANT. .
and Kini Edward Caudill· two bro- whose baby died 37 hours after
. If yo u will oblige me, I wo uld thers Arlie Craft Bridg~port
birth. The Bakers live at PortsNOTICE
like to pay a spec ial compliment Cond and Stev~ Iva111 Craft'
mouth, Va. The baby's funeral
to the Mountain Eagle.
Jere~iah; and a sister, Vada Cau- was held at the home of its grandPursuant to KRS 25.195, notice
. In m y recen~ successful camdill, Jeremiah.
~other, ~ rs. Georg_e Stewart, and
is hereby given t hat on June 7,
paign for the nomination for coun- She was a member of the First
1t was bur 1ed at Whitaker.
1965 Laura Smith, Gua,rdian for
ty commissioner, I think the si m- Baptist Church at Smithsboro.
A~o our sympathy goes to the .
Glenda Sue Burrows, an infant,
ple statement of common sense,
Moore and craft Funeral Home . family of Tom I-Iolmes of McRobfiled her Final Report and Setgood will ~nd good intentions. as
handled funeral arrangements.
erts, who died rv1onday. His funera : tlement in the Letcher County
presented 1n· the Eagle reached
was held Tuesday at Banks and
. Court, which wa s ordered to lay
. 9ur thinking people , those who
Craft Fµneral Home in Neon. His
over until July 7, 1965; for e x put first the welfare of all the
I
SU CCU ffi S body was taken to Sawyer Hill, .
ceptions, and no exceptions hav people, better than anything else .
·
· Tennessee, for burial.
. ing been filed or taken thereto,
I believe it shows that our good
Jimmy Darrel Bates, 20, died
Another of our longtime residents j further notice is hereby given that
;
people will place confidence in
Wednesday, June 9, at the Randied Sunday. He was Robert H.
i on July 7, 1965, unless e xceptions
you if you show faith in them. •
dolph County Hospital in WinBrown, better , known to his friends ! are filed in the m e antime , an or,
.And the y respect the Eagle .
chester, Ind., as the result of in- as Greasemonkey Brown. Mr. Browr! der will be entered approving and
juries received June 7 in an auto- dro vf:, a cab abd lived in Neon for ! confirming said Final Report and
(The following is Senator Coop.:.
I . D. BACK
,.
mobile accident.
·
many years. He was at the home
Settlement in all things.
er's letter to Federal Cochairman
Blackey , Ky .
Funeral services for him were to · of a sister in Whitesburg at the
Dated this 7 day of Ju~e 1965.
Sweeney of the, Appalachian Com.•
be held Saturday at the Little Rock time of his death. ·
mission.
CHARLIE WRIGHT
Regular Baptist Church at Kona by
Mr. and ~virs. Deward Banks, Su.
Elder John Sexton. Burial was to sie, Jan.and Archie and Miss Kathy Clerk, Letcher County Court
,
Dear Mr. Sweeney:
be in the Thornton Cemetery.
Richardson have gone to Fontana
I appreciate very much ti.'le opI
He was a son of Greeley and Ver- Lake, N. C., for a week's vacaportunity you have given me to
nia Wright Bates, who survive him . tion.
discuss with you the road program
I
Other survivors are the following
Miss Sandra Wojciechowski is
FOR SALE--One eight-room with
for Kentucky under the Appaiach· brothers and sisters: Betty Sue
.h ome from Eastern Kentucky State bathroom, hardwood floors, baseian -Regioncj-1 Development Act,
Word has been received here of Stewart, Lebanon, Ohio; Paul Eu- College for a week visiting her
ment with coal furnace. Gas heatand, in recent weeks, the need
the death of Mrs. James McCor- gene, . Danny Wayne, Johnny Mor- parents, Mr. and Mrs. Steve Wojer in living .room.. This house is
for constructing under this Act a .
mack Fairchild in Lexington May gan, Geneva Gale, Tommy K.,
ciechowski. She will return to
on large lot 200 feet back, plenty
development highway along the .
15.
Charles, Dewana, Delana, Fernia summer school.
. shade trP-es, eight hickory trees,
corridor following the route of
Mrs. Fairchild died at Good Sa- June and · Greeley Bates Jr., all at
Mr. and Mrs. Jerry V. Collier
five bearing apple trees, twelve
U. s. 119 and 25E in Letcher,
maritan -H ospital after an illness · home.
.
and family of South Shore were
plum trees, cherry trees and beauHarlan and Bell Counties, Kenof more than a year.
Moore and Craft Funeral Home here over the week end visiting
tiful maple trees.
tucky.
The former Mattie Cecil Prater, ,handled funeral arrangements.
aexparents, Mr. and Mrs. W. M.
One store building stocked with
It is necessary that this corridor
she .was a native of Magoffin Conn·
De:r:npsey, and her sister, Mrs.
groceries; also fixtures . All this
be approved, so that Harlan and
ty. After attending Richmond ?
Jim Revis, and .Mr. Revis. Sunproperty is located two blocks
Bell Counties, located deep in
State Normal School , now Easterp:
•
·
day they attended a dinner at
from Berea College, two blocks.
,
the Appalachian region of Kentucky,Kentucky State College, she was
Elizabeth ·Regular Baptist Church,
from Berea rubber plant. This is ·
1
1
.rill not be left isolated. The ap- : a teacher in the Whitesburg Elery
Millstone. 1\.1rs. Bertha Collier
. for sale to settle the estate of the
proval of this corridor woul d promeptary School for three years,
Funeral servic;es for Pfc. Kirby
and daughter Carol, also of South
late John D. Smith. Located 504
. vide a link with the corridors apLater she became J1ead of milliIson, 20, were to be conducted , Shore, were here to attend the
West Jefferson Street, Berea, Ky .
\
prove_d for Kentucky a~ t~e last
nery for the Mullins Department
Saturday at the home of his mo- d~ner and to visit relatives.
Phone 986-4506 or contact Mrs.
meeting of the Commission, and
Store .
ther Mrs Marie Ison Oscal 00 Sgt. E/5 Ray Stapleton, who
John D. Smith, 504 West Jefferson
it would p~vi_d e to these and o. · In 1927 she was married to James sa, by Elders Carl Bac'k, Ed Wil- has been stati?ned at Fort C~mpStreet, Berea, Ky.
ther counties in the area access
McOorm.ack Fairchild, son of the lis and Maynard Banks. Burial
bell, Ky lo, with the 101st Air= to Interstate Highway -I--7-5.~~It-, ...,__._-,·l ate- Sa-rah-Anne Ke-lly Fairchild,.,. - was to be -in tae,. Ison cemetery at _borne Div.ision,-:ccame in Friclay .
f
would also provide outlets t o
· ·and Stephen Gose Fairchild of
Premium.
to visit his pareIJ.ts, Mr and Mrs.
Tennessee and to the Cumberland Whitesburg. He survives her.
Pfc. Ison drowned in a boating L. C. Stapleton of Fleming.. He
'COMMONWEALT I-I of KEN1,UCKY
Gap area, and. thence to Virginia
Mrs, Fairchild also is survived
accid,e nt May 30 on the Mein
is go~ng to Ber~in, Germany , where DEPART1\.1ENT OF HIGHWAYS
.and th_e East. Harlan and Bell .
by a da17g~ter, Mrs. Ch~les EdRiver in Germany·, where he was he will be ~at1~ned for a_fe,,,,r
NOTICE TO CONTRA CTORS
Counties have been_ prosperous m
ward Phillips of Hy atta ville, Md . . stationed with the u. s. Army.
m_onths. _His wife_and children
Sealed bids will be received by
past years, and their economy .·
seven sisters anct four JJrothers.
He was as.o n of the late Ruben
will stay 1n Amarillo, Te1as,
•'
the Department of Highways at
can reco.v er if their present state
Funeral services were conductIson.
with her parents, Mr. and Mrs.
its office, Frankfort, Kentu c ky ,
of is_o lation--chiefly from lack
ed May 18 at the W. R• . Milward . . He attended Whitesburg High
A . .M. Brown, while he is away.
,
until 10:00 A M . Eastern Stanof h1ghway~•can be ended . . I
mortuary in Lexington by the Re v. School and enlisted in tlie Army
Mrs. Bobby Welch and 'bo&gt;:s. o_f
dard Time on the 2 5th day of.
hope. that approval can be g1 ven
Da vid .A_. Friedley. Burial was in in February of 1964.
.
Morehead have been here v1sit1ng
June, 196 5, at which time bids
to th.is section of the road sys.terx:i
the Le&gt;:m gton cemetery.
Survivors besides his mother are her parents, Mr, and Mrs, Paul
will be publicly opened and read
as early as possible th_is su~me:·
··
,
a sister, Jenny Ison, Oscaloosa,
Broom of Fleming, and t1is parfor the improvement of:
I have worked on this legislation
and four brothers, Pfc. Nolan I- . ents, Mr. and Mrs. Earl Welch of
LETCHER COUNTY, APD 102 (35)
for years and have discussed it .
_______
son, Germany, and Roland · John Jenkins, for a while.
SP .6 7- 69: The Hazard-Whitesburg
many times with officials in the
and James Ison, all at hom'e.
Mr. and Mrs. Cecil Reed were
Road fr ~m Ky . 160 near Van t o
,.
D~partment o_f Commerce, and
Moore and Craft Funerat Home~ here from C~ci~ati_ visiting her
the Dry Fork Road, a distance of
'
Wl_tn_ two Presidents. It w~ my
handled funeral arrange:r:nents.
father, who lS qu1.te_111,. They
2. 188 miles. Grade, Drain and
privilege to co-sponsor this Act
took her father, J. W. Berry, back
Traffic Bound Surface.
at its introduction in the Senate.
j
with them to care for him until
LETCI-IER COUNTY ;APD 102 (3 6)
Additionally t as a member of the
By MABEL KISER
he is better.
SP 67- 69 : The Haz ard-Whitesburg
Senate Public Works Committee,
Haymond residents were sadruneral services for 1v1rs, ArHerbert Fleenor and a friend,
Road from Ky. 15 approximately
which was responsible for conduct- dened last week by the death of
m~lda Hampton, 79, widow of
B1;1ster Thompson, of Logan, w.
0. 5 mile east of Isom to Ky. 160
ing hearings and reporting the leg- a neighbor, Mrs. Rushie ljolbrook Wilburn Hampton, were ,t o be
· Va., were visiting Mr. Fleenor's
near Van, a distance of 2 . 686
islation to the Senate, I had the
· Noble sh'ehee. She was the daugh- ~onduc~d Friday, June 11, a~
parents, Mr. and Mrs. John Fleemiles . Grade, Drain and Traffic
opportunity to_study closely its
ter of the late Mr. and Mrs. Bill
~he Blau Branch Regular B_a ptist
nor of Fleming Sunday. Mrs.
Bound-Surface.
details and to; conside~ carefully Holbrook, and was the sister of
Church by Elders I. D. B_ack,
Fleenor has been ill for two weeks. NOTE: MINIMUM WAGE RA TES ·
the borad p~oses of the Act.
· Mrs. Della Holbrook, Mrs. John
Man~s Ison a nd Ra:y Collms.
Brack Holland of Fleming reFOR THE. ABOVE PROJECTS HA VE
I
When the bill was before the
Richardson and Bummer Holbrook,
~urial _was to be in the Horre_
ceived a. call from his nephew last
BEEN PRE- DETERMINED BY THE
..'
Senate for action, I worked with
all of whom live in Tollivertown. Mill Pomt Cemet~ry at Jeremiah. week telling him his brother was
SECRETARY OF LABCR AND ARE
'.
Sen~tor Jennin~s Randolph of
Mrs. 'Sheehee had made her home
Mrs. ~ampton~die~ Tuesday at seriously ill in Mt. Sterling, Mr. · · SET FORTI-I IN THE PROPOSAL .
I'
the Whitesburg hos.pital, where
West Virginia in its management
in Hazard the past year with a
Holland went to him, and on SunThe Special Provisions for the
i
on the Senate floor , and I partic- . daughter and her husband, Mr.
the had been a patient for several day the brother died, ~r symHighway Projects f inanced with
'
ipated in the entire debate over
and Mrs. Willis Kiser. Funeral
ours ~
pathy goes to the family.
Federal Highway Funds apply oh
'
its provisions. I know that in the
services were conducted at her
She was a daughter of the }ate
. Earl David Holt of Eastern State
the foregoing projects.
nd
• l
consideration of those .;Sections of old home by Elders Francis HubNoah a
Rebecca A}11burgey. Gent College is here until fall with his . : · Bid and Specimen proposals for
the bill concerned with the conbard, Bill Rose and Carl Duty.
· a nd was a member O the Blair
parents, Mr. and Mrs. Earl Holt of ; all projects Are a vailable at the
struction of highways, it 'was unde~ Burial was in the Holbrook famBranc~ church.
..
· ;Hemphill road.
·
Di vision of Oontract Controls at
stood that main corridors .w9uld
ily cemetery. Among those from
Suryivors are four d~ughters'. Mrs, Mrs. Martlll
. · Sturgill and daugtia cost of $2 . 06 each . Bid pro- .·
be constructed to connect the ·
out of town here for tfie funeral
Matt!e H. Lewis, Whi~sburg, Mrs. ter Kathy are here Ior several
· posals are issued only t o preAppalachian States and to ppen . were Mr. and Mrs. Delmar Hall,
H_attie ~tewart, Jeremiah; Mrs. , months visiting her parents, Mr.
qualified1Contractors. Remit'up areas of the several Sta'fe.§ , in- of Richrr1ond; Mr. and Mrs. oensil Billy Price, ,O·ghdehen, dUt~, ~nd . · and Mrs •. Earl Johnson, and Kentance payable to the State Treaseluding Kentucky, to acc~~s and
Hall, Cumberland; Mrs. Can Hol- ~rs. Grace S _ep r , Cmcmnan;_ ny and hxs p~rents, Mr~ and M_rs.
urer of Kentucky ~ust accomdevelopme. nt. But it has always
brook and daughter of Knoxville;
five sons, Blame Hampton, ~othair Dewey Stu~gill of Jenkins, while
pany request for proposals.
been my view that the Act:--inMr. and Mrs. Elbert Richardson
Ova Hampton,. S~merset;. Ellis
· .her husbana is overseas.
·
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS
eluding its road provisions--was
and family of D'etroi t; Mr. and
Hampt~n. ~ouisville; _Ernest Hamp· SHOULD BE MADE TO: MRS .
nd
alSo designed to accom_elish, to
Mrs. Cletis Holbrook and Mr. and ton, MiamlSb~g, O~o. a
Lee
BETTIE BARKER, DIV. OF CONthe greatest e~nt poss1.ble, d~Mrs. Kenneth Holbrook, Hazard; · Ham t_on,. In d ianapolis, Ind.: four
TRACT CONTROLS, DEPART velopment of the isolated regions Mrs. Millard Cantrell and &lt;laugh- stepc 1ldren, Mrs. Bertha Combs,
Mrs, Nathan Baker, former
MENT -OF HIGHWAYS, STATE
of Kentucky and other Appalachter and Mr. and Mrs. John E.
?assafr_as; Dewey Hampton, Lexpresident of Boone Boy Industries,
OFFICE· BUILDING, FRANKFORT,
ian States 111 order to provide new Holbrook, of Cleveland; Mr~ and ingt?n, Marshless M. Hampton,
said this week she is opening a
KENTUCKY.
.
opportunity and imvrovement for
Mrs. Eppie Holbrook of Kite; Mr. Cadiz, and Kel_ley Hampton,
reupholstery shop in downtown
REQUEST FOR PLANS SHOULD .
their people and communities.
and Mrs. Roy Mullins and Mr. •
Beattyville; a sister, Mrs. Ca~Whitesburg, ·
BE MADE TO: MR. ' KAVANAUGH ·
I am · aw~ that un~er the Act
and Mrs. sam Bentley of Jenkins. bia, Morton, Jackson, 1_6 gran~
The new business will be known
INMAN, DIV. OF ,DESIGN, DEthe S~~ nave the primary_ re•
M~s. Shehee was survived by six
~~iill~rere.nn and four great grand
as "Letcher Reupholstery" and will . PARTMEN'T OF HIGHWAYS,
sponsibility for recommendmg
children, three boys and three .
.. ·
·
be located at the rear of the Dan- · STATE OFFICE BUILDING, ··
projects and establishing priorigirls--S. H. (Homas) Noble of
Moore and Craft Funeral Home
iel Boone Hotel on Broadway in ·
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY .
ties within their borders, and
Hazard; Roosevelt N'oble, cieve- ~n~led funeral arrangements.
quarters forme~ occupied by an
. ADDITIONAL INCORMA TION
that their recommendations are .
land; Tommy Shehee of Cleveair-conditioning firm.
CONCERN.ING THIS ADVERTISE~en coi:iside~ by
Appala~h- lan_d; Mrs. Sar~ N. King of De· The Bakers will be sole owners.
MENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM
1an Regional :""ommission for fmal tr01t; Mrs. Juanita Kiser of Haz-.
Boone Boy, a furniture and re' MR. W . T . JUDY, DIRECTOR,
approval. I am writing, . however, ard,' an.d Mrs. Billy Jean Webb ·of . ,f • •
•
upholstery firm located at Letch- ·
DIVISION OF CONTRACT CONto resta~ the reasons I~ ve ad- ·
Haymond. ~ brother, sandy Hol- SJ. Ip ffi In
ffi
er, was sold recently to a ManTROLS; DEPARTMENT OF HIGHvanced in our conversations in
' brook, of Ohio, was unable to
.
chester corporation after it lost.
WAYS, FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY
support of my views regard~g the come for his sister's funeral.
its rented quarters
June 4, 1965.
'
Mr. Sweeney to restate this need
and my views. and ·1 am enclosing
a copy of that l~tter.
. ·
I am glad to tell you that the
Appalachian Region'a l Commission
met today and considered the case
for approval of this development
highway along the corridor following the route of u. S. 119 and
25E in Letcher, Harlan and Bell
Counties. After the case for approval of this corridor was presented, the Commission announced
its intention to hold a special
meeting in two weeks in order to
arrive at a determination as to
whether to include this highway
in the regional plan.
I am sure that the Commission
w1ll approve the corridor, and I
. believe the work and concern
in your communities has resulted
in the Commission giving careful
consideration to this important
matter. I was very glad to be
able to work with you, and to explain my strong convictions and
support for this project tc Cocha:i.rman Sweeney.
JOHN SHERMAN COOPER

NOTICE

Compliment

j

J•
Bt
mmy a es

.

b

M
J
F . h"Id
rS. ames al rC
d' . L . t
es In eXI ng On

fr. '

19 65

-1\t,rs. Lor1zo Caudill dies Fleming-Neon

LETTERS TO THE ED ITOR (from Page 2)

I

iO ,

FOR SALE

Pfc Kirby Ison
drowns in Ger man,

'

CALL FOR B DS -

.

Haym· ond

•
•

I

M

Sh h

rs. · ee . ee
d'1·es ·, n Hazard

.',

Mrs. Ham pt on d es.

~

~

1

f:he.

Attend the antit.
r
e ee Ing
at .Carr c·reek Jun·e· 16

New firm opens',here

�rf H t

r-,1 0 U &gt;I T A I N E A. G L E •

•

•

L E 'T C 1-'l ER C O U N 1' Y • l&lt; E l~ 'f u· CI&lt;: Y

\v' I:-I I T E S B U R G ,

•

•

•

T 1--I U R S D 1\ Y , J U l\J E 1 0 ,

1 9 G-'S

•

•

•

PA G E 1 2

T

•

c ~~ 0 -~-k :;~_gh

=1 -:::,:1 c:;l

gy·~:.0.n.2, ~.l''.].I":!} i n

Jt:

1i.-: 11

~~-

,~ 71 --'.

T 0o·1"t t i• !T; k '. ~~l 1 l l e v r
0

1
f~·(~e~~~l~z;)t. '?:g :i[i n~ly
fl~;d;d , 'i
~p~;hed ;ff
t~~TJ~:t :;t~da~~~ i~~::~~g
rneetin a had been scheduled at
into the creek. · · Now some of
Kentucky. They go ahead and
th ese _boys (fror1: Knott c;oun!y) are buy the timber for a pittance and -·the Hi ndman gym but plans were
changed beca use that gym is un over in South Vietnam fighting for make tremendous profits off of it
dergoing repairs. ·
~he_country ~nd these nien are _push- because the people know they
Strip coal operators have rei~g a nd ~earing up au d d~ stroying
must sell--they know it is going
sponded qui ckly to organization
what we ve got au d t~e Judge gave to be co vered up if they don't
_
thedmI an °rd e r to go rigbht on thr~ul gh sell. Then they make it worse
of the group and to counter its
charges.
an
guess _t11ey w~nt a out a m1 e - by bragging . . . how they cheat- ·•·Already coal industr y spokes~odac1Jlowmg up timft:r a~hthr0 w .;;_d these poor people who sold their ·
men are circulating rumors tha t
ing
over on top O it.
_e way . timber to them.
..-i\\&lt;
the aroused citizens are "radicals " they have these laws set up, it all
"I would dispute the claim that
communists, etc. These are ' falls btck t;ey have got al_l the ws we are any longer dependent for
the common propaganda tactics
set up hor t e ophera1tordagaindst t
our economy upon strip or auger
d
.
..
E
man w o owns t e an • an we
tn ines Id ,~ th'nk th
.
1
use aga!nst a most any astern_
don't have a chance we don't have b d : h. on .. i h ere _1s ~nfyyKentuck1an who speaks out against
h
.
'
o Y 1n ~ is state w o can Just1
the abuses of the coal industry.
a
the destruction of these moi:ntains.
1c~~rkin~ told us flatly that
The Group to Save the Land and h
. st th'
.
. .
1-IA.RRY M. CAUDILL, Whitesburg
p
h f'
.
d' . b
e was again
1s (strip mining
attorney d 1
t·
f
f .
~ he . eop 1e as ive 1mme 1ate o - abuses) and that he would do e _ .
. .
an ong- ime oe o str1pectrves·
·
v
mm1ng-'
I--IONORED-,-William Van Whita- J
. · .
erything in his power to get some"W h
d - 'd
NG G
ker, son of Mr. and 1v1rs . Court1. To raise funds to enable
th · dO n b t 1.t d tb th
e ave to eci e and vote for
E A ED--Miss Susan Hope
ney Whitaker of Madison, Ind. ,
Homer Ritchie to file suit aga inst
ingd lel tah ou
an
ba e_ · life or vote _for deat~. There is no Stallard, daughter of Mr. and
Kentucky River Coal Sales Co,
woul, ca
e governor a . out it.
longer any tin1e to discuss, onder
Mrs, Troy R. Stallard of Whitesreceived the Rotary Club 's citiR't
H~ sugge~ted that ~ e get_in t~uch and confer. East Kentucky has
burg, will be married July 31 to
1 c h'ie •s home on Clear Cree k
·zenship for outstanding service to
with our c onservation people in
. .
his community, given each year was covered by mud and trees a
Frankfort J O Matl · k
d1
come down to the moment 1n hisDelano Thomas, son of Mr. and
to one boy in the graduating class few_days ago ~hE::n virtually an
told him 'th~t B;other ~c Oa~attory w~en people are gain$ to have M:s· Walter Byron Th?mas _o f
M d·
c
1· d d 1--r h
entire mounta1rrside which had
. k d h
b
h. ·
.
_to decide whether to 11 ve 1n Eastern Millstone. The wedding will
1
st
at a ison onso i at_e
ig
been strip mined slid down on 1·t.
ck an t ose lsoys, they arke Juh
Kentucky as free men ot be dri ven
take place at the First Baptist
1~
School. I-le also received tfi,e
i e everyone e e t ey ta e t e
National Thespian Society's cer2. To collect signatures on pe- $ 200 h
h
'
out of here as a bunch of dispossessed Church in Whitesbur g. Both Miss
tificate of m~rit for outstanding
titians to Gov. Edward T. Breath- b d t ~t ~ e co~p~~yl p~sr as
paupe_rs. You have to dig in and do ~ta~lard and Mr. j)homas will be
itt requesting immediate action
ond a1;1 uy a an uho dfes1cue
what 1s necessary to preserve yourJuniors at Morehel d State ColPer"1 ormance 1·n the fi' eld of the
• f
· .
.
see - - 1t amounts to a an u
1
h
d h f
1
· h f 11 B h
d
dramatic arts. The Whitakers
toen orce st ate strip mine ~aws
when you try to cover what the
sfe vehs, your omes ~n t e uture
ege 1nftWeh _a b. .otH. ahresgrha 1
fornierly liv~d in Whitesbu
itn_d to halt further destruction of
auger tears up-:--and they couldor.t ~ next generation or you are
ua_tes o
1tes urg 1g c oo.
private property.
,
. d
.1 ~
through.
Miss Stallard attended Lees Juand Wl'lli'am plans to atten the
.
.
d
n
t
even
sow
1t
own
wit
1
1escue
"W
·
·
d
bl•
ff·
· c 11
tJ k
dM
University of Kentucky ill the fall. 3 • Pet1t1ons an te 1egra~~ to
and start them a stand with that
. e as c1t_1zens an pu ic o_ 1n1or o ege a ac s?n an . r.
He is a grandson of Melvin Cornett ?ther s~ate an~ federal off1c1als,
mane and the .t t o reclaim
c1ats are going to have to decide
~ho~as attende~ Indiana Uniof Whitesburg. his mother is the
including President Johnson.
h. 1Y'd I , Y1 ry h . ,
whether we are for the land and
ve~s1ty at Bloomington be ~ore
former Rosem ~rv Cornett
·
4. A giant motorcade to Frank- t is an • t s a aug • _it s a _
for the people or whether we are
~01_ng t_o Moreheaa. S~e 1s 111a . .
·
fort seeking new legislation, This farce. Anybody wllo _knows any
for the coal companies and the
~or1ng 1n home _econo1111cs _and he
(f rom
tertatively had been ~lanned_ for
t~~g_ ~bou} conser~t10? kn1ws
fast bu_ck, the_ coa; companies that 1n heal~h, physical education and
T he ms at Flemin a and Letcher June 21, when~ spe cial session
t
attsa~e. k e sig~e tu~
are going to rip this country .apart
recreation. ·
0
gy
.
c
of the state legislature was to have on e
ree_ area, Jus a
and take all the wealth.
could oe built for about $250,000 b
Th 1 . 1 r·
. h
bout everybody signed up on an
"The 1.t. . .
.h
h
e ach, school officials est im ate.
egun.
. e eg1s a ive session as ASC program to get the creek
.
po I icians are eit er on t e
1)
There are no estimates on the r-Iot been post_poned and another date
d d d t Ri ht
·r•
t
sid~ of the people whose home; are
.
, . .
will be pi cked.
re ge ou_ · . g JJ.?W 1 s go
being destroyed or they are on the
ARC funds will be the core of
Spot or Kingd_om Come ou1ld111gs,
T
.
f
d
h
more
mud
in
1t
than
1t
had
when
side
of
those
ho
d
tro
h
__
5
new programs to demonstrate new
but there o?v1oosly w_ould be adt:- u. ·s. Sou;~~s~eu~o~r~oac:~~f t~st~ne we had it dre~ged. We're paying it'~ as simplewas th~:. : ~ ~m
ways to bring health services to
quate bonding
potential
left
to
fithe
l'd't
_
f
th
Id
..
f
g
for
that
dredging.
The
taxtayers,
"You
a
the
.,
,
1
h
t·
va 1 1 y o
e o
.1on~- orm
d
,
.
.
re
on1y peop .e ,n t11e
remote areas.
nance t e111 as we 11 as renova 10n de ds"
d
hi h t.
you an me, we re paying or 1t. 'Ju·~,,j St te t Od
hO h ARC has asked OEO, which can
of some other older school builde
un er ~ ~ s rip m~ne op- We signed up this spring-- I signed ' t l L,,• • a s
ay w
ave no
ings which will continue in use .
erators are cla11111ng autho_r1ty to
up for lO, 000 trees to be set on
tenure in h~use and ,home. You've finance medical services for the
poor, for a $500, 000 grant to plan
The hith court's ruling does not destroy P!Operty of the holders of
our land They cut the pine trees put every drme _vou ve worked out
.
_ surface ri ghts.
·
· 1n these coal mines, a11d every
the health program in the 49 ::Easspecify t at taxes cannot be low
.
They come along and they t ake
dime you've worked out in these
tern Kentucky counties- - including
e red, thus cutting bonding possiEldon Dav1ds~n, the ~-tcher
the bulldozer and they cover them little mountain farms and here
Letcher-·that are considered povbilities, but the Kentucky mini~ou_nty co-c~au_ma;11, ~01ned Mar- up. When we set them we, have
i n the middle of the ~ost roserty areas . Eastern Kentucky is
. murr1 foundation law which gov- tin m a special invitation to every to sign a contract that we will
. h 1. P f
considered ideal for the demonerns school systems through the
resident of Letcher .County to join protect them from forest fires
p:rous cledntury in t e 11story 0 .
· ·
·
Kno· tt an d p erry c aunty res1'dents
!
t, 1e wor d your government
comes
stration-planning project because
state - requires
a "max1mu111
loand we can't even put a calf m
t
th
1
it "contains more concentrated
c al -e'ffort" toward school financin th_e meeting at' the Carr Creek
them. And they put bulldo zers
ah ondg anf tt.nns_ydou oyeli~ to eh
•
h
. h
gym next Wednesday night (June
.
d
he
d
an s o some 111 ustna s s w o
rural poverty than any other com1ng. A_pparently a c ange in ~ e _ 1
m an cover t m up, ~n we
would have. 110 more compunction
parable land area, " Shriver said.
foundation law would be -required
~)·
.
pay to have them set with taxa-gainst destroying everything you
to permit a lowering of school
'!'f e must unite and work toge th- payers money. Now if that's jush
ld
.
k' 11_
1115t
t ax rates Fiscal court sets the
er if we · are to save Eastern Kentice my friends I'm 'going to
~wn t an kyou whou Thag~ h 1
·
b. · - •
tucky " he said ·
' h
' "'
111g a coc roac .
at s w at
1eave
school tax rate, ut 1t is.required
,
. •
t e country.
ou're u a ainst
.
by law to set whatever rate the
Both Tolbert Combs, the Perry
DAVIDSON-Y "If
p g
il · h. ·
d
school board requests and the
County commonwealth's attorney,
"I would like to tell you about
h we1~an go a t ~ way a~ounf
school board is requi;ed by state
and Calvin Manis, the county at- something that comes from one
tv_e wor to prlotectGt ed peop e 0
torneu
· · d . o f t he c h'ie f bulld ozer operators
1etnam,
y to o we can
law to levy at least $1.10. on
h . ;; of Perry County , promise
find
a littlesure
time
to protect the
each $100 of assessed valuation.
t eu s~pp~rt.
working on the head of Clear
eople of this state ·
You are
A delegation of about 25 Whites- Manis said he was the only coun- Creek. If you go back there, you
db. · b b
burg business and civic leaders ap- ty attorney in Eastern Kentucky who will find a beautiful garden groweing pahuperize ld Y a bar a1rous ·
.h
•
f h had sued any firm for stream pol- .
.
. be h
process t at wou not e to eratpeare d at t e June meeting o t e 1 .
f
.
mg on a ye 11 ow strip mine nc . ed in any truly civilized corner of
Board of Education to ask just
ution. He orced a construction· This bench has peen cut down 60
h' 1 b "
where Whitesburg stands in the
~ompany recen~ly to remove dirt
or 70 feet, and here is this beaut 15 ~ 0 e.
matter of school building priority. lt_had dumpt?d l~to _t_~ Kentucky
tiful garden, It looks black and
Board n1embers replied that they River. Manis said Cit1Ze!15 _would
he althy and so forth. What the
James Hractley, 4o, of Livingsha ve an option on a site for the
have to 0 before grand _Juri_es and average person doesn't know when
ton , foreman of the highwa y
new grade school on the old show charge t e co al .coml_anies in orhe goes back there to see that ·
b~idge project under way near
grounds, part of the Whitesburg
der to get an}'.th mg one _abou~
garden is that first they took bull· Whitesburg, di€d of an apparent
urban renewal project. As soon · ~tream pollution from st r1p mindozers and scooped up the ground ·
heart attack in his sleep Tuesday
as the land is filled and made safe mg.
.
_
.
and filled it full of sawdust. They· night.
fro n1 flooding by the Kentucky
Comb~ said he would be 1n the
then t ook highlifts and went through H
f
dd d· b d
1
Rive r, the board will buv the larrl motor_ca_de to Frankfort and would
one of those fertile coves and lifted Wednesday
e was oun
ea in e ear+y
morning.
for $32, 000; it h?pes to complete 1ead It i f t he others wante d h im to. the topsoil from the valley from the
the purchase during the next bud- Here are some remarks by other
man's land and hauled that back
get year . Superintendent ~f
speaAkers:
with dumptrucks and dumped it in
'fhe Letcner County Historical
Schools Dave L. Crafts;; , ~he .
:;1 RTIN-- there and t hen mized it up with
Society will meet at 7:30 p. m.
MISS MARY JO HART
State Dep artment of Edu.:at1on 1s
I am a school teacher. I got a
fertilizer and so forth and set out
Friday, June 18, at the home of
well plea~ed with the site. I-low- loan and remodel~d my house, and this garden. - _ It just proves that
Mr. an:l Mrs. Zenneth Bentley at
e ve~,. until _the Court of Appeals no".{ they are coming -around back
any damn fool that has~got a bullMay king.
dec1s1on this week, re appeared
of It and as far as our l_aws are con-, dozer, sorne highlifts and a fleet
the board would not have bondcerned at the present time, we cant of dump trucks can raise a garden
ing capac_ity_to build the grade
even collect damages. They can
on a strip mine bench. . . .
·
Whitesburg Chapter 149, Royal
school building for three or four collect trees and rocks_down on us
"Where they are doing the resetArch Masons, will meet at 6 P•
Mr. and Mrs. Joe Hart of Richmore years.
_
.
_
and push our house on into the
ting, they are doing i! on coal
m. Saturday, June 19, to confer
mond announce the engagement
Board Member Kern Whitaker
creek, and the only we can collect company land How is this going
MEM and RAM degrees.
of their daughter, Mary Jo, to
indi~ated he felt the board must damage~ in this state .is to let the
to help us? s~ppose they grew half
Roger Darrell Kincer, son of Mr.
provide classrooms fo: the Hot
creeks fill up and_ the water get up a I?illi?n bushels of apples on. these
and Mrs. Lenville Kincer of MaySp?t ~rea befor~ starting a'T'new
and flood us. I live way up the
strip mllie benches. Can that prekin~.
building for Whitesburg. .1. ~e
, - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - . vent the runoff water on that overDear Friends,
Miss Hart was graduated from
grade school here has had ,h1gh
burden that is being pushed down
Madison High School and will repriority for many y~a~s, but fires ·
on top of people? That's where
To the 975 persons who had con- , ceive her bachelor of science deat several other buildings have
LJ
your water is comirig from and
fidence that I would make an hon- gree from Eastern Kentucky State
!creed construction at other sites
they are never going to get anyest Sheriff., had I been nominated
College in August. She is a meminstead .
_ . .
thing on that overburden. We
and elected, I say thanks from the ber of Cw ens, sophomore women's
All board members indicated
O
have people from the University
bottom of my heart.
honorary. and Collegiate Pentacle,
they fe.lt classroom needs should
WU
I
O
-of Kentucky, we have J&gt;ErOple
To the workers, some I know
a senior women's honorary.
be me~ before playrooms, etc .'
fro~ Berea. Clill.l~ge and ~li~
worked hard in helping me get the
Mr. Kincer was graduated from
are built.
.
_
·
, Quicksand Experrment Station, and n11mber of votes I received, I say
Whitesburg High School and re~
~In other action at the June sest·
they are collaborating with these
thanks to you. some of these peo- ceived his bachelor of science desi?n,_ t?e boa rd employed Mrs. OUn
OmffilSSIO -er strip mine operators and talking a- ple I have known for years and they gree from Eastern. , He is employ ..
Virginia B:own as cle_rk and Mrs.
1
bout experimenting. and so on. The have shown they are my friends.
ed by the Fayette County schools,
Parky Davidson as ass1s_tant and
__ I
I
only e xperiments that are aily good, . To the people who were supposed where he teaches industrial arts at
Warold Day as me?hanic. It ·_
in my opinion, are the ones that are to be working for me--they were
Beaumont Junior High School in
t ur~ed down Crafts recommenI
done before the da·mage is done.
_ hired to give out cards for me but
Lexington.
dation of Kearney Day Jr.• -son
I
Let them experiment and find a
didn'•t I find some were even
The wedding will take place
of a for1:1er board member, as a SU_
In
e eC I
remedy before this is done. I don't worki~g for the opposition--! have . Aug. 7 a! 3 p. m. a! th~ First
mechanic _also. It gave fu?,dS to · •
know how they expect us to sit here this to say: Only a few of the peo- , Presbytez:1an G_hurch 1n Richmond.
::he athletics club at Fleming- _
In OVe ffiDer.
and listen to things like elderbeny
ple let me down; I say pray long
A recepnon will be held after the
Neon to help tow,ard construct.1.on
bushes. We've got millions of eland hard--you need to.
ceremony at the church.
of a dugout for Little Leagu_t: _
deroerry OUJOOS ID· thl.S county now;
'thanks Friends.
The custom of opea church will
~aseball teams and appro~ated
·· ·
·· • ·
- 1f they liet t?am on the ruip mine .
'
·
be observed. All friends and rel: :sa~:i~~f:r:11~~:~ oft coun
.
!
th!y· will Ctlv"er uo. couple are invited
0

r

11

wiil'be

-

i-;:

11

'~c!~

11

,
1

Schools

Paae 1)

~;t t

· Health (from Paqe

•I

b.

''

._ .

i

Dies urtexpectedly

g

H·, stor ·,ans to meet

Masons to meet

Hart-Kincer
betrothal told

WARF THANKS VOTERS

ADAMS THANKS
S pPORTERS

I
Id ·1·ke t .thank ..
al I who voted for me for:
CC _ • • n
Y
from o· str ·ct and toask for your cont· nued
t • t:h
t·on
ppor
e
-N

ERNEST C ADAMS
1
Democratic nominee _rtcne,

~

:Raymon~'tr,,,,,: warf ::~~~~~-the

1

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="58">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57609">
                  <text>Perkins, Carl D. Congressional Papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57610">
                  <text>Carl D. Perkins (1912-1984) served eastern Kentucky as a US Representative between 1948 and 1984. His papers contain legal documents and correspondence related to his activities in Congress and focus heavily on coal mining, flood control, education and labor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only a portion of this collection has been digitized. See the &lt;a href="http://ekufindingaids.libraryhost.com/index.php?p=collections/controlcard&amp;amp;id=188"&gt;Finding Aid&lt;/a&gt; for a description of the entire collection.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57611">
                  <text>Perkins, Carl D.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57612">
                  <text>1948-1984</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57613">
                  <text>text</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57614">
                  <text>photographs</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57615">
                  <text>reel to reel</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="57616">
                  <text>film</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57617">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57618">
                  <text>collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="57619">
                  <text>2005a002</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841825">
                <text>Independent Agencies - Federal Power Commission</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841826">
                <text>Carl D. Perkins Congressional Papers</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841827">
                <text>1965-1967</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841828">
                <text>Contact &lt;a href="mailto:archives.library@eku.edu"&gt;Special Collections and Archives&lt;/a&gt;, Crabbe Library, Eastern Kentucky University for reproductions, rights and permission to publish.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841829">
                <text>newspaper</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="841830">
                <text>publication</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="841831">
                <text>news clipping</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="841832">
                <text>correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841833">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841834">
                <text>text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="841835">
                <text>2005a002-bd046-f02</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="194">
        <name>electrical plants</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="635">
        <name>flood control</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
